HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-25-2026 Personnel Board Meeting MinutesCITY OF FAIRHOPE
Personnel Board Meeting
7:00 A.M.
June 25th, 2026
161 N. Section Street
Fairhope, AL 36532
Present were:
Members: Jake O’Neil; Stephanie Sandefur; Terry Ullrich; Human Resource Director Hannah
Noonan; Councilman Andrea Faust; Evergreen Solutions, LLC Project Manager Stasey Whichel
The Fairhope Personnel Board meeting was called to order.
The minutes from the April meeting were reviewed and approved unanimously. There was
no old business to discuss, so the Board moved directly into new business concerning the
City’s compensation and classification study being conducted by Evergreen Solutions.
Stasey, the City’s consultant from Evergreen Solutions, presented a high-level overview of
the study, which has been underway since January. She explained that the purpose of the
study was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the City’s current compensation
system, identify salary compression and internal-equity concerns, review job
classifications and career paths, gather employee feedback, compare the City’s pay
structure with similar public employers, and develop recommendations for a competitive
and sustainable compensation plan. The presentation was informational, and the final
plan is expected to return to the Personnel Board for consideration before being
incorporated into the FY2027 budget.
Evergreen reviewed approximately 480 employees working across roughly 30 departments
or operational areas. The City currently has approximately 280 job classifications, which
equals about 1.7 employees per classification. Stasey noted that this is a relatively large
number of classifications for the size of the workforce, although it is not necessarily a
problem as long as the City avoids creating unnecessary classifications. The current
compensation system is an open-range system with minimum, midpoint, and maximum
salaries rather than fixed salary steps. The existing general pay plan uses grades 3 through
14 and has an approximately 86% spread between the minimum and maximum of each
range. Evergreen noted that organizations of a similar size typically use ranges between
approximately 50% and 70%.
The review found that approximately 53% of employees are currently paid above the
midpoint of their assigned ranges, while about 47% are below the midpoint. Most
employees are concentrated around the second and third quartiles of the pay ranges. The
average employee tenure is approximately 9.2 years, which Evergreen described as
positive compared with current public-sector employment trends. Stasey explained that
employees are generally moving between employers more frequently than they did in the
past, so an average tenure of more than nine years indicates relatively strong retention.
Evergreen identified salary compression as a significant issue. Because many of the City’s
minimum salaries are below the labor market, departments have often had to hire new
employees above the minimum and sometimes near the midpoint of the range. This
creates situations in which new employees are paid close to the salaries of experienced
employees who have been with the City for several years. Evergreen concluded that the
City has been informally adjusting for an outdated pay plan rather than being able to use
the plan as originally designed.
As part of the employee-engagement process, Evergreen conducted focus groups and
received approximately 250 responses to an anonymous employee survey. The feedback
received in the focus groups was consistent with the survey results. Employees said they
were attracted to or remained with the City because of the benefits, work schedules,
location, convenient commute, opportunities to serve the community, positive
relationships with coworkers, and opportunities for career growth. Employees generally
reported that they enjoyed their work and had positive relationships with coworkers.
However, the most common concern was that pay had not kept pace with nearby public
employers or the cost of living. Employees also expressed a desire for clearer career paths
that would explain how they could move from entry-level positions into higher
classifications and what experience, certifications, or training would be required.
For the external market analysis, Evergreen compared the City with 20 peer organizations
and received responses from all 20. The study included approximately 1,200 market data
points and 129 benchmark classifications. Positions were matched based on actual job
duties and responsibilities rather than job titles, and Evergreen required at least five valid
comparisons before using a classification as a benchmark. Cost-of-living adjustments
were also applied when comparing the City with employers located outside the immediate
area.
The market analysis found that the City’s current minimum salaries are approximately 15%
below the market median. The current midpoints are approximately 9.5% below the market
median, while maximum salaries are generally closer to or slightly above the market
because of the unusually wide ranges. Areas identified as being particularly behind the
market included communications, equipment operators, building inspections, utilities,
maintenance, planning, and several public works and skilled operational positions. Stasey
emphasized that these findings relate to the City’s salary structure and do not necessarily
mean that every individual employee is paid the same percentage below the market.
