The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-07-2025 Planning Commission Agenda PacketJune 2, 2025 Planning Commission Minutes 1 The Planning Commission met Monday, June 2, 2025, at 5:00 PM at the City Municipal Complex, 161 N. Section Street in the Council Chambers. Present: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; John Worsham; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot; Kim McCormick; Hollie MacKellar; Erik Cortinas; Kevin Boone; Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director; Mike Jeffries, Development Services Manager; Payton Rogers, Planning and Zoning Manager; Michelle Melton, Planner; Chris Williams, City Attorney, and Cindy Beaudreau, Planning Clerk. Absent: Chairman Turner called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM. Consent Agenda • Approval of the Minutes May 5, 2025 John Worsham made a motion to approve the consent agenda including the minutes. Rebecca Bryant seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; John Worsham; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot; Hollie MacKellar; Kim McCormick; Erik Cortinas and Kevin Boone Nay: None Old Business None New Business Hunter Simmons, Planning and Zoning Director, stated that he had received a question about this project and why it was on the agenda when the city has a temporary suspension on MOPs. Mr. Simmons explained that this project was already in the pipeline prior to the temporary suspension of MOPs being approved. Mr. Simmons then introduced Payton Rogers as the City’s new Planning and Zoning Manager. A. SD 25.10 Public hearing to consider the request of the Applicant, SE Civil, LLC on behalf of the Owner, Shelley Springer, for approval of the Summit Street Inn, a 6-unit multiple occupancy project. The property is zoned B-3b, Tourist Resort Commercial Service District. The property is approximately 0.30 acres and is located at 131 Fairhope Avenue. PPIN #15053 Rebecca Bryant recused herself due to a conflict. Mike Jeffries, Development Services Manager, presented the request of the Applicant, SE Civil, LLC on behalf of the Owner, Shelley Springer, for approval of the Summit Street Inn, a 6-unit multiple June 2, 2025 Planning Commission Minutes 2 occupancy project. The property is zoned B-3b, Tourist Resort Commercial Service District. The property is approximately 0.30 acres and is located at 131 Fairhope Avenue. Mr. Jeffries shared the zoning map and aerial map. Staff recommends approval of SD 25.10 with the following condition: 1. The landscape buffer and final landscape plan is approved by the City Horticulturist at time of building permit. Chairman Turner opened the public hearing at 5:05pm. Bob Griffin, 203 Fairhope Avenue, asked whether the Summit Street Inn will be short term or long-term rentals. Mr. Simmons stated that it will be short term rentals and that there has been a lot of work done to keep the house just the way it is. Kim McCormick disclosed that she and Ms. Springer have discussed this project prior to this meeting. The public hearing was closed at 5:08pm John Worsham made a motion to approve SD 25.10 with staff recommendations. Eric Cortinas seconded the motion and the motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYE: Lee Turner; John Worsham; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot; Hollie MacKellar; Kim McCormick; Erik Cortinas and Kevin Boone Nay: None Adjournment Erik Cortinas made a motion to adjourn. AYE: Lee Turner; Rebecca Bryant; John Worsham; Harry Kohler; Paul Fontenot; Hollie MacKellar; Kim McCormick; Erik Cortinas and Kevin Boone Nay: None Adjourned at 5:09pm. _______________________ ________________________ Lee Turner, Chairman Cindy Beaudreau, Secretary This digital package has been condensed for size and some documents may not contain all the original pages. All submittals were reviewed in full by staff in preparation for the reports prepared for the Planning Commission. 1 SD 25.08 Rockwell Place Resub Final – July 7, 2025 Summary of Request: Public hearing to consider the request of the applicant, Sawgrass Consulting, LLC, acting on behalf of the Owner, FST Rockwell, LLC, for Preliminary Plat approval of Rockwell Place Resub, a 10-lot Major Subdivision. The property is approximately 13 acres and is zoned B-2, General Business District. The property is located on the east side of State Highway 181, south of the Harvest Green East Subdivision and across from The Waters Subdivision. Site Data Site Plan 2 SD 25.08 Rockwell Place Resub Final – July 7, 2025 Comments: The development is a re-subdivision of lot 1 of Rockwell Place Subdivision and is zoned B-2. The infrastructure for this development already existed and is available along Bushel Drive. - Water services for lots 1-9 will come from the water main along Hwy 181. (See plat note) - Mandatory Site Plan Review is required for all future development. - A multi-use path has been constructed along Hwy 181 along with landscaping and connects to the multi- use path to the south in the Encounter Development. - Drainage is master planned and designed for the entire site. A very shallow landscape depression exists along the front of the lots inside a drainage easement. During normal conditions they will be dry and sodded. - The drainage has been reviewed and meets the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. - Shared access points have been designated on the plat to limit the number of road cuts along Bushel Drive. - The O&M plan has been amended to include the new drainage infrastructure. - Greenspace is provided a 30’ wide Greenway along the north and west property lines that includes and the multi-use path and landscaping. None of the areas around the detention ponds are being credited as greenspace. The subdivision regulations contain the following criteria in Article IV.B.2. Approval Standards. “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; • Meets b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Meets c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; • Meets d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; or • Meets e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets Recommendation: Staff recommends Approval of SD 25.08 Rockwell Place Resub. Rockwell Place 4/22/2025 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS 350 FT Parcel Number Pin Owner Name Address City State Zip Property Street Name OS-46--02-03-0-000--004 .093 296786 MOSES, ANDREW JAMES ETAL MOSES, KELLY ELAND IZABETH 723 BIG CANOE RUN FAIRHOPE AL 36S32 BIG CANOE RUN OS-46-02-03-0-000--004.090 296783 HAGOOD, THOMAS LANIER SR ETAL HAGOOD, KR ANO ISTI DEASON 73S BIG CANOE RUN FAIRHOPE AL 36S32 BIG CANOE RUN 05-46--02-03-0-000 -004.098 296791 WATERS AT FAIRHOPE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC ANO IATION INC, THE PO BOX259 MONTROSE AL 36559 ST HWY 181 OS-46-02-03-0-000-004 .092 296785 BURNS, CHARLIE WADE Ill ETAL BURNS, CASS AND IE K 727 BIG CANOE RtJN FAIRHOPE AL 36532 BIG CANOE RUN 05-46-02-03-0-0Q0.004.091 296784 JONES, ANTHONY R ETALJONES, NANCY L 731 BIG CANOE RUN FAIRHOPE AL 36532 SIG CANOE RUN 05-46-02-03-0-000-004.089 296782 SOUTHALL, JUSTIN FISHER ETAL SOUTHALL, T ANO OBIE ANN LANCASTER 739 BIG CANOE RUN FAIRHOPE Al 36532 BIG CANOE RUN 05-46-01-02-0-000-001.502 14737 STATE OF ALABAMA 1409 COLISEUM BLVD RM K-101 MONTGOMERY Al 36110 ST HWY 181 05-46-0l-02-0-000-001 .962 626784 FST HARVEST GREEN EAST OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 707 BELROSE AVE DAPHNE Al 36526 THRESHING BLVD 05-46-02-03-0-000,004.248 627987 CITY OF FAIRHOPE, THE PO BOX 429 FAIRHOPE AL 36533 ST HWY 181 05-46-02-03-0-000-004.001 98366 BYC LLC 23100 ST HWY 181 FAIRHOPE Al 36532 ST HWY 181 05-46-01-02-0-000-001.503 14535 FST ROCKWELL LL C PO BOX 579 BAY MINITTE Al 36507 BUSHELRO 05-46-0l-02-0-000.001.912 625449 FST ROCKWELL LL C POBOX579 BAY MINffiE AL 36507 BUSHEL RD OS-46-01-02-0-000·001.971 627495 FST ENCOUNTER DEVE LOPMENT LL C 1189 POST RO STE 38 FAIRFIELD CT 06824 BUSHEL DR 05-46-01-02-0-0Q0.001.911 625448 FSTROCKWELLLLC PO BOX 579 BAY MINITTE Al 36S07 BUSHEL RO OS-46 ·01-02-0-000-001.926 626748 FST OR HORTON INC· SIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE DR HOOVER Al 35244 THRESHING BLVD 05-46-01-02-0-0Q0.001.910 625447 FST ROCKWELL LL C PO BOX 579 BAY MINETTE AL 36507 BUSHEL RO OS-46-01-02-0-000-001 .S 10 108453 FST ENCOUNTER DEVELOPMENT LL C 1189 POST RD STE 38 FAIRFIELD CT 06824 ST HWY 181 05-46-01-02-0-000-001.972 627496 FST ENCOUNTER DEVELOPMENT LL C 1189 POST RO STE 38 FAIRFIELD CT 06824 ST HWY 181 05-46-01-02-0-000-001.925 626747 FST O R HORTON INC · BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE DR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING BLVD OS-46-01-02-0-000-001.928 626750 FST D R HORTON INC· BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE OR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING BLVD 05-46--01--02-0-000--001. 9 56 626n8 FST DR HORTON INC-BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE OR HOOVER Al 35244 THRESHING BLVD 05-46·01-02·0-000-001 .929 626751 FST DR HORTON INC• BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE DR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING BLVD 05-46-01-02-0-000-001 .927 626749 FST DR HORTON INC• BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE OR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING BLVD OS-46-0l-02-0-000-001.930 626752 FST O R HORTON INC· BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE DR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING BLVD 05-46-0l-02-0-0Q0-.001 .9Sl 626773 FSTD R HORTON INC· BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE DR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING BLVD 05-46-01-02-0-000-001.954 626776 FST OR HORTON INC· BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE DR HOOVER AL 3S244 THRESHING BLVD 05-46-0l-02-0-000-001.955 626777 FST O R HORTON INC· SIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE OR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING BLVD OS-46-0l-02-0-000-001.966 626788 FST 68V HARVEST GREEN EAST 2022 LL C 29891 WOODROW LN STE 300 SPANISH FORT AL 36527 THRESHING BLVD OS-46 -0l-02-0--000-001.9S3 626775 FST O R HORTON INC· BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE DR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING BLVD OS-46-0l-02-0-000-001 .964 626786 FST HARVEST GREEN EAST OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 707 BELROSEAVE DAPHNE AL 36S26 THRESHING BLVD 05-46-01•02-0-000-001 .952 626774 FST D R HORTON INC· BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY LAKE DR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING BLVD OS-46-02-03-0-000-004 .246 626315 CORTE, CAVE/MITCHELL 1 l l C PO BOX 81322 MOBILE Al 36689 ST HWY 181 05-46-02-03-0-000-004.245 626314 CORTE, CAVE/MITCHELL 1 LL C PO BOX 81322 MOBILE AL 36689 ST HWY 181 OS-46-01-02-0-000-001. 