Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-06-2026 Planning Commission Packet
Council Chambers, Fairhope Municipal Complex, 161 N Section St For more information, please visit: fairhopeal.gov/departments/planning-and-zoning Sherry Sullivan Mayor Council Members Andrea F. Booth Jack Burrell, ACMO Jimmy Conyers Joshua N. Gammon Jay Robinson Lisa A. Hanks, MMC City Clerk Kimberly Creech City Treasurer Fairhope Planning Commission Agenda April 6, 2026 – 5:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER Lee Turner, Chairman Paul Fontenot Rebecca Bryant, Vice Chairman Kim McCormick Hunter Simmons, Secretary (interim) John Worsham Harry Kohler Erik Cortinas Hollie MacKellar Jimmy Conyers (CC) (CC) City Council Representative 2. CONSENT AGENDA • Approval of Minutes – March 2, 2026 • Appointment of Planning Commission Secretary • UR 26.01 Request of C-Spire for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of 4,767± LF of fiber cable at 401 Oak Avenue. • UR 26.02 Request of C-Spire for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of 10,863± LF of fiber cable at 167 Ettle Street. • UR 26.03 Request of C-Spire for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of 27,968± LF of fiber cable at 818 Fairhope Avenue. • UR 26.04 Request of C-Spire for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of 11,686± LF of fiber cable at 19362 County Road 13. 3. REGULAR AGENDA OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS A. ZC 26.01 Discussion regarding proposed amendments to the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance concerning building height. The City of Fairhope Planning and Zoning Department advises that this item be considered for discussion only and recommends the Planning Commission continue discussion of the proposed amendment for further study. Council Chambers, Fairhope Municipal Complex, 161 N Section St For more information, please visit: fairhopeal.gov/departments/planning-and-zoning Sherry Sullivan Mayor Council Members Andrea F. Booth Jack Burrell, ACMO Jimmy Conyers Joshua N. Gammon Jay Robinson Lisa A. Hanks, MMC City Clerk Kimberly Creech City Treasurer B. SD 26.07 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, Geographic Consulting, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, Ross Wilson, for Preliminary Plat approval of 150 N Section, a 3-unit Multiple Occupancy Project on property zoned B-2, General Business District. The property is located at 150 North Section Street and is 0.18± acres. PPIN #: 15235 C. SD 26.09 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, SE Civil, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, FST RW, LLC, for Preliminary and Final Plat approval of Vatan Mixed Use Development, a 9-unit Multiple Occupancy Project on property zoned B-2, General Business District. The property is located at 301 Magnolia Avenue and is 0.5± acres. PPIN #: 15164 D. SD 26.10 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, SE Civil, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, Millrose Properties Alabama LLC, for Final Plat approval of Greenfields, an 81-lot Major Subdivision on property zoned R- 2, Medium Density Single-Family Residential District. The property is located on the east side of County Road 13, north of County Road 32 and is 39.9± acres. PPIN #: 55265, 41079 E. SD 26.11 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, Arthur Johnson, on behalf of the Owner, Bonnie Baker, for Preliminary Plat approval of Stonevale, a 16-lot Major Subdivision on property zoned R-1, Low Density Single-Family Residential District. The property is located on the west side of Highway 181, south of Windmill Road and is 9.83± acres. PPIN #: 15456 F. Resolution 2026-02 Public hearing to consider the request of the City of Fairhope’s Planning and Zoning Department to accept Resolution 2026-02 adopting the temporary suspension of consideration of certain residential multiple occupancy project and subdivision applications under the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations as set forth in Ordinance 1859. 4. ADJOURN This digital package has been condensed for size and some documents may not contain all the original pages. All submittals were reviewed in full by staff in preparation for the reports prepared for the Planning Commission. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes March 2, 2026 – 5:00 PM Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 1 ADMINISTRATIVE The Planning Commission met Monday, March 2, 2026, at 5:00 PM at the City Municipal Complex, 161 N. Section Street in the Council Chambers. Present: (CC) City Council Representative Staff: Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director; Mike Jeffries, Development Services Manager; Payton Rogers, Planning and Zoning Manager; Michelle Melton-Null, City Planner; Chris Williams, City Attorney and Janine Saykes, Code Enforcement. Chairman Turner called the meeting to order at 5:02 PM. CONSENT AGENDA • Approval of the Minutes – February 2, 2026 Rebecca Bryant stated that there was a correction needed to remove the second paragraph under New Business, item C from the minutes. Rebecca Bryant made a motion to approve the minutes. John Worsham seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; Jimmy Conyers; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot, Erik Cortinas, John Worsham, Hollie MacKellar and Kim McCormick NAY: None ABSTAIN: None • Hunter Simmons addressed the Committee Members and public attendees regarding the updates being made to the city website and explained how to navigate the Planning Commission meetings and agenda. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 2 OLD BUSINESS A. SR 25.09 Request of the Applicant, HFA-AE LTD, on behalf of the Owner, Brew Horizons LLC, for Site Plan Approval of 7 Brew Fairhope. The property is zoned B-2, General Business District. The property is located on Lot 5 of Planters Pointe on the northwest corner of State Highway 181 and State Highway 104 and is 1.01± acres. PPIN #: 626310 Payton Rogers, Planning and Zoning Manager, presented the request of the Applicant, HFA-AE LTD, on behalf of the Owner, Brew Horizons LLC, for Site Plan Approval of 7 Brew Fairhope. Payton Rogers shared the zoning map, aerial map, proposed Site Plan and elevations. He stated that the signage has not been finalized yet and will be reviewed at the time of submitting a sign permit. Payton Rogers stated that the site has been included in numerous Subdivision and Multiple Occupancy Project requests since 2020. The Final Plat for Planter’s Pointe Subdivision was approved in December 2023 and includes a note which requires mandatory Site Plan Review prior to the development of any of the out parcels of Planter’s Pointe. The application was tabled in January by the Applicant’s request due to deficient tree planting, landscaping, stormwater screening, dumpster screening and exterior lighting. The current application has resolved all concerns. Lee Turner asked if any of the members had questions for staff. Paul Fontenot asked about the lack of screening for parking. The required screening is stopped before all the use areas and needs extended. There should be an unbroken screen which is stated in the Ordinance. Payton Rogers said those are issues we can address in comments and conditions. Lee Turner asked if anyone would like to speak on behalf of the developer. Garrett Small, Engineer of record with HFA-AE LTD stated that he is available for questions. We have received the comments and will ensure that we will address the issues with Payton Rogers before going to City Council. The dumpster enclosure is in the revised Site Plan. Staff recommends approval of SR 25.09 to City Council with the following recommendations: 1. Revision of the Site Plan to illustrate all proposed parking spaces to utilize pervious surfacing while maintaining compliance with ADA standards; 2. Revision of the construction plans to include a dumpster detail illustrating dumpster screening in compliance with Article IV.B.2. of the Zoning Ordinance; and 3. Revision of the Photometric Plans to remove any lighting not to be proposed. 4. Revision of the tree and landscape plan to reflect the required screening of vehicular circulation. Paul Fontenot made a motion to recommend SR 25.09 7 Brew Fairhope to the City Council with staff recommendations. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 3 John Worsham seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; Jimmy Conyers; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot, Erik Cortinas, John Worsham, Hollie MacKellar and Kim McCormick NAY: None ABSTAIN: None B. SD 23.26 Discussion of vertical construction at the Vatan Mixed-Use Development. The property is located on the northeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and North Church Street and is 0.52± Acres. PPIN #: 15164 Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, brought a discussion item regarding the project on the corner of Magnolia Avenue and North Church Street. The infrastructure has been built. We received a building permit for one of the buildings. During the Preliminary approval we originally stated there would be no vertical construction until the final MOP was approved. We don’t see a problem with starting vertical construction for the first building. Rebecca Bryant asked which building it was. Hunter Simmons replied with building #3. Rebecca asked if there were any changes. Hunter Simmons stated there were no significant changes. In addition to the MOP, there was an approved Site Plan that does not have to come back for anything further. Lee Turner asked the Commissioners if there were any objections from the committee to approve one building permit at this time. No objections stated. NEW BUSINESS C. SR 26.01 Request of the Applicant, Lieb Engineering, on behalf of the Owner, Rockwell LLC, for Site Plan Approval of Jiffy Lube Fairhope. The property is zoned B-2, General Business District. The property is located on Lot 2 of Rockwell Place north of the northeast corner of State Highway 181 and State Highway 104 and is 0.99± acres. PPIN #: 633808 Payton Rogers, Planning and Zoning Manager, presented the request of the Applicant, Lieb Engineering, on behalf of the Owner, Rockwell LLC, for Site Plan Approval of Jiffy Lube Fairhope. Payton Rogers shared the zoning and aerial maps as well as the proposed Site Plan and elevations. The subject site has had numerous Subdivision, Multiple Occupancy Project, and Zoning Change applications. Most recently the subject site was before the Planning Commission on July 7, 2025, which was a request for approval of a 10-Lot Major Subdivision to re-subdivide Rockwell Place Lot 1. The Site is compliant but some labels and language need to be revised in the staff report that did not match the plan. Parking was miscalculated and the Site Plan is compliant. Mechanical screening and dumpster screening will need adjusted. Lee Turner asked if there were any questions for staff. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 4 Paul Fontenot stated the required screening on the landscape plan, on the west side, the trees stop 10-12 feet before each property line and should be extended to the property line. On the east side it should be a continuous hedge. It should be an unbroken screen as stated in the Ordinance. Payton Rogers said those are issues we can address in comments and conditions. Lee Turner asked if anyone would like to speak on behalf of the developer. Chris Lieb, Lieb Engineering Company stated that he is available for questions. We have received the comments and will ensure that the mechanical equipment is screened and we will address the dumpster enclosure and the vehicle screening before going to City Council. Staff Recommends Approval of SR 26.01 to City Council: 1. Revision of the Site Plan to accurately label all easements and setbacks in accordance with the Final Plat for Rockwell Place Commercial Subdivision (Resubdivision of Lot 1 and Common Areas 1 & 2, Rockwell Place); 2. Provision of a note on the Tree and Landscape Plan stating that all nine (9) existing Credit Trees shall not be removed and shall be protected throughout construction in accordance with the City of Fairhope Trees and Landscaping Ordinance; 3. Revision of the Site Plan, Civil Plans, and Elevation Plans to include compliant mechanical screening or relocation of all mechanical equipment to the roof; 4. Provision of Architectural Plans prior to issuance of Building Permit illustrating compliant dumpster screening; and 5. Builder to meet the landscape requirements. John Worsham made a motion to recommend SR 26.01 Jiffy Lube Fairhope to the City Council with staff recommendations. Hollie MacKellar seconded the motion and the motion carried with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot, Erik Cortinas, John Worsham, Hollie MacKellar and Kim McCormick NAY: None ABSTAIN: Jimmy Conyers Lee Turner stated the next two Agenda items will be presented together and voted on back-to- back. Attorney Chris Williams is in attendance and agrees. D. SR 26.02 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, S.E. Civil, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, FST DELAMARE PLACE LLC, for Site Plan Approval of De La Mare Phase 2, on property zoned B-2, General Business District. The property is located on the southeast corner of De La Mare and Bernhardt Lane and is 0.24± acres. PPIN #: 15174 E. SD 26.05 Request of the Applicant, S.E. Civil, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, FST DELAMARE PLACE LLC, for Preliminary Plat approval of De La Mare Phase 2, a 9-unit Multiple Occupancy Project, on property zoned B-2, General Business District. The property is located on the southeast corner of De La Mare and Bernhardt Lane and is 0.24± acres. PPIN #: 15174 Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 5 Michelle Melton-Null, City Planner, presented the request of the Applicant, S.E. Civil, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, FST DELAMARE PLACE LLC, for Site Plan Approval of De La Mare Phase 2. Michelle Melton-Null shared zoning and aerial maps as well as the proposed Site Plan and elevations. They are preserving a 43-inch oak and have a tree preservation plan. Phase 1 was built in 2002. Phase 2 was approved unanimously in July 2003 and did not go to City Council and the approval expired. De La Mare Place Phase 2 SR 26.02 for Site Plan Approval and SD 26.05, Preliminary Plan for a 9-unit Multiple Occupancy Project (MOP), applications were submitted concurrently. Site Plan SR 26.02 is compliant as well as the Multiple Occupancy Project (MOP) SD 26.05. Staff recommends approval of SR 26.02 to City Council with the following recommendations: 1. Approval of SD 26.05 De La Mare Phase II MOP; 2. Revision of all construction and architectural plans to replace the label for “Rooftop Terrace” with “Second Floor Porch”; 3. Provision of written consent and approval by the Parking Authority for the use of Bernhardt Lane and the alley behind Phase II during construction; 4. Approval of all easement(s) by the Parking Authority for utilities and/or services within Bernhardt Lane ROW and the alley behind Phase II shown on Site Plan; 5. Revision of the Site Plan to include a note and/or illustrate the location of all easements approved by the Parking Authority for utilities and/or services within Bernhardt Lane ROW and the alley behind Phase II; and 6. Completion of any required improvements to alley behind Phase II or Bernhardt Lane ROW as determined by the Applicant, Parking Authority, and applicable city departments. 7. Developer meets with the city horticulturist to confirm the tree protection plan is adequate. Staff recommends approval of SD 26.05 with the following recommendations: 1. Approval of SR 26.02 De La Mare Phase II Site Plan by the City Council; 2. Revisions of all construction and architectural plans to replace the label for “Rooftop Terrace” with Second Floor Porch”; 3. Provision of written consent and approval by the Parking Authority for the use of Bernhardt Lane and the alley behind Phase II during construction; 4. Approval of all easement(s) by the Parking Authority for utilities and/or services within Bernhardt Lane ROW and the alley behind Phase II shown on Site Plan; and 5. Completion of any required improvements to alley behind Phase II or Bernhardt Lane ROW as determined by the Applicant, Parking Authority, and applicable city departments. Lee Turner asked if there were any questions for staff. No questions asked. Lee Turner asked if anyone would like to speak on behalf of the developer. Ryan Baker Architect with Walcott Adams Vernueille, stated he is available for any questions. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 6 Rebecca Bryant asked about tree protection. She is concerned about seeing a grade change and seeing a cut around the 43-inch oak tree. Ryan Baker stated they had the area checked by Arborist, Chris Francis who checked the roots. Ryan Baker stated they are not cutting around the tree roots and are leaving the retaining wall around the tree in place. Rebecca Bryant asked if they met with Will Mastin or the Tree Committee. Ryan Baker stated they did not. Our intent is to keep the tree. Ryan Baker said they will address all concerns before we go to City Council. Chairman Turner opened the public hearing at 5:42pm. Having no one present to speak, the public hearing was closed at 5:42pm. Rebecca Bryant made a motion to recommend SR.26.02 De La Mare Phase 2 to the City Council with staff recommendations. John Worsham seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot, Erik Cortinas, John Worsham, Hollie MacKellar, Jimmy Conyers and Kim McCormick NAY: None ABSTAIN: None John Worsham made a motion to recommend SD.26.05 De La Mare Phase 2 with staff recommendations. Hollie MacKellar seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot, Erik Cortinas, John Worsham, Hollie MacKellar, Jimmy Conyers and Kim McCormick NAY: None ABSTAIN: None F. SD 26.02 Public hearing to consider the request of Dewberry, on behalf of the owners, James M and SM Scopolites, for Preliminary Plat approval of Dresden Woods, a 6-lot Major Subdivision on property zoned R-1, Low Density Single-Family Residential District. The property is located on the northeast corner of Bishop Road and Gayfer Road Extension and is 4.66± acres. PPIN #: 43888 Michelle Melton-Null, City Planner, presented the request of the Applicant, Dewberry, on behalf of the Owner, James M and SM Scopoliltes, for Preliminary Plat Approval of Dresden Woods. Michelle Melton-Null shared zoning and aerial maps as well as the proposed Site Plan and elevations. In May 2020 a 3-lot Minor Subdivision was tabled due to concerns regarding the lots proximity to a fire hydrant, and the construction of sidewalks. It was approved in June 2020 with sidewalk, fire hydrant and sidewalk waivers. In December 2023 it was annexed into the city. In July 2024 a 2-lot Minor subdivision was approved and expired. In December 2025 a Preliminary Plat approval for a 4-lot Major Subdivision was approved. Staff recommends approval of SD 26.02 with the following recommendations: Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 7 1. Revision of the Final Plat to remove all structures illustrated on Lot 6 prior to application for Final Plat; 2. Receipt of all required permits necessary for proposed ROW work from Baldwin County; and 3. Installation of sidewalks along all street frontages prior to application for Final Plat. Chairman Turner opened the public hearing at 5:54pm. Having no one present to speak, the public hearing was closed at 5:54pm. John Worsham made a motion to recommend SD.26.02 Dresden Woods with staff recommendations. Erik Cortinas seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot, Erik Cortinas, John Worsham, Hollie MacKellar, Jimmy Conyers and Kim McCormick NAY: None ABSTAIN: None G. SD 26.06 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, Sawgrass Consulting, on behalf of the Owner, PCH Hotels and Resorts/RSA, for Final Plat approval of Battles Trace Phase 9, an 81-lot Major Subdivision, on property zoned TR, Tourist Resort District. The property is located on the north side of Battles Road, on the east and west sides of Colony Drive and is 22.4± acres. PPINS #: 5499, 20948, 286294 Mike Jeffries, Development Services Manager, presented the request of the Applicant, Sawgrass Consulting, on behalf of the Owner, PCH Hotels and Resorts/RSA, for Final Plat Approval of Battles Trace Phase 9. Mike Jeffries shared zoning and aerial maps as well as the proposed Site Plan and elevations. Mike Jeffries shared a map of the highlighted area being developed. Mike Jeffries shared an email from a citizen, Delphine Williams who had a concern regarding the construction impact near her property on Twin Beech Road. He stated that the area she is asking about is not part of this phase. Mike Jeffries stated the two conditions of the Preliminary Plat approval have been met. The subdivision has been built in compliance with Preliminary Plat approval. Staff recommends approval of SD 26.06 with the following recommendations: 1. Recording of the Final Plat with Baldwin County Probate Office within 120 days of acceptance and submittal of a copy of the recorded Final Plat to Planning Staff; 2. Recording of the final Operations and Maintenance Agreement with Baldwin County Probate Office and provision of a copy of the recorded O&M Agreement to Planning Staff; and 3. Execution of the Maintenance Agreement by the Subdivider to include the Final Plat Instrument # (this document is not considered fully executed until it has received the Mayor’s signature). Lee Turner asked if there were any questions for staff. No questions asked. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 8 Lee Turner asked if Sawgrass had anything to add. Nothing more to add. Chairman Turner opened the public hearing at 5:59 pm. Delphine Williams, Twin Beech Road, asked when construction starts, I want to make sure I still have access to my driveway. Lee Turner explained that this phase is completed, in regard to street access. There is nothing new planned on Twin Beech Road for an entrance or exit road, at this time. Hunter Simmons showed Miss Williams the map and explained where the current construction entrance is and will not affect her property access. Troy Vickers, 248 Cuban Lily, said that the homeowners in Battles Trace were sold a lie regarding future development by RSA and they continue to do whatever they want in Fairhope. And the City and Planning Commission just roll over and let RSA dictate the actions of the city. We were told as homeowners that we were dumb for not reading all the details of the TR zoning granted to RSA years ago. We are Fairhope citizens and taxpayers and we expect our government to protect our interests, not just the developers. It should be a priority of the Planning Department to update and provide proper protection in the TR zoning requirements. You have the ability to do that. I’ve heard that Fairhope can’t fight RSA on their development plans. Chairman Turner closed the public hearing at 6:04 pm. Jimmy Conyers stated that he has heard concerns raised from community members regarding this development and water runoff to existing developments. He would like to know what has been done to address this throughout this phase. Jimmy Conyers stated, I have been out there and saw a video with substantial runoff after a significant rain event. I know the developer has been working on this and trying to correct it. What is the enforcement and follow up for this. Hunter Simmons stated that within the RSA development, you had two issues. First, in previous phases you had contractors building homes and you had more violations than in this phase. Secondly, after the major storm, there were breaches with the runoff, and our Code Enforcement and Building Department were out there early every morning checking on it. We sent violation notifications and we asked City Council to change some regulations so we could have quicker actions and fees, as opposed to sending multiple letters and going to court. The violations are now attached and sent to their building permit. So, there is a fee for re-inspection every time we go out. We have every issue documented. This has been a construction issue. Erik Cortinas noted that the Building Department monitors the storm water and grading of the lots and getting the water to the conveyance points. We monitor that during construction. There is a difference between drainage and flooding. Flooding relates to water getting into or up to your home. As opposed to surface water and heavy rain. The typical rule of thumb for drainage issues is after forty-eight hours after the end of the rain, if you still have standing water you need to look at your grading. We have not had any flooding problems anywhere within Battles Trace to my knowledge. Jimmy Conyers stated he appreciates this and asks that it continues to be monitored through the next phases. Hollie MacKellar brought up an ongoing issue. The developer was supposed to finish the sidewalks on the outside of the development. It is something that should be pushed upon the developer. She stated that for safety it should be completed. Lee Turner stated that it is important and discussed that it does need addressed. Tim Walley from Sawgrass responded that Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 9 he is not sure how many more phases there will be. Maybe three or four more. He does not know about the rest of the sidewalks. He stated that he thought all sidewalks have been installed that they were asked or obligated to do. He is unsure of the location of sidewalks being discussed. Hollie MacKellar stated on the curve of Battles Road there is no sidewalk. There’s not a contiguous sidewalk anywhere in the development. Tim Walley stated in Phase 1 and 2 that was not asked or required in the approval. Hollie MacKellar stated that it was. Lee Turner stated that before the next phase it needs to be discussed. Paul Fontenot asked about the management plan regarding the silt fencing and ponds. Hunter Simmons stated that there is a schedule for when the maintenance is to be done. Tim Walley said the work started three to four weeks ago and is approximately 75- 80% done. Hollie MacKellar asked Tim Walley if he is unsure about the final plat or plans, how would the public know what is coming next. Tim Walley said that it would be when they submit a plan. At this point in time there is no directive to start an additional phase. Attorney Chris Williams stated for the record, when this whole development was zoned, there were some overarching master plan requirements in terms of lots and limitations. With some of the changes in phases there have been different requirements. Historically, there is a record of each approval through City Council and Planning Commission. It’s all public record. Hunter Simmons addressed what we can change. We have a TR District within the Zoning Ordinance. To apply for a TR District, it’s like a PUD. You can propose the application for a specific property and there are changes other than what is in our Zoning Ordinance that govern this property that was approved in 2010. Looking at those documents and seeing what was required would give you a specific allowance of what was allowed. The TR District that is in the Zoning Ordinance now is for anything new that would be zoned TR. Anything relating to this specific property we would have to go back to the original documents and any amendments made throughout the years. Rebecca Bryant asked if there was any pathway to make any amendments to this property. Chris Williams said there are limited circumstances based on the framework. They were given a path and certain building blocks they had to comply with. Lee Turner asked Chris Williams if Sawgrass or another company comes back to submit the next phase, can the city hire someone to audit phase by phase and find deficiencies with prior phases. If that happened, would we be able to legally do anything about those deficiencies, as we approve the final phases based on how RSA comes back. Chris Williams said it is hard to speculate on that. It depends on the details. In some circumstances there may be opportunity to do that based on the impact on the surrounding community. If it was done correctly and approved in the phase it would be limited. It really depends on the details. Rebecca Bryant asked if the details of the TR District supersede the Tree Ordinance. Hunter Simmons said that it does because the details in the Ordinance give the developer the flexibility to do what he decides. It specifically says the Tree Ordinance does not apply to that acreage of land. Rebecca Bryant stated that maybe the Tree Ordinance needs to be changed, because citizens buy in a wooded area that’s very natural. And as each subdivision preserves some of trees, the builders come in and cut down the trees because no one wants them. Erik Cortinas made a motion to approve SD 26.06 Battles Trace Phase 9 with staff recommendations. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 10 John Worsham seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot, Erik Cortinas, John Worsham, Hollie MacKellar, Jimmy Conyers and Kim McCormick NAY: None ABSTAIN: None H. ZC 25.08 Public Hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, Core Development and Construction of Alabama, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, FST and Bertolla Properties LLC, for Conditional Annexation to PUD, Planned Unit Development for Colony Village. The property is located at 10504 State Highway 104 and is 148± acres. PPIN #: 14396 Lee Turner stated he has a conflict with this item and is recusing himself. Vice Chairman Rebbeca Bryant will step in. Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director presented the request of the Applicant, Core Development and Construction of Alabama, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, FST and Bertolla Properties LLC, for Conditional Annexation to PUD, Planned Unit Development for Colony Village. Jade Consulting is the Engineer of Record. Hunter Simmons shared zoning and an aerial map, as well as a Site Plan. This is currently not in the city limits. It is zoned R/A Rural Agriculture in Baldwin County. Hunter explained the review process for zoning changes. Staff intend to make a recommendation of holdover until sufficient progress justifies a recommendation in support or opposition of the application. This report will not go into detail with all aspects of the proposed development. The intent of this report is to provide enough information to glean feedback for a list of issues that may benefit Staff and the Applicant. A PUD, Planned Unit Development, is intended to encourage innovative development. The Subject Property is located within a Suburban Residential Place Type, which does not meet a description of a Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant’s Master Development Plan incorrectly describes the property as within a Suburban Mixed-Use Center Place Type. A Suburban Residential area generally has the largest lot sized for single-family detached houses. They focus on lot sizes that range from a third of an acre and up, minimum widths between 75-100 feet, and minimum front setbacks between 30-40 feet. The lot sizes and setbacks proposed are significantly less than what is prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant is proposing four lot types mixed throughout the development. These are described as Signature Lots, Village Cottage Lots, Neighborhood Cottage Lots, and CV Townhome Lots. The Master Development Plan requires use of Base Zoning Districts and listed deviations within the PUD. This development has chosen R-3 Zoning for their Base Zoning. Hunter shared a table which shows the four (4) lot sizes and summarizes the deviations from R-3. Some of those details we do not agree with. An example of this is 90% lot coverage. Details are in conflict. The maximum lot coverage, as proposed, increases from 35% to 71-92% and calls it a “modest increase”. There are also inconsistencies with the form-based code submitted within the application. One of the positive aspects is greenspace. But we need to know the details and if the amenities will be built in the first phase. There are also wetlands and we would need specifics on the usage and plans for those. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 11 The Zoning Ordinance and its associated zoning map are derived from long-range comprehensive planning studies intended to promote orderly, desirable development. Casual or unsupported amendments to the Zoning Ordinance can undermine this purpose. Therefore, rezoning requests are evaluated according to the following criteria: 1. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan; 2. Compliance with the standards, goals, and intent of this ordinance; 3. The character of the surrounding property, including any pending development activity; 4. Adequacy of public infrastructure to support the proposed development; 5. Impacts on natural resources, including existing conditions and ongoing post- development conditions; 6. Compliance with other laws and regulations of the City; 7. Compliance with other applicable laws and regulations of other jurisdictions; 8. Impacts on adjacent property including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values; and 9. Impacts on the surrounding neighborhood including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values. Staff is prepared to work with the Applicant to ensure we receive plans that reflect the desired outcome. To resolve these issues, both the Applicant and Staff would like feedback from the Commissioners as it relates to a PUD. Staff recommend Holdover of ZC 25.08 Colony Village Conditional Annexation for PUD, Planned Unit Development. Rebecca Bryant asked if there were any questions for Staff. Hollie Mackellar said that we need to send this back and mark it up a little bit. Doug Anderson, Attorney for the developer, stated that they are agreeable to the holdover. Paul Fontenot asked about the traffic and read the public comment on traffic. He suggested a third-party traffic study. Hunter Simmons agreed. Hollie MacKellar said she would like to require a new traffic study for every phase of the project. Erik Cortinas would like to hear from the public and their concerns. Jimmy Conyers stated he likes a lot of the amenities proposed and would like to know more about the wetlands. What is the lot count and how does it differ from a standard subdivision. Are they getting more lots in the PUD. Hunter Simmons stated that maybe the Engineer would have a better answer to that. We can’t estimate that. Jimmy Conyers stated that he doesn’t want to see PUD’s being utilized to max out the number of units. Although, this does have some really nice amenities and looks like it could be a really nice development. It seems a little dense though. Rebecca Bryant stated they we will open this to the public shortly. She said we don’t want to risk squelching the actual creative use of PUD’s, but the density needs to be drilled down on. Paul Fontenot would like to discuss why this PUD would be better than a typical or standard R-2 development. Hunter Simmons wanted to clarify that this is a Conditional Annexation, it is not in the city. At any time, the city or Applicant can decide not to go through with this. The annexation is tied to the zoning request. John Worsham asked about the alleyways. Is that a city right of way or the development. Hunter Simmons said the alleys would have to remain private. John Worsham also asked how services and garbage pickup would fit through the narrow right of ways where the townhomes are located. Hunter Simmons said those are the problems we are discussing. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 12 Rebecca Bryant asked if the Applicant would like to speak. Doug Anderson, Attorney representing the developer, stated that he agreed with the holdover for the application. He stated that his client met with the neighbors a year ago for feedback. The plan has been tweaked based on the feedback received, but there is still work to be done. We welcome your input to move forward. I would like to first address the traffic. The traffic improvements that have been recommended by the engineer will all be done in phase 1. This will probably be an eight (8) year project. We plan to build approximately 50 homes a year. We realize that standards change throughout the years with the city, county and ALDOT. The wetlands improvements and restoration will be done in Phase 1. We have had a lot of conversations regarding utilities, especially along the easements. We have been working with the city on that and are headed in the right direction. Drainage is always an issue. We are not in the drainage phase yet but will do whatever is required. We will have architectural guidelines included in a plan book, with specific guidelines to follow. We will also have restrictive covenants. Mr. Anderson discussed that the Ordinance requires all amenities being completed in Phase 1. We have added a pool and pickle ball court to Phase 1. But, the majority of amenities are on northeast side of the wetlands and we don’t want to do a lot of construction there. We would like to restore the wetlands first. We don’t plan on building the infrastructure there yet. We ask to be allowed to do that in phases. The parking will have 867 on-street spaces when this is completed. Mr. Anderson discussed the location of the development being near the high school as a positive idea. Rebecca Bryant opened the public hearing at 7:15pm. Linda Smith 10821 State Hwy 104, shared photos and video showing that her property is contiguous to the subject property. She showed multiple pictures after heavy rains from 2022 to 2025 showing three (3+) plus inches of rain and the effects to the property. She shared a video from March 2025 that shows over four (4) inches of rain in one day, in the area that would be used as greenspace in the development. Ms. Smith said these heavy rains happen 4-5 times a year. The accumulation of water has increased over the years because of all the pavement that has been done around her. Wade Perry 2454 Eland Drive, Mobile, stated he believes this is a terrible proposal for the community and the environment. He stated he heard that one environmental firm refused to work on it and the developer pulled out from the Baldwin County process on this project because Baldwin County was ready to tell them no. Mr. Perry stated he thinks it is a bad look for Fairhope to approve something the County was ready to deny. I recommend you vote to say no. Ben Gould 21735 Pillar St. explained the retention ponds from other developments in the area all overflow into the subject property. He stated that this is not greenspace, it is the Pensacola Branch of the Fish River, that is a major drainage basin. This development does not have any detention ponds on their plan. If they had 3-5 acre lots this would work. That would be a lot more land for the water to flow. The elevation drop on this property is also concerning for the flow of water. It’s going to be a major flood area. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 13 Bobby Shumake 21482 Roundhouse Rd. said he was here 4-5 months ago and heard the same presentation. The feedback was not taken to heart. We are back here with the same problems. He feels that the PUD does not work here and does not fit the neighborhood. It’s not just about us but everyone downstream from us. Paul Orcutt 105 Wedgewood Cir. said that he and his wife just bought a lot in The Verandas. Mr. Orcutt stated that he is involved in stormwater and wastewater detection. I would ask the city to have an impact study done by Mobile Bay National Estuary Program. My concern is things are changing with all the construction and the impact of that. If we do this wrong it could have a very detrimental impact. Margaret Hudson 12843 Woodhaven Dairy Rd West stated the impact of Pensacola Branch getting so full and overflowing is affecting everything downstream. The depth of the river used to be 9-12 feet and now it is 4-6 feet in our area due to run-off such as silt. When the storms come through there are also contaminants coming down stream and landing in Mobile Bay. In 2017 three or four inches of rain would only give 11 feet of flooding at the river. Now we get four (4) inches in one day we can have as much as 16 feet of flooding. She shared photos of the erosion around a 3-tiered deck at a neighbor’s house, a carport with the water to the top of a vehicle and debris inside of a house. She said the subject subdivision will overwhelmingly impact everyone downstream. Gary Little 11010 Catania Ave. stated that he understands that the developers have already contacted City Council and are promoting this property before going before the proper channels and processes. Mr. Little said he called the Mayor and found out that the information is correct, and he found that strange. With all the staff deviations mentioned, the developer hasn’t changed a thing. Mr. Little said this is a beautiful idea but in the wrong place. It doesn’t fit the neighborhood. Dan Ruble 21933 Veranda Blvd. stated that he is going to suffer great impact because of what they are doing upstream. He also said making a focal point of the green space is ridiculous. It’s like an estuary full of insects. He thinks there will be a lot of pesticides being dumped to control this. Additionally, with all the retention ponds that fill with trash and debris flow down to them. Mr. Ruble also brought attention to the traffic hazard on Hwy 104. His daughter was rear ended trying to pull into The Verandas, his wife had a semi-truck almost kill her and a cement truck rolled over. The road is already in crisis. He also said the water accumulating there will be in his backyard. I hope you say no to this project, it is wrong for this community. Sissy Hawkins 11567 Branchwood Dr. said that she was surprised no one brought up 867 street parking spaces. Where is the mailman, the FedEx, Amazon, and the UPS drivers going to go. And if there are children playing, they will not be seen. In last month’s County Commission meeting there were discussions with ALDOT to put a light at the Estates. There was also discussion regarding making Hwy 104 a four-lane road. Hollis Sellew 12853 Woodhaven Dairy Rd West stated that in 1991 he bought on Fish River and discussed the floods he has lived through there. He stated he is a victim of the progress of man. Rebecca Bryant closed the public hearing at 7:50pm. Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 14 John Worsham would like to make a comment. In my opinion there have been a couple of implications made tonight. City employees, elected officials, and volunteers, are in the pockets of developers and I resent the hell out of that. Rebecca Bryant asked the Developer to come up and address questions. Paul Marcinko Engineer from Jade Consulting addressed downstream drainage issues. We understand that we will need to retain some water and must release some. When you look at the entire area it is always changing. We are proposing some water crossings. This project will be looked at pre vs. post water release rates and what the requirements are. We will certify that post development water release rates will be lower than predevelopment rates. I can answer any drainage questions. Erik Cortinas stated that during the DRC meeting discussions this is not designated a flood way on the FEMA map but it is heavy drainage area. I would like a FEMA based flood study. Paul Marcinko agrees with that and said it would be part of their design. Rebecca Bryant said it seems like the requirement not to increase the rate would be difficult with multiple outlets dumping into the same area. Especially with the proposed density. Mr. Marcinko said that’s what the study would include. Erik Cortinas is trying to compare this development to another one to see what issues have arisen. With the density and setbacks proposed there is nowhere for the water to go. With setbacks as tight as proposed you don’t have room for mechanical equipment and generators in between houses. My main concern is the potential for very heavy water flow from neighbor to neighbor. Christian Preus, with CPLA, Landscape Architect addressed the street parking. We are using smart code methods of on-street parking. We do need to look into the rear setbacks for parking. The intent for the 867 spaces shows the capacity to have that much parking if it’s needed. We are designing a functional street with pedestrian safety measures. Jimmy Conyers asked what is being addressed during the holdover before this comes back to the Committee. Doug Anderson stated they will be addressing all issues brought up this evening. We know drainage and density are key issues to address. Rebecca Bryant asked where the additional storm water will go. Mr. Anderson stated it has not been determined because it hasn’t been designed yet. But, we will do our best to address it. Kim McCormick stated she doesn’t see what the innovative development is here. Mr. Anderson said it is the different types of lots and the amenities. Kim McCormick said that she continues to have concerns about density. I think it’s inappropriate for the area, the site itself, and that’s been demonstrated tonight with the drainage. What you are proposing is so dense and covered with pavement and building, that you are going to destroy the potential of the east side of Fairhope. We have an opportunity to build a community that is attractive and not condensed. I object to these lots that cover 92% of the lot. You came here a few months ago for informal input and I don’t see any reflections in the plans here tonight. Are we going to see significant changes the next time you come here? Mr. Anderson said we will put forth a plan that is good for everyone. Kim McCormick asked if the plan they took to the County with larger lot sizes is comparable to our R-1 Zoning, and why that was not presented to us? Paul Fontenot asked how many lots were in that plan. Mr. Anderson stated approximately 300. Kim McCormick stated it Fairhope Planning Commission Minutes – March 2, 2026 15 is 113 less. I also have concerns about streets that are not public. I would like public services to be able to go down those streets. People in townhomes shouldn’t have to walk blocks to get to their house. The townhouses in that area don’t make sense. Where are people on the north end going to park when they drive to pickleball at the south end? I don’t see parking at those amenities. These have to be functional city streets. I don’t see the innovation. I don’t think this was the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Harry Kohler asked if there are sufficient utilities in Fairhope for this plan. Hunter Simmons said the Master Development Plan has some flexibility. Until you get to each phase there is not a full engineering plan. In a zoning case like this, capacity is an issue and how to navigate that. There is a burden on the developer that needs to be worked out. You can’t get into the numbers until you have a final plan with lot numbers. Mr. Anderson said he understands their obligation to pay for those improvements. Harry Kohler said his concern is the capacity of the wastewater treatment plant. It has a fixed capacity and if it’s going to be enlarged. Hunter Simmons said there is a lot of investment in expanding the capacity. Rebeca Bryant doesn’t feel as strong about density. Her concern is the amount of impervious area on this site, but I do like the creativity. Hunter Simmons explained the options for the Committee members. Jimmy Conyers made a motion to Holdover ZC 25.08 Colony for Village for up to six (6) months with staff recommendations. Erik Cortinas seconded the motion and the motion carried with the following vote: AYE: Rebecca Bryant; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot, Erik Cortinas, John Worsham, Hollie MacKellar, Jimmy Conyers and Kim McCormick NAY: None ABSTAIN: Lee Turner I. ZC 26.01 Various proposed amendments – HELDOVER TO LATER MEETING DATE TO BE DETERMINED ADJOURNMENT Erik Cortinas made a motion to adjourn. AYE: Rebecca Bryant; Jimmy Conyers; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot, Erik Cortinas, John Worsham, Hollie MaKellar and Kim McCormick NAY: None ABSENT: Lee Turner Adjourned at 8:24pm. _________________________________ _________________________________ Lee Turner, Chairman Hunter Simmons, Interim Secretary City of Fairhope Planning Commission April 6, 2026 UR 26.01 -401 Oak Avenue Project Name : 401 Oak Avenue Site Data: 4 ,767 LF of fiber cable Project Tvoe : Proposed fiber cable installation Jurisdiction: Fairhope Planning Jurisdiction Zoning_ District: N/A PPIN Number: N/A General Location: N/A Survey_or ot Record: N/A Eng_ineer ot Record: N/A Owner L Develo12.er: C-Spire School District: Fairhope Elementary School Fairhope Middle and High Schools Pre~ared b~: Mike Jeffries -Road D Parcel LJ UR26 .0l s UR 26.01 – 401 Oak Ave April 6, 2026 Page 1 of 4 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Request of C-Spire for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of 4,767± LF of fiber cable at 401 Oak Avenue. Locator Image Excerpt from Construction Plans STAFF COMMENTS The proposed utility construction falls within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the respective agency. This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: 1) City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands; 2) City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas; 3) City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398); and 4) Chapter 19 Article VI: ROW Construction and Administration, Ordinance (1754). Permitting, Locating, and Phasing • Subsurface Utility Engineering may be required for sensitive locations within the city as required by the ROW supervisor. • An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures needed for SUE. • A traffic control plan shall be submitted with all permits that affect the flow of traffic. • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department. Permit not valid until approved and paid for on Citizen Serve online portal. • The City’s ROW inspector is to be notified 24 hours prior to any activity within the ROW. The prior notice applied to all activity within the ROW including but not limited to trenching, boring, concrete placement. l OJCTDCTM.l£GCICl llllXllllCT \ .\ \ I I -- ···- I = I SOME~. TIIE Ctrf 11"5 NO CIJRR£NT RECOl«JEO RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE AFFECTEOAOADS ARE SHOWN AS M'f'AAENT RIGHT-OF-WAY, PERMISSION.TO PLACE FISER~• OFF OF EDGE OF PAVEIAENT REQUIRED V ER IZON TOW ER City of Fairhope -Permit Drawing (R EV. 1) CITY OF FAIR HO PE / DAPHNE - --· \ BAL DW IN COUNTY , ALABAMA -= ~ 01 /23/2026 \ ' EX HH COORDINAT ES: 30.605143, -87.900804 '°" Eiism!E 81 1 LOCATESARECAU.EO IN 1q !()ldCOf<iSl~llONISSI I 10 BEOltl IN ACCORCl,\NCE TO SECTION JT-1~ PERMITS REQUIRED HOUSE COUNT CITY Y£S COUNTY : YES ALDOT : YES FEDERAL · NIA RAILROAD : NIA PRIVATE RtN : N'A MISC : N.',t, UR 26.01 – 401 Oak Ave April 6, 2026 Page 2 of 4 • Hand holes/boxes shall not be allowed to be installed in sidewalks. