Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-08-2016 City Council Meeting MinutesSTATE OF ALABAMA )( COUNTY OF BALDWIN )( The City Council, City of Fairhope, met in regular session at 6:00 p.m., Fairhope Municipal Complex Council Chamber, 161 North Section Street, Fairhope, Alabama 36532, on Thursday. 8 September 2016. Present were Council President Jack Burrell, Councilmembers: Rich Mueller, Diana Brewer, and Kevin Boone, City Attorney Marion E. Wynne, and City Clerk Lisa A. Hanks. Councilmember Michael A. Ford and Mayor Timothy M. Kant were absent. There being a quorum present. Council President Burrell called the meeting to order and stated the reason for the meeting being changed; FAA Grant deadline for the Fairhope Airport Authority and Chairman being out of town on September 12, 2016. The invocation was given by Reverend A. B. Sawyer, Associate Pastor of First Baptist Church, and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Councilmember Brewer moved to approve minutes of the 22 August 2016, regular meeting; minutes of the 22 August 2016, work session; minutes of the 22 August 2016, agenda meeting; and minutes of the 30 August 2016 special City Council meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Mueller, motion passed unanimously by voice vote. Councilmember Brewer addressed the City Council and brought up placing a moratorium on subdivisions to update the zoning regulations and the subdivision regulations. She suggested a 6-month moratorium. City Attorney Wynne commented we need to look carefully at a moratorium; and do it properly and legally. Council President Burrell addressed the City Council and mentioned the Tuesday night Planning Commission meeting where both Fly Creek PUD and Old Battles Place were both on the agenda. He said the City Council adopted the ordinance with a 3 to 2 vote with conditions placed on it. Council President Burrell requested for Planning Director Jonathan Smith to come forward and said there were numerous studies to be done. He questioned Mr. Smith if we look at the results of these studies before we move forward. Mr. Smith replied that they look at the conclusions of each study; and the developer must do any recommendations in the study. Mr. Smith also said both of these are residential Planned Unit Developments not commercial which are not required to come back before the City Council. Council President Burrell commented he would like it to be changed that any PUD needs to come back to the City Council for final approval. Mr. Smith said the second development was a site plan review which is a subdivision review. He said if there were any negative results in the studies, he must report to the developer to correct.