931 626753 FST DR HORTON INC • BIRMINGHAM 2188 PARKWAY I.AKE DR HOOVER AL 35244 THRESHING SLVO 05-46-0l-0 2-0-000-001.963 626785 FST HARVEST GREEN EAST OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 707 BELROSE AVE DAPHNE Al 36526 THRESHING BLVD Subdivision: Rockwell Place Subdivision location: NE corner of State Hwy 181 & State Hwy 104 - Fairhope Requested by: Heather Bell - Sawgrass Email: hbell@sawgrassllc.com Phone: 251-544-7900 Reservation valid through: 8/19/2025 We have approved the following road names for the development listed above. The road names are reserved for one year (365 days) from the date of this letter. If the road name changes in any way from what is listed on this confirmation letter, please contact our office for approval. If you find that you need these road names reserved beyond one year, you must contact us requesting such or the road names will be automatically released and labeled “available for use”. PreMod PreDir PreType PreSep Street Name PosTyp PosDir PosMod ROCKWELL BOULEVARD BUSHEL DRIVE Please feel free to contact our office with any questions or concerns. Signed: Samantha Roberts Date: 8/19/2024 DAVID WILSON Chairman RAYMOND LOVELL Vice Chairman ANTHONY LOWERY Secretary/Treasurer KRISTI STAMNES Director PAUL MUELLER AL TOLBERT ROY GLENN MARK SEALY MARK D. RYAN General Counsel 911 TELECOMMUNICATOR CIRCLE, ROBERTSDALE, ALABAMA 36567 EMERGENCY POLICE • FIRE • MEDICAL DIAL 9-1-1 Date 01/30/2023 Engineer Stephen Tirador Name And Address ELE34427 Rockwell Place Phase 1 This invoice covers the Aide-To-Construction for the underground services to : 1 Aid-to-Construction $246,399 .99 Ft. of 200A U/G Secondary Service $0.00 Ft. of 400A U/G Secondary Service $0.00 # Utility Crossing@ $100.00 ea . $0.00 37 # of Decorative Lights $37,000.00 0 # of lots for new subdivision $0.00 Misc. Cost Total of all charges due: $283 ,399.99 Page 5 of 10 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL Application Type: Village Subdivision Minor Subdivision Informal (No Fee) Preliminary Plat Final Plat Multiple Occupancy Project Attachments: Articles of Incorporation or List all associated investors Date of Application: ______________________ Property Owner / Leaseholder Information Name of Property Owner: _______________________Phone Number: ___________ Address of Property Owner: ________________________________________________ City: ____________________________ State: _____________ Zip: ____________ Proposed Subdivision Name: ________________________________________________ No. Acres in Plat: _______________________ No. Lots/Units: ___________________ Parcel No: _______________________________ Current Zoning: ___________________ Authorized Agent Information Plat must be signed by the property owner before acceptance by the City of Fairhope Name of Authorized Agent: ______________________Phone Number: ____________ Address: _________________________________________________ City: ____________________________ State: _____________ Zip: ____________ Contact Person: ______________________ Surveyor/Engineer Information Name of Firm: __________________________________Phone Number: ____________ Address: _________________________________________________ City: ____________________________ State: _____________ Zip: ____________ Contact Person: ______________________ Plat Fee Calculation: Reference: Ordinance 1269 Signatures: I certify that I am the property owner/leaseholder of the above described property and hereby submit this plat to the City for review. *If property is owned by Fairhope Single Tax Corp. an authorized Single Tax representative shall sign this application. ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Property Owner/Leaseholder Printed Name Signature ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Date Fairhope Single Tax Corp. (If Applicable) 1 SD 25.09 Resubdivision of Lot 1, Aviation Industrial Group Replat Subdivision – July 7, 2025 Summary of Request: The owner is Elpizo Corporation. Evan Geerts of DDG is the authorized agent for the project. This application is requesting approval of Resubdivision of Lot 1, Aviation Industrial Group Replat Subdivision, a 2-lot Minor Subdivision. The property is zoned M-1, Light Industrial District. The property is approximately 17 acres and is located at 8100 McGowin Drive. General Comments: All lots are within 450 feet of a fire hydrant and each lot fronts a paved publicly maintained road. The proposed subdivision according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations is a minor subdivision and has been reviewed accordingly. The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any additional infrastructure or improvements therefore a tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable. The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations Article VI Section D requires the provision of sidewalks along all streets in the Planning Jurisdiction of Fairhope. Sidewalks do not currently exist along McGowin Drive. The applicant has requested to provide an easement for the sidewalk in lieu of installing sidewalks. Final plat must be recorded within 120 days of approval. Drainage Comments: Private drainage infrastructure currently exists from previous development. This drainage area is captured in an easement. Note 4 on the plat references this easement as temporary and will be vacated with future development. The plat provides a drainage easement for the future relocation of the private drainage. Utility Comments: Water, sewer, and gas are provided by the City of Fairhope. Power is provided by Riviera and AT&T is the telecommunications provider. Water and sewer is available along McGowin Drive and future connections will require coordination of all testing and reporting through Fairhope Public Utilities. Connectivity: The applicant is requesting a sidewalk easement. The driveway will remain a private drive with an ingress/egress easement to allow the northern lot access. 2 SD 25.09 Resubdivision of Lot 1, Aviation Industrial Group Replat Subdivision – July 7, 2025 Comments: The City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations contain the following criteria in Article V.B.2. Approval Standards. “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; • Meets b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Meets c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; • Meets d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; • Meets e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets Staff Recommendation Staff recommends APPROVAL of SD 25.09 Resubdivision of Lot 1, Aviation Industrial Group Replat Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. Approval of the sidewalk easement. 2. All required utility testing is coordinated with Fairhope Public Utilities at time of future development. 3. An ingress/egress easement is added to the private drive to allow the northern lot access. 4. Label the lots “Lot 1” and “Lot 2”. thompso n E>l(i Nlt~ t.G broom sedge (Andropogon virginicus). Soils in the property consist of sandy material, including some introduced fill. Due to the absence of wetlands within this property, any proposed development of the site would not be subject to Sec. 404 of the Clean Water Act. Please feel free to call or email me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely, J ,I I 1 ~~/rpPt;rt--1 ~a~~2 V~tt~r, PhD Principal Scientist Alabama I Florida ! Georgia I Louisiana I Mississippi I North Carolina I Tennessee I Texas 2970 Cottage Hill Rd. Ste. 190 Mobile, AL 36606 thompsonengineering.com I 251.666.2443 Page 2 of 2 z ,J •✓• < .., HL ~n,~; a: .a C:Jll,han :, Ail)>Ort u 0 1 0 i.,c1 Acre~ ALI Cl. , 1hc,o ,~ _,. Co tt1 ng1m n Yennft Ln ~ □ C Ln ~ ;: ~L.1~0 D• Mon k R ct M o nk Rd {, ,! <3 f .a rm Rd Rabbll Ru n Rd e -a u er L n W :a ooner Rd 8 ish o p R <I iJ' " ., "' j = Ro::U! B ish o p L,1 ] i ; -;; ~ "' I □ Estimated Property Boundary (17.1 acres)• I C h . Baldwin County, Alabama Section 04, Township 7 South, Range 2 East ,,, Latitude/Longitude: 30.459402° N, 87.883442° W •NOT A SURVEY• For representation purposes only I lo 0.25 0 .5 1Mllese l Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity Map (Street Locator) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region See ERDC/EL TR-10-20; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R 0MB Control#: 0710-0024, Exp : 11/30/2024 Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) ProjecUS lte : McGowin Or , Lot 1 City/County: Fairhope/Baldwin Samp li ng Date : 5116125 Sampling Poi nt: Up land 1 Applicant/Owner: DOG , PC State: AL ----------------------------- 1 n vest i gator ( s): Matt Stowe & Connor Eu ban ks Section, Township , Range : _S_4_T_7_S_R_2E _____________ _ Landform (liillslde . terrace , etc .): _T_e_rr_a_c_e _________ Loca l relief (co ncave , convex, none): _c_o_nv_e_x _____ Slope (%): __ 0-_1_ Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat 30.458090 Lo ng : -87 .884162 Da l um ; So ll Map Unit Name: MaA: Malbis fine sandy loam NWI classrfication : --------- Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no. expla in in Remarks ) Are Vegetation Are Vegetation , Soil , Soil , or Hydro logy , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are "No rmal Circumstances" presen t? Yes X No (I f needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area ---- Hydtic Soll Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? --Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X ---- Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators; Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check .all that apply) _Surface Water (A1) _Aquatic Fauna (813) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Mar1 Deposits (815) (LRR U) __ SaturaUon (A3) _ Water Marks (B1) _Sediment Deposits (82) _ Drift Depos its (83) __ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) __ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) __, Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) __ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) __ Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ Iron Depos its (B5) __ Other (E xpla in In Remarks) __ Inundation Vlslble on Ae rial Imagery (87) _Water-Sta ined Leaves (89) Field Observations : Yes -- Yes No No X X Depth (inches); __ _ Depth (inches): __ _ Yes No X ---- Secondary Ind icators {min imum of two requ ired) __ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) __ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) __ Dra inage Patterns (810) _ Moss Trim Lines (B 16) __ Ory-Season Water Table (C2) __ Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Geornorphic Position (D2) _ Shallow Aql.Jitard (D3) _FAG-Neutra l Test (05) _Sphagnum Moss (08) (LRR T, U) Surface Water Present? Water Tab le Present? Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Yes No_X_ Depth (inches): __ _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge , mon itoring well, aerial photos , previous inspections), if available : Remarks: ENG FORM 6116·2, JUL 2018 Atlan ti c and Gulf Coastal Pla in -Version 2 ,0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) -Use scientific hames of plants . Sampling Po int: Upland 1 Absolute Dom inant Indicator Tree Stratum (P lot s ize : 0.1 Acre ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Number of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL , FACW , or FAC : 0 (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant 4 Species Across All Strata : 1 (8) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6 That Are OBL , FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/B) =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Total% Cover of: Multiply by : Sagti ng Stratum (Plol size : 0 .1 Acre ) OBL species 0 x:1:: 0 1. FACW species 0 x:2 = 0 2. FAC species 0 x:3 = 0 3. FACU spe ci es 80 x4 = 320 4 . UPL species 0 x-5 = 0 5. Column Totals : 80 (A ) 320 (8) 6. Prevalence Index = BI A= 4.00 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of tota l cover: 20% of total cover: 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation -- Shrub Stratum (Plo t size : 0 .1 Acre ) 2 -Dom in ance Test is >50% -- 1. 3 • Prevalence Index is :S3 .0 1 -- 2 . Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatio n 1 (Explain ) -- 3. 4 . 5. 11ndicators of hydric soil and we tl and hydrology must be 6. present, unless disturbed or problematic. =Tota l Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 50 % of total cover : 20% of tolal cover: Tree -Woody plants , excluding woody vi nes. Herb Stratum (Plot s ize: 0 .1 Acre ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in he ight and 3 in . 1. Paspa/um notatum ·so Yes FACU (7 .6 cm) or la rger in diameter at breast height (DBH ). 2 . Andropogon virginicus FAC Sapling -Woody plants , excluding woody vines , 3. lmperata cy/indrica UPL approxim ately 20 ft (6 m) or more in he ight and less 4. than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH . 5 . Shrub -Woody Plants , excluding woody v ines, 6. approxi mately 3 to 20 ft (1 lo 6 m) in hei gh l 7. Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants , includ ing 8. herbaceous vines, regardless of s ize, and woody 9 . plants , except woody vines , less than approximately 3 10 . f1 (1 m) in height. 11 . Woody Vine -All woody v ines, regardless of height. 80 =Total Cover 50% of tote I cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16 Wood~ Vine Stra tum (P lot size: 0 .1 Acre ) 1. 2. 3 . 4 . 5 . =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation 50% of total cover : 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No X Remarks : (If observed . li st morpholog ica l adaptations below.) ENG FORM 6116-2 , JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Pla in -Vers ion 2 .0 SOIL Sampling. Po int: Upland 1 Profile Description : (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Re dox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (m oist) % Type1 loc2 Texture Remarks ------ 0-3 10YR 3/3 Sandy Clay Fill -------- 3-9 10YR 3/3 50 Sandy Clay FIii --------. 7 .SYR 5/6 50 Sandy Clay FIi i -------- 9-15 10YR 4/6 80 -------- 5YR 5/8 50 -------- -------- -------- 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains . 2Location : PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 : -H1stosol (A1J -Thi n Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) -1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) -Histic Epl pedon (A2) _BarrTer Islands 1 cm Muck (S12) _2 cm Muck (A 10) (LRR S) -Black His tic (A3) (MLRA 1538, 153D) -Coast Prairie Redox (A 16) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR OJ (outside MLRA 150~) -- -Stratified Layers (AS) -loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) -Reduced Vertie (F18) -Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P , T, U) -Depleted Ma trix (F3) (outside MLRA 150A, 1508) _S cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) -Redox Dark Surface (F6) -Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T) -Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U) -Depleted Dark Surface (F7) -Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P , T) _ Redox Depressions (FB) (MLRA 1538) _ Depleted Be low Dark Surface (A 11) -Marl (F10) (LRR U) -Red Parent Material (F21) -Thick Dark Surface (A 12) _Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) -Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_lron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0 , P, T) (outside MLRA 1381 152A in FL , 154) -Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0 , S) -Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) -Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7) -Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) -Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B , 1530) -Sandy Redox (SS) -Reduced Vertfc (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) -Other (Explain in Remarks) -Stripped Matrix (S6) -Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) -Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T , U) -Anomalous Bright Floodplain Solis (F20) -Po lyva lue Be low Surface (S8) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and (LRRS, T, U) Very Shallow Dark Surface {F22) wetland hydrology must be present, -(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictlve Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (Inches): Hydrlc: Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks : - ENG FORM 6111:i-2 , JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal P lain -Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region See ERDC/EL TR-10-20; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R 0MB Control#: 0710-0024, Exp: 11/30/2024 Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) ProjecV Sfte : McGowi n Dr, Lot 1 City/County: Fairhope/Baldwin Sampling Dale : 5/16/25 Appl icanVOwner: _D_D_G...;'c..P_C __________________________ Slate : __ A_L __ Sampling Po int: Upland 2 lnvestlgator(s): Matt Stowe & Con nor Euba nks Sect ion , Township, Range _S_4_T_7_S_R_2E _____________ _ Landform (hillside , t.errace , etc .): _T_e_rr_ac_e _________ Loca l rene f (concave, convex, none)~ _C_o_nv_e_x _____ Slope (%): __ 0-_1 __ Subreg ion (LRR or MLRA): _L_R_R_P _____ Lal: 30.459927 Long :-87 .884198 Datum : Soil Map Una Name: MaA: Malbis fine sandy loam NWI classification: --------- Are climatic-/ hydrologic oond ltlons on lhe site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, exp lain in Rem arks .) Are Vegetation Are Vegetation , Soil , Soi l , or Hydrology , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are "Norma l Circumstances" present? Yes X No (If needed , expla in any answers in Remarks .) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Presen t? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area --Hydr ic Soll Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? ----Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks : HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prima ry Indicators (mini mum of one is requl red ; check all that apply) _Surface Water (A1) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U) _ Satu ration (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) __ Waler Marks (B 1) __ Oxidtzed Rhizospheres on Uvlng Roots (C3) __ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) __ Recent Iron Reductron ln TIiied Soils (C6) _Thin Muck Surface (C7) __ Sed im ent Depos its (82) __ Drift Deposits (83) _Algal Mat or Crust (B4) __ Iron Deposits (85) __ Other (Explain in Remarks) __ Inundation V isib le on Ae ri al lma9ery (87) -Waler-Stained Leaves (B9) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): -- Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): ---- Yes No X ---- Secondary Indicators (mi nimum of lwo required) __ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) __ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _Drai nage Patterns (810) _Moss Trfm Lines (816) _ Ory-Season Water Table (C2) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) __ Shallow Aquitard (03) _ FAC-Neutral Test (05) _ Sphagnum Mos s (D8 ) (LRR T, U) Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X ----(inclu des capillary fringe} Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge , monitorin g well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), 1f ava ilable : Remarks : ENG FORM 6116-2 , JUL 2018 AtlantTc and Gulf Coastal Pla in -Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) -Use scientific names of plants . Sampling Point: Upland 2 Absolute Dominant Ind ica tor Tree Stratum (P lot size: O 1 Acre ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: I . Number of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL , FAC W , or FAC : -0 (A) 3, Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata : 2 (8) 5. Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW , orFAC: 0 .0% (A/8) =Tota l Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 50% of total cover. 20% of total cover: Total% Cover of: Multiply by: Sag llng Stratum (Plot size : 0.1 Acre ) OBL species 0 X 1 = 0 1. -FACW species 0 x2= 0 2 . FAC species 0 x3 = 0 - 3. FACU species 50 x4 = 200 4. UPL species 50 x5 == 250 5. Co lum n Totals : 100 (A) 450 (B) 6. Prevalence Index = BIA == 4 .50 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% of tota l cover: 1 -Rap id Test for Hydrophytio Vegetation -Shrub Stratum (Plot size : 0.1 Acre ) 2 -Dominance Test is >50% - 1. 3 -Prevalence Index is s3 .0 1 -- 2. Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation 1 (Exp lain) -3. 4. 5. 1 Indica tors of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 6. present , unless disturbed or pro blematic. =Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata : 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Tree -Woody plants , excluding woody vines, Herb Stratum (Plot size : 0.1 Acre ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in he ight and 3 in . 1. Eremoch/oa ophiuroides 50 Yes UPL (7.6 cm) or large r in diameter al breast height (DBH). 2, Paspalum notatum 50 Yes FACU Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 3. approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less 4. than 3 In. (7.6 cm) DBH . 5. Shrub -Woody Plants, excluding woody vines, 6. approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height. 7. Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, inc luding 8. herbaceous vines, regardless of size , and woody 9. plants , except woody vines , less than approximately 3 10 , ft (1 rn) in height. 11 . Woody Vine -All woody vines, regard less of height 100 :Total Cover 50% of total cover. so 20% of total cover: 20 Wood~ Vine Stratum (Plot size : 0.1 Acre ) 1. 2. 3 . 4 . 