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate with the ROW inspector to resolve any conflicts. • The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call 811 to locate all existing utilities in the ROW (750 LF maximum daily allocation for COF utility locates per day). • A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. Construction • A minimum horizontal clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from water, sewer, gas, stormwater, and other city utility infrastructure. • A minimum depth for all telecommunication lines shall be 30”. • Conduit shall match the 811-color code for communication, electric, gas etc. No blue/blue striped conduit is to be used for telecommunications. • The contractor responsible for *excavating inside right of way will be required to provide video documentation of the integrity of any sanitary sewer line (including laterals) within 3 feet of work being performed. This can be videoed prior to work being performed if locations, including depths, are clearly established by contractor, and said work is not within 3 ft of sewer mains or laterals within right of way. This does not apply to laterals on private property not “publicly maintained” (Private infrastructure). • Water, sewer, and gas mains/services must be potholed prior to bore/missile crossings. If street cuts are necessary please contact Right of Way inspector for restoration. • If sidewalk panels need to be removed, the subgrade must be compacted to the satisfaction of the ROW inspector. Cold patch asphalt shall be used as a temporary walking surface until the permanent repair can be done. • Sidewalk panels shall be a minimum of 4000 psi and be inspected within 24 hours of pouring concrete. Anything over one sidewalk panel shall be poured via concrete truck (no bag mix allowed). Horticultural • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of trees within City property, to include the right of ways, without explicit written permission from the City Horticulturalist. • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within tree dripline, consult the City of Fairhope Horticulturist prior to earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. • Consultation with the City’s horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. • Any work done within the critical root zone shall be done to meet or exceed Internal Society Arboriculture (ISA) standards. • All roots to be removed shall be severed cleanly at the perimeter of the protected radius. • Protective barriers shall be used for all trees, barricades shall be erected a minimum of 20’ from the trunk. Erosion Control • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day & disturbed areas shall be re- vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. Sod shall be watered to ensure survival. • Any excess soil shall be removed and disposed of properly. Dumping on private property without approval will not be tolerated. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. UR 26.01 – 401 Oak Ave April 6, 2026 Page 3 of 4 • Inlets shall be protected. BMPs shall be placed at all affected storm inlets. • If the site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), red soil/clay shall not be allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. • BMPs shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. Project Completion, Punch List Walk, and As-Built • The applicant shall provide as-built drawings of all installed lines depicting depths. • Damage to any City’s infrastructure (storm, sewer, water, ditches etc. shall be the responsibility of the permittee to repair to city standards at no cost to the city. • Any damage that occurs needs to be reported to the city as soon as possible. • Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency.. UR 26.01 – 401 Oak Ave April 6, 2026 Page 4 of 4 UTILITY REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Standards of Review: Alabama Code Section 11-52-11 grants review authority to the Planning Commission for all proposed construction of utilities within public right-of-way. Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of UR 26.01 401 Oak Utility Review with the following conditions: 1. A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits; 2. Follow-up activities below required by staff and the applicant: a. Upon satisfactory review and approval by ROW Construction Inspector, as-builts will be submitted to the GIS technician for inclusion in GIS utility maps; 3. Provide a Traffic Control Plan to ROW Inspector prior to commencement of any work. 4. Applicant shall contact Alabama One Call to locate all existing utilities (1000ft max per day). UR 26.02 – 167 Ettle St April 6, 2026 Page 1 of 4 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Request of C-Spire for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of 10,863± LF of fiber cable at 167 Ettle Street. Locator Image Excerpt from Construction Plans STAFF COMMENTS The proposed utility construction falls within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the respective agency. This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: 1) City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands; 2) City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas; 3) City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398); and 4) Chapter 19 Article VI: ROW Construction and Administration, Ordinance (1754). Permitting, Locating, and Phasing • Subsurface Utility Engineering may be required for sensitive locations within the city as required by the ROW supervisor. • An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures needed for SUE. • A traffic control plan shall be submitted with all permits that affect the flow of traffic. • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department. Permit not valid until approved and paid for on Citizen Serve online portal. • The City’s ROW inspector is to be notified 24 hours prior to any activity within the ROW. The prior notice applied to all activity within the ROW including but not limited to trenching, boring, concrete placement. • Hand holes/boxes shall not be allowed to be installed in sidewalks. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate with the ROW inspector to resolve any conflicts. UR 26.02 – 167 Ettle St April 6, 2026 Page 2 of 4 • The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call 811 to locate all existing utilities in the ROW (750 LF maximum daily allocation for COF utility locates per day). • A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. Construction • A minimum horizontal clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from water, sewer, gas, stormwater, and other city utility infrastructure. • A minimum depth for all telecommunication lines shall be 30”. • Conduit shall match the 811-color code for communication, electric, gas etc. No blue/blue striped conduit is to be used for telecommunications. • The contractor responsible for *excavating inside right of way will be required to provide video documentation of the integrity of any sanitary sewer line (including laterals) within 3 feet of work being performed. This can be videoed prior to work being performed if locations, including depths, are clearly established by contractor, and said work is not within 3 ft of sewer mains or laterals within right of way. This does not apply to laterals on private property not “publicly maintained” (Private infrastructure). • Water, sewer, and gas mains/services must be potholed prior to bore/missile crossings. If street cuts are necessary please contact Right of Way inspector for restoration. • If sidewalk panels need to be removed, the subgrade must be compacted to the satisfaction of the ROW inspector. Cold patch asphalt shall be used as a temporary walking surface until the permanent repair can be done. • Sidewalk panels shall be a minimum of 4000 psi and be inspected within 24 hours of pouring concrete. Anything over one sidewalk panel shall be poured via concrete truck (no bag mix allowed). Horticultural • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of trees within City property, to include the right of ways, without explicit written permission from the City Horticulturalist. • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within tree dripline, consult the City of Fairhope Horticulturist prior to earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. • Consultation with the City’s horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. • Any work done within the critical root zone shall be done to meet or exceed Internal Society Arboriculture (ISA) standards. • All roots to be removed shall be severed cleanly at the perimeter of the protected radius. • Protective barriers shall be used for all trees, barricades shall be erected a minimum of 20’ from the trunk. Erosion Control • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day & disturbed areas shall be re- vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. Sod shall be watered to ensure survival. • Any excess soil shall be removed and disposed of properly. Dumping on private property without approval will not be tolerated. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. • Inlets shall be protected. BMPs shall be placed at all affected storm inlets. • If the site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), red soil/clay shall not be allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. UR 26.02 – 167 Ettle St April 6, 2026 Page 3 of 4 • BMPs shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. Project Completion, Punch List Walk, and As-Built • The applicant shall provide as-built drawings of all installed lines depicting depths. • Damage to any City’s infrastructure (storm, sewer, water, ditches etc. shall be the responsibility of the permittee to repair to city standards at no cost to the city. • Any damage that occurs needs to be reported to the city as soon as possible. • Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency.. UR 26.02 – 167 Ettle St April 6, 2026 Page 4 of 4 UTILITY REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Standards of Review: Alabama Code Section 11-52-11 grants review authority to the Planning Commission for all proposed construction of utilities within public right-of-way. Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of UR 26.02 – 167 Ettle St Utility Review with the following conditions: 1. A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits; 2. Follow-up activities below required by staff and the applicant: a. Upon satisfactory review and approval by ROW Construction Inspector, as-builts will be submitted to the GIS technician for inclusion in GIS utility maps; 3. Provide a Traffic Control Plan to ROW Inspector prior to commencement of any work. 4. Applicant shall contact Alabama One Call to locate all existing utilities (1000ft max per day). UR 26.03 – 818 Fairhope Ave April 6, 2026 Page 1 of 4 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Request of C-Spire for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of 27,968± LF of fiber cable at 818 Fairhope Avenue. Locator Image Excerpt from Construction Plans STAFF COMMENTS The proposed utility construction falls within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the respective agency. This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: 1) City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands; 2) City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas; 3) City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398); and 4) Chapter 19 Article VI: ROW Construction and Administration, Ordinance (1754). Permitting, Locating, and Phasing • Subsurface Utility Engineering may be required for sensitive locations within the city as required by the ROW supervisor. • An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures needed for SUE. • A traffic control plan shall be submitted with all permits that affect the flow of traffic. • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department. Permit not valid until approved and paid for on Citizen Serve online portal. • The City’s ROW inspector is to be notified 24 hours prior to any activity within the ROW. The prior notice applied to all activity within the ROW including but not limited to trenching, boring, concrete placement. • Hand holes/boxes shall not be allowed to be installed in sidewalks. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate with the ROW inspector to resolve any conflicts. UR 26.03 – 818 Fairhope Ave April 6, 2026 Page 2 of 4 • The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call 811 to locate all existing utilities in the ROW (750 LF maximum daily allocation for COF utility locates per day). • A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. Construction • A minimum horizontal clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from water, sewer, gas, stormwater, and other city utility infrastructure. • A minimum depth for all telecommunication lines shall be 30”. • Conduit shall match the 811-color code for communication, electric, gas etc. No blue/blue striped conduit is to be used for telecommunications. • The contractor responsible for *excavating inside right of way will be required to provide video documentation of the integrity of any sanitary sewer line (including laterals) within 3 feet of work being performed. This can be videoed prior to work being performed if locations, including depths, are clearly established by contractor, and said work is not within 3 ft of sewer mains or laterals within right of way. This does not apply to laterals on private property not “publicly maintained” (Private infrastructure). • Water, sewer, and gas mains/services must be potholed prior to bore/missile crossings. If street cuts are necessary please contact Right of Way inspector for restoration. • If sidewalk panels need to be removed, the subgrade must be compacted to the satisfaction of the ROW inspector. Cold patch asphalt shall be used as a temporary walking surface until the permanent repair can be done. • Sidewalk panels shall be a minimum of 4000 psi and be inspected within 24 hours of pouring concrete. Anything over one sidewalk panel shall be poured via concrete truck (no bag mix allowed). Horticultural • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of trees within City property, to include the right of ways, without explicit written permission from the City Horticulturalist. • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within tree dripline, consult the City of Fairhope Horticulturist prior to earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. • Consultation with the City’s horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. • Any work done within the critical root zone shall be done to meet or exceed Internal Society Arboriculture (ISA) standards. • All roots to be removed shall be severed cleanly at the perimeter of the protected radius. • Protective barriers shall be used for all trees, barricades shall be erected a minimum of 20’ from the trunk. Erosion Control • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day & disturbed areas shall be re- vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. Sod shall be watered to ensure survival. • Any excess soil shall be removed and disposed of properly. Dumping on private property without approval will not be tolerated. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. • Inlets shall be protected. BMPs shall be placed at all affected storm inlets. • If the site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), red soil/clay shall not be allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. UR 26.03 – 818 Fairhope Ave April 6, 2026 Page 3 of 4 • BMPs shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. Project Completion, Punch List Walk, and As-Built • The applicant shall provide as-built drawings of all installed lines depicting depths. • Damage to any City’s infrastructure (storm, sewer, water, ditches etc. shall be the responsibility of the permittee to repair to city standards at no cost to the city. • Any damage that occurs needs to be reported to the city as soon as possible. • Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency.. UR 26.03 – 818 Fairhope Ave April 6, 2026 Page 4 of 4 UTILITY REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Standards of Review: Alabama Code Section 11-52-11 grants review authority to the Planning Commission for all proposed construction of utilities within public right-of-way. Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of UR 26.03 – 818 Fairhope Ave Utility Review with the following conditions: 1. A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits; 2. Follow-up activities below required by staff and the applicant: a. Upon satisfactory review and approval by ROW Construction Inspector, as-builts will be submitted to the GIS technician for inclusion in GIS utility maps; 3. Provide a Traffic Control Plan to ROW Inspector prior to commencement of any work. 4. Applicant shall contact Alabama One Call to locate all existing utilities (1000ft max per day). UR 26.04 -19362 CR 13 April 6, 2026 Page 1 of 4 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Request of C-Spire for an 11.52.11 Utility Review and approval of the proposed installation of 11,686± LF of fiber cable at 19362 County Road 13. Locator Image Excerpt from Construction Plans STAFF COMMENTS The proposed utility construction falls within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope. Any portions of the project affecting public right-of-way (ROW) maintained by Baldwin County or the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) shall require permits through the respective agency. This site shall comply with all State, Federal and local requirements, including, but not limited to the following City of Fairhope Ordinances: 1) City of Fairhope Wetland Ordinance (#1370), which regulates activity within 20' of wetlands; 2) City of Fairhope Red Soil & Clay Ordinance (#1423), which prohibits the use of red soil / clay within 100' of critical areas; 3) City of Fairhope Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (#1398); and 4) Chapter 19 Article VI: ROW Construction and Administration, Ordinance (1754). Permitting, Locating, and Phasing • Subsurface Utility Engineering may be required for sensitive locations within the city as required by the ROW supervisor. • An additional right-of-way permit may be required for the potholing procedures needed for SUE. • A traffic control plan shall be submitted with all permits that affect the flow of traffic. • No work shall begin until a ROW permit is issued by the City of Fairhope Building Department. Permit not valid until approved and paid for on Citizen Serve online portal. • The City’s ROW inspector is to be notified 24 hours prior to any activity within the ROW. The prior notice applied to all activity within the ROW including but not limited to trenching, boring, concrete placement. • Hand holes/boxes shall not be allowed to be installed in sidewalks. The applicant shall review the sidewalk plan to determine if there are any conflicts. The applicant shall coordinate with the ROW inspector to resolve any conflicts. UR 26.04 -19362 CR 13 April 6, 2026 Page 2 of 4 • The applicant shall contact Alabama One Call 811 to locate all existing utilities in the ROW (750 LF maximum daily allocation for COF utility locates per day). • A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits. Construction • A minimum horizontal clearance (separation) of 36” must be maintained from water, sewer, gas, stormwater, and other city utility infrastructure. • A minimum depth for all telecommunication lines shall be 30”. • Conduit shall match the 811-color code for communication, electric, gas etc. No blue/blue striped conduit is to be used for telecommunications. • The contractor responsible for *excavating inside right of way will be required to provide video documentation of the integrity of any sanitary sewer line (including laterals) within 3 feet of work being performed. This can be videoed prior to work being performed if locations, including depths, are clearly established by contractor, and said work is not within 3 ft of sewer mains or laterals within right of way. This does not apply to laterals on private property not “publicly maintained” (Private infrastructure). • Water, sewer, and gas mains/services must be potholed prior to bore/missile crossings. If street cuts are necessary please contact Right of Way inspector for restoration. • If sidewalk panels need to be removed, the subgrade must be compacted to the satisfaction of the ROW inspector. Cold patch asphalt shall be used as a temporary walking surface until the permanent repair can be done. • Sidewalk panels shall be a minimum of 4000 psi and be inspected within 24 hours of pouring concrete. Anything over one sidewalk panel shall be poured via concrete truck (no bag mix allowed). Horticultural • Handholes shall not be located within driplines of trees within City property, to include the right of ways, without explicit written permission from the City Horticulturalist. • Any proposed trenching shall not be within the dripline of trees. • If within tree dripline, consult the City of Fairhope Horticulturist prior to earth work. • Trees shall not be negatively impacted. • Consultation with the City’s horticulturalist, to determine if the required depth of bore must be increased so that no trees are impacted by the project. The contractor is responsible for any damaged trees. • Any work done within the critical root zone shall be done to meet or exceed Internal Society Arboriculture (ISA) standards. • All roots to be removed shall be severed cleanly at the perimeter of the protected radius. • Protective barriers shall be used for all trees, barricades shall be erected a minimum of 20’ from the trunk. Erosion Control • Any ROW cuts shall be stabilized (covered) at the end of each day & disturbed areas shall be re- vegetated with sod within ten (10) days of completion of the project. Sod shall be watered to ensure survival. • Any excess soil shall be removed and disposed of properly. Dumping on private property without approval will not be tolerated. • Mulch / seed shall only be acceptable as temporary cover. • Inlets shall be protected. BMPs shall be placed at all affected storm inlets. • If the site is within 100' of a critical area (wetland, etc.), red soil/clay shall not be allowed as fill material, per the City’s Red Clay/Soil Ordinance. UR 26.04 -19362 CR 13 April 6, 2026 Page 3 of 4 • BMPs shall be installed at boring sites and trench locations. • Ground conditions in the ROW’s shall be returned to original preconstruction condition(s) or better. • No open trenches shall be allowed. Directional boring shall be used in sensitive areas, such as under roads, in proximity to trees, on finished lots, etc. Project Completion, Punch List Walk, and As-Built • The applicant shall provide as-built drawings of all installed lines depicting depths. • Damage to any City’s infrastructure (storm, sewer, water, ditches etc. shall be the responsibility of the permittee to repair to city standards at no cost to the city. • Any damage that occurs needs to be reported to the city as soon as possible. • Pedestals shall be placed in a manner as to avoid obstructing visibility of motorists and to allow vehicles to exit the roadway during an emergency.. UR 26.04 -19362 CR 13 April 6, 2026 Page 4 of 4 UTILITY REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Standards of Review: Alabama Code Section 11-52-11 grants review authority to the Planning Commission for all proposed construction of utilities within public right-of-way. Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of UR 26.04 – 19362 CR 13 Utility Review with the following conditions: 1. A pre-construction meeting shall be held with the City prior to issuance of any permits; 2. Follow-up activities below required by staff and the applicant: a. Upon satisfactory review and approval by ROW Construction Inspector, as-builts will be submitted to the GIS technician for inclusion in GIS utility maps; 3. Provide a Traffic Control Plan to ROW Inspector prior to commencement of any work. 4. Applicant shall contact Alabama One Call to locate all existing utilities (1000ft max per day). City of Fairhope Planning Commission April 6, 2026 The following is a proposed amendment to change and alter the City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission will review the proposed language and take one of the following actions: a) Recommend approval to the City Council; b) Recommend approval to the City Council, conditioned on specific revisions; c) Recommend denial to the City Council; or d) Continue discussion of the proposed amendments for further study. Any zoning amendment must be approved by the City Council. During the Planning Commission Hearing, as well as the City Council Hearing, all persons shall have an opportunity to be heard in opposition to or in favor of the proposed amendment. Comments may also be emailed to planning@fairhopeal.gov. Executive Summary of Amendment(s) There seems to be a consensus that current policy regulating building height could be improved. The reasons for which vary, but some say they are confusing, expensive to determine, definitions are unclear, while others are concerned with the end results. Opinions about potential solutions vary more than the reasons for concern. Staff originally advertised for a public hearing as required by State codes, but with all things considered, would prefer the agenda item for the April 6 Planning Commission meeting to be discussion driven. To this end, Staff will not propose formal language for the Planning Commission during the April meeting, instead we will present the concerns, along with potential solutions and invite discussion of those items. The Planning Commission must take formal action, but Staff recommends action item (d) above, “Continue discussion of the proposed amendments for further study”. Prior to proposing specific amendments Staff recommends we readvertise, publish exact amendments prior to the meeting, and hold an additional public hearing at a future Planning Commission meeting. ZC 26.01 Zoning Amendment Page 5 of 10 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL Application Type: Village Subdivision Minor Subdivision Informal (No Fee) Preliminary Plat Final Plat Multiple Occupancy Project Attachments: Articles of Incorporation or List all associated investors Date of Application: ______________________ Property Owner / Leaseholder Information Name of Property Owner: _______________________Phone Number: ___________ Address of Property Owner: ________________________________________________ City: ____________________________ State: _____________ Zip: ____________ Proposed Subdivision Name: ________________________________________________ No. Acres in Plat: _______________________ No. Lots/Units: ___________________ Parcel No: _______________________________ Current Zoning: ___________________ Authorized Agent Information Plat must be signed by the property owner before acceptance by the City of Fairhope Name of Authorized Agent: ______________________Phone Number: ____________ Address: _________________________________________________ City: ____________________________ State: _____________ Zip: ____________ Contact Person: ______________________ Surveyor/Engineer Information Name of Firm: __________________________________Phone Number: ____________ Address: _________________________________________________ City: ____________________________ State: _____________ Zip: ____________ Contact Person: ______________________ Plat Fee Calculation: Reference: Ordinance 1269 Signatures: I certify that I am the property owner/leaseholder of the above described property and hereby submit this plat to the City for review. *If property is owned by Fairhope Single Tax Corp. an authorized Single Tax representative shall sign this application. ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Property Owner/Leaseholder Printed Name Signature ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Date Fairhope Single Tax Corp. (If Applicable) 11/25/25 Ross Wilson 251-615-1171 2101 Pine Crest Drive Vestavia AL 35216 Geographic Consulting, LLC 251-458-5588 11111 US Hwy 31, Suite A Spanish Fort Alabama 36527 Catherine Clark Geographic Consulting, LLC 251-458-5588 11111 US Hwy 31, Suite A Spanish Fort Alabama 36527 Catherine Clark Ross Wilson 4 Docusign Envelope ID: B6A074F2-FBAC-404D-B4C4-A8A3FC446962 11/25/2025 SD 26.07 150 N Section (MOP) April 6, 2026 1 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, Geographic Consulting, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, Ross Wilson, for Preliminary Plat approval of 150 N Section, a 3-unit Multiple Occupancy Project on property zoned B-2, General Business District. The property is located at 150 North Section Street and is 0.18± acres. PPIN #: 15235 SITE HISTORY No previous Planning Cases were found for this existing development. STAFF COMMENTS The purpose of this request is to create three units in an existing building which only includes interior renovations. Subject property is located within the CBD. Fairhope Utilities for Electric, Water, Sewer, and Gas will serve the site. Utilities Utility service providers for the subject site include Fairhope Utilities for electric, water, sewer, and gas, as well as AT&T for communications. Water and sewer connections will be subject to all applicable tap fees and system development charges (SDCs), and any required infrastructure improvements will be the developer’s responsibility. Electric and Gas are available subject to ATC’s and other applicable fees. Traffic A Traffic Verification letter was submitted with the application and is attached to this packet. As proposed the three units do not trigger a full traffic study. Drainage The building footprint is not changing nor is there any impervious area being added. The existing drainage flows into the City’s drainage system. Tree & Landscaping The building is built to the property line. A 6’ wooden fence will be constructed to screen the A/C Units and mechanical equipment. SUBDIVISION CONSIDERATIONS Standards of Review: In accordance with Article V.B.2 of the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations the Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; SD 26.07 150 N Section (MOP) April 6, 2026 2 Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; or e) The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of SD 26.07 150 N Section MOP Preliminary/Final. G-101 DRAWING INDEX G-101 WITH VICINITY MAP COVER SHEET COVER PAGE , DRAWING INDEX BCS1 BUILDING CODE SUMMARY LSP1 LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLANS Fairhope, AL. Project Number: Sheet No. Drawn By: Checked By: Date: PCD July 25th, 2025 2025.27 756 Saint Louis Street Mobile, Alabama 36602 (251) 432-3480 15 0 N . S e c t i o n S t r e e t TEH Fa i r h o p e , A L . In t e r i o r a n d E x t e r i o r R e n o v a t i o n s ARCHITECTURAL D-101 DEMO FLOOR PLAN A-101 FLOOR PLAN AND NOTES A-401 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN WITHINTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND NOTES 150 N. Section Street A-501 HEAD, JAMB AND SILL DETAILS Interior and Exterior Renovations A-102 REFLECTED CEILING FLOOR PLAN A-201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSWITH DOOR AND WINDOW TYPES AND WALL TYPES STRUCTURAL S1.0 RENOVATION PLAN 2509 COMMERCIAL PARK DR. Mobile, AL 36606 (251) 450-3757 61 ST. JOSEPH STREET Mobile, AL 36602 (251) 402-1364 40680 STATE HWY 59 BAY MINETTE,, AL 36507 (251) 937-6313 ELECTRICAL E1.0 ELECTRICAL LEGEND AND NOTES E1.1 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLAN E2.1 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN E3.0 ELECTRICAL DETAILS, RISERS MECHANICAL M-100 HVAC NOTES M-200 HVAC DEMO PLAN M-201 HVAC NEW WORK PLAN M-300 HVAC DETAILS PLUMBING P-100 PLUMBING NOTES P-200 PLUMBING DEMO PLAN P-201 PLUMBING NEW WORK PLAN P-300 SANITARY WASTE PLAN 61 ST. JOSEPH STREET Mobile, AL 36602 (251) 402-1364 P-301 SANITARY WASTE RISER P-400 PLUMBING DETAILS M-301 HVAC DETAILS Project Number: Sheet No. Drawn By: Checked By: Date: PCD July 25th, 2025 2025.27 756 Saint Louis Street Mobile, Alabama 36602 (251) 432-3480 15 0 N . S e c t i o n S t r e e t TEH Fa i r h o p e , A L . In t e r i o r a n d E x t e r i o r R e n o v a t i o n s D-101 A D-101 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" DEMO FLOOR PLAN DEMO FLOOR PLAN LEGEND LSP1 A LSP1 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLAN Project Number: Sheet No. Drawn By: Checked By: Date: PCD July 25th, 2025 2025.27 756 Saint Louis Street Mobile, Alabama 36602 (251) 432-3480 15 0 N . S e c t i o n S t r e e t TEH Fa i r h o p e , A L . In t e r i o r a n d E x t e r i o r R e n o v a t i o n s TOTAL HEATED AND COOLED 5,836 S.F. LIFE SAFETY CODE LEGEND OCCUPANT LOAD Project Number: Sheet No. Drawn By: Checked By: Date: PCD July 25th, 2025 2025.27 756 Saint Louis Street Mobile, Alabama 36602 (251) 432-3480 15 0 N . S e c t i o n S t r e e t TEH Fa i r h o p e , A L . In t e r i o r a n d E x t e r i o r R e n o v a t i o n s A-101 A A-101 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" FLOOR PLAN Project Number: Sheet No. Drawn By: Checked By: Date: PCD July 25th, 2025 2025.27 756 Saint Louis Street Mobile, Alabama 36602 (251) 432-3480 15 0 N . S e c t i o n S t r e e t TEH Fa i r h o p e , A L . In t e r i o r a n d E x t e r i o r R e n o v a t i o n s A-202 A A-202 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" FRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION B A-202 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" RIGHT SIDE EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTE: ALL FOUR EXTERIOR SIDES OF THE BUILDING WILL RECEIVE NEW STUCCO. SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SC A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " E2 . 11 EL E C T R I C A L P O W E R P L A N KE Y N O T E S ( T H I S S H E E T O N L Y ) E2 . 1 EL E C T R I C A L PO W E R PL A N Pr o j e c t N u m b e r : Sh e e t N o . Dr a w n B y : Ch e c k e d B y : Da t e : GW S Se p t . 2 2 t h , 2 0 2 5 20 2 5 . 2 7 75 6 S a i n t L o u i s S t r e e t Mo b i l e , A l a b a m a 3 6 6 0 2 (2 5 1 ) 4 3 2 - 3 4 8 0 150 N. Section Street GW S Fairhope, AL. Interior and Exterior Renovations 9/ 2 6 / 2 5 ST E W A R T E N G I N E E R I N G AN D C O N S T R U C T I O N 40 6 8 0 S T A T E H W Y 5 9 BA Y M I N E T T E , A L A B A M A 3 6 5 0 7 (2 5 1 ) - 9 3 7 - 6 3 1 3 ( 2 5 1 ) - 9 3 7 - 1 7 8 2 F a x ws t e w a r t @ s t e w a r t e n g i n e e r i n g . n e t 11111 US Highway 31, Suite A, Spanish Fort, AL 36527 (251) 458-5588 February 6, 2026 Mike JeAries City of Fairhope Development Services Manager 555 S. Section Street Fairhope, Alabama 36532 RE: TraAic Impact Study Determination Project: 150 N. Section Street - Interior Renovations Fairhope, Alabama To Whom It May Concern, This letter has been prepared to determine whether the proposed renovations to the existing commercial building located at 150 N. Section Street in Fairhope, Alabama require a Tra Aic Impact Study in accordance with the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations. The proposed project consists of renovations to an existing commercial building totaling approximately 5,836 square feet. The scope of work includes interior improvements, upgrades to building systems, and exterior façade improvements. The project does not include an expansion of the building footprint, an increase in gross floor area, modifications to the existing site access or parking layout, or a change in the building’s land use classification. The total conditioned building area is approximately 5,836 square feet. The City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations (TraAic Impact Study provisions under Site Plan Review) state that a TraAic Impact Study shall be required for all applications that will generate an average daily traAic (ADT) count of 1,000 trips or more, or which will generate 50 trips or more during any peak hour period, based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation methodology, unless otherwise waived by the City Engineer. Because the proposed project is limited to renovations of an existing structure and does not increase the building size or intensity of use, the project will not generate additional traAic beyond the traAic currently associated with the site. Therefore, the net new trip generation associated with the renovation is zero trips. For reference, typical ITE trip generation rates for a commercial building of this size are summarized below. 11111 US Highway 31, Suite A, Spanish Fort, AL 36527 (251) 458-5588 Estimated Trip Generation using building size of 5,836 SF ITE Code Land Use Period SF) Trips 712 Small Office Building Daily (ADT) 9.74 57 AM Peak Hour 1.17 7 PM Peak Hour 1.15 7 826 Retail Daily (ADT) 36.13 211 AM Peak Hour 2.38 14 PM Peak Hour 5.81 34 Even if the building were evaluated as new development, the estimated peak-hour trips would remain below the 50 peak-hour trip threshold, and the estimated daily tra Aic would remain below the 1,000 ADT threshold identified in the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations for requiring a TraAic Impact Study. Based on the scope of work and the absence of any increase in building area, change in land use, or modification to site access or circulation, the proposed renovations will not generate additional traAic demand and therefore do not meet the thresholds requiring a TraAic Impact Study under the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations. This determination was prepared using generally accepted tra Aic engineering practices. Please contact our oAice if additional information is needed. Sincerely, Catherine Clark, P.E. Principal Geographic Consulting, LLC 251-458-5588 catherine@geo-consultllc.com - Null LLC Cert of Formation - 11/2021 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF ALABAMA DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (LLC) CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION PURPOSE: In order to form a Limited Liability Company (LLC) under Section 10A-5A-2.01 of the Code of Alabama 1975, this Certificate of Formation and the appropriate filing fees must be filed with the Office of the Secretary of State. The information required in this form is required by Title 10A. 1. The name of the limited liability company (must contain the words “Limited Liability Company” or the abbreviation “L.L.C.” or “LLC,” and comply with Code of Alabama, Section 10A-1-5.06. You may use Professional or Series before Limited Liability Company or LLC (or PLLC or SLLC) if they apply: 2.A copy of the Name Reservation Certificate from the Office of the Secretary of State must be attached. 3. The name of the registered agent (only one agent): Street (no PO Boxes) address of registered office (must be located in Alabama): *COUNTY of above address: Mailing address in Alabama of registered office (if different from street address): 4.The undersigned certify that there is at least one member of the limited liability company. RW LLC David Ryan Alabama Sec. Of State 001-044-188 DLL Date 10/12/2022 Time 11:20:00 File $100.00 County $100.00 ------- Total $200.00 71 N. Section Street, Suite B Fairhope, AL 36532 BALDWIN DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (LLC) CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION LLC Cert of Formation – 11/2021 Page 2 of 2 5.Check only if the type applies to the Limited Liability Company being formed: Series LLC complying with Title 10A, Chapter 5A, Article 11 Professional LLC complying with Title 10A, Chapter 5A, Article 8 Non-Profit LLC complying with Section 10A-5A-1.04(c) 6.The filing of the limited liability company is effective immediately on the date received by the office of the Secretary of State, Business Services Division or at the delayed filing date (cannot be prior to the filing date) specified in this filing complying with Section 10A-1-4.12 The undersigned specify / / as the effective date (must be on or after the date filed in the office of the Secretary of State, but no later than the 90th day after the date this instrument was signed) and the time of filing to be : AM or PM. (cannot be noon or midnight – 12:00) Attached are any other matters the members determine to include herein (if this item is checked there must be attachments with the filing). Date (MM/DD/YYYY) Signature as required by 10A-5A-2.04 Typed title (organizer or attorney-in-fact) *County of Registered Agent is requested in order to determine distribution of County filing fees. 10 12 2022 11 20 10 //12 2022 Member David Ryan Additional Details Organizers Organizer Street Address Mailing Address David Ryan 71 N. Section Street, Suite B Fairhope, AL 36532 71 N. Section Street, Suite B Fairhope, AL 36532 John H. Merrill Secretary of State P.O. Box 5616 Montgomery, AL 36103-5616 I, John H. Merrill, Secretary of State of Alabama, having custody of the Great and Principal Seal of said State, do hereby certify that pursuant to the provisions of Title 10A, Chapter 1, Article 5, Code of Alabama 1975, and upon an examination of the entity records on file in this office, the following entity name is reserved as available: RW LLC This name reservation is for the exclusive use of David Ryan, 71 N. Section Street, Suite B , Fairhope, AL 36532 for a period of one year beginning April 08, 2022 and expiring April 08, 2023 In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of the State, at the Capitol, in the city of Montgomery, on this day. April 08, 2022 Date RES015531 John H. Merrill Secretary of State SD 26.09 Vatan Mixed Use Development April 6, 2026 Page 1 of 6 SUMMARY OF REQUEST Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, SE Civil, LLC, on behalf of the Owner, FST RW, LLC, for Preliminary and Final Plat approval of Vatan Mixed Use Development, a 9-unit Multiple Occupancy Project on property zoned B-2, General Business District. The property is located at 301 Magnolia Avenue and is 0.5± acres. SITE HISTORY The Board of Adjustments approved BOA 23.02 for the use on April 17, 2023. Planning Commission approved SD 23.26 (MOP) at its October 2, 2023, meeting with conditions. Per Article IV, Section C(6)(b) of the Subdivision Regulations a final plat must be submitted within two (2) years or less after preliminary approval and if it is not then the “preliminary plat shall be null, void and of no force or effect.” City Council approved SR 23.05 at its October 23, 2023, meeting with conditions. LND25-000083 was issued on April 21, 2025. Approval of SD 23.26 expired on October 2, 2025. A building permit (RES26-000106) for Unit 3 was applied for on January 26, 2026. Said building permit has not been approved. STAFF COMMENTS There are differences between SD 23.36 (and SR 23.05) and the current application. In summary, the number of units has not changed. The overall “Building (under roof)” square footage increased 2,213 sf (from 10,487 sf to 12,700sf or from 46.15% to 55.77%). Most likely due to adding sf to the upper floors of units. Impervious pavement amounts decreased from 0.18 acres (34.62%) to 0.12 acres (23.08%). The configuration and numbering of the units has also changed, but not significantly enough to warrant a new Site Plan Review. Prior approval of this MOP has expired; however, the conditions of approval for the prior MOP application are still applicable. The NOA for SD 23.26 is within the agenda packet. Most of the conditions have been satisfied; however, #1 on the list is to be determined. That condition is: Developer shall coordinate the installation of the sidewalks with the Public Works Department to minimize disturbance to the existing trees in the ROWs at the time of building permit. Prior review and discussions regarding preserving the Heritage Trees within the ROW were very extensive and at that time thought to be the best method going forward. The previous MOP (and Site Plan) was approved with portions of the sidewalks along N. Church Street and Magnolia Avenue reduced to six (6) feet, which is allowed within the CBD per Article V, Section B(4)(e). See below. Currently, there is concern about the viability of the trees on both Magnolia Avenue and N. Church Street. More discussion within the Tree & Landscaping section of this report. SD 26.09 Vatan Mixed Use Development April 6, 2026 Page 2 of 6 Utilities Fairhope is providing all of the utilities and there are Utility As-Builts within the packet. Test results are also included within the packet. Any easements required for utilities shall be provided prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy. Traffic A traffic study is not necessary for this project. Drainage The terrain of the site falls from east to west with elevations ranging. Runoff flows westward across the surface of the site and enters the N. Church Street ROW where it enters City storm sewer lines through inlets located along N. Church Street. Runoff will be directed to a series of area drains and drop inlets located along N. Church Street. The underground storm pipes will carry the runoff to an existing City inlet on the east side of N. Church Street near the Magnolia Avenue intersection where it will continue through Fairhope’s storm sewer network. Retention facilities are not required for this development. An HOA will be formed that will be required to maintain any and all stormwater facilities and structures located outside of the publicly accepted ROW. Submitted plans have been approved. Tree & Landscaping The landscape plan has been updated to reflect the new configurations of the site and units. The landscaped area increased from SD 23.26 when it was 0.10 acres or 19.23% to 0.11 acres or 21.15% in the proposed landscape package. The updated landscape plan was sent to the city horticulturist on March 23, 2026. There is missing information on the Plant Schedule that SE Civil was made aware of on March 26, 2026 (i.e. height at time of planting). Landscaping is set to be installed in Phase 1C. As aforementioned, eight (8) and six (6) foot sidewalks and/or pavers were previously approved for this site by City Council. It was deemed that the reduced six (6) feet stretches of sidewalk and/or pavers would better preserve the six (6) Heritage Trees within the ROWs with the understanding that once the site starts getting developed there may need to be adjustments. During the review process for this MOP application Ickes Tree Service submitted the Vatan Sidewalk Assessment dated March 18, 2026, in response to three (3) options regarding the sidewalks and trees. The options are the following: no sidewalk, a paver sidewalk, and an ADA compliant sidewalk (3 ft in width). In summary, Ickes Tree Service states: “The best option is to not install a sidewalk at the corner of Magnolia Avenue or along Church Street for the health of the Heritage Trees.” Then the assessment goes on to state that the paver sidewalk option will have a “significant impact” on the Heritage Trees; the ADA compliant sidewalk will have “moderate impact” on the Heritage Trees. Poured concrete is preferable over pavers because poured concrete will “present a lower risk to the health and integrity of the Heritage Trees…;however, the construction of the sidewalk will cause stress to the trees.” The full assessment is included in the packet. The Assessment was sent to the Tree Committee for comment. Joshua Gammon, City Council, Place 2, and a member of the Tree Committee is not in favor of removing the sidewalks and suggests stamped concrete that mimics pavers in a March 28 email (included in packet). Will Mastin, City Horticulturist, agrees with Ickes Sidewalk assessment and is not in favor of sidewalks at all due to the potential long-term strain on the trees. If it is determined that not installing sidewalks or installing sidewalks that are less width than the previously approved 6 foot sidewalks in the 2023 Site Plan (SR 23.05) is in the best interests of the trees and the project then another review by City Council of the Site Plan is warranted. SD 26.09 Vatan Mixed Use Development April 6, 2026 Page 3 of 6 Phasing Plan Phase 1A is already complete. Phase 1B is underway as a , no more than five (5) buildings will be issued a certificate The “Landscaped Amenity Area” is a priority in this project for the city. It is a popular and very visible corner that of vertical construction, and limitations of certifi- acceptable. The same applies to the installation ese self-serving limitations shall be stricken from the MOP Phasing Narrative. SD 26.09 Vatan Mixed Use Development April 6, 2026 Page 4 of 6 SUBDIVISION CONSIDERATIONS Standards of Review: In accordance with Article V.B.2 of the City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations the Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a) The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; b) The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; c) The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; d) The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; or e) The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of SD 26.09 Vatan Mixed Use Development MOP Preliminary and Final Plat with the following conditions: 1. Due to the circumstances of required sidewalks, the City’s desire to protect Heritage tress, and requirements of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, the Site Plan shall be reviewed by the City Council as the final authority to determine a solution for any sidewalks that may conflict with Heritage Trees. Final approval of this MOP is contingent on the approval of a revised Site Plan that shall be approved by the City Council; 2. Developer shall coordinate the installation of the sidewalks, if any, with the Public Works Department to minimize disturbance to the existing trees in the ROWs; 3. Update Plant Schedule on landscape plan to reflect the height of the plants at time of planting; 4. Provide compliant sign and sign lighting plan pursuant to a note on the landscape plan; 5. Provide spot elevations for the building corners, along with building elevations, for each unit with the building permit application for that particular unit to confirm building height; and 6. Provide a Hold-Harmless agreement for the elevated staircases proposed in the ROW. EXHIBITS SD 26.09 Vatan Mixed Use Development April 6, 2026 Page 5 of 6 Excerpt from Table 3-2: Dimension Table – Lots and Principle Structure Dimension District or Use Per Acre (UPA) Setback Setback Setback Setback All Structures Height B-2 None/ -none 20’ d none f none e 30’ l a. Structure may exceed the building height provided the lot width is increased by 10 feet for each additional foot in height. b. Where a driveway is in the side, and extends past the front of the principle structure, the side setback shall be 15’. Driveways shall not be within 3 feet of the side lot line. The area between the side lot line and driveway shall be vegetated and remain pervious. c. End units shall have a minimum side yard of 10’. d. Where a lot abuts residential property on both sides, the front setback shall be in line with adjacent structures. e. Where a lot abuts residential property, the side setback shall be 10’. f. Where a lot abuts residential property to the rear, the rear setback shall be 20’ g. In the case of existing adjacent establishments, the