Evergreen recommended replacing the existing general pay plan with a new structure
containing 30 salary grades. The proposed plan would narrow the range between the
minimum and maximum to approximately 60%. Most salary grades would have about a 5%
progression between adjacent midpoints, while certain higher-level grades would have
approximately a 7.5% progression to reflect increased leadership responsibilities and
market conditions. The proposed midpoints would be aligned with the median of the labor
market.
The lowest entry rate in the proposed general pay plan would be $13.50 per hour. These
lower grades would primarily apply to seasonal employees, attendants, and other task-
oriented positions. Several regular entry-level classifications, including certain public
works, utilities, and customer-service positions, would be placed at approximately $19 per
hour because that rate is more consistent with the local labor market. The proposed plan
would allow the City to advertise more realistic salary ranges and hire employees closer to
the minimum instead of routinely placing new hires near the midpoint.
Evergreen also recommended creating a separate public safety compensation plan
because of the unique schedules and pay requirements associated with law-enforcement
and public-safety positions. The proposed public safety plan would contain 14 salary
grades and would also use a 60% spread between minimum and maximum salaries. It
would separately account for employees who work schedules that differ from a standard
40-hour workweek, including employees whose annual salaries are based on
approximately 42 hours per week or other applicable public-safety schedules.
A proposed employee-placement and compression-adjustment strategy was also
discussed. Evergreen recommended using a placement methodology based on factors
such as relevant experience, certifications, and tenure. However, the City’s available data
does not consistently identify how long each employee has been in the employee’s current
classification. Because an employee may have worked for the City for many years but
recently moved into a new position, Evergreen recommended capping initial salary
adjustments at approximately 7.5%. This would help prevent the placement model from
treating an employee’s entire City tenure as time spent in the current position. Evergreen
will also provide Human Resources with a salary-placement tool that can be used to
estimate an appropriate hiring or placement rate based on experience, education, and
certifications.
Evergreen recommended that the City maintain the new pay plan by reviewing salary
information annually using approximately five to ten local peer organizations and by
conducting targeted reviews of representative or difficult-to-fill positions. The City should
also consider appropriate economic indicators, including regional Consumer Price Index
data, when determining whether the salary scale should be adjusted. A full compensation
study should be conducted every three to five years. Evergreen also recommended
updating the City’s compensation policies so that they remain consistent with the new pay
structure. Annual cost-of-living increases should generally adjust the entire salary scale so
that employees near the maximum remain eligible to receive appropriate increases.
Department heads will receive the proposed classification and salary schedules and will
be given a limited period to review how the recommendations affect their departments.
They may submit concerns regarding job classifications, position responsibilities, internal-
equity relationships, market comparisons, and proposed new or revised job titles. The
group was reminded to evaluate the duties and responsibilities of each position rather
than the performance or abilities of the employee currently holding it. Any requested
change to one classification must also be evaluated for its effect on related positions
throughout the City.
The estimated cost of implementing the new compensation plan could range from
approximately $300,000 to as much as $2 million, depending on the employee-placement
method and the number of classifications that are adjusted. Human Resources will work
with department heads, the mayor, Evergreen, and the Finance Department to refine the
recommendations while considering the overall payroll budget. Merit increases,
certification incentives, and future cost-of-living adjustments may continue separately
from the implementation of the salary study.
Evergreen concluded that City employees generally enjoy their work, value the City’s
benefits, and have a positive view of the workplace culture. However, the existing salary
structure is outdated and has contributed to recruitment difficulties and salary
compression. The City’s minimums and midpoints are below the local market, and the
proposed plan would make the City more competitive while creating a more manageable
and sustainable compensation structure. No final action was taken on the proposed pay
plan. The matter will return for additional departmental review, possible revisions, and
formal consideration by the Personnel Board.
End of meeting.
Thank you,
Jake O’Neil, Secretary