5. Hydrophytic =Total Cover Vegetation 50% of tota l cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No X Remarks : (If observed, list morphological adaptations be low ) ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2 .0 SOIL Sampling Poi nt : Upland 2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth nee<led to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Oeplll Matrix Redox Features (I nches ) Color (moist) % Colo r (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks ------ 0-4 10YR 3/4 -------- 4--9 10YR4/6 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -- ------ Type : C=Concentration , D:Deplellon , RM=Reduced Matrix, MS-Masked Sand Grains . 2Localion : PL=Pore Uning , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unJess otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 : -Histosol (M) _Thin Dark Surface (59) (LRR S, T, U) -1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) -Histic Epipedon (A2) -Barrier Is lands 1 cm Muck (512) -2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) -Black Hlstic (A3) (MLRA 1538, 153D) -Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Hydrogen Sulflde (A4) -Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) (outside MLRA 150A) -Stratified Laye rs (A5) -Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) -Reduced Vertie (F18) -Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) --Depleted Ma trix (F3) (outside MLRA 150A, 1508) _ s cm MucKy Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) -Piedmont Floodplain So ils (F19) (LRR P, T) _ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U) -Depleted Dark Surface (F7) -Anomalous Brighi Floodplain Soils (F20) -1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _ Redox Depress ions (F8) (MLRA 1538) -Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) -Marl (F1 0) (LRR U) -Red Parent Material (F.21) _Thick Dark Surface (A12) -Dep leted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) -Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) _coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_lron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) (outside MLRA 138 , 152A in FL, 154) -Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) -Um bric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) -Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7) -Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) -Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B , 153D) Sandy Redox (S5) Reduced Vertie (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Other (Explain In Remarks) --- -Stripped Matrix (S6) -Pfedmont Floodplafn Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) -Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T , U) -Anoma lous Bright Floodplain Solis (F20) Polyvalue Be low Surface (S8) -(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and (LRR S, T, U) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) wetland hydrology-must be present. -(MLRA 1387 152A in FL, 154) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type : Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks : ENG FORM 6116 -2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coasta l Pla in -Version 2.0 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region See ERDC/EL T R-10-20 ; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R 0MB Control#: 0710-0024, Exp: 11/30/2024 Requirement Control Symbol E'XEMPT: (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a) Project/Sile: McGowin Dr, Lo i 1 City/County: Fairhope/Baldwin Sampling Date: 5/16/25 Sampling Point: Upland 3 ApplicanUOwner: DOG , PC State: AL ----------------------------- 1 n v es II gal or ( s): Matt Stowe & Connor Eubanks Section , Townsh ip , Range : _S_4_T_7_S_R_2E _____________ _ Land form (h111s lde , terrace, etc): _T_e_rra_c_e _________ Local relief (concave , convex, none): _c_o_n_v_e_x _____ Slope (%): __ 0-_1 __ Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat _3_0_.4_5_93_77 ________ Lo ng : -8 7.882633 Datum : Soll Map Unit Name : MaA: Malbls fine sand y loam NWI classification : Are climatic/ hydrologic condftlons on the site typ ical for th is time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain i n Remarks ,) Are Vegetation Are Vegetation , Soil , Soil , or Hydrology , or Hydro logy signifrcantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are "Nonmal Circumstances" present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks .) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations , transects, important features , e.tc . Hydrophytic Vege tati on Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area ---- Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? ----Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators '. Prima ry In dicators {minimum of one. ls reouired : check all that anply) _Surface Water (A1 ) _Aquatic Fau na (B13) _ High Water Table (A 2) _ Saturation (A3 ) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Sediment Deposi ts (B2) __ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Iron Deposits (85) _Marl Deposi ts (8 15) (LRR U) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 ) __ Ox idized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Pre sence of Reduced Ir on (C4) __ Rece nt Iron Reduction in TIiied Soils (C6 ) __ Thin Muck Surfa ce (C7) __ Other(Explain in Rem arks ) __ Inundation Visible on Ae ri al Im age ry (B7) __ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Field Observations : Yes -- Yes No No X X Depth (inches); __ _ Depth (inches): __ _ Yes No X ---- Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _Surface So il Cracks (86) __ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) __ Drainage Patterns (B 10 ) _ Moss Tri m Lines (B 16) __ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _Crayfish Burrows (CB) __ Saturatron Visib le on Aerial Imagery (cg) __ Geomorphio Posit ion (02) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _FAG-Neutra l Test (05) _Sphagnum Moss (08) (LRR T , U) Surface Water Present? Water T able Present? Saturation Present? (inclu de s capillary frin ge ) Yes No X Depth 0nches): __ _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Describe Recorded Data (s tream gauge, monitoring well , ae ria l photos , prev ious inspections), if ava ilable : Remarks : ENG FORM 6116·2 , JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) -Use screntific names of plants. Sampling Point: Upland 3 Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0.1 Acre ) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet; 1 _ Number of Dominant Species 2. ThatAreOBL, FACW , orFAC: 0 (A) 3. Total Number of Domfnant 4 . Species Across All Strata : 2 (B) . 5 . Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A/8) I =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet; 50 % of total cover: 20% of total cover. Tota\% Cover of: Multiply by: Sa12l ing Stratum (Plot size : 0 , 1 Acre ) OBL species 0 x1= 0 1. FACW species 0 x2 = 0 2. FACspecies 0 X'3 = 0 3. FACU species 80 x4= 320 4. UPL species 20 x5-= 100 5. Column Totals: 100 (A) 420 (B) 6. Prevalence Index = BIA= 4.20 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 50% of total cover: 20% ·of Iota! cover: 1 -Rapid Teslfor Hydrophytic Vegetation - Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 0.t Acre ) 2 -Dominance Test is >50% -- 1. 3 -Prevalence Index is -;3 .0 1 --2_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explaln) -- 3. 4. 5 . 11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrolo gy must be 6. present, unless _disturbed or pro blematic . =Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Tree -Woody plants, exclud ing woody vines, Herb Stratum (Plot size : Q_ 1 Acre ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 i11 , 1. Paspa/um notatum 80 Yes FACU (7-6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast hefght (DBH)- 2 . Eremochloa ophiuro!des 20 Yes UPL Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 3_ approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more In height and less 4 . than 3 In. (7 _6 cm) DBH. 5. Shrub • Woody Plants, excluding woody vines , 6_ approximately3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in he [ght. 7. Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including 8-herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody g_ plants, except woody v1nes, less than approx.irn-a tely 3 10, rt (1 m) in height. 11 , Woody Vine -All woody vines, rega rdless of height. 100 =Total Cover 50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover. 20 Wood~ Vine Stratum (Pio! size: O 1 Acre ) 1. 2 , 3 . 4 . 5. Hydroptiytic =Total Cover Vegetation 50% of total cover~ 20% of totaJ cover: Present? Yes-No X Remarks : (If observed, list morphological adaptations below .) ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coasta l Plain -Version 2_0 SOIL Sampling Point: Upland 3 Profile Description : (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Dep th Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type ' Loc2 Texture Remarks ------ 0-3 10YR 3/4 -------- 3-9 10YR 5/8 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- 1Type : C=Concentration , D=Depletlon , RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grafns. 2Loca tio n: PL=Pore Lining , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils,; -Histosol (A 1) _Thin Park Surface {S9) (LRR S , T , U) -1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) -Histic Eplpedon (A2) -Barrier Island s 1 cm Muck (S 12) -2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) -Black Histic (A3) (MLRA 1538, 153D) -Coast Prairie Redox (A16) -Hydrogen SUifide (A4) -Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) (outside MLRA 150A) -Stratified Layers (AS) -Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) -Reduced Vertie (F 18) _Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) -Depleted Matrix (F3) (outside MLRA 150A, 1508) _s cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P , T, U) -Redox Dark Surface (F6) -Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T) -Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U) -Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Anomalous Bright Fl oodplafn Solis (F20) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P , T) Redox Deptessions (F8) (MLRA 1538) -- -Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) -Marl (F10) (LRR U) -Red Parent Material (F21) -Thick Dark Surface (A 12) -Depleted Oehrle (F11) (MLRA 151) -Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_lron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR o , P, T) (outside M LRA 138, 152A in FL, 154) -Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0 , S) -Umbnc Surface (Ft3) (LRR P, T, U) -Barrier Is lands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) --Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) (MLRA 153B, 153D) Sandy Redox (SS) Reduced Vertie (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Other (Explain In Remarks) --- -Stripped Matri x (S6) -Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A} -Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S , T, U) -Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soi ls (F20) -Polyvalue Below Su rface (SB) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530) 3 1ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and (LRR S, T, U) Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22) wetland hydrology rnust be present. - (MLRA 138, 152Ain FL, 154) unless disturbed or problemati c. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (i nches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks . ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Pla in -Version 2.0 May 22, 2025 City of Fairhope Planning Commission Attn: Mr. Hunter Simmons 451 Pecan Ave. Suite 200 Fairhope, AL 36532 Re: Traffic Generator Memorandum Elpizo Subdivision Dear Mr. Simmons, We are submitting this memorandum to provide an estimate of the anticipated traffic impact for the proposed light industrial facility south of McGowin Dr. Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Land Use Code 110 (General Light Industrial) and an assumed maximum building size of 60,000 SF, the estimated trips are as follows: · Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 298 trips (entering/exiting combined) · AM Peak Hour: Approximately 42 trips (entering/exiting combined) · PM Peak Hour: Approximately 38 trips (entering/exiting combined) These estimates are derived from industry-standard trip generation rates per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for light industrial facilities. The actual trip generation may vary based on site-specific conditions, employee shifts, and operational characteristics. Additionally, should a larger building be proposed in the future, the trip generation shall be recalculated. The number of estimated trips does not exceed the threshold of 1,000 trips per day or 50 trips during the peak hour. It is our professional opinion that a traffic impact analysis is not required. If further analysis or adjustments are required, I am available to provide additional details. Sincerely, Evan M. Geerts, P.E. Duplantis Design Group, PC 3703 Old Shell Rd. Mobile, AL 36608 PROFESSIONAL Sherry Sullivan Mayor Council Members: Kevin G. Boone Jay Robinson Jack Burrell, ACMO Jimmy Conyers Corey Martin Lisa A. Hanks, MMC City Clerk Kimberly Creech Treasurer 161 North Section St. PO Drawer 429 Fairhope, AL 36533 251-928-2136 (p) 251-928-6776 (f) www.fairhopeal.gov May 6 1 2025 Re: McGowin Dr., (Aero Project) Future development is South of the existing building Pin 309678 This letter of availability is only valid based on what was proposed at the utility review meeting. Any chaoges or dev iati ons of the proposed plan will require ano01er utility r eview. This statement of availability remains effective for twelve (12) months from the date of this letter, at which time it shall expire and automatically be withdrawn. Water· & Sewer: Based upon review of the proposed development, water and sewer service by Fairhope Public Utilities is currently available and active. All tap fees and system development charges (SDC's) will apply, and all necessary infrastructure improvements will be at the developer's expense. Sincerely, RIVIERA UTILITIES 413 East Laurel Avenue - Foley, AL 36535 Phone (251) 943-5001 3/25/2025 Joseph Ory DDG 1 Galleria Blvd, Suite 1506 Metairie, LA 70001 RE: Fairhope Aero – McGowin Dr. This letter is to confirm based on the site plan received; Riviera Utilities is willing and able to provide electric service to the above referenced property. Riviera Utilities requires a 10’ easement along all side property lines and a 15’ easement along all front and rear property lines. Please ensure all property plats reflect the easements. Upon final design, Riviera Utilities will provide estimates for service fees and system installation requirements to meet all Riviera specifications. Please contact the following Riviera employees concerning costs and requirements. Name Department Email Wes Abrams Electric wabrams@rivierautilities.com If you have any questions or comments, contact Riviera Utilities at 251-943-5001. Thank you, James Wallace May 12, 2025 Joseph Ory Duplantis Design Group RE: Service Availability – 8100 McGowin Dr. Fairhope, AL Dear Mr. Ory, This letter is in response to your request for information on the availability of service at the above location by AT&T. This letter acknowledges that the above referenced property is located in an area served by AT&T. Any service arrangements for this location will be subject to later discussions and agreements between the developer and AT&T. Please be advised that this letter is not a commitment by AT&T to provide service to this location. Please contact me at the phone number included in this letter with any questions. Thank you for contacting AT&T. Sincerely, Wade Mitchell Senior – OSP Design Engineer AT&T Alabama 2155 Old Shell Rd Mobile, Alabama 36607 Gulf District/ Mobile Office (251) 680-7402 To: City of Fairhope Planning Dept. Attn: Hunter Simmons Hunter.simmons@fairhopeal.gov 451 Pecan Ave., Suite 200 Fairhope, AL 36532 May 9, 2025 To whom it may concern: Elpizo Corporat ion PO Box 129 Lake Placid Florida 33882 This letter is to confirm that the proposed subdivision of Lot 1 on the south side of McGowin Dr. has a private contract for trash removal services given that it is an industrially zoned property. Elpizo Corporation contracts with Republic Services for trash service and therefore does not request regular trash removal services from the City of Fairhope . Feel free to reach out to me with any further questions or concerns. Richard Walser Director Parcel Number Pin Owner Name Address 05-56-02-04-3-001-015.001 231388 PRECISION 98 PROPERTIES LL C 8054 MCGOWIN DR 05-56-02-04-3-001-006.000 103393 LANGENBACH JOHNNY D PO BOX 1275 05-56-02-04-3-001-015.005 291596 RHTS LEASING L LC PO BOX 1406 05-56-02-04-3-001-009.000 103361 NIEMEYER, KENNETH E PO BOX 888 05-56-02-04-3-001-015.004 291595 PRECISION 98 PROPERTIES LL C 8054 MCGOWIN DR 05-56-02-04-3-001-015.006 309678 ELPIZO CO RPORATION PO BOX 129 05-56-02-04-3-001-014.000 93452 MCLENDON PROPERTIES, LL C 8050 MCGOWEN DR 05-56-02-04-3-001-005.000 114982 MAIDS OF JUBILEE PO BOX 106 05-56-02-04-3-001-015.003 262811 PRECISION 98 PROPERTIES L LC 8054 MCGOWIN DR 05-56-02-04-3 -001-008.000 103360 AIRPARK LOT 2 LL C 71 SECTION ST N 05-56-02-04-3-001-015.002 262810 PRECISION 98 PROPERTIES LL C 8054 MCGOWIN DR 05-56-02-04-3-001-015.000 91233 FAIRHOPE, THE CITY OF PO DRAWER 429 05-56-02-09-2-001-004.001 273671 ROUSH PROPERTIES L L C 168 CLUBHOUSE CIR 05-56-02-04-3-001-007 .000 103359 LANGENBACH CONSTRUCTION COMPAN, 8119 MCGOWIN DR STE A 05-56-02-04-3-001-004.000 226626 FAIRHOPE AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 429 05-56-02-09-2-001--004 .000 3152 WHITE EXCAVATION & CO NSTRUCTION L 16201 GREENO RD 05-56-02-04-3-001-015.007 356651 ELPIZO CORPORATION PO BOX 129 05-56-02-09-2-001-003.000 67889 ELPIZO CORPORATION PO BOX 129 05-56-02-04-3-001-010.000 28449 FAIRHOPE AIRPORT AUTHORITY PO BOX 429 Address2 City State Zip Property St Property Street Name FAIRHOPE AL 36532 8054 MCGOWIN DR POINT CLEAR AL 36564 8119 MCGOWIN DR FAIRHOPE AL 36533 16020 GREENO RD MONTROSE AL 36559 8111 MCGOWIN DR FAIRHOPE AL 36532 0 GREENO RD 901 HILLCREST AVE LAKE PLACID FL 33862 8100 MCGOWIN DR FAIRHOPE AL 36532 8050 MCGOWIN DR & 8077 FAIRHOPE AL 36533 8251 MCGOWIN RD FAIRHOPE AL 36532 0 GREENO RD STE B FAIRHOPE AL 36532 8115 MCGOWIN DR FAI RHOPE AL 36532 16150 GREENO RD FAIRHOPE AL 36533 16150 GREENO RDS FAIRHOPE AL 36532 15980 GREENO RD FAI RHOPE AL 36532 8115 MCGOWIN DR FAIRHOPE AL 36533 0 CO RD 32 FAIRHOPE AL 36532 15930 GREENO RD (A) 901 HILLCREST AVE LAKE PLACID FL 3 3862 16150 GREENO RDS 901 HILLCREST AVE LAKE PLACID FL FAIRHOPE AL STATE OF ALABAMA BALDWIN COUNTY 33862 0 36533 0 MCGOWIN DR !• TEDDY J. FAUST, JR ., Revenue Commissione r 1n a~d for said State and County, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of the records of this office ~16Jli:di RESOLUTION NO: 2025-04 A RESOLUTION AMENDING ARTICLE VI, SECTIONS F.C. AND H.2. OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TO REVISE DIVISION II OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTING SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES AND WATER FACILITES WHEREAS, the City of Fairhope Planning Commission (the “Planning Commission”) adopted the current Subdivision Regulations for the City of Fairhope, Alabama on March 8, 2007 (the “Subdivision Regulations”); and WHEREAS, such regulations may include provisions as to the extent to which water and sewer and other utility mains, piping or other facilities shall be installed as a condition to the approval of the plat; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such authority the City of Fairhope Planning and Zoning Commission (“Commission”) has adopted the STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTING SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES AND WATER FACILITIES (“STANDARDS”), which contain provisions for both design criteria and technical specifications; and WHEREAS, the design criteria provisions, DIVISION II – DESIGN CRITERIA, provide for the general design parameters, including mapping “as built” data, clearances, slopes, peak flow factors, pumping rates, pipe size requirements and other pertinent design guidance factors and encompass the basic methodology for how water and sewer utilities are designed, installed and the level of service to users of the water and sewer systems; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission desires to amend the Subdivision Regulations as hereinafter provided as necessitated by recent changes to the jurisdiction. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. Section A.6. of DIVISION II – DESIGN CRITERIA of the Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities is hereby revised to read as follows: 6. Sanitary sewers shall be separated a minimum of ten (10) feet clear horizontal distance from any existing or proposed water main. Where sanitary sewers are required to cross water mains a minimum of eighteen (18) inches vertical distances (Water Main must be vertically above the sewer) between the outside of the mains shall be obtained. Sewer mains at water main crossings shall be constructed with ductile iron pipes with joints at least nine feet (9’) from the crossing centerline. If these conditions cannot be obtained, additional design considerations approved by the City of Fairhope shall be incorporated to protect both lines and prevent cross contamination. 2. Section B.11, of DIVISION II – DESIGN CRITERIA of the Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities is hereby revised to read as follows: 11. BUILDING a. Minimum height (feet) 8 b. Minimum unobstructed floor space (feet) 4 c. Ventilation requirements (air changes/hour): (1) Continuous duty 12 (2) Intermittent 30 d. Water service line (inches) 3/4 e. Interior lighting (LED Energy Efficient Fixtures Only) 2 f. Interior electrical receptacles (each): (1) 110 volt 4 (2) 240 volt 2 5. Section B ADDITIONAL SANITARY SEWER REQUIREMENTS, of DIVISION II – DESIGN CRITERIA of the Standard Specifications for Constructing Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Water Facilities is hereby revised to read as follows: 1. Gravity sanitary sewer collection mains shall be a minimum of eight (8) inches in diameter. 