setback shall be the average within 100 feet on either side of the proposed structure. h. Where a side or rear lot abuts residential districts, the setbacks shall be determined on an individual basis. i. R-6 Districts may be larger than 5 acres provided they meet all the special design requirements of Article V., Section D.5. j. Individual lots in the R-3 TH district may be as small as 2,400 square feet, however each unit must have a minimum of 3,600 square feet made up of lot area and common or public open space according to the standards in Article III, Section D.2. k. Central Business District 40’. l. A building located in any commercial zone may have a height of 35’ if it contains both residential and commercial space. The residential use must make up at least 33% of the total area of the building and be located on the second and/or third floor and retail or office space must be located on ground and/or second floor. (See Site Plan Review Article II, Section C, Sub-section 2 – Site Plan, for approval procedures) CBD Overlay District: This district is intended to preserve downtown Fairhope as the regional village center and as the focal point of the City, in accordance with the comprehensive plan. The district encourages infill development, including shopping, restaurant and entertainment, cultural and artistic institutions, offices, government functions, and residential uses, provided it creates a pedestrian oriented atmosphere and is consistent with the historic fabric of downtown. EXHIBITS SD 26.09 Vatan Mixed Use Development April 6, 2026 Page 6 of 6 Preliminary and Final Plat PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS TABLE OF CONTENTS C02 COVER SITE PLAN GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN for CONTACTS Vatan Mixed Use Development C01 C03 C04 UTILITY PLAN GAS DEPARTMENT WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENTBUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF FAIRHOPE MR. ERIK CORTINAS 555 SOUTH SECTION STREET FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 251-990-0141 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 301 Magnolia Avenue C05 C06 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS R Know what's below. before you dig.Call C07 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT CITY OF FAIRHOPE MR. BEN PATTERSON 555 SOUTH SECTION ST. FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 251-928-8003 Fairhope, Alabama 36532 Developer: RW LLC 71 N Section St. Fairhope, AL 36532 PLANNING/ZONING DEPARTMENT ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Alabama holding Certificate Number 51064, hereby certify that I have reviewed the design herein which was done under my direct control and supervision and that, to the best of my professional knowledge and to the best of my belief, conforms to the requirements of Section 7-18 of the City of Fairhope Municipal Code and to all other rules, regulations, laws, and ordinances applicable to my design. Project Engineer March 18, 2026 Name of Project to which this Certificate Applies: Vatan Mixed Use Development. Plans which are certified consist of Pages Cover Sheet thru Sheet C10. VICINITY MAP N.T.S. SECTION 37, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA C08 SITE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF FAIRHOPE MR. RICHARD JOHNSON 555 SOUTH SECTION STREET FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 251-928-8003 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN D01 DEMOLITION & TREE PROTECTION PLAN Civil Engineering& Surveying 9969 Windmill RoadFairhope, AL 36532251-990-6566 CITY OF FAIRHOPE MR. HUNTER SIMMONS 555 SOUTH SECTION STREET FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 251-928-2136 CITY OF FAIRHOPE MR. WES BOYETT 555 SOUTH SECTION STREET FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 251-928-8003 CITY OF FAIRHOPE MR. DARYL MOREFIELD 555 SOUTH SECTION STREET FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 251-928-8003 ALTA SURVEY REVISIONS: NO.REVISIONDATE APPR. REVISIONS 0 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION6/9/2025 DRL CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC09 CONSTRUCTION DETAILSC10 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION "Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot one (1), Block six (6), Division one (1) of the lands of the Fairhope Single Tax Corporation in the City of Fairhope, Alabama, as per map or plat thereof recorded September 13, 1911, in Miscellaneous Book 1, Pages 320 through 321, in the records in the Office of the Judge of Probate, Baldwin County, Alabama, run East 140 feet along South line of Block 6, to a point; thence run North 160 feet to a point; thence run West 140 feet to a point on the West line of said Block; thence run South 160 feet along West line of Block 6 to the Point of Beginning; Parcel lies in Fractional Section 18, Township 6 South, Range 2 East, Baldwin County, Alabama." DESCRIPTION COPIED FROM SCHEDULE A OF OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; ISSUING AGENT: FAIRHOPE TITLE SERVICES, LLC., COMMITMENT NO. VX937666 BEGINNING AT A ONE-HALF INCH IRON PIPE FOUND AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT ONE, BLOCK SIX, DIVISION ONE OF THE LANDS OF THE FAIRHOPE SINGLE TAX CORPORATION IN THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA AS PER MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 13, 1911 IN MISCELLANEOUS BOOK 1, PAGE 320 THROUGH 321, IN THE RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF PROBATE, BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA AND RUN THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF MAGNOLIA AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 141.12 FEET TO A THREE-QUARTER INCH CRIMP TOP IRON PIPE FOUND; THENCE DEPARTING SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY, RUN NORTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 160.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.04 FEET TO A ONE INCH IRON PIPE FOUND ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CHURCH STREET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY, A DISTANCE OF 159.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TRACT CONTAINS 0.52 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. (DESCRIPTION COMPOSED FROM PROBATE RECORDS AND AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY & DESCRIBES THE SAME PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT NO. VX937666) SURVEYED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1 PRELIM/FINAL MOP2/23/2026 DRL 2 AMENITY AREA PATH3/18/2026 DRL Civil RW, LLC (251) 990-6566 9969 WINDMILL ROADFAIRHOPE, AL 36532 Engineering& Surveying PROJ MGR OFSHEET FILE PROJECT SCALE DED 11 20231216 20231216 1"=20' CHKD. JAF DRAWN RDC ALTA/NSPS LAND B AAMALA HL D E.DIEDAVI LEGEND: TITLE SURVEY N 00 20 40 20 SCALE 10 SURVEYOR'S NOTES: MAGNOLIA AVENUE 66 FT. R/W (PUBLIC) CH U R C H S T R E E T 6 6 F T . R / W ( P U B L I C ) FLOOD STATEMENT 0.52 AC. ± BUILDING SETBACKS (See City of Fairhope Zoning Ordinance for any additional zoning information) P.O.B. TABLE A REQUIREMENTS Item 1 - Monuments found or placed at all corners as shown hereon Item 2 - Address of Property - 301 Magnolia Avenue, Fairhope, AL 36532 Item 3 - Flood Zone Classification - Shown hereon Item 4 - Gross Land Area - 0.52 acres± Item 5 - Vertical relief from ground survey. Contours are displayed at a 1 foot interval and are referenced to NAVD 88 datum. Item 7(a) - Exterior Footprint - Shown hereon Item 8 - Substantial Features - Shown hereon Item 10 - Location of certain division or party walls to adjoining property- None found Item 11(b) - Markings Coordinated by Surveyor Item 13 - Adjoining Owners shown hereon Item 16 - There is no observed evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction or repairs. Item 17 - No changes to street right-of-ways and there is no observed evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction or repairs. Item 18 - There is no observed evidence of offsite easements or servitudes. DESCRIPTION COPIED FROM SCHEDULE A OF OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; ISSUING AGENT: FAIRHOPE TITLE SERVICES, LLC., COMMITMENT NO. VX937666 SCHEDULE B II - EXCEPTIONS NOT A SURVEY ITEM NOT A SURVEY ITEM NOT A SURVEY ITEM NOT ASURVEY ITEM SHOWN HEREON, IF ANY NONE FOUNDNONE OBSERVEDNOT A SURVEY ITEM NOT A SURVEY ITEM SHOWN HEREON NOT A SURVEY ITEM NOT A SURVEY ITEMNOT A SURVEY ITEM NOT A SURVEY ITEM NOT A SURVEY ITEM SURVEYED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: X X XXXXX 1/2"CRF 3/4"CTIF 36" LIVE OAK 48" LIVE OAK 30" LIVE OAK 26" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK 1/2"OEPF 1"OEPF SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS TBM 1/2"CRS N=190984.279 E=1841188.743 EL=109.35' (SE CIVIL) (4' PRM) MAGNOLIA AVENUE 66 FT. R/W (PUBLIC) CH U R C H S T R E E T 6 6 F T . R / W ( P U B L I C ) EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING LOT A2 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND TURNER INSTRUMENT NO. 1807835 COMMON AREA 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) LOT B 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND SOSNOWCHIK INSTRUMENT NO. 1805011 COMMON AREA 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) LO T 3 RE P L A T O F L O T 1 W O O D C H U R C H SU B D I V I S I O N (S L I D E 2 4 6 2 - A ) FS T A N D 4 1 2 F A I R H O P E L L C IN S T R U M E N T N O . 1 9 7 7 3 9 8 RIM:101.2' INV:98.1' OHP OHP OHP OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P 15"RCP15"RCP 18 " R C P 18"RCP G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ED G E O F P A V E M E N T GGGG W EDGE OF PAVEMENT 15 " C M P G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G OHP OHP OHP OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP 2 RESIDENCE BRICK/VINYL ONE STORY PORCH PA R A P E T W A L L WALL WA L L 3 3 3 4 36"(STUMP) 40"(STUMP) 11 1 11 010 910 8 10 710 6 10 510 4 10 3 102 101 100 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 96 97 98 99 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 4 10 5 11 0 109 10 8 107 10 6 105 10 410 3 10 2 10099 5 5 FENCE ONLINE FENCE 0.2' N RIM:100.4' INV:97.1'(15") INV:96.5'(18") RIM:101.8' THROAT:100.9' RIM:99.7' INV:91.0' RIM:95.6' INV:89.6' RIM:101.3' INV:93.0' RIM:101.47' INV:94.9' RIM:103.7' INV:97.3' SS VALLEY CURB TO REMAIN 48" TP TPTP TP TP TP TP TP TP 1 AS P H A L T D R I V E 1 RAM P 1 1 CO N C R E T E D R I V E CO N C R E T E 1 ASPHAL T D R I V E 1 6 6 6 EX. FENCE TO REMAIN EX. FENCE TO REMAIN RIM:99.7' INV:97.4'(15") INV:96.0'(18"IN) INV:91.5'(18"OUT) TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TPTPTP TP TP TP TP TP 7 8 8 SAWCUT ALONG EDGE OF ASPHALT (±35 LF) TO CREATE CLEAN EDGE FOR CONCRETE REMOVAL & CURB CONSTRUCTION SAWCUT ALONG EDGE OF ASPHALT (±33 LF) TO CREATE CLEAN EDGE FOR CONCRETE REMOVAL & CURB CONSTRUCTION SAWCUT ALONG EDGE OF ASPHALT (±33 LF) TO CREATE CLEAN EDGE FOR CONCRETE REMOVAL & CURB CONSTRUCTION VALVE AND HYDRANT TO BE RELOCATED OUTSIDE PROPOSED SIDEWALK. SEE UTILITY PLAN. 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE SHEETD01 20231216 DRL DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 2/23/26 1"=10' SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E R Know what's below. before you dig.Call DE M O L I T I O N & T R E E PR O T E C T I O N P L A N 40" STUMP TREE REMOVAL NOTES TREE REMOVAL LEGEND REMOVAL X TREE PROTECTION FENCE TP TREE REMOVAL TYPE 36" STUMP 1 QTY 1 DEMOLITION LEGEND PIPE REMOVAL REMOVAL - ASPHALT ASPHALT SAWCUT REMOVE PAVING AND BASE MATERIAL IN THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY1 DEMOLITION SYMBOLS INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT BARRIERS AND TREE PROTECTION PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FROM STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES PRIOR TO THE DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ANY STRUCTURES, TREES, PAVING, OR INFRASTRUCTURE. ALL DEBRIS, STRUCTURES, INFRASTRUCTURE, PIPES, POLES, CABLE, PAVING, AND ANY OTHER MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE AT A PERMITTED FACILITY. CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED FOR DRIVE ENTRANCES AND SITE WORK. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTOR'S CONTRACT WITH THE OWNER. ON-SITE BURIAL/DISPOSAL OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION (C&D) WASTE IS PROHIBITED. CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MEANS BUILDING MATERIALS FROM CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ASBESTOS- CONTAINING WASTE, WOOD, BRICKS, METAL, CONCRETE, WALL BOARD, PAPER, AND REFER TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAILS. MAKE SAWCUTS AT AREAS WHERE PAVING IS TO REMAIN. CURBING SHOULD BE REMOVED TO 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. CARDBOARD. 6. 7. AN EXISTING JOINT. SCALE: NTS TREE BARRICADE STEEL "T" POST TREE PROTECTION FENCE: CHAINLINK FENCE. STEEL "T" POSTS INSTALLED AT 8' O.C. PROVIDE AN 8.5" X 11" LAMINATED SIGN STATING "KEEP OUT TREE PROTECTION ZONE" SPACED EVERY 50 FEET ALONG THE FENCE KEEP OUT TREE PROTECTION AREA 4' TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED 20' FROM TRUNKS OF TREES LARGER THAN 20" DBH AND 10' FROM TRUNKS OF TREES UNDER 20" DBH. Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 2/ 2 3 / 2 6 REMOVE BUILDING AND APPURTENANCES2 REMOVE WALLS3 REMOVE POWER POLES AND OVERHEAD LINES4 REMOVE FENCE5 6 7 REMOVE CURBS, CURB CUTS, SIDEWALKS, & RAMPS REMOVAL - CONCRETE Va t a n M i x e d Us e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 TREE CANOPY REMOVE & PATCH ASPHALT FOR STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 8 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER AND SIDEWALK FOR STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION. NOTE: TREE BARRICADE SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE OUTER EDGE OF THE DRIP LINE OF THE TREE PRIOR TO ANY LANDSCAPE DISTURBANCE AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND CLEARLY MARKED AS LONG AS POSSIBLE DURING CONSTRUCTION. NW D E M O L I M I T S - C H U R C H S T R E E T 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 5 XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 36" LIVE OAK 48" LIVE OAK 30" LIVE OAK 26" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK MAGNOLIA AVENUE 66 FT. R/W (PUBLIC) CH U R C H S T R E E T 6 6 F T . R / W ( P U B L I C ) EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING LOT A2 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND TURNER INSTRUMENT NO. 1807835 COMMON AREA 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) LOT B 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND SOSNOWCHIK INSTRUMENT NO. 1805011 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) LO T 3 RE P L A T O F L O T 1 W O O D C H U R C H SU B D I V I S I O N (S L I D E 2 4 6 2 - A ) FS T A N D 4 1 2 F A I R H O P E L L C IN S T R U M E N T N O . 1 9 7 7 3 9 8 EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNIT 2 FFE=110.12 2,378 SFUNIT 1 FFE=104.52 1,594 SF UNIT 3 FFE=105.87 2,836 SF UNIT 5 FFE=105.26 1,532 SF UNIT 7 FFE=104.76 1,551 SF UNIT 6 FFE=104.47 1,434 SF UNIT 4 FFE=105.32 1,369 SF 20' CURB & GUTTER (MATCH EXISTING) CONNECT TO EXISTING SIDEWALK CONNECT TO EXISTING SIDEWALK CONNECT TO EXISTING SIDEWALK GARAGE FFE=106.18 GARAGE FFE=105.87 GARAGE FFE=105.26 GARAGE FFE=104.76 GARAGE FFE=104.47 GARAGE FFE=105.32 GARAGE FFE=106.12 1' RIBBON CURB (SEE DETAIL) 8' SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 8' SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) LIMESTONE PATH (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS) 16' 30' 18' 18' 24' SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR STAIR DESIGN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR STAIR DESIGN. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR STAIR DESIGN. SIDEWALK TO MATCH STORM INLET TOP ON ALL SIDES 8' 6' SIDEWALK REDUCED TO 6' WIDTH NEAR HERITAGE TREES. 48" 2 2 2 2 2 22 CURB & GUTTER (MATCH EXISTING) FENCE (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) CONCRETE SIDEWALK. (MATCH EXISTING DESIGN) CURB & GUTTER (MATCH EXISTING) ASPHALT PATCH (MATCH EXISTING) CURB & GUTTER (MATCH EXISTING) 21' R4' 18'16' LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) TERRACE TERRACE RETAINING WALL. DESIGN BY OTHERS STAIR FFE=106.54 EQ U I P . S L A B FF E = 1 0 5 . 7 8 LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) PHASE 2 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 1 VATAN PLACE (3RD FLOOR) 301 MAGNOLIA AVE. (1ST & 2ND FLOOR) 303 MAGNOLIA AVE. (1ST FLOOR) 2 VATAN PLACE (2ND & 3RD FLOOR) 3 VATAN PLACE 4 VATAN PLACE 5 VATAN PLACE 6 VATAN PLACE 7 VATAN PLACE SHEETC01 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 3/18/26 SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E R Know what's below. before you dig.Call SI T E P L A N Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 3/ 1 8 / 2 6 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE 20231216 1"=10'DRL Va t a n M i x e d Us e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 PROPOSEDEXISTING SITE PLAN LEGEND CURB & GUTTER STANDARD PARKING QUANTITY MEDIUM DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING BRICK PAVERS RIBBON CURB PROPERTY AREA LAND USAGE --0.52 ACRES BUILDING AREA (UNDER ROOF)55.77%0.29 ACRES IMPERVIOUS PAVING 0.12 ACRES PERVIOUS PAVING 0.00 ACRES DESCRIPTION % OF PROPERTY AREAAREA 23.08% 00.00% GRASSED/LANDSCAPED AREA 0.11 ACRES 21.15% CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED ALL CURBED OR STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 4' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. TO ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED FOR SITE WORK. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES THE DRAWINGS. CONCRETE FOR CURBING SHALL BE 3000 PSI. PAINTED STRIPING SHALL BE BRIGHT AND CLEAR. STRIPES SHALL BE PER PLAN AND PAINTED CURBING SHALL BE FORMED AND POURED CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED WITHIN HANDICAP RAMPS AND PARKING STALLS SHALL BE PER ADA REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED TO BE TRUE AND ACCURATE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. THE SURVEY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS IS SHOWN WITHIN THESE PLANS. ALL EXISTING ON CLEAN ASPHALT OR CONCRETE. THIS SITE IS ZONED B-2 (CBD). NOTIFY CITY OF FAIRHOPE INSPECTIONS 24 HOURS BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF EVERY PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL STRIPING IN R.O.W. TO BE CLASS A TYPE 2 THERMOPLASTIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED GOVERNMENTAL A COPY OF THE APPROVED LAND DISTURBANCE PLAN AND PERMIT SHALL BE PRESENT ON SITE WHENEVER LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY IS IN PROGRESS. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PARKED IN REQUIRED R.O.W. WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE CITY. DURING CONSTRUCTION, ACCESS ROADWAYS CONSTRUCTED OF AN ALL WEATHER SURFACE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING 80,000 POUNDS GROSS WEIGHT SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE WIDTH OF THE ACCESS ROADWAY, DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE 20 FT PER STANDARD FIRE PREVENTION CODE, LATEST EDITION. ALL NON-HANDICAP PARKING SPACE LINES WILL BE WHITE. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND MARKINGS USED ON THE SITE WILL CONFORM WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), FHWA, LATEST EDITION. REFERENCE THE SIGN CODES CONTAINED IN THE MUTCD FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS. NOTE THE COLOR AND SIZE OF ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS, REFERENCING DETAILS IN ALDOT'S ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS WHERE APPLICABLE. NO "PROTECTED TREES" WILL BE REMOVED, DESTRUCTIVELY DAMAGED, MUTILATED, RELOCATED, DISFIGURED, DESTROYED, CUT DOWN, OR EXCESSIVELY PRUNED DURING SITE PLAN NOTES AND CODES AS WELL AS O.S.H.A. AND ALDOT STANDARDS. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE REGULATIONS FIRE LANES AND SIGNAGE TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 1 CHAPTER 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE SITE; INCLUDING UTILITIES, SURFACES, ETC. AND SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES THEY CAUSE TO NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, PROPERTY AND ANY UNAUTHORIZED DISRUPTION TO UTILITIES ON SITE AND TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, EXISTING UTILITIES AT PROPOSED CONNECTIONS AND CROSSINGS SHALL BE FIELD EXCAVATED TO VERIFY LOCATIONS, ELEVATION AND SIZE. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY WITH ANY DEVIATIONS OR CONFLICTS. TOTAL SITE ACREAGE =0.52 ACRES. REGULATIONS. INSPECTIONS. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23.PARKING DATA TOTAL REQUIRED (1 SPACE/UNIT) = PARKING REQUIREMENT SPACES 7 TOTAL PROVIDED =14 CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCH. PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS24. OF EXIT PORCHES; PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.25. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR THE COLUMN GRID LAYOUT AND INFORMATION REQUIRED26. TO LAYOUT THE BUILDING WITHIN THE FOUNDATIONS. NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN27. COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR STAIR DETAILS.28. BUILDING (UNDER ROOF) SITE ANALYSIS 12,700 SF ± SITE ACREAGE (PROPOSED) ±0.51 AC (22,362 SF) BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT YARD: SIDE YARD: REAR YARD: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 0 FT 0 FT 0 FT 40' BUILDING HEIGHT 40 FT PROVIDED PARKING 14 SPACES REQUIRED PARKING 7 SPACES (SEE PARKING DATA) MAX. BUILDING SITE COVERAGE:---- JURISDICTION CITY OF FAIRHOPE REQUIRED: ZONING B-2 (CBD) TOTAL UNITS 9 UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS 7 UNITS COMMERCIAL UNITS 2 UNITS X NOTES: CIVIL PLANS NOT TO BE USED FOR BUILDING LAYOUT. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING LAYOUT. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS AS SHOWN HEREIN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL / STRUCTURAL PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CIVIL ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. PRIOR TO INSTALLING SIDEWALKS ALONG CHURCH STREET AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A PRE-INSTALLATION MEETING WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, THE ARBORIST, AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING IS TO REVIEW THE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ADA AND TO EXAMINE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE SIDEWALK WITH THE TREE ROOT MOUNDS. IF THERE ARE ROOTS THAT INTERFERE WITH THE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS, A TREE WELL, CURB OR SIDEWALK MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. RE T A I N I N G W A L L & A S P H , C U R B , S W P A T C H 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 5 MEDIUM DUTY ASPHALT PAVING AM E N I T Y P A T H 3/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 6 XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXX 36" LIVE OAK 48" LIVE OAK 30" LIVE OAK 26" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS MAGNOLIA AVENUE 66 FT. R/W (PUBLIC) RIM:101.2' INV:98.1' OHP 15"RCP15"RCP 18 " R C P G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W EDGE OF PAVEMENT 15 " C M P G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 110.69 103.32 103.16 110.04 11 1 11 010 910 8 10 710 6 10 510 4 10 3 102 101 100 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 96 97 98 99 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 4 10 5 11 0 10 9 10 8 107 10 6 105 10 410 3 10 2 10099 109.88 110.93 105.43 106.09 107.54 106.19 107.48 106.38 106.70 106.83 106.38 106.10 106.00 106.34 106.20 105.88 106.05 106.05 105.95 105.85 105.67 105.94 106.00 106.00 105.70105.60 105.51 104.58 104.63 104.12 104.08 104.34 104.40 104.33 104.52 104.35 104.56 105.13 105.13 104.76 104.62 105.21 105.21105.21 105.13105.75 105.41 105.75 105.48 UNIT 2 FFE=110.12 2,378 SFUNIT 1 FFE=104.52 1,594 SF UNIT 3 FFE=105.87 2,836 SF UNIT 5 FFE=105.26 1,532 SF UNIT 7 FFE=104.76 1,551 SF UNIT 6 FFE=104.47 1,434 SF UNIT 4 FFE=105.32 1,369 SF 104.43 103.25 < <<< 104.70104.70 102.80 < << 104.50 105.18 104.15 104.50103.69 102.19 101.37 101.76 102.87 102.15 102.83 <<<<<< 103.93 103.90 104.38 102.2097.20 104.34 104.50 104.82 105.80 105.88 105.62 105.74 105.67 > 103.87 105.00 104.83 104.64 105.28 105.16 > 105.30 104.95 104.30 110.92 104.45 FENCE ONLINE FENCE 0.2' N 104.48 105.58 RIM:100.4' INV:97.1'(15") INV:96.5'(18") RIM:101.8' THROAT:100.9' SS GARAGE FFE=106.18 GARAGE FFE=105.87 GARAGE FFE=105.26 GARAGE FFE=104.76 GARAGE FFE=104.47 GARAGE FFE=105.32 GARAGE FFE=106.12 MATCH 99.87 100.00 99.79 101.23 MATCH MATCH 105.51 MATCH 102.88 103.19 105.54 104.57 MATCH MATCH 104.50 107.97 107.85 110.16MATCHMATCH 103.13MATCH 100.16 99.98 101.87 MATCH 48" RIM:99.7' INV:97.4'(15") INV:96.0'(18"IN) INV:91.5'(18"OUT) 105.68 105.23 105.60104.12 104.11 104.25 104.29 110.10 100.14 101.57 99.96 TOC FL TOC FL 110.70 110.58 104.82 106.00 104.78 104.82 105.88 111.00 BOW104.07 95.16 LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS)103.55 104.22 104.40 104.48 104.50 104.50 104.13 104.48 MATCH 107.49MATCH 105.99105.99 106.27 106.82 MATCH 103.71 104.00104.00 103.58103.00 103.33 98.69 98.85 98.54 104.74 104.58 98.48 104.63 104.34 104.30 104.45 104.30 104.90 105.23 104.50 MATCH MATCH 110.05 110.48 110.71 110.58 110.48 109.59 108.21 105.74 <> 105.66105.28 105.75 106.96 105.11 105.23 104.75 105.19 > 104.40 < 103.97 104.43 103.77 104.31 TERRACE TERRACE 102.37 105.65 AREA DRAIN GRATE=104.30 INV=99.78 35 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0%DROP INLET GRATE=103.94 INV=99.30 JUNCTION BOX RIM=104.05 INV=99.14 DROP INLET GRATE=103.94 INV=99.24 AREA DRAIN GRATE=101.90 INV=98.00 34 LF, 12" HDPE @ 3.4% 14 LF, 12" HDPE @ 1.1% 9 LF, 12" HDPE @ 1.1% 53 LF, 12" HDPE @ 1.8% DROP INLET GRATE=105.26 INV=100.23 47 LF, 12" HDPE @ 1.6% 20 LF, 12" HDPE @ 2.4% DOGHOUSE MANHOLE RIM=95.24 INV=92.43 AREA DRAIN GRATE=103.78 INV=99.43 13 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0% AREA DRAIN GRATE=105.59 INV=100.71 AREA DRAIN GRATE=104.64 INV=101.03 32 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0% 36 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0% AREA DRAIN GRATE=103.71 INV=99.28 38 LF, 12" HDPE @ 2.0% AREA DRAIN GRATE=96.90 INV=92.90 73 LF, 12" HDPE @ 7.0% DROP INLET GRATE=105.77 INV=101.00 105.61 105.40 105 10 6 106 107 10 5 104 10 9 11 0 104 104 1021011009998 102101 10099 103 104 104 104 97 96 10 0 101 102 105 10 3 10 4 99 98 10 8 103 103 102 10110099 104 10497103 103 107.10 STAIR FFE=106.54 < EQ U I P . S L A B FF E = 1 0 5 . 7 8 > > BOW AREA DRAIN GRATE=105.14 INV=100.35 12 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0% 105.74 105.74 > 105.28 RD RD RD RD RD RD RD 104.20 104.24BOW 106.07 > 103.87 < 105.23103.88 > TO P O F W A L L EL = 1 1 1 . 5 4 ' TO P O F W A L L EL = 1 1 0 . 8 7 ' TO P O F W A L L EL = 1 0 9 . 5 4 ' TO P O F W A L L EL = 1 0 8 . 2 1 ' TOP OF WALL EL=106.88' 107.00 105 105 105 108.00 109.00 110.00 109.64 105.18 STUB 8" PIPE FOR ROOF DRAIN AND POOL EQUIP. STUB 12" PIPE THROUGH WALL & CAP FOR FUTURE TIE-IN. SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAIL LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) PLANTER BOX TOW 106.90 104 AREA DRAIN GRATE=104.18 INV=98.85 AREA DRAIN GRATE=104.00 INV=98.76 21 LF, 12" HDPE @ 2.0% 4 LF, 12" HDPE @ 2.0% RD RD RD PHASE 2 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 101.69 100.72 100.95 100.84 SHEETC02 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 3/18/26 SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E R Know what's below. before you dig.Call GR A D I N G & D R A I N A G E PL A N SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO ASSURE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM THE REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PREPARATION OF THE SUBGRADE. BUILDING PAD. 23. 24. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE LINEAR DISTANCES BETWEEN CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE QUANTITY OF PIPE NEEDED FOR THE JOB, BASED ON SLOPE LENGTH AND WHOLE STANDARD PIPE SECTIONS. JUNCTION BOX = TOP; THE TOP MOST PART OF THE RIM AND COVER CASTING. CATCH BASIN = THROAT; ELEVATION OF THE POINT AT WHICH WATER PASSES INTO THE BOX. DROP INLET = GRATE; THE TOP MOST PART OF THE FRAME AND GRATE. WEIR INLET = THROAT; ELEVATION OF THE POINT AT WHICH WATER PASSES INTO THE BOX. DEFINITION OF THE TYPE OF TOP IS AS LISTED: THE ELEVATION OF MANHOLE/INLET TOPS ARE TO BE AT THE FINISH ELEVATION SHOWN. THE THE CONTOUR INTERVAL IS ONE FOOT OR AS SHOWN. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT OTHERWISE COVERED BY BUILDINGS OR PAVEMENT SHALL RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND STABILIZED PER THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE TYPE OF PIPE MAY BE ALTERED IF APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS NEEDED, AND EXISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SLOPES STORM PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE DE-WATERED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND THE SPECIFICATIONS. APPROVED MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THE PROPER INSTALLATION OF THE PIPING SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE OWNER GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES STANDARDS UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE PER ASTM C-478/C-913 AND ALDOT STEEPER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE COVERED WITH CURLEX BLANKETS BY AMERICAN EXCELSIOR ALL CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE TO HAVE A MIN. 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH OF 3000 P.S.I. AND ENGINEER HARMLESS FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR DE-WATERING AND BACKFILL LABOR & ALL STRUCTURAL FILL AREAS TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A SOILS ENGINEER. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY GEOCON ENGINEERING & MATERIALS GRADES NOT OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN. ABRUPT CHANGES IN SLOPE SHALL BE WELL ROUNDED. ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINAL GRADE. ALL SILT BARRIERS SHALL BE PLACED AS ACCESS IS OBTAINED DURING CLEARING. NO GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNTIL THE TREE PROTECTION, SAVE AREAS, SILT BARRIER INSTALLATION AND DETENTION FACILITIES ARE CONSTRUCTED. THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT MUST BE DISPLAYED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND IN PLAIN VIEW FROM A PUBLIC ROAD OR STREET. ALL O.S.H.A. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED TO. RCP, CLASS III PER ALDOT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PROPER TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LIGHTS AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE FEDERAL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, ERECT AND MAINTAIN BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT COMPANY OR EQUAL. AND HIGHWAYS, LATEST EDITION. MATERIALS. TESTING, INC. FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.. 17. 18. 19. 20. MAXIMUM CUT OR FILL SLOPE IS 3H:1V CONTRACTOR TO CLEAN OUT ACCUMULATED SILT IN THE STORM SYSTEM AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION WHEN DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. 21. 22. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE ENGINEER RECORD DRAWINGS OF AS-BUILT CONDITIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE. HDPE, ADS N12 PIPE PER SPECIFICATIONS. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 88 DATUM.25. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SURVEYED AS-BUILT OF THE STORM SYSTEM.26. PROPOSEDEXISTING GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN LEGEND STORM SEWER PIPING JUNCTION BOX (JB) CONTOURS SPOT ELEVATION XXX + XXX.XX XXX XXX.XX HIGH POINT HP TYPE "S" 2- WING INLET (DWCB) DROP INLET (DI) WEIR INLET (WI) TYPE "S" 1- WING INLET (SWCB) UNDERDRAIN ROOF DRAIN (8" TYP.) UD RD PVC, SCH. 40 PIPE PER SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES SERVING THE STRUCTURE. UTILITIES ARE TO BE REMOVED 27. TO THE RIGHT OF WAY. Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 3/ 1 8 / 2 6 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE 20231216 1"=10'DRL Va t a n M i x e d Us e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 FIRM NO. 01003C0644M EFFECTIVE DATE APRIL 19, 2019, SHOWS THE PROPERTY TO BE SITUATED IN ZONE X UNSHADED. NOTES: CIVIL PLANS NOT TO BE USED FOR BUILDING LAYOUT. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING LAYOUT. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS AS SHOWN HEREIN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL / STRUCTURAL PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CIVIL ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. PRIOR TO INSTALLING SIDEWALKS ALONG CHURCH STREET AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A PRE-INSTALLATION MEETING WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, THE ARBORIST, AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING IS TO REVIEW THE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ADA AND TO EXAMINE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE SIDEWALK WITH THE TREE ROOT MOUNDS. IF THERE ARE ROOTS THAT INTERFERE WITH THE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS, A TREE WELL, CURB OR SIDEWALK MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. CURB FLOW LINE FL TOP OF CURB TOC TOP OF WALL TOW BOTTOM OF WALL BOW RE - I S S U E E N T I R E S H E E T 6/ 5 / 2 0 2 5 TOP OF FOUNDATION WALLS OF ALL BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 0.50' ABOVE EXTERIOR FINISHED GRADE, EXCEPT AT ENTRANCES. GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM FOUNDATION TO 28. PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. ROOF DRAIN STUBS SHALL BE PVC OR HDPE AT 1.0 % MINIMUM SLOPE TO STORM SEWER.29. ENDS OF STUBS SHALL BE CAPPED FOR FUTURE CONNECTION BY BUILDING CONTRACTOR. XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXX 36" LIVE OAK 48" LIVE OAK 30" LIVE OAK 26" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING LO T 3 RE P L A T O F L O T 1 W O O D C H U R C H SU B D I V I S I O N (S L I D E 2 4 6 2 - A ) FS T A N D 4 1 2 F A I R H O P E L L C IN S T R U M E N T N O . 1 9 7 7 3 9 8 15"RCP15"RCP 18 " R C P EDGE OF PAVEMENT 15 " C M P 11 1 11 010 910 8 10 710 6 10 510 4 10 3 100 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 96 97 98 99 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 4 10 5 11 0 109 10 8 107 10 6 105 10 410 3 10 2 10099 UNIT 2 FFE=110.12 2,378 SFUNIT 1 FFE=104.52 1,594 SF UNIT 3 FFE=105.87 2,836 SF UNIT 5 FFE=105.26 1,532 SF UNIT 7 FFE=104.76 1,551 SF UNIT 6 FFE=104.47 1,434 SF UNIT 4 FFE=105.32 1,369 SF < <<< < << <<<<<< > > FENCE ONLINE FENCE 0.2' N GARAGE FFE=106.18 GARAGE FFE=105.87 GARAGE FFE=105.26 GARAGE FFE=104.76 GARAGE FFE=104.47 GARAGE FFE=105.32 GARAGE FFE=106.12 X X X 48" LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) <> > < TERRACE TERRACE 105 10 6 106 107 10 5 104 10 9 11 0 104 104 1021011009998 102101 10099 103 104 104 104 97 96 10 0 101 102 105 10 3 10 4 99 98 10 8 103 103 102 10110099 104 10497103 103 XXXXXXXXXXXX XXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X STAIR FFE=106.54 < EQ U I P . S L A B FF E = 1 0 5 . 7 8 > > > > < > 105 105 105 LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) 104 X PHASE 2 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 X X X X X X X X X X X XXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X FIP FIP FIP FIP FIP FIP CIP SB FIP SB W W W W W W W TSMU PS W W W W TSMU PS TSMU PS TSMU PS TSMU PS TS MU PS TS MU PS TS MU CIP FIP W W FIP W W W TS MU PS TS MU PS W W W W W CEP TSMU PS TSMU PS TSMU PS TSMU PS TSMU PS TSMU PS FIP TS MU TS MU PS SB FIP FIP SB SHEETC03 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 3/18/26 SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E R Know what's below. before you dig.Call ER O S I O N & S E D I M E N T CO N T R O L P L A N 1. 2. 3. 4. EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND WATER CONSERVATION COMMITTEE OFFICER, AND THE FEDERAL E.P.A. GUIDELINES FOR THE NPDES PROGRAM. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PER THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER, SOIL5. ABSOLUTELY NO SEDIMENT SHALL BE PERMITTED TO LEAVE THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.6. IF HEAVY RAINS OR UNUSUAL SITE CONDITIONS RESULT IN THE POLLUTION OF ROADWAYS OR ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY AND PERMANENTLY SEEDED WITH "SOUTH" ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING OFFICIALS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GRADING CONTRACTOR TO BE INTIMATE WITH THE LOCAL EROSION CONTROL LAWS AND TO REFLECT THIS KNOWLEDGE IN HIS/HER ACTIONS AND 7. 8. FOR EROSION CONTROL, SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ON ALL VEGETATION SHALL BE PLANTED AND MAINTAINED PER THE ALABAMA HANDBOOK IMMEDIATELY AND RESTORE THE AREAS TO THE ORIGINAL CONDITION WITHIN 24 HOURS. ADJACENT PARCELS THEN THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN THE DISTURBED AREAS TYPE SEEDINGS PER THE ALABAMA HANDBOOK. THE ESCAPE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE SHALL BE PREVENTED BY THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES PRIOR TO, OR CONCURRENT WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 11. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CHECKED DAILY AND ANY DEFICIENCIES NOTED WILL BE CORRECTED BY THE END OF EACH DAY. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSTALLED IF DEEMED NECESSARY AFTER ON-SITE INSPECTION THE EXISTING SITE IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. ALL SILT BARRIERS SHALL BE PLACED AS ACCESS IS OBTAINED DURING CLEARING. NO GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNTIL THE SEDIMENT BARRIERS HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER PERMANENT GRASSING IS IN PLACE AND ESTABLISHED. THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT PAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH STONE, AS CONDITIONS DEMAND, AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEAN OUT OF ANY STRUCTURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL MATERIALS SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR DISTURBED AREAS LEFT IDLE FOR TEN DAYS OR LONGER ARE TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED. SEDIMENT / EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE CHECKED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. EACH DEVICE IS TO BE MAINTAINED OR REPLACED IF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION HAS REACHED 1/3 OF THE CAPACITY OF THE DEVICE. CONTACT DAVID KING, QCI 251-990-6566. AREA TO BE DISTURBED = 0.51 ACRES MAINTENANCE OF ALL SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES AND PRACTICES, WHETHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT, SHALL BE AT ALL TIMES THE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND URBAN AREAS (ALABAMA HANDBOOK). QUOTATIONS. REFERENCE THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL FEATURES AND GENERAL CONSTRUCTION. 9. 10. BY THE GOVERNING OFFICIAL OR ENGINEER OF RECORD. 12. 13. TRACKED FROM VEHICLE OR SITE ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 14. 15. 16. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER'S CONTRACTOR. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT THE LOSS OF SEDIMENT DUE TO WIND VIA WATERING18. DRY SOILS. CAUTION SHOULD BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THE SITE IS NOT OVER WATERED. 19. THE SITE IS TO BE CLEARED AND GRADED AS TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF SOIL EXPOSED 20. AT ONE TIME. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. IF FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPROVED PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR EFFECTIVE EROSION CONTROL, ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED TO CONTROL OR TREAT THE SEDIMENT SOURCE. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING DOWNSTREAM CONDITIONS THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD AND CLEARING ANY DEBRIS AND SEDIMENT CAUSED BY 21. CONSTRUCTION. BMP'S SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER THE ALABAMA HANDBOOK STANDARDS.22. BMP'S SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH MINIMAL CLEARING ACTIVITY.23. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURES.24. 1. 2. 3. REMOVE VEGETATION ONLY IN AREAS OF THE PERIMETER SEDIMENT BARRIERS, INSTALL THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT PER DETAILS. INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT BARRIERS PER DETAILS. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE - PHASE 1 4. 5. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING PER TREE PROTECTION ORDINANCE. 4. ESTABLISH VEGETATION ON AREAS NOT IMPACTED BY PAVING OPERATIONS. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE - PHASE 2 PERFORM CLEARING & ROUGH GRADING ON THE LOT AND ESTABLISH COVER ON1. INSTALL STORM SYSTEM AND UTILITIES. AREAS WHEN BROUGHT TO GRADE. 2. AND CONSTRUCTION EXIT. INSTALL CURBING AND STONE BASE. 3. 6.ONCE INSPECTION IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED, CLEARING & SITE WORK CAN BEGIN (PHASE 2). REQUEST BMP & TREE PROTECTION INSPECTION PRIOR TO CLEARING. 1. 2.CALL FOR AN INSPECTION FROM THE QCP. ONCE THE QCP HAS CERTIFIED THAT ALL AREAS ARE STABILIZED, REMOVE BMPS AND TREE PROTECTION. STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY BMP AND TREE PROTECTION REMOVAL. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE - PHASE 3 3. INSTALL PAVING AND FINAL LANDSCAPING. 4. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES MUST BE SURFACE ROUGHENED AND VEGETATED WITHIN 7 DAYS25. OF THEIR CONSTRUCTION. ALL FILL SLOPES HAVE SILT FENCE AT THE TOE OF SLOPES. 26. EXISTING TREES, TO BE SAVED, SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.27. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN IN ALL GRADING ACTIVITIES TO REMAIN OUTSIDE THE DRIP LINES OF EXISTING TREES. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING TO BE INSPECTED DAILY AND REPLACED OR REPAIRED AS NEEDED. TREE PROTECTION DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO ANY CLEARING,28. GRUBBING, OR GRADING. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAN OUT ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT IN THE DETENTION POND AT THE END29. OF CONSTRUCTION WHEN DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. SEDIMENT STORAGE INDICATORS MUST BE INSTALLED IN SEDIMENT STORAGE STRUCTURES, 30. INDICATING THE 1/3 FULL VOLUME. ALL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3H:1V MUST BE MATTED AND STAKED WITH AMERICAN 31. EXCELSIOR JUTE MAT. Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 PRACTICE FIP SB CODE CEP MU TS PS CIP W 3/ 1 8 / 2 6 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE 20231216 1"=10'DRL Va t a n M i x e d Us e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 USDA SOIL SURVEY CLASSIFICATIONS EuC - WADLEY LOAMY FINE SAND, 5 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPES - HSG A 5. CONSTRUCT BUILDINGS EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES RE - I S S U E S H E E T - R E V . F O R R E T A I N I N G W A L L 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 5 LA N D S C A P E D A M E N I T Y A R E A 3/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 6 XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXX 36" LIVE OAK 48" LIVE OAK 30" LIVE OAK 26" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS MAGNOLIA AVENUE 66 FT. R/W (PUBLIC) CH U R C H S T R E E T 6 6 F T . R / W ( P U B L I C ) EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING LOT A2 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND TURNER INSTRUMENT NO. 1807835 COMMON AREA 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) LOT B 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND SOSNOWCHIK INSTRUMENT NO. 1805011 STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) LO T 3 RE P L A T O F L O T 1 W O O D C H U R C H SU B D I V I S I O N (S L I D E 2 4 6 2 - A ) FS T A N D 4 1 2 F A I R H O P E L L C IN S T R U M E N T N O . 1 9 7 7 3 9 8 RIM:101.2' INV:98.1' OHP OHP 15"RCP15"RCP 18 " R C P 18"RCP G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W GGG W EDGE OF PAVEMENT 15 " C M P G G G G G G G G G G G G G G OHP OHP 11 1 11 010 910 8 10 710 6 10 510 4 10 3 102 101 100 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 96 97 98 99 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 4 10 5 11 0 109 10 8 107 10 6 105 10 410 3 10 2 10099 UNIT 2 FFE=110.12 2,378 SFUNIT 1 FFE=104.52 1,594 SF UNIT 3 FFE=105.87 2,836 SF UNIT 5 FFE=105.26 1,532 SF UNIT 7 FFE=104.76 1,551 SF UNIT 6 FFE=104.47 1,434 SF UNIT 4 FFE=105.32 1,369 SF FENCE ONLINE FENCE 0.2' N RIM:100.4' INV:97.1'(15") INV:96.5'(18") RIM:101.8' THROAT:100.9' RIM:95.6' INV:89.6' RIM:101.3' INV:93.0' RIM:101.47' INV:94.9' RIM:103.7' INV:97.3' SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSS SSSS SS SS SS SS GARAGE FFE=106.18 GARAGE FFE=105.87 GARAGE FFE=105.26 GARAGE FFE=104.76 GARAGE FFE=104.47 GARAGE FFE=105.32 GARAGE FFE=106.12 48" RIM:99.7' INV:97.4'(15") INV:96.0'(18"IN) INV:91.5'(18"OUT) W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WW W W W W W W W W W W W F F F F F F F F F F F FF W W W W W W W W F F LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) FF FF SS TERRACE TERRACE 105 10 6 106 107 10 5 104 10 9 11 0 104 104 1021011009998 102101 10099 103 104 104 104 97 96 10 0 101 102 105 10 3 10 4 99 98 10 8 103 103 102 10110099 104 10497103 103 PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION RESIDENTIAL TRASH RESIDENTIAL TRASH COMMERCIAL TRASH W/ SCREENING PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS RESIDENTIAL TRASH RESIDENTIAL TRASH RESIDENTIAL TRASH RESIDENTIAL TRASH RESIDENTIAL TRASH COMMERCIAL TRASH W/ SCREENING PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS CONNECT TO EXISTING CLEAN OUT MANIFOLD FOR FOUR (4) - 1" RESIDENTIAL & ONE (1) - 1.5" COMMERCIAL WATER METERS MANIFOLD FOR THREE (3) - 1" RESIDENTIAL & ONE (1) - 1.5" COMMERCIAL WATER METERS 6" WATER SERVICE CONSOLIDATED PIPE & SUPPLY TO TAP EXISTING WATER MAIN & INSTALL VALVES PER FPU SPECIFICATIONS 6" D.I. WATER SERVICE 6" M.J. GATE VALVES (2) W/ MEGALUGS 6" FIRE SERVICE PER FPU SPECIFICATIONS 6" D.I. FIRE SERVICE 25 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 13 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 16 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 19 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 10 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 23 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN.19 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 9 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 53 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 21 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN.25 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 9 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 9 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 4 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 33 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 1 12" WATER SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1 12" WATER SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE STAIR FFE=106.54 EQ U I P . S L A B FF E = 1 0 5 . 7 8 105 105 105 LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) 104 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 15 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 5 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. T T PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O.C.O. C.O.C.O. C.O. C.O. E G E GE G EGGE E G EG GA S W / H GA S W / H C.O. C.O. C.O. W RELOCATE VALVE AND FIRE HYDRANT OUTSIDE PROPOSED SIDEWALK. SHEETC04 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 3/18/26 SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E R Know what's below. before you dig.Call UT I L I T Y P L A N THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE ALL O.S.H.A. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED TO. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PROPER TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LIGHTS AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE FEDERAL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, ERECT AND MAINTAIN BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT AND HIGHWAYS, LATEST EDITION. 9. 10. 11. 12. THE GAS SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO THE METER BY THE LOCAL GAS UTILITY. REFER TO THE MECHANICAL/PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE METER LOCATION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL SECONDARY WIRING AND CONDUIT FROM THE PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER TO THE LOCATION OF THE METERS. REFER TO THE 14. UTILITY NOTES COMPLIANCE OF ALL SYSTEMS WITH THESE CODES. INTIMATE WITH THE LOCAL CODES AND REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ALL NEW UTILITY SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILS, AND VALVES, FITTINGS AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FPU SPECIFICATIONS. OF FAIRHOPE PUBLIC UTILITIES (FPU) PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. ALL PIPING, CONTRACTOR AND CERTIFIED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED PLUMBING THE SANITARY SEWER LINE SHALL BE TESTED FOR INFILTRATION/EXFILTRATION IN CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SURVEYED AS-BUILT OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS AS INSTALLED PRIOR TO REQUESTING A PUNCH LIST. REQUIREMENTS OF FPU AND OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE ACCORDANCE WITH FPU STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. ALL PVC PIPE SHALL BE MARKED USING DETECTABLE UNDERGROUND UTILITY MARKER TAPE TAPE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5 MILS THICK AND 3 INCHES IN WIDTH. MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH SHALL BE 35 POUNDS AND TAPE SHALL ELONGATE NOT LESS THAN 80 PERCENT ALL PVC PIPE INSTALLATIONS REQUIRE THAT METALIZED MARKER TAPE BE BURIED IN THE BACKFILL APPROXIMATELY 12 INCHES ABOVE THE PIPE. THE TAPE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO FITTINGS, VALVES, HYDRANTS, ETC. TO PROVIDE A LOCATION ABOVE GROUND TO TRANSMIT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. BEFORE BREAKING. TAPE SHALL BE PERMANENTLY IMPRINTED WITH AN APPROPRIATE LEGEND TO IDENTIFY THE CONTENTS OF THE PIPE. THE SIGNAL TO THE TAPE WITHOUT HAVING TO DIG DOWN TO THE PIPE. PRIOR TO BACKFILLING AND TESTING. THRUST BLOCKING AND PIPE RESTRAINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA-24. THESE RESTRAINTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND FPU WATER MAINS UNDER 4" SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D2241. PIPE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM PRESSURE RATING OF 200 PSI, SDR 21 OR HEAVIER. WATER MAINS 4"-12" SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C900, SDR 18 OR HEAVIER. 7. 8. THE PROPOSED WATER MAIN SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED, CLEANED, AND DISINFECTED WITH THE NEW PIPING SYSTEM TO THE MAIN SYSTEM. WATER MAINS TO BE INSTALLED AND 15. TESTED PER AWWA STANDARDS. LEAKAGE TEST PERFORMED AT 200PSI FOR MINIMUM OF 2 HOURS. DRILL AND CORE THE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE(S) FOR THE NEW SERVICE LEADERS. 16. ALL LEADERS TAPPED INTO MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A RUBBER KOR-N-SEAL WATERTIGHT CONNECTION. Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 3/ 1 8 / 2 6 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE 20231216 1"=10'DRL Va t a n M i x e d Us e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 POST INDICATOR VALVE VALVE WATER METER EXISTING SS G FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY MANHOLE WATER SANITARY SEWER THRUST BLOCK UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GAS UGE PROPOSED G OHP OVERHEAD POWER UGE OHP WW SS CLEAN OUT WW C.O. UTILITY PLAN LEGEND SS GAS METER (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ELECTRIC METER (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) G E ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THE METER LOCATION. VERIFY EXACT WATER, SEWER, AND FIRE CONNECTIONS FOR ALL BUILDINGS WITH ARCHITECT.17. ALL FIRE SERIVICES SHALL HAVE BACK FLOW PREVENTERS ON RISERS. SEE ARCHITECTURAL 18. PLANS FOR DETAILS. AD D V A L V E S O N W A T E R / F I R E L A T E R A L S 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 5 XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 36" LIVE OAK 48" LIVE OAK 30" LIVE OAK 26" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK MAGNOLIA AVENUE 66 FT. R/W (PUBLIC) CH U R C H S T R E E T 6 6 F T . R / W ( P U B L I C ) EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND TURNER INSTRUMENT NO. 1807835 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND SOSNOWCHIK INSTRUMENT NO. 1805011 LO T 3 RE P L A T O F L O T 1 W O O D C H U R C H SU B D I V I S I O N (S L I D E 2 4 6 2 - A ) FS T A N D 4 1 2 F A I R H O P E L L C IN S T R U M E N T N O . 1 9 7 7 3 9 8 EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNIT 2 FFE=110.12 2,378 SFUNIT 1 FFE=104.52 1,594 SF UNIT 3 FFE=105.87 2,836 SF UNIT 5 FFE=105.26 1,532 SF UNIT 7 FFE=104.76 1,551 SF UNIT 6 FFE=104.47 1,434 SF UNIT 4 FFE=105.32 1,369 SF GARAGE FFE=106.18 GARAGE FFE=105.87 GARAGE FFE=105.26 GARAGE FFE=104.76 GARAGE FFE=104.47 GARAGE FFE=105.32 GARAGE FFE=106.12 48" LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) TERRACE TERRACE STAIR FFE=106.54 EQ U I P . S L A B FF E = 1 0 5 . 7 8 LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) SHEETC05 20231216 DRL DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 3/18/26 1" = 10' SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E R Know what's below. before you dig.Call Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 3/ 1 8 / 2 6 NOTE: PRIOR TO INSTALLING SIDEWALKS ALONG CHURCH STREET AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A PRE-INSTALLATION MEETING WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, THE ARBORIST, AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING IS TO REVIEW THE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ADA AND TO EXAMINE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE SIDEWALK WITH THE TREE ROOT MOUNDS. IF THERE ARE ROOTS THAT INTERFERE WITH THE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS, A TREE WELL, CURB OR SIDEWALK MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE - 2% MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS ACCESSIBLE ROUTE - 5% MAX RUNNING SLOPE & 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE - RAMP PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PEDESTRIAN ROUTE NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SLOPES PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE AND/OR PAVING TO ENSURE THE MAXIMUM SLOPES INDICATED ON THIS DRAWING ARE NOT EXCEEDED. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES. 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE Va t a n M i x e d Us e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 PE D E S T R I A N C I R C U L A T I O N P L A N AM E N I T Y A R E A P A T H 3/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 6 SHEETC06 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E CO N S T R U C T I O N D E T A I L S R Know what's below. before you dig.Call Va t a n Mi x e d U s e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 20231216 DRL 2/23/26 N.T.S. NOTE: CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN ALL POURS SEPARATED BY MORE THAN 30 MINUTES TIME. PLACE LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT AT CENTERLINE OF ROADWAYS WHEN PAVEMENT IS WIDER THAN 12'. TWELVE FEET (12') SPACING BETWEEN CONTRACTION JOINTS OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. FILL JOINTS TO WITHIN 1/8" OF SURFACE WITH A SELF-LEVELING JOINT SEALANT. 1. 2. 3. 4. t t/4 1/4" BROOM FINISH (TYP.) 1. 2 5 t 5' THICKEN EDGE WHERE- EVER EDGE IS SUBJECT 3/8" PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT FILLER ADJACENT TO ALL STRUCTURES OR OTHER CONCRETE. t SAWN CONTRACTION JOINT ISOLATION JOINT TO WHEEL LOADS. JOINTING AT STRUCTURES STRUCTURE OR CASTING 5.WHEN A JOINT FALLS WITHIN 5' OF A MANHOLE, LIGHT POLE BASE, OR OTHER STRUCTURE, SHORTEN ONE OR MORE PANELS ON EITHER SIDE OF STRUCTURE TO ALLOW CONTROL JOINTS TO FALL AT STRUCTURE. LONGITUDINAL JOINT TRANSVERSE JOINT ISOLATION JOINT SEE NOTE 5. AND SEAL DOWELED JOINT 1/4"1" t SAWCUT TIED LONGITUDINAL JOINT TIE BAR #5 X 36"@ 24" O.C. t/ 2 t/ 2 ONE SIDE @ 12" O.C. 14" LENGTH, LIGHTLY GREASE SMOOTH DOWEL, 3/4" DIA., SCALE: NTS CONCRETE PAVEMENT JOINTS DETAILS 6.CONCRETE PAVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, JOINTED, REINFORCED, AND FINISHED TO MEET ACI 330 AND PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION (PCA) GUIDELINES. 1/4"1" AND SEALSAWCUT 1ST POUR2ND CONSTRUCTION JOINT SEALANTRESERVOIRAND SEAL POUR HALF ROUND KEY JOINT .2t AND SEALSAWCUT NOTE: SEE DETAIL FOR JOINTS 6" - ALDOT SECTION 825 CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL SCALE: NTS CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL 24" COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL(TOP 6" COMPACTED TO100% STANDARD DENSITY) TYPICAL SIDEWALK DETAIL ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 4" THICK CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED AT 5'-0" FOR SIDEWALKS 5' WIDE AND FOR SIDEWALKS 5' TO 8' WIDE, SPACING OF CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE EQUAL FOR SIDEWALKS OVER 8' WIDE, SPACE CONTRACTION JOINTS AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE 1" DEEP AND EDGED WITH 1/8" RADIUS. PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION MATERIAL WHERE SIDEWALK ABUTS CONCRETE A LAYER OF #15 FELT IS REQUIRED BETWEEN WALK AND ADJACENT 50' MAX. SPACING BETWEEN EXP. JOINTS CONTRACTION JOINTS LESS. TO WIDTH. STRUCTURE. PARALLELING CONCRETE CURB. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. SCALE: NTS NOTES: CU R B O R P A V E M E N T 1. 2. 1/4" EXP. JOINT BUILDING PAD 12" SEE NOTE #6 3'-0" 4" 1/4" EXP. JOINT 1/2" EXP. JOINT 9. WWF SHALL BE UTILIZED TO REINFORCE THE SIDEWALKS. CONCRETE. FOR SIDEWALKS 10' OR GREATER OR WHEN SIDEWALKS ABUT PARKING WHERE THERE IS NOT A CURB, THICKEN WALK TO 12" IN 3'. 8" VARIES 4" 4" TROWELED EDGE FINISH LIGHT BROOM FINISH SIDEWALK FINISH 6"PAVEMENT COMPACTED BASE SUBGRADE THICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK W/ THICKENED EDGE FRONT ELEVATION SECTION THRU RAMP 6'-0" HANDICAP RAMP NOTE: CEMENT CONCRETE RAMPS TO BE TEXTURED WITH A STIFF BROOM FINISH. SCALE: NTS GUTTER TOP CURB 6' 4" 6"1.5' 4'-0"6'-0" 2" 5" PLAN 6' NOTES FOR RAMPS: FLOATS AND STIFF BRISTLE BROOMS. CONCRETE TO BE PLACED 4" THICK AND FINISHED WITH TAMPS, WOOD 1/2 " EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED WHERE SIDEWALKS TIE IN TO A STRUCTURE OR TERMINATE AT CURB, RAMPS OR DRIVEWAYS. 2. 1. DETECTABLE WARNING TO BE PLACED PER ADA REQUIREMENTS.3. 2/ 2 3 / 2 6 Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 LIMIT OF PAYMENT TRENCH WIDTHS AND PAVING CUT- BACKS 4 6 8 10 12 14 15 16 18 20 24 30 36 42 48 40 42 44 46 48 50 51 52 54 56 60 66 72 78 84 NOMINAL PIPE DIAMETER (INCHES) TRENCH WIDTH (INCHES) TRENCH WIDTH NOTES: THE JAGGED EDGES OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT ALONG THE TRENCH CUT SHALL BE SQUARED AND CUT TO A NEAT LINE WITH AN APPROPRIATE SAW ALONG STRAIGHT LINES PARALLEL TO THE CENTER OF THE PAVEMENT CUT. PAVING CUT- BACK PAVING CUT- BACKVERTICAL SIDE WALLS PROPERLY SHEATHED AND BRACED DIA. OF PIPE SCALE: NTS ALL STRIPING MUST BE REPLACED WITH THERMOPLASTIC. 12" RIBBON CURB COMPACTED BASE NOTE: 1. PROVIDE #6 X 18" LONG, SMOOTH DOWELS AT ALL EXPANSION JOINTS. 2. 3/4" EXPANSION JOINTS WITH BITUMINOUS SEALANT AT 30 FEET INTERVALS SCALE: NTS AND AT ALL RADII AND AT DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. 3. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI. 4. LIGHT BROOM FINISH ON ALL SURFACES, ALL RADII TO BE TRUE ARCS. 5. PROVIDE (2) #4 BARS, 10' LONG, CENTERED OVER ALL TRENCH CROSSINGS. 6. PROVIDE (2) #6 X 2.5' LONG BARS TO CONNECT EXISTING AND NEW CURBS. 7. GUTTER SHALL PITCH AS REQUIRED TO CONVEY DRAINAGE. ADJACENT PAVING 12" 6" COMPACTED BASE NOTE: 1. PROVIDE #6 X 18" LONG, SMOOTH DOWELS AT ALL EXPANSION JOINTS. 2. 3/4" EXPANSION JOINTS WITH BITUMINOUS SEALANT AT INTERVALS PER ACI SCALE: NTS 24" CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL PROVIDE 1% MIN. PITCH PER DRAINAGE CONDITIONS RECOMMENDATIONS, AT ALL RADII AND AT DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. 3. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI. 4. LIGHT BROOM FINISH ON ALL SURFACES, ALL RADII TO BE TRUE ARCS. 5. PROVIDE (2) #4 BARS, 10' LONG, CENTERED OVER ALL TRENCH CROSSINGS. 6. PROVIDE (2) #6 X 2.5' LONG BARS TO CONNECT EXISTING AND NEW CURBS. 7. GUTTER SHALL PITCH AS REQUIRED TO CONVEY DRAINAGE. ADJACENT PAVING 24" 18"6" 6" 12 " 6" 1" R 1" R 6" - 3,000 PSI CONCRETE (MIN. 350 PSI FLEXURAL STRENGTH) WELDED WIREMESH (TYP.)2" ABOVESUBGRADE (100% STANDARD DENSITY)REPLACEMENT PAVEMENT EXISTING ASPHALT TACK COAT CUT EXISTING ASPHALT BACK 5' AND REPLACE WITH NEW ASPHALT NEW ASPHALT SCALE: NTS PAVEMENT JOINT DETAIL 6" - ALDOT SECTION 825 CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL SCALE: NTS BRICK PAVER BUILD-UP DETAIL 24" COMPACTED STRUCTURAL FILL(TOP 6" COMPACTED TO100% STANDARD DENSITY) BRICK PAVERS (100% MODIFIED DENSITY) 1" SAND SETTING BED TENSAR TX-130 GEOGRID NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PERFORMED BY GEOCON FOR ADDITIONAL SOILS & COMPACTION INFORMATION. ALL CONCRETE MATERIAL AND PAVING OPERATIONS SHOULD MEET APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE AND ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO REFERENCE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PERFORMED BY GEOCON FOR ADDITIONAL SOILS & COMPACTION INFORMATION. ALL CONCRETE MATERIAL AND PAVING OPERATIONS SHOULD MEET APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE AND ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. SHEETC07 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E CO N S T R U C T I O N D E T A I L S R Know what's below. before you dig.Call 20231216 DRL 2/23/26 N.T.S. Va t a n Mi x e d U s e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 HDPE PIPE BEDDING DETAIL SCALE: NTS MIN. TRENCH WIDTH (SEE TABLE) 4" FOR 12"-24" PIPE 6" FOR 30"-60" PIPE 6" MIN. COVER TO RIGID PAVEMENT, H MIN. COVER TO FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT, H SPRINGLINE FINAL BACKFILL INITIAL BACKFILL HAUNCH BEDDING SUITABLE FOUNDATION NOTES: 1. ALL PIPE SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPE FOR SEWERS AND OTHER GRAVITY FLOW APPLICATIONS", LATEST ADDITION 2. MEASURES SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF NATIVE FINES INTO BACKFILL MATERIAL, WHEN REQUIRED. 3. FOUNDATION: WHERE THE TRENCH BOTTOM IS UNSTABLE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE TO A DEPTH REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER AND REPLACE WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. AS AN ALTERNATIVE AND AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER, THE TRENCH BOTTOM MAY BE STABILIZED USING A GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL. 4. BEDDING: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I OR II. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TO ENGINEER. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY THE ENGINEER, MINIMUM BEDDING THICKNESS SHALL BE 4" (100mm) FOR 4"-24" (100mm-600mm); 6" (150mm) FOR 30"-60" (750mm-900mm). 5. INITIAL BACKFILL: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I OR II IN THE PIPE ZONE EXTENDING NOT LESS THAN 6" ABOVE CROWN OF PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TO ENGINEER. MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION. 6. MINIMUM COVER: MINIMUM COVER, H, IN NON-TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS (GRASS OR LANDSCAPE AREAS) IS 12" FROM THE TOP OF PIPE TO GROUND SURFACE. ADDITIONAL COVER MAY BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT FLOTATION. FOR TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS, MINIMUM COVER, H, IS 12" UP TO 48" DIAMETER PIPE AND 24" OF COVER FOR 54"-60" DIAMETER PIPE, MEASURED FROM TOP OF PIPE TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR TO TOP OF RIGID PAVEMENT. 18" 15" 12" 39" 34" 30" PIPE DIAM.MIN. TRENCH WIDTH 8" 10" 6" 4" 26" 28" 23" 21" RECOMMENDED MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTHS 30" 24" 56" 48" 42" 36" 60" 48" 72" 64" 96" 80" 2'-0" JUNCTION BOX FRAME AND COVER 24"Ø HEAVY DUTY COVER NOTE: BOX SIZE SHALL BE ADEQUATE TO ACCOMMODATE SIZES AND ANGLES OF ENTRY OF ALL PIPES ENTERING STRUCTURE WITH A MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS OF 6" BETWEEN PIPES. SCALE: NTS JUNCTION BOX (JB) DETAIL TO CREATE A WATER TIGHT SEAL PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTION CONFORMING TO LATEST REVISION OF ASTM C913 REINFORCED CONCRETE COLLARS AS NEEDED FLEXIBLE JOINT SEALANT - TO FILL AT LEAST 75% OF JOINT CAVITY SET FRAME IN FULL BED OF MORTAR 6"3'-0" MIN. 8"MIN REINFORCED TO MEET H-20 LOADING OUTSIDE OF PIPE +2" CLEARANCE MIN. 0.14 SQ. IN. STEEL PER VERTICAL FOOT, PLACED ACCORDING TO ASTM C913SPECIFICATIONS STEPS ON ALL STRUCTURES OVER FOUR FEET TALL REFER TO SPECS 3" CLEAR MORTAR ALL JOINTS IMPRINTED WITH "STORM" AGGREGATE FOUNDATION 6" COMPACTED GRADED 18" MIN. 18" MIN. JOINT OVERLAP 1/3 CIRCUMFERENCE 18"18" MIN.MIN. PIPE SECTION ISOMETRIC VIEW FILTER FABRIC FILTER FABRIC STORM PIPE JACKET OF THE PIPE 2/ 2 3 / 2 6 Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 VARIES SEE GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 24" 6" PROFILE NOTES: 1. 24" PVC DROP INLET TO BY NYLOPLAST OR EQUAL. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. THE FRAME SHALL BE STAMPED WITH "NO DUMPING DRAINS TO RIVER" OR EQUAL 2. THE DROP INLET GRATE SHALL BE 24" H-10 PEDESTRIAN GRATE (ROUND). PVC DRAIN SCALE: NTS AREA DRAIN (AD) DETAIL 2'-0" NOTE: BOX SIZE SHALL BE ADEQUATE TO ACCOMMODATE SIZES AND ANGLES OF ENTRY OF ALL PIPES ENTERING STRUCTURE WITH A MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS OF 6" BETWEEN PIPES. SCALE: NTS DROP INLET (DI) DETAIL DROP INLET FRAME AND GRATE 24"X24" GRATE W/ 1.25" X 4.5" OPENINGS TO CREATE A WATER TIGHT SEAL PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTION CONFORMING TO LATEST REVISION OF ASTM C913 FLEXIBLE JOINT SEALANT - TO FILL AT LEAST 75% OF JOINT CAVITY 6"3'-0" MIN 8"MIN REINFORCED TO MEET H-20 LOADING OUTSIDE OF PIPE +2" CLEARANCE MIN. 0.14 SQ. IN. STEEL PER VERTICAL FOOT, PLACED ACCORDING TO ASTM C913SPECIFICATIONS STEPS ON ALL STRUCTURES OVER FOUR FEET TALL REFER TO SPECS 3" CLEAR MORTAR ALL JOINTS HEAVY DUTY AGGREGATE FOUNDATION 6" COMPACTED GRADED NOTE 1: CLEARANCE BETWEEN PIPE AND TRENCH WALL SHALL BE ADEQUATE TO SEE NOTE 1 EXCAVATION LINE BEDDING H Di ENABLE SPECIFIED COMPACTION BUT NOT LESS THAN Do/6 MIDDLE BEDDING LOOSELY PLACED UNCOMPACTED BEDDING EXCEPT FOR TYPE 4 Do/3 FOUDATION Do OVERFILL OR BACKFILLSW, ML, OR CL HAUNCH LOWER SIDE Do (MIN.) OUTER BEDDING MATERIAL AND COMPACTION EACH SIDE, SAME REQUIREMENTS AS HAUNCH Do/6 (MIN.) BEDDING H Di MIDDLE BEDDING LOOSELY PLACED UNCOMPACTED BEDDING EXCEPT FOR TYPE 4 Do/3 FOUDATION Do OVERFILLSW, ML, OR CL HAUNCH LOWER SIDE Do (MIN.) OUTER BEDDING MATERIAL AND COMPACTION EACH SIDE, SAME REQUIREMENTS AS HAUNCH EMBANKMENT INSTALLATIONTRENCH INSTALLATION TYPE 1 Do/24 MINIMUM; NOT LESS THAN 3". IF ROCK FOUNDATION, USE Do/12 MINIMUM; NOT LESS THAN 6". 95% CATEGORY I 90% CATEGORY I, 95% CATEGORY II, OR 100% CATEGORY III UNDISTURBED NATURAL SOIL WITH FIRMNESS EQUIVALENT TO THE FOLLOWING PLACED SOILS: 90% CATEGORY I, 95% CATEGORY II, 100% CATEGORY III, OR EMBANKMENT TO THE SAME REQUIREMENTS. INSTALLATION TYPE BEDDING THICKNESS HAUNCH AND OUTER BEDDING TRENCH INSTALLATION LOWER SIDE EMBANKMENT INSTALLATION LOWER SIDE TYPE 2 Do/24 MINIMUM; NOT LESS THAN 3". IF ROCK FOUNDATION, USE Do/12 MINIMUM; NOT LESS THAN 6". 90% CATEGORY I, OR 85% CATEGORY I, 90% CATEGORY II, OR 95% CATEGORY III UNDISTURBED NATURAL SOIL WITH FIRMNESS EQUIVALENT TO THE FOLLOWING PLACED SOILS: 85% CATEGORY I, 90% CATEGORY II, 95% CATEGORY III, OR EMBANKMENT TO THE SAME REQUIREMENTS. 95% CATEGORY II TYPE 3 Do/24 MINIMUM; NOT LESS THAN 3". IF ROCK FOUNDATION, USE Do/12 MINIMUM; NOT LESS THAN 6". 85% CATEGORY I, 90% CATEGORY II, OR 95% CATEGORY III UNDISTURBED NATURAL SOIL WITH FIRMNESS EQUIVALENT TO THE FOLLOWING PLACED SOILS: 85% CATEGORY I, 90% CATEGORY II, 95% CATEGORY III, OR EMBANKMENT TO THE SAME REQUIREMENTS. 85% CATEGORY I, 90% CATEGORY II, OR 95% CATEGORY III TYPE 4 NO BEDDING REQUIRED, EXCEPT IF ROCK FOUNDATION, USE Do/12 MINIMUM, NOT LESS THAN 6". NO COMPACTION REQUIRED EXCEPT IF CATEGORY III, USE85% CATEGORY III NO COMPACTION REQUIRED EXCEPT IF CATEGORY III, USE85% CATEGORY III NO COMPACTION REQUIRED EXCEPT IF CATEGORY III, USE85% CATEGORY III RCP STORM PIPE BEDDING DETAIL SCALE: NTS AS REQUIRED SCALE: NTS DOGHOUSE MANHOLE DETAIL 3'-0" MIN. AGGREGATE FOUNDATION 6" COMPACTED GRADED EXISTING 15" CMP BOTTOM TO BE CAST IN PLACE PLAN VIEW SECTION A-A 36" MIN. NEW 12" HDPE CONCRETE PAVED BENCH CUT AND REMOVE PIPE DOWN TO BENCH CUT AND REMOVE PIPE DOWN TO BENCHA A EXISTING 15" CMP GROUT PIPE PENETRATIONS GROUT PIPE PENETRATIONS GROUT PIPE PENETRATIONS EXIST. STORM INV. = 92.43 CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY PRIOR TO ORDERING STRUCTURE DO G H O U S E M A N H O L E D E T A I L 2/ 2 3 / 2 6 SHEETC08 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E CO N S T R U C T I O N D E T A I L S R Know what's below. before you dig.Call PERMANENT SEEDING SCALE: NTSPS ZONE 3 - AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO FREQUENT MOWING DATE OF PLANTING LIME RATE:1 TON PER ACRE ON LIGHT-TEXTURED, SANDY SOILS (IF THE COVER WILL BE TALL FESCUE AND CLOVER USE 2 TONS/ACRE.)2 TONS PER ACRE ON HEAVY-TEXTURED, CLAYEY SOILS FERTILIZER RATE:GRASSES ALONE: 400 LB/ACRE OF 8-24-24WHEN VEGETATION HAS EMERGED TO A STAND AND IS GROWING, FERTILIZE WITH 30 TO 40 LBS/ACRE OF 28-0-0 MULCH RATE:PER MULCHING DETAIL GRASS-LEGUME MIXTURES: 800 TO 1200 LB/ACRE OF 5-10-10 OR THE EQUIVALENTLEGUMES ALONE: 800 TO 1200 LB/ACRE OF 0-10-10 OR THE EQUIVALENT REQUIRED POUNDS PER ACRE OF PURE LIVE SEED ANNUAL RYEGRASS HULLED BERMUDAGRASS UNHULLED BERMUDAGRASS TALL FESCUE WEEPING LOVEGRASS RESEEDING CRIMSON CLOVER PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS REQUIRED PERMANENT PLANT JAN. 1 TO FEB. 15 FEB. 16 TO AUG. 31 SEPT. 1 TO NOV. 30 DEC. 1 TO DEC. 31 10 29 29 29 29 MIXED 12 18 50 24 10 12 12 35 29 29 10 29 29 29 29 ANNUAL LESPEDEZA (KOBE) 2 2 TEMPORARY SEEDING SCALE: NTSTS SPECIES SEEDING RATE/ACRE NORTH CENTRAL SOUTH SEEDING DATES MILLET, BROWNTOP OR GERMAN 40 LBS MAY 1-AUG 1 APR 1-AUG 15 APR 1-AUG 15 RYE 3 BU SEPT 1-NOV 15 SEPT 15-NOV 15 SEPT 15-NOV 15 RYEGRASS 30 LBS AUG 1-SEPT 15 SEPT 1-OCT 15 SEPT 1-OCT15 SORGHUM-SUDAN HYBRIDS 40 LBS MAY 1-AUG 1 APR 15-AUG 1 APR 1-AUG 15 SUDANGRASS 40 LBS MAY 1-AUG 1 APR 1-AUG 1 APR 1-AUG 15 WHEAT 3 BU SEPT 1-NOV 1 SEPT 15-NOV 15 SEPT 15-NOV15 COMMON BERMUDAGRASS 10 LBS APR 1-JULY 1 MAR 15-JULY 15 MAR 1-JULY 15 CRIMSON CLOVER 10 LBS SEPT 1-NOV 1 SEPT 1-NOV 1 SEPT 1-NOV 1 LIME RATE:1 TON PER ACRE ON COARSE TEXTURED SOILS3 TONS PER ACRE ON FINE TEXTURED SOILS FERTILIZER RATE:APPLY 8-24-24 FERTILIZER PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONSWHEN VEGETATION HAS EMERGED TO A STAND AND IS GROWING, FERTILIZE WITH 30 TO 40 LBS/ACRE OF 28-0-0 MULCH RATE:PER MULCHING DETAIL MULCHING SCALE: NTSMU MATERIAL RATE PER ACRE &NOTES STRAW WITH SEED 1 1/2 - 2 TONS SPREAD BY HAND OR MACHINE; ANCHOR WHEN (70 LBS-90 LBS)SUBJECT TO BLOWING STRAW ALONE (NO SEED)2 1/2 - 3 TONS (115 LBS-160 LBS) WOOD CHIPS 5-6 TONS (225 LBS-270 LBS)TREAT WITH 12 LBS NITROGEN/TON BARK 35 CUBIC YARDS (0.8 CUBIC YARDS)CAN APPLY WITH MULCH BLOWER PINE STRAW 1-2 TONS (45 LBS-90 LBS) (PER 1000 SF) SPREAD BY HAND OR MACHINE; ANCHOR WHEN SUBJECT TO BLOWING SPREAD BY HAND OR MACHINE; WILL NOT BLOW LIKE STRAW PEANUT HULLS 10-20 TONS (450 LBS-900 LBS) WILL WASH OFF SLOPES. TREAT WITH 12 LBS NITROGEN/TON 20231216 DRL 2/23/26 N.T.S. Va t a n Mi x e d U s e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 UNDISTURBED GROUND LENGTH - 5' MIN. SPACED 10' MAX O.C. 44" TYPE "A" GEOTEXTILE FABRICCONFORMING TO ASSHTO M288 DISTURBED NOTE: OVERLAP JOINTS IN FABRIC AT POST TO PREVENT LEAKAGE OF SILT AT SEAM. COMPACTED BACKFILL FLOW SCALE: NTS SILT BARRIER TYPE "A" STEEL "T" POST 1.3LB/FT MIN. TRENCH FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW SB SILT FENCE ROLL 1 ROLL JOINT FOR JOINING TWO SILT FENCE SECTIONS STEEL POST GROUND 10' MAX. OC 6" 32 " 36 " M I N . 24 " M I N . 32 " 6" 6"24 " M I N . W/ WIRE BACK SILT FENCE ROLL 2 POSTS (ONE POST APPLICABLE FOR TYPES A & B FENCE) ROLL THE ENDS OF EACH SECTION OF FENCE ONEOR MORE TIMES BEFORE INSTALLING THE POSTS FABRIC (WOVEN WIRE FENCE BACKING) SCALE: NTS SECTION B-B CURB INLET PROTECTION PAVEMENT GUTTER FLOW FL O W CATCH BASIN 9" DIAMETER WATTLE PLACED TO ALLOW CATCH BASIN OVERFLOW OF LARGER STORM EVENTS B FL O W CURBING PAVEMENT B CIP PLACE SANDBAG BETWEEN THE THROAT AND THE WATTLE TO PROVIDE AN OVERFLOW POINT PLACE SANDBAG OVER WATTLE TO PREVENT MOVEMENT PLACE SANDBAG OVER WATTLE TO PREVENT MOVEMENT 2/ 2 3 / 2 6 Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 50' MIN. ALABAMA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT COARSE AGGREGATE GRADATION NO. 1 NON-WOVEN CLASS IV HARD SURFACE PUBLIC ROAD 12" MIN. 20' MIN. SCALE: NTS CONSTRUCTION EXIT PADCEP REPAIR AS NEEDED GEOTEXTILE UNDERLINER 8" FLO W EXISTING ROAD CONSTRUCTION EXIT PAD BERMED UP 8 INCHES TO PREVENT RUN-OFF FROM ENTERING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY PROFILE (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE AND LOCATION) 8" 3,000 P.S.I. CONCRETE CAST IRON VALVE BOX (SCREW TYPE) 2 CU. FT. OF STONE WATER MAIN GATE VALVE NRS FINISHED GRADE 8" 8" SCALE: NTS VALVE BOX SETTING BACKFLOW PREVENTER GATE VALVES WATER MAIN TO SITE SYSTEM SCALE: NTS 18" 6" PROFILE #6@12" EACH WAY 18" O.S.&Y. TO BLDG. PLAN DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY WITH FREEZE PROTECTION 6" AMES 2000SS OR WATTS 774 PIPE MOUNTED TO FOUNDATION WITH PIPE BAND BOLTED TO TOP OF FOUNDATION. NOTE: PROVIDE FOUR BRONZE BALL VALVE TEST COCKS FITTED WITH BRASS PLUGS AT EACH GATE VALVE AND EACH CHECK VALVE. DCDA TO MEET ASSE 1048 AND AWWA C510 6" - -- PVC WATER BEDDING SCALE: NTS OF PIPESPRING LINE 6" LAYERS COMPACTED BEDDING, IF REQ'D. PIPE 12"12" 8" M I N . 3' M I N . CO V E R 12 " TO 85% STANDARD PROCTOR LAYERS COMPACTED HAUNCHING, MAX. 6", TO 90% STANDARD PROCTOR LAYERS COMPACTED INITIAL BACKFILL, MAX. 6", TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR MAX. 6" LAYERS COMPACTED TO 100% BACKFILL WITH SELECT MATERIAL STANDARD PROCTOR (TOP 24" OF FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR UNDER STRUCTURES AND ROADWAYS) MA T E R I A L S H A L L B E AN G U L A R S T O N E (3 / 4 " M A X . D I M E N S I O N ) , GR A V E L O R S A N D CLASS 1B MATERIAL, MAX. MAXMAX SANITARY SEWER PVC PIPE BEDDING SCALE: NTS OF PIPE SPRING LINE LAYERS COMPACTED BEDDING, MAX. 6", MAIN 8"8" 6" M I N . 1' TO 85% STANDARD PROCTOR LAYERS COMPACTED HAUNCHING, MAX. 6", TO 85% STANDARD PROCTOR LAYERS COMPACTED INITIAL BACKFILL, MAX. 6", TO 85% STANDARD PROCTOR MAX. 6" LAYERS COMPACTED TO 95% BACKFILL WITH SELECT MATERIAL STANDARD PROCTOR (TOP 24" OF FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR UNDER STRUCTURES AND ROADWAYS) MA T E R I A L S H A L L B E AN G U L A R S T O N E (3 / 4 " M A X . D I M E N S I O N ) , GR A V E L O R S A N D 3' M I N . CO V E R SHEETC09 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E CO N S T R U C T I O N D E T A I L S R Know what's below. before you dig.Call 20231216 DRL 2/23/26 N.T.S. Va t a n Mi x e d U s e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 2/ 2 3 / 2 6 Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 PLAN SCALE: NTS 3. FRAME TO BE WRAPPED WITH WIRE BACKED SILT FENCE FABRIC DROP INLET PROTECTION SIDE VIEW & NAILED TO THE FRAME @ 6" O.C. 1. THE SEDIMENT BOX TO BE MADE OF 2"X4" P.T. BOARDS 2. THE MAX. POST SPACING IS 2'. 2"X4" P.T. POSTS TYP. COMPACTED GRADE BRACING INLET 2"X2" P.T. CROSS FIP TY P E " A " S I L T F E N C E INSTALLED SECURELY AGAINST THE EXTERIOR SURFACE OF THE INLET W/ W I R E B A C K I N G TY P E " A " S I L T F E N C E W/ W I R E B A C K I N G INLET 2' MAX. TYPE"A" SILT FENCEW/ WIRE BACKING 12 " 12 " M I N . 30 " M A X . FABRIC BURIED 12"W/ COMPACTED EARTH FILL 2"X4" P.T. POSTS TYP. INSTALLED SECURELY AGAINST THE EXTERIOR SURFACE OF THE INLET 4'4' 2' WOOD STAKE STAKE WITHIN 2' OF THE END OF WATTLE 8" STRAW WATTLE EMBEDDED IN A 2' CROSS SECTION SCALE: NTS WATTLE INSTALLATION DETAIL 2" DEEP TRENCH 8" STRAW WATTLE EMBEDDED IN A 2" DEEP TRENCH W MANHOLE WALL MANHOLE GASKETTAKE-UPCLAMP POWERSLEEVE TYPICAL "BOOT" DETAIL PSX ASSEMBLY AS MANUFACTURED BY PRESS-SEAL GASKET CORPORATION OR APPROVED EQUAL SCALE: NTS SEWER PIPE 12" X12"X6"TH. CONC. COLLAR 1/2"FINISH GRADE 4" SANITARY ELL SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SCALE: NTS TOP & BRONZE PLUG ZURN Z-1400-HD, WADE W-6000-2, CLEANOUT TO BE 4" DURA-COATED HEAVY DUTY WITH ROUND NOTE: SEWER PIPE 12" X12"X6"TH. CONC. COLLAR 1/2"FINISH GRADE WATTS CO-Z00-RX4, OR APPROVED EQUAL. FINISH GRADE(LANDSCAPING)(PAVEMENT) 4" SANITARY TWO-WAY CLEANOUT FITTING ONE-WAY TWO-WAY SHEETC10 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E CO N S T R U C T I O N D E T A I L S R Know what's below. before you dig.Call 20231216 DRL 2/23/26 N.T.S. Va t a n Mi x e d U s e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 2/ 2 3 / 2 6 Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 PIPE REQ'D. BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PATCH WEARING SURFACE & BINDER LAYER (MIX 424), MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT THICKNESS EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING BASE COURSE REQ'D. 401-A BITUMINOUS TREATMENT, 'TYPE A' 1'1' REQ'D: SAW CUT (TYP. ) BACKFILL MATERIAL MIN.MIN.MIN.MIN. TRENCH WEARING SURFACE 1' BASE MATERIAL 1' REQ'D. BASE MATERIAL MATCH EXISTING BASE THICKNESS PAVEMENT PATCH SCALE: NTS & MATERIAL (0.25 GAL/SY) XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXX 36" LIVE OAK 48" LIVE OAK 30" LIVE OAK 26" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS MAGNOLIA AVENUE 66 FT. R/W (PUBLIC) RIM:101.2' INV:98.1' OHP 15"RCP15"RCP 18 " R C P G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W EDGE OF PAVEMENT 15 " C M P G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 11 1 11 010 910 8 10 710 6 10 510 4 10 3 102 101 100 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 96 97 98 99 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 4 10 5 11 0 10 9 10 8 107 10 6 105 10 410 3 10 2 10099 < <<< < << <<<<<< > > FENCE ONLINE FENCE 0.2' N RIM:100.4' INV:97.1'(15") INV:96.5'(18") RIM:101.8' THROAT:100.9' SS 48" RIM:99.7' INV:97.4'(15") INV:96.0'(18"IN) INV:91.5'(18"OUT) LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) <> > <AREA DRAIN GRATE=104.30 INV=99.78 35 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0%DROP INLET A/B GRATE=103.94 INV=99.30 JUNCTION BOX A/B RIM=104.05 INV=99.14 DROP INLET A/B GRATE=103.95 INV=99.24 AREA DRAIN A/B GRATE=101.96 INV=98.00 34 LF, 12" HDPE @ 3.4% 14 LF, 12" HDPE @ 1.1% 9 LF, 12" HDPE @ 1.1% 53 LF, 12" HDPE @ 1.8% DROP INLET A/B GRATE=105.30 INV=100.23 47 LF, 12" HDPE @ 1.6% 20 LF, 12" HDPE @ 2.4% DOGHOUSE MANHOLE RIM=95.24 INV=92.43 AREA DRAIN A/B GRATE=103.81 INV=99.43 13 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0% AREA DRAIN GRATE=105.59 INV=100.71 AREA DRAIN GRATE=104.64 INV=101.03 32 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0% 36 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0% AREA DRAIN GRATE=103.71 INV=99.28 38 LF, 12" HDPE @ 2.0% AREA DRAIN A/B GRATE=96.84 INV=92.90 73 LF, 12" HDPE @ 7.0% DROP INLET A/B GRATE=105.77 INV=101.00 105 10 6 106 107 10 5 104 10 9 11 0 104 104 1021011009998 102101 10099 103 104 104 104 97 96 10 0 101 102 105 10 3 104 99 98 10 8 103 10310210110099 104 10497103 103 < > > AREA DRAIN A/B GRATE=105.18 INV=100.35 12 LF, 10" HDPE @ 1.0% > RD RD RD RD RD RD RD > < > TO P O F W A L L EL = 1 1 1 . 5 4 ' TO P O F W A L L EL = 1 1 0 . 8 7 ' TO P O F W A L L EL = 1 0 9 . 5 4 ' TO P O F W A L L EL = 1 0 8 . 2 1 ' TOP OF WALL EL=106.88' 105 105 105 STUB 8" PIPE FOR ROOF DRAIN AND POOL EQUIP. STUB 12" PIPE THROUGH WALL & CAP FOR FUTURE TIE-IN. SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAIL LANDSCAPE PLANTER (DESIGN BY OTHERS) 104 AREA DRAIN A/B GRATE=104.16 INV=98.85 AREA DRAIN A/B GRATE=104.07 INV=98.76 21 LF, 12" HDPE @ 2.0% 4 LF, 12" HDPE @ 2.0% RD RD RD UNIT 2 FFE=110.12 2,378 SFUNIT 1 FFE=104.52 1,594 SF UNIT 3 FFE=105.87 2,836 SF UNIT 5 FFE=105.26 1,532 SF UNIT 7 FFE=104.76 1,551 SF UNIT 6 FFE=104.47 1,441 SF UNIT 4 FFE=105.32 1,369 SF GARAGE FFE=106.18 GARAGE FFE=105.87 GARAGE FFE=105.26 GARAGE FFE=104.76 GARAGE FFE=104.47 GARAGE FFE=105.32 GARAGE FFE=106.12 TERRACE TERRACE STAIR FFE=106.54 EQ U I P . S L A B FF E = 1 0 5 . 7 8 SHEETC02 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 2/22/26 SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E R Know what's below. before you dig.Call AS - B U I L T G R A D I N G & DR A I N A G E P L A N SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO ASSURE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM THE REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PREPARATION OF THE SUBGRADE. BUILDING PAD. 23. 24. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE LINEAR DISTANCES BETWEEN CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE QUANTITY OF PIPE NEEDED FOR THE JOB, BASED ON SLOPE LENGTH AND WHOLE STANDARD PIPE SECTIONS. JUNCTION BOX = TOP; THE TOP MOST PART OF THE RIM AND COVER CASTING. CATCH BASIN = THROAT; ELEVATION OF THE POINT AT WHICH WATER PASSES INTO THE BOX. DROP INLET = GRATE; THE TOP MOST PART OF THE FRAME AND GRATE. WEIR INLET = THROAT; ELEVATION OF THE POINT AT WHICH WATER PASSES INTO THE BOX. DEFINITION OF THE TYPE OF TOP IS AS LISTED: THE ELEVATION OF MANHOLE/INLET TOPS ARE TO BE AT THE FINISH ELEVATION SHOWN. THE THE CONTOUR INTERVAL IS ONE FOOT OR AS SHOWN. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT OTHERWISE COVERED BY BUILDINGS OR PAVEMENT SHALL RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND STABILIZED PER THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE TYPE OF PIPE MAY BE ALTERED IF APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS NEEDED, AND EXISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SLOPES STORM PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE DE-WATERED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND THE SPECIFICATIONS. APPROVED MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THE PROPER INSTALLATION OF THE PIPING SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOLD THE OWNER GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES STANDARDS UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. ALL STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE PER ASTM C-478/C-913 AND ALDOT STEEPER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE COVERED WITH CURLEX BLANKETS BY AMERICAN EXCELSIOR ALL CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE TO HAVE A MIN. 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH OF 3000 P.S.I. AND ENGINEER HARMLESS FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR DE-WATERING AND BACKFILL LABOR & ALL STRUCTURAL FILL AREAS TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A SOILS ENGINEER. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY GEOCON ENGINEERING & MATERIALS GRADES NOT OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS SHALL BE UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN. ABRUPT CHANGES IN SLOPE SHALL BE WELL ROUNDED. ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINAL GRADE. ALL SILT BARRIERS SHALL BE PLACED AS ACCESS IS OBTAINED DURING CLEARING. NO GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNTIL THE TREE PROTECTION, SAVE AREAS, SILT BARRIER INSTALLATION AND DETENTION FACILITIES ARE CONSTRUCTED. THE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT MUST BE DISPLAYED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND IN PLAIN VIEW FROM A PUBLIC ROAD OR STREET. ALL O.S.H.A. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED TO. RCP, CLASS III PER ALDOT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PROPER TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LIGHTS AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE FEDERAL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, ERECT AND MAINTAIN BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT COMPANY OR EQUAL. AND HIGHWAYS, LATEST EDITION. MATERIALS. TESTING, INC. FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.. 17. 18. 19. 20. MAXIMUM CUT OR FILL SLOPE IS 3H:1V CONTRACTOR TO CLEAN OUT ACCUMULATED SILT IN THE STORM SYSTEM AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION WHEN DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. 21. 22. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE ENGINEER RECORD DRAWINGS OF AS-BUILT CONDITIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE. HDPE, ADS N12 PIPE PER SPECIFICATIONS. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD 88 DATUM.25. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SURVEYED AS-BUILT OF THE STORM SYSTEM.26. PROPOSEDEXISTING GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN LEGEND STORM SEWER PIPING JUNCTION BOX (JB) CONTOURS SPOT ELEVATION XXX + XXX.XX XXX XXX.XX HIGH POINT HP TYPE "S" 2- WING INLET (DWCB) DROP INLET (DI) WEIR INLET (WI) TYPE "S" 1- WING INLET (SWCB) UNDERDRAIN ROOF DRAIN (8" TYP.) UD RD PVC, SCH. 40 PIPE PER SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES SERVING THE STRUCTURE. UTILITIES ARE TO BE REMOVED 27. TO THE RIGHT OF WAY. Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 2/ 2 2 / 2 6 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE 20231216 1"=10'DRL Va t a n M i x e d Us e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 FIRM NO. 01003C0644M EFFECTIVE DATE APRIL 19, 2019, SHOWS THE PROPERTY TO BE SITUATED IN ZONE X UNSHADED. NOTES: CIVIL PLANS NOT TO BE USED FOR BUILDING LAYOUT. SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING LAYOUT. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS AS SHOWN HEREIN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL / STRUCTURAL PLANS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CIVIL ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. PRIOR TO INSTALLING SIDEWALKS ALONG CHURCH STREET AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A PRE-INSTALLATION MEETING WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, THE ARBORIST, AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE PURPOSE OF THE MEETING IS TO REVIEW THE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ADA AND TO EXAMINE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE SIDEWALK WITH THE TREE ROOT MOUNDS. IF THERE ARE ROOTS THAT INTERFERE WITH THE SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS, A TREE WELL, CURB OR SIDEWALK MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED. CURB FLOW LINE FL TOP OF CURB TOC TOP OF WALL TOW BOTTOM OF WALL BOW RE - I S S U E E N T I R E S H E E T 6/ 5 / 2 0 2 5 TOP OF FOUNDATION WALLS OF ALL BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 0.50' ABOVE EXTERIOR FINISHED GRADE, EXCEPT AT ENTRANCES. GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM FOUNDATION TO 28. PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. ROOF DRAIN STUBS SHALL BE PVC OR HDPE AT 1.0 % MINIMUM SLOPE TO STORM SEWER.29. ENDS OF STUBS SHALL BE CAPPED FOR FUTURE CONNECTION BY BUILDING CONTRACTOR. 1. AS-BUILT SURVEY DATA WAS COLLECTED ON ON OCTOBER 1, 2025, OCTOBER 14, 2025 & FEBRUARY 18, 2026. FOR STORM AND UTILITY LOCATIONS ONLY. NO VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION WAS COMPLETE AT THE TIME OF THE AS-BUILT SURVEY. 2. ROOF DRAINS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN AS-BUILT SURVEY. THEY ARE SHOWN HEREIN PER THE IFC DESIGN DRAWINGS 3. STORM INVERTS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN AS-BUILT SURVEY. INVERTS SHOWN ARE PER THE IFC DESIGN DRAWINGS. 4. AS BUILT GRATE AND RIM ELEVATIONS ARE DENOTED A/B. ALL OTHERS WERE NOT AT FINAL DESIGN GRADE AT THE TIME OF SURVEY AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE PER THE IFC DESIGN DRAWINGS. AS-BUILT NOTES XXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXX 36" LIVE OAK 48" LIVE OAK 30" LIVE OAK 26" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK 24" LIVE OAK SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS MAGNOLIA AVENUE 66 FT. R/W (PUBLIC) CH U R C H S T R E E T 6 6 F T . R / W ( P U B L I C ) EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING LOT A2 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND TURNER INSTRUMENT NO. 1807835 COMMON AREA 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) LOT B 52 N. CHURCH STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) FST AND SOSNOWCHIK INSTRUMENT NO. 1805011 STREET SUBDIVISION (SLIDE 2494-F) LO T 3 RE P L A T O F L O T 1 W O O D C H U R C H SU B D I V I S I O N (S L I D E 2 4 6 2 - A ) FS T A N D 4 1 2 F A I R H O P E L L C IN S T R U M E N T N O . 1 9 7 7 3 9 8 RIM:101.2' INV:98.1' OHP OHP 15"RCP15"RCP 18 " R C P 18"RCP G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W G G G G G G G G G G G G G W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W GGG W EDGE OF PAVEMENT 15 " C M P G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G OHP OHP 11 1 11 010 910 8 10 710 6 10 510 4 10 3 102 101 100 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 96 97 98 99 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 4 10 5 11 0 109 10 8 107 10 6 105 10 410 3 10 2 10099 FENCE ONLINE FENCE 0.2' N RIM:100.4' INV:97.1'(15") INV:96.5'(18") RIM:101.8' THROAT:100.9' RIM:95.6' INV:89.6' RIM:101.3' INV:93.0' RIM:101.47' INV:94.9' RIM:103.7' INV:97.3' SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSS SSSS SS UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E UG E UGE UGE UGE UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UG T UGT UG E UG E UG E UG E UGE UGE UGE UG E UG E UG E SS SSSS SS SSSS T 48" RIM:99.7' INV:97.4'(15") INV:96.0'(18"IN) INV:91.5'(18"OUT) W W F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F FF FFF FF SS C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O. C.O.C.O. C.O. C.O. E G E GE G EGGE E G EG GA S W / H GA S W / H C.O. C.O. C.O. 105 10 6 106 107 10 5 104 10 9 11 0 104 104 1021011009998 102101 10099 103 104 104 104 97 96 10 0 101 102 105 10 3 104 99 98 10 8 103 10310210110099 104 10497103 103 CONNECT TO EXISTING CLEAN OUT RELOCATE VALVE AND FIRE HYDRANT OUTSIDE PROPOSED SIDEWALK. MANIFOLD FOR THREE (3) - 1" RESIDENTIAL & ONE (1) - 1.5" COMMERCIAL WATER METERS NOT INSTALLED AT TIME OF AS-BUILT SURVEY 6" WATER SERVICE CONSOLIDATED PIPE & SUPPLY TO TAP EXISTING WATER MAIN & INSTALL VALVES PER FPU SPECIFICATIONS 6" D.I. WATER SERVICE 6" M.J. GATE VALVES (2) W/ MEGALUGS 6" FIRE SERVICE PER FPU SPECIFICATIONS 6" D.I. FIRE SERVICE 26 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 13 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 17 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 15 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 11 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 21 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 8 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 53 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 21 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN.22 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 8 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 7 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 3 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 31 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 1" & 1 12" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 1" & 1 12" WATER SERVICE 6" FIRE SERVICE 105 105 105 104 15 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 3 LF, 4" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. UGT UGT UGT UG E UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WATER METER MANIFOLD FOUR (4) - 1" RES. SERVICES ONE (1) - 1.5" COM. SERVICE 2 x 1" W . S . 6 x 1" W.S. & 1 x 1.5" W.S. 5 x 1 " W . S . 4 x 1 " W . S . 2 x 1 " W . S . GGGG GG UGE UGE UGE UGT UGT T 2x4" SECONDARY 2x4" SECONDARY 3x2" PRIMARY 2x4" SECONDARY 3x2" PRIMARY 3x2" PRIMARY GV GV GV GV GV GV GV GV 2x4" SECONDARY 20 LF, 6" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.04% MIN. 2x4" SECONDARY G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G W W W W W W FFF F F SHEETC04 DRAWN DATE SCALE JOB No. 2/22/26 SE A L AF F I X RE V I S I O N DA T E R Know what's below. before you dig.Call AS - B U I L T UT I L I T Y P L A N THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE ALL O.S.H.A. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE STRICTLY ADHERED TO. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PROPER TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LIGHTS AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE FEDERAL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, ERECT AND MAINTAIN BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES FOR STREETS RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT AND HIGHWAYS, LATEST EDITION. 9. 10. 11. 12. THE GAS SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED TO THE METER BY THE LOCAL GAS UTILITY. REFER TO THE MECHANICAL/PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE METER LOCATION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL SECONDARY WIRING AND CONDUIT FROM THE PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMER TO THE LOCATION OF THE METERS. REFER TO THE 14. UTILITY NOTES COMPLIANCE OF ALL SYSTEMS WITH THESE CODES. INTIMATE WITH THE LOCAL CODES AND REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ALL NEW UTILITY SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILS, AND VALVES, FITTINGS AND DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FPU SPECIFICATIONS. OF FAIRHOPE PUBLIC UTILITIES (FPU) PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. ALL PIPING, CONTRACTOR AND CERTIFIED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED PLUMBING THE SANITARY SEWER LINE SHALL BE TESTED FOR INFILTRATION/EXFILTRATION IN CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SURVEYED AS-BUILT OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS AS INSTALLED PRIOR TO REQUESTING A PUNCH LIST. REQUIREMENTS OF FPU AND OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE ACCORDANCE WITH FPU STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. ALL PVC PIPE SHALL BE MARKED USING DETECTABLE UNDERGROUND UTILITY MARKER TAPE TAPE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5 MILS THICK AND 3 INCHES IN WIDTH. MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH SHALL BE 35 POUNDS AND TAPE SHALL ELONGATE NOT LESS THAN 80 PERCENT ALL PVC PIPE INSTALLATIONS REQUIRE THAT METALIZED MARKER TAPE BE BURIED IN THE BACKFILL APPROXIMATELY 12 INCHES ABOVE THE PIPE. THE TAPE SHALL BE ATTACHED TO FITTINGS, VALVES, HYDRANTS, ETC. TO PROVIDE A LOCATION ABOVE GROUND TO TRANSMIT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. BEFORE BREAKING. TAPE SHALL BE PERMANENTLY IMPRINTED WITH AN APPROPRIATE LEGEND TO IDENTIFY THE CONTENTS OF THE PIPE. THE SIGNAL TO THE TAPE WITHOUT HAVING TO DIG DOWN TO THE PIPE. PRIOR TO BACKFILLING AND TESTING. THRUST BLOCKING AND PIPE RESTRAINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA-24. THESE RESTRAINTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER AND FPU WATER MAINS UNDER 4" SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D2241. PIPE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM PRESSURE RATING OF 200 PSI, SDR 21 OR HEAVIER. WATER MAINS 4"-12" SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C900, SDR 18 OR HEAVIER. 7. 8. THE PROPOSED WATER MAIN SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED, CLEANED, AND DISINFECTED WITH THE NEW PIPING SYSTEM TO THE MAIN SYSTEM. WATER MAINS TO BE INSTALLED AND 15. TESTED PER AWWA STANDARDS. LEAKAGE TEST PERFORMED AT 200PSI FOR MINIMUM OF 2 HOURS. DRILL AND CORE THE EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE(S) FOR THE NEW SERVICE LEADERS. 16. ALL LEADERS TAPPED INTO MANHOLES SHALL HAVE A RUBBER KOR-N-SEAL WATERTIGHT CONNECTION. Ci v i l En g i n e e r i n g & S u r v e y i n g 99 6 9 W i n d m i l l R o a d Fa i r h o p e , A L 3 6 5 3 2 25 1 - 9 9 0 - 6 5 6 6 2/ 2 2 / 2 6 400 5 10 20 10 SCALE 20231216 1"=10'DRL Va t a n M i x e d Us e D e v e l o p m e n t 30 1 M A G N O L I A A V E FA I R H O P E , A L 3 6 5 3 2 POST INDICATOR VALVE GAS VALVE WATER METER EXISTING SS G FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY MANHOLE WATER SANITARY SEWER THRUST BLOCK UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC GAS UGE PROPOSED G OHP OVERHEAD POWER UGE OHP WW SS CLEAN OUT WW C.O. UTILITY PLAN LEGEND SS GAS METER (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ELECTRIC METER (PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) G E ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR THE METER LOCATION. VERIFY EXACT WATER, SEWER, AND FIRE CONNECTIONS FOR ALL BUILDINGS WITH ARCHITECT.17. ALL FIRE SERIVICES SHALL HAVE BACK FLOW PREVENTERS ON RISERS. SEE ARCHITECTURAL 18. PLANS FOR DETAILS. AD D V A L V E S O N W A T E R / F I R E L A T E R A L S 6/ 9 / 2 0 2 5 1. AS-BUILT SURVEY DATA WAS COLLECTED ON ON OCTOBER 1, 2025, OCTOBER 14, 2025 & FEBRUARY 18, 2026. 2. AS-BUILTS ARE BASED ON SURVEYED LOCATION OF UTILITIES WHERE EXPOSED NEAR FUTURE BUILDING CONNECTIONS OR METER CONNECTIONS, AND APPROXIMATE TRENCH LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 3. NO METERS WERE INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY. THE METERS LOCATIONS ARE SHOWN PER THE IFC DESIGN DRAWINGS. 4. WATER & FIRE LATERALS, VALVES, FITTINGS & METERS IN ROW WERE NOT INSTALLED AT TIME OF AS-BUILT SURVEY. LOCATION IS SHOWN PER THE IFC DESIGN DRAWINGS. 5. WATER SERVICES INSIDE THE PROPERTY WERE INSTALLED IN SHARED TRENCHES WHERE POSSIBLE. THE LOCATION SHOWN HEREIN IS APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF 2' WIDE TRENCH BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 6. FIRE SERVICE LOCATIONS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN AS-BUILT SURVEY. LOCATION IS SHOWN PER THE IFC DESIGN DRAWINGS. 7. ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION CONDUIT ARE SHOWN PER ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN AND RED-LINE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR, AND AS-BUILT SURVEY INFORMATION COLLECTED AT EXPOSED ENDS OF CONDUIT. 8. TRANSFORMERS WERE NOT INSTALLED AT TIME OF AS-BUILT SURVEY. 9. GAS TRUNK LINE SHOWN PER RED-LINE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. SERVICE LINES WERE FIELD SURVEYED AT EXPOSED END OF GAS PIPE AND VALVE LOCATIONS, AND WERE ASSUMED TO CONNECT PERPENDICULAR TO THE TRUNK LINE. 10. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITY INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON THE BEST AVAILABLE DATA AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY. 11. SEWER CLEAN OUTS WERE FIELD SURVEYED AND UNDERGROUND SEWER SERVICE LINES WERE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE CLEAN OUT LOCATIONS. TERRACE TERRACE UNIT 4 FFE=105.32 1,369 SF UNIT 6 FFE=104.47 1,441 SF UNIT 7 FFE=104.76 1,551 SF UNIT 5 FFE=105.26 1,532 SF UNIT 3 FFE=105.87 2,836 SF UNIT 1 FFE=104.52 1,594 SF UNIT 2 FFE=110.12 2,378 SF AS-BUILT NOTES UNDERGROUND COMM.UGTUGE WATER VALVE GVGV TRANSFORMER (PER ELECTRICAL PLANS)T ! ! " # $#%$#&' $# ($# $#%$# ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( $#%$#&'%$#&'%$#&' ! ! ( ( ( ) " ( * ! ! ! + + + + + + + ! ! + + + 67 8 9 6 7 : ; 5 <5= = > 67 8 9 6 7 : ; 5 ?@ABCDEFGH ?@ABCDEFGHIJABCDEFGH IKABCDEFGHLJABCDEFGH L?ABCDEFGH L?ABCDEFGH MFNOP T U %* +"(+ (( (("( (" %("++ (" "" 6VWXYZ[\]^5;][_`ZaY[b\ab`[^_cVb^db^_aZd^]dWZVWdZ^XVe4_Wa116ab`gaXbV^hdcVW[d`VZi_abXYaXY[^]Vi^YZ[^^dbWdZg[__[VeZVg4_Waf[dZ5 ("$lmmn o#p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`920)a'-1(I0)211-034015B809:&*(;<*=>-9-<?2640166 M.?01-29C0.0*_'0I0)211-034015BC(22F.N<11=340156809:&*(;<*=>-9-<?264016W D-?2.(2)34015BAB40180;<*-0C<E(I092..T922/2P90..B401B809:&*(;<*=>-9-<?2640166H 66B40180;<*-0C<E(I092.. 8<<*.;0F<,I0)211-0B740156C12*F29C-1;<'2((2C,22(P')A@4015B`920)a'-1(I0)211-034015ZM.?01-29>-((12P2)804*<1-06@4015J809:&*(;<*=>-9-<?26401B6 rks s tuvwxyz{|}~ uvwxyz{|}~€wxyz{|}~ efqj ‚k cƒ„……†‡„ˆ‰Š‡ˆ‹Œ‹ ‹Ž‡ˆ‹‰ † ˆ‘Š’“ ‰”‹•‹ Ž‚ss–—‘‡•ˆ‰—‘‡•Œ‰”‘ ‡Ž‘˜‹ˆ—™‘‹ ˆ‡……‘•‡ ‡“‡ ˆ‰ƒˆ—‘…‡ • Œ‡“‘“‡Œš‡Ž‘k›k cŒ‰Š“…‘ˆ‘…‡ • Œ‡“‘œ ‹Ž …‹Ž—ˆ‹ Ž † ˆ‘Š˜‹……™‘‹ ˆ‡……‘•‡ ‡“‡ ˆ‰ƒˆ—‘…‡ • Œ‡“‘“‡Œš‡Ž‘k š|žŸ £# ""¤#¥ %¦$% $$" $#$¦$ $¦# $¦% % $¦¦¦ l‰“†˜ ‹Ž—ˆkq—‹ • ‡˜‹ އ •‹ˆ Œ‰ ˆ‘ ˆ ‡ ‘ˆ—‘“ ‰“‘ ˆ†‰ƒj “‡ggl‡ •Ї† ‰ˆ™‘Œ‰“‹‘•‰ „ ‡ †˜‡†˜‹ˆ—‰„ˆ˜ ‹ˆˆ‘ “‘ Š‹ ‹‰ƒ ‰Šj “‡…‹‘ k $¦©ªª« ¬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`abYZ[\]^_` acYZ[\]^_` acYZ[\]^_`deUfghV ijkllmnkopqnorsrttrunorpvwmwoxqyztp{r|rvuh}}~xn|opxn|sp{xtnux€ro xrvwonllx|nwnzntopjoxlnv|wsnzxzns‚nuxVƒV ispqzlxoxlnv|wsnzx„wruvlruorvuwmwoxq€rll xrvwonllx|nwnzntopjoxlnv|wsnzxzns‚nuxV …^†‡ˆ Ž ‘ ’ “ “ “ ‘“ “““ Ppzm€truoVUrw|tn€rvunv|rowspvoxvowntxoxztpzxtompjfwzn Pnv|qnmvpo xspzrx|ptkwnvm€nm€ropko€trooxvzxtqrwwrpjtpqfwznlrxtV “–—˜˜™ š› œš›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``^aZ[^\bcYc[d]ef`\g^h^baSiijkdZh[\kdZh_\gd`Zadl^[kmd^bc[ZXXdhZcZfZ`[\V[kdXZbhc_ZfdfZ_nZadToT U_\]fXd[dXZbhc_Zfdpc^abX^ak[^bacYc[d]l^XXmd^bc[ZXXdhZcZfZ`[\V[kdXZbhc_ZfdfZ_nZadT qrstu }~€€ ‚~ƒ „ƒ… †‚‚€ ‚~† †~ „† † † ††‚ ‡\fYl`^ak[TPk^ch`Zl^baZbh^[c_\b[db[cZ`d[kdf`\fd`[Y\VQcfZ||‡Zbh]ZYb\[md_\f^dh\`WcZbYlZYl^[k\W[l`^[[dbfd`]^cc^\V`\]QcfZX^d`T ‚†Œ ŽŽ ‘’‘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dce e f ]^gbhic [jkllmnkopqnorsrttrunorpvwmwoxqyztp{r|rvuiee}~xn|op~xn|sp{xtnuxro~€xrvwonllx|nwnzntopjo~xlnv|wsnzxzns nuxc‚c [spqzlxoxlnv|wsnzxƒwruvlru~orvuwmwoxqrll€xrvwonllx|nwnzntopjo~xlnv|wsnzxzns nuxc „…†‡ˆ Ž ‘Ž’ “’ ‘‘ ‘ Ž Ž “ ‘ ”pzmtru~ocg~rw|tnrvunv|rowspvoxvowntxo~xztpzxtompjbwzn__”nv|qnmvpo€xspzrx|ptkwnvmnmro~pkotrooxvzxtqrwwrpjtpqbwznlrxtc ‘™š››œ šž Ÿ ž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