2. Where velocities will exceed 15 fps, special provisions shall be made to protect against displacement by erosion and impact. 3. Sanitary sewers shall be laid with uniform slope between Sanitary Sewer manholes. 4. Sanitary sewers placed on twenty (20) percent slopes or greater shall be anchored securely with an approved method and spacing. 5. Curvilinear alignment of sanitary sewers shall not be utilized in construction. 6. Sanitary Sewer manholes shall be installed on average every 400 feet and shall not exceed a distance of 450 feet. Manholes shall also be installed at: a) all changes in grade, size, or alignment; b) all intersections; and c) the end of each line. 7. Manholes shall be a minimum of 48 inches in diameter with minimum access diameter of 24 inches. 8. An approved drop connection shall be installed at each manhole where the sanitary sewer pipe is 24 inches or more above the manhole invert. 9. Sanitary sewage system components and piping configurations shall comply with the City of Fairhope Standard Details for sewer systems. 10. New sewage pumping stations shall be equipped with provisions for “quick connecting” to emergency generators, “quick connections” and piping configurations for permanent suction and discharge to allow for connecting to emergency bypass pumps. Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems in accordance with the SCADA systems currently in use by the Fairhope sewer system for monitoring operating conditions of the pump station from the Fairhope Water Reclamation Facility shall be installed at new sewage pumping stations. 11. New sewage pumping stations shall be provided with a backup generator or motor driven backup pump. The City shall choose which option that will be required. EFFECTIVE DATE: This amendment shall be in full force and effect upon its due adoption and certification as provided by law. Adopted this _______ Day of _______, 2025. ______________________________ Lee Turner, Chairman Attest: ______________________________ Cindy Beaudreau, Secretary 1 SD 25.12 Magnolia Beach Estates – July 7, 2025 Summary of Request: The owner is Mary Crumpton. Justin Palmer of The Woodlands Group, LLC is the authorized agent for the project. This application is requesting approval of Magnolia Beach Estates, a 2-lot Minor Subdivision. The property is approximately 2.4 acres and is located at 104 Laurel Avenue. The subject property is zoned R-2 - Medium Density Single-Family Residential District. There is an existing residence on proposed Lot-1. The site data table is below: General Comments: All lots are within 450 feet of a fire hydrant and each lot fronts a paved publicly maintained road. The applicant has proposed a new name, Hickory Preserve, to avoid a similar or duplicate name of existing subdivisions. Staff has no issues with this name. The proposed subdivision according to Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations is a minor subdivision and has been reviewed accordingly. The proposed subdivision does not include the building of any additional infrastructure or improvements therefore a tree protection plan, landscape plan, and other criteria required for a major subdivision is not applicable. The proposed subdivision did not trigger a traffic study. Fairhope’s Subdivision Regulations Article VI Section D requires the provision of sidewalks along all streets in the Planning Jurisdiction of Fairhope. Sidewalks do not currently exist along Laurel Ave. The applicant has requested to provide an easement for the sidewalk in lieu of installing sidewalks. Final plat must be recorded within 120 days of approval. The name of the subdivision “Magnolia Beach Estates” too closely resembles multiple existing subdivisions. Staff requests a new name be proposed and approved by the Planning Director. Drainage Comments: The existing flow patterns are not being changed. 2 SD 25.12 Magnolia Beach Estates – July 7, 2025 Wetlands exist on the property and are reflected on the plat along with the appropriate wetland buffer. The wetland buffer signs need to be reflected every 100’ and signs installed. Utility Comments: Water, sewer, and gas are provided by the City of Fairhope. Power is provided by Riviera and AT&T is the telecommunications provider. Connectivity: The applicant is requesting a sidewalk easement. The applicant states conflicts exist with heritage trees and utilities. Also there are no sidewalks in the nearby vicinity. A potential sidewalk project at the intersection of S. Mobile St. and Laurel Ave. will not extend near this property. The easement will allow for future sidewalk installation. Comments: The City of Fairhope Subdivision Regulations contain the following criteria in Article V.B.2. Approval Standards. “2. Consistency with Plans, Regulations and Laws - The Planning Commission shall not approve the subdivision of land if the Commission makes a finding that such land is not suitable for platting and development as proposed, due to any of the following: a. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and/or the City’s Zoning ordinance, where applicable; • Meets b. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan or any other plan or program for the physical development of the City including but not limited to a Master Street Plan, a Parks Plan, a Bicycle Plan, a Pedestrian Plan, or the Capital Improvements Program; • Meets c. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with these Regulations; • Meets d. The proposed subdivision is not consistent with other applicable state or federal laws and regulations; • Meets e. The proposed subdivision otherwise endangers the health, safety, welfare or property within the planning jurisdiction of the City.” • Meets Staff Recommendation Staff recommends APPROVAL of SD 25.12 Magnolia Beach Estates (Hickory Preserve) with the following conditions: 1. Grant approval of the 10’ sidewalk easement in lieu of the installation of sidewalk. 2. Wetland buffer signs are reflected on the plat and installed prior to final signature of the plat. Y1' 30'4C7'N 4119!1) 41198'.I Hydric Rating by Map Unit-Baldwin County, A labama (104 Laurel Ave) 413)10 4t21Bl 41ml 413)10 4121B) Map Scale: 1 :CJZl f prrtEd on A portrat (8.5" X 11 ") sheet. ---===------======iMe!B'S 0 10 20 40 to ----====--------=======:=,Feet o ~ ro ® ~ Map projection: \\\b Merti!llr O:meraxinlnares: WGS84 fdgetlcs: un-1 Zllne 16N WGS84 Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 41ml 412100 -I Y1' 30'46"N 412100 9/20/2024 Page 1 of5 30" 3()'4C7'N Hydric Rating by Map Un it-Baldwin County, Alabama (104 Laurel Ave) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOl) D Area of Interest (AO!) Solla Soll Rating Polygons 0 Hydric (100%) 0 Hydric (66 to 99%) D Hydric (33 to 65%) D Hydrlc (1 to 32%) D Not Hydric (0%) O Not rated or not available Soll Rating Unes -,; Hydrlc (100%) • ~ Hydric (66 to 99%) ,. • Hydric (33 to 65%) JI Hydrtc (1 to 32%) , Not Hydric (0%) ,. , Not rated or not available Soll Rating Points Hydric (100%) □ Hydric (66 to 99%) C Hydric (33 to 65%) 0 Hyd ri c (1 to 32%) Not Hydrfc (0%) CJ Not rated or not available Water Featurea us~ Natural Resourees Conservation Service Streams and Canals Transportation H-+ Rails .,..,,, Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background • Aerial Photography Web Soil Survey Nattonal Cooperative Soil Survey The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Waming : Soil Map may not be valid at this scale . Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale . Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements . Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coord inate System : Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based 011 the Web Mercator projection, Which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection , should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required . This product Is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified dala as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area : Baldwin County, Alabama Survey Area Data : \lers on 16, Sep 11, 2023 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1 :50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed : Nov 12, 2021-0ec 22 ,2021 The orthophoto or other base map on wh ich the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 9/20/2024 Page 2 ofS Hydric Rating by Map Unit-Baldwin County, Alabama Hydric Rating by Map Unit Map unit symbol Map unit name I LaB Lakeland loamy fine Is Totals for Area of Interest sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes Rating Web So il Survey I Natural Resources Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey AcrealnAOI I 2.4 2.4 104 laurel Ave I Percent of AOI I 100.0% 100.0% 9/20/2024 Page 3 of5 Hyd ri c Rati ng by Map Unit-8aldWi n County, Alaba ma wa Description This rating indicates the percentage of map units that meets the criteria for hydric soils . Map units are composed of one or more map unit components or soil types, each of which is rated as hydric soil or not hydlic. Map units that are made up dominantly of hydric soils may have small areas of minor nonhydric components in the higher positions on the landform, and map units that are made up dominantly of nonhydric soils may have small areas of minor hydric components in the lower positions on the landform. Each map unit is rated based on its respective components and the percentage of each component within the map unit. The thematic map is color coded based on the composition of hydric components. The five color classes are separated as 100 percent hydric components, 66 to 99 percent hydric components, 33 to 65 percent hydric components , 1 to 32 percent hydric components , and less than one percent hydric components. In Web Soil Survey, the Summary by Map Unit table that is displayed below the map pane contains a column named 'Rating'. In this column the percentage of each map unit that is classified as hydric is displayed. Hydric soils are defined by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS) as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (Federal Register, 1994 ). Under natural conditions, these soils are either saturated or inundated long enough during the growing season to support the growth and reproduction of hydrophytic vegetation. The NTCHS definition identifies general soil properties that are associated with wetness. In order to determine whether a specific soil is a hydric soil or nonhydri c soil, however, more specific information, such as information about the depth and duration of the water table, is needed. Thus, criteria that identify those estimated soil properties unique to hydric soils have been established (Federal Register, 2002}. These criteria are used to identify map unit components that normally are associated with wet1ands. The criteria used are selected estimated soil properties that are described in "Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 1999) and "Keys to Soil Taxonomy" (Soil Survey Staff, 2006) and in the "Soil Survey Manual" (Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993). If soils are wet enough for a long enough period of time to be considered hydric , they should exhibit certain properties that can be easily observed in the field . These visible properties are indicators of hydric soils. The indicators used to make onsite determinations of hydric soils are specified in "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States" (Hurt and Vasilas , 2006). References : Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States . Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Natural Reeources Conservation Service Web Soll Survey National Cooperative Soll Survey 104 Laurel Ave 9/20/2024 Page 4 of 5 Hydric Rating by Map Unit-Baldwin County, Alabama Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas , editors . Version 6.0, 2006 . Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service . U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys . 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Percent Present Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Lower Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soll Survey 104 Laurel Ave 9/20/2024 Page 5 or 5 Exhibit D Current Aerial Exhibit E National Wetland Inventory Map Exhibit F Quad Map Exhibit G Sketch of Wetland Resources Exhibit H USACE Data Sheets WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site : 104 Laurel Street, PPIN 36014 City/County: Fairhope/Baldwin Sampling Date: _9_/2_0_2_4 __ _ ApplicanVOwner: Mary Crumpton Revocable Living Trust State: AL Sampling Point _w_e_t_-1 __ _ lnvestigator(s): _C_r_a_ig_M_a_rt_in _____________ Section, Township, Range: _S_e_c_3_7_l'_w_p_6_S_R_2_E _________ _ Landform (hillslope, terrace , etc .): ___________ Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): _0_-2 __ Subregion (LRR orMLRA): 152A-Gulf Coastal Plain Lat: 30.5116506° Long : -87 .9168143° Datum : WGS84 Soll Map Unit Name: Lakeland loamy fine sand NWI classification : _P_F_0_3_C _____ _ Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes _X __ No __ (If no, explain in Remarii:s .) Are Vegetation~ Soil_. or Hydrology __ significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation __ . Soll __ , or Hydrology __ naturally problemallc? Are "Nonnat Circumstances · present? Yes __ No _x __ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks .) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_><-__ No ---Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes_x __ No ---within a Wetland? Yes X No WeUand Hydrology Present? Yes_ic __ No --- Remarks : Major topographic condition, wetland/floodplain generally at toe of slope HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primaay Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) 8 Surface Water (A1) D Aquatic Fauna (B13) High Wate r Table (A2) D Mar1 Deposits (815) (LRR U) Secondary Indicators {minimum of two required} 0 Surface Soil Cracks (B6) l2J Saturation (A3) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci) C Water Marii:s (81) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3) 0 Sediment Deposits (B2) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) § Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (816) 8 Ory-Season Water Table (C2) @ Drift Deposits (B3) D Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) 0 Algal Mat or Crust (84) 8 Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (CS) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 0 Geomorphic Position (02) 0 Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain In Remarks) 0 In undation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) 0 Waler-Stained Leaves (B9) Field Observations: Yes __ No_x __ Depth(inches): ____ _ Surface Water Present? Water Table Present'? Saturation Present? (indudes caoillarv frinoe\ Yes _x __ No __ Depth (Inches): ____ _ Yes _x_ No __ Depth (inches): _4 ___ _ 0 Shallow Aquitard (03) @ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) 0 Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _x__ No __ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge , monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remafi<s ; Stream (Tatumville Gully) off property/floodplain bench. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coaslal Pla in Region -Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: _W_e_t_-1 __ _ Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worttsheet: Tree Stratum (Plol size: ) % Cover S~cies? S!atus Number of Dominant Species 1. Pinus elllotlli 30 y FACW That Are OBL. FACW. orFAC: 4 (A) 2. Magnolia virginiana 20 y FACW Total Number of Dominanl 3. Species Across All Strata : 5 (B) 4. 5. Percent of Dominant Species 80 That Are OBL, FACW , or FAC: (NB) 6. 7. Prevalence Index worttsheet: 8. Total % Coyer of: Multiply by: 30 OBLspecies 30 X 1: 30 ::: Total Cover 15 20% of total cover: 6 FACW species 50 X 2"' 100 50% of total oover: FAC species 30 x3::: 90 Sa11ling/Shrub ~lralum (Plot size: ) 1. Ligustrum sinense 30 y FAC FACU species x4::: 2. Pnmus carol inium 30 y FACU UPL species X 5::: Column Totals: 110 (A) 220 (B) 3 . 4. Prevalence Index =BIA:: 2.0 s. Hydrophyth: Vegetation Indicators: 6. 0 1 • Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. 0 2 • Dominance Test is >50% 8. 0 3 • Prevalence Index is :s3 .0 1 30 "'Total Cover 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain) 50% of total cover: 16 20% of total cover: 6 Herb Stratum (Plot size : 1mx1m ) 1Indicators of hydric soil and weUand hydrology must 1. Woodwardia aerolata 30 y OBL be present. unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. Tree -Woody plants. excluding vines, 3 In . (7.6 cm) or 4. more ln diameter at breast height (OBH), regardless of 5. height. 6. Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants , excluding vines, less 7. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft {1 m) tall . 8. Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless 9. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall . 10. Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 11. height. 12 . 30 ::: Total Cover 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 Woody V!ae S!ratum (Plot s ize : NIA ) 1, 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytlc = Total Cover Vegetation Yes_x __ 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? No --- Remarks: (If observed, lisl morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Ver5 ion 2.0 SOIL Samptlhg Point: Wet-1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confinn the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (jngi~) Colo,: (mgi!itl ~ Color (!!!Qist) --1-....Im!L. Loc2 Texture Bemart<s 0-8 10YR 3/2 5 C M FSL sandy redox --------- 6-12 10YR 3/1 FSL ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- 1Tvoe : C=Concenlratlon D=Deoletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Unina, M=Matrix. Hydrlc Soll Indicators: (Appllcable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solla': 0 Histosol (A1J Q Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U) ~ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) § Histic Epipedon (A2) B Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Reduced Vertie (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,8) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ~ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) TI Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tl B Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) TI Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dari( Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538) § 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dart< Surface (F7) D Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (FB) IJ Very Shallow Oar1< Surlace (TF12) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, Tl B Mar1 (F10) (LRRU) :0 Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11) Depleted Ochric (F11 )(MLRA 151) 0 Thick. Dark Surface (A12) D Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T} 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and B Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) B Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) weUand hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mi neral (S1) (LRR 0, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. 0 Sandy Gleyed Mattix (S4) 0 Reduced Vertie (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508) ~ Sandy Redox (S5) E Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) ✓ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) 0 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soll Present? Yes_X __ t,lo __ Remarks : Depositional layers obvious floodplain bench US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Project/Site: 104 Laurel Street, PPIN 36014 City/County: Fairhope/Baldwin Sampling Date: _9_12_0_2_4 __ _ Applicant/OWner: Mary Crumpton Revocable Living Trust State: AL Sampling Point : _U_-_1 ___ _ lm1esliga1or(s): _C_r_a_ig_M_a_rt_in ____________ Section. Township, Range: _s_e_c_3_7_T_w_p_6_S_R_2_E _________ _ Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): _F_la_t_s _________ Local relief (concave, convex, none): _n_o_n_e _____ Slope (%): _0_-2 __ Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 152A-Gulf Coastal Plain Lat : 30.1837263° Long : -087 .9167586° OaltJm: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Lakeland loamy fine sand NWI classification : _U_P _______ _ Ale climatic/ hydrotogic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes _X __ No __ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation __ . Soil __ , or Hydrology __ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances• present? Yes _X __ No __ Are Vegetation_, Soll __ , or Hydrology __ naturally problematic? (If needed, e><plain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc-. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_x __ No ---Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ---No_X __ within a Wetland? WeUand Hydfotogy Present? Yes ---No_X __ Remar1<s: Well drained Residential uses/lawns, storage, home and gardens HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators {minimum of one is required: check all that apply) 8 Surface Water (A1) D Aquatic Fauna (813) High Water Table (A2) 0 Man Deposits (815) (LRR U) 8 Saturation (A3) D Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Water Marks (B1) D Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (CJ) B Sediment Deposits (B2) D Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Drift Depcsils (B3) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) D Algal Mat or Crust (84) 8 Thin Muck Surface (C7) D Iron Deposits (85) Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) 0 Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Field Observations: Yes __ No _x __ Depth (inches): ____ _ Yes __ No _x __ Depth (Inches): ____ _ Yes No X Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) 0 Surface Soil Cracks (86) § Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Drainage Patterns (B10) Moss Trim Lines (816) 0 Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Q Crayfish Burrows (CS) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 0 Geomorphic Position (02) 0 Shallow Aquitard (D3) 0 FAC-Neutral Test (05) Q Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturation Present? /Includes caolllarv frinael Yes __ No_x_ Depth(lnches): ____ _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes __ No_X __ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous Inspections), if available: Remarks : No hydrologic indicators present US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata)-Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: _u_-_1 __ _ Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Ct-,.t,,c- Number of Dominant Species -, ..... MO' 1. Quercus virginiana 35 y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2.. Primus caroliniana 10 y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. Quercus nigra 10 N FAC Species ACfOSS All Strata; 5 (8) 4. 5. Percent of Dominant Species 40 Thal Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/8) 6. 7. Prevalence Index wor1<sheet: 8. Total % Coyer of: Multiplvbv: 55 = Total Cover OBLspecies X 1 = 50% of total cover: 2 7 ,5 20% of total cover. 11 FACW species x2= 10m x 10m FAC species 65 x3: 195 Sa!!ling/Sbt.Yt! Stratum (Plot size: ) llex vomltoria 35 y FAC FACU species 65 x4= 260 1. 2 . Ligustrum sinense 30 y FAG UPLspecies X 5"' Column Totals: 145 (A) 425 (B) 3. 4. Prevalence Index =BIA= 2.93 5. Hydrophytlc Vegetation Indicators: 6. D 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 7. 0 2 -Dominance Test is >50% 8. 0 3 -Prevalence Index is s3.0' 65 = Total Cover 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegelation 1 (Explain) 50% or total cover. 32.5 20% of total cover: 13 Herb S!r@tum (Plot size: 1mx 1m ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and weUand hydrology must 1. Pteridlum aqullinum 20 y FACU be present. unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 3. Tree-Woody plants. excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 an) or 4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 5. height. 6. Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, exduding vines, less 7, than 3 In. DBH and greater lhan 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 8. Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants. regardless 9. of size, and woody plants less lhan 3.28 ft tall. 10. Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 11. height. 12. 20 ~ Total Cover 50% of total cover: 1 O 20% of total cover: 4 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: NIA ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Hydrophytlc = Total Cover Vegetation No_X __ 50% of total cover: 20% of Iota! cover: Present? Yes - Remarks : (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Residential upland condition us Anny Corps of Engineers AUantlc and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: _U_-_1 __ _ Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confinn the absence of indicators.} Depth Ma!riX Redox Features ,inches} QQlor (moii1t} ___L__ QotQr (!Il2i§U ~ ~ ~ Text11re R!;lmarks 0-6 7.5YR 5/1 fine sands uncoated ------------6-12 7 .5YR4/1 --------- --------- --------- --------- ------------ ------------ 1Tvoe: C:.Concentration, D::Deoletlon RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains. iLocation: PL=Pore Linina M=Matrix . Hydrlc Soll lndtcatora: (Applicable to all L.RRs, unless otherwise noted.) lndlcatof$ for Problematic Hydrtc Solla 1 : O Histosol (A1) 0 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ~ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0) § Hislic Eplpedon (A2) 8 Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A 10) (LRR S) , Black Hlslic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) Redllced Vertie (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B} Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) E Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) B Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) B Stratified Layers (AS) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dart< Surface (F6) (ML.RA 1538} B 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) § Depleted Dart< Surface (F7) 0 Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (FB) IJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Marl (F10) (LRR U) D Other (Explain in Remarks) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface (A 11 ) 0 Depleted Ochric(F11) (MLRA 151) 0 Thick Oa111. Surface (A12) .D Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and B Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) B Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) weUand hydrology must be present, Sandy Muclly Mineral (S1) (LRR O, SJ Delta Oehrle (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic. § Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) B Reduced Venic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Ftoodplaln Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix.(S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530) 0 Dark. Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type : Depth (Inches): Hydric Soll Present? Yes --No_X __ Remarks: US Army Corps or Engineers AUantlc and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2 .0 7/26124, 8 :56 AM Go gle Maps Fairhope, Alabama 112 Laurel Ave Flow Hydrant G Google Street View May 2024 See more dates Jerry Taylor U 112 Laurel Ave -Google Maps Image capture: May 2024 C 2024 Google https:1/www.google.com/maps/@30.5121981 .-87.9157168,3a,68.5y,346.39h,96.06t/data::13m611e113m411sDN0gTOlqtupYIMzrqfwGWWl2e0171163841818192?coh::205409&entry=ttu 1/1 1249 Pencarro Blvd Foley, Alabama 36535 T: (251) 269-8689 jww@wooteneng.com July 27, 2024 The Woodlands Group ATTN: Justin Palmer, PLS, Principal Surveyor (601) 479-3408 Justin@TheWoodlandsGroup.org RE: MAGNOLIA BEACH ESTATES 104 LAUREL STREET FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA 36532 Dear Mr. Palmer: Wooten Engineering has reviewed the information you have provided for the planned Magnolia Beach Estates Subdivision with respect to the need for a potential traffic study. It is our understanding that the subdivision is to create 3 lots from an existing lot located at 104 Laural Street in Fairhope, Alabama (County Parcel No. 05-46-03-37-0-013-085.000). The existing property is a 2.35-acre single-family lot located along the southwest side of Laurel Street between the intersections of Satsuma Street/Laurel Streets and Kumquat/Laurel Streets. There is an existing house located near the center of the property. An existing driveway connects to Laurel Street. The surrounding area of the subject site is typical single-family neighborhood with curbed city streets of approximately 20 feet total width. The planned subdivision will create a 1.81-acre lot to site the existing house and two 0.27-acre lots for future single-family residential use. All three lots will have driveway connections to Laurel Street. Attached is the planned subdivision plat provided. It is our opinion that the creation of 2 additional single-family lots along Laurel Street does not warrant a traffic study to determine effects on the level of service of city streets in vicinity to the project. Please note that this determination is based on the land use being single-family residents. If the planned use is to differ from our assumption, we would appreciate an opportunity to review and possibly revise our recommendation. Respectfully, Jason W. Wooten, P.E., Principal ATTACHMENT 1 ZC 25.04 Smith Fresh Kitchen Conditional Annexation B‐2 – July 7, 2025 Summary of Request: The Applicant/Owner, Gold Kist Corner, LLC, requests conditional annexation with rezoning to B‐2 “General Business District.” The property is approximately 4.65 acres and is located at the southwest corner of State Hwys 104 and 181. Lieb Engineering is the authorized agent. Comments The property is currently zoned B‐4 “Major Commercial District” by the County. There are two (2) operating businesses on the subject property: Smith Fresh Kitchen (bka “The Hub” a gas station/convenience store) and Sweat Tire. Permitted Uses for Baldwin County B‐4 are the following: Applicant desires to be zoned B‐2 if annexed into the City. Staff supports B‐2 zoning for the subject property if annexed into the City because B‐2 is the “most similar district” per Article I, Section C(6)(c) to Baldwin County B‐4 zoning. Allowed uses in County B‐4 and City B‐2 zoning are similar and some of the very same uses, including the current uses on the subject property: convenience store/gas station and automobile parts sales (i.e. tires). Google Street View last visited on June 13, 2025. 2 ZC 25.04 Smith Fresh Kitchen Conditional Annexation B‐2 – July 7, 2025 Table 3‐1 Use Table from Fairhope Zoning Ordinance 3 ZC 25.04 Smith Fresh Kitchen Conditional Annexation B‐2 – July 7, 2025 Since the property is anticipated to be annexed into the City then City regulations shall apply once the property is outright under the City’s jurisdiction going forward as B‐2. As such, future development of the site shall come into compliance with city standards and connect to city utilities. Convenience Stores in the City may operate with Special Conditions for the Use set forth in Article III, Section D(4). Moreover, there are incompatible uses to the west. A Baldwin County RSF‐E parcel, which is residential, and requires buffering. The Tree Ordinance makes reference to 10 ft buffer strips along the incompatible property line(s) of the developing property and for property adjacent to public ROWs (Section 20.5‐4(11) and (4), respectively and Article V, Section B(2) reads: Because this is a rezoning case, Staff recommends requiring a 20’ landscape buffer abutting all residential property that is compliant with Article V, Section B(2) above, but would support planting of trees and shrubs at time of future development. The City Council, with Planning Commission recommendation, has the authority and discretion to determine if any additional conditions are applicable to the zoning case at hand. Citizen Comments Citizen comments received do not favor this conditional annexation. Most of the comments are about vehicular congestion due to the existing commercial activity and disappointment in ALDOT for missed opportunities to improve the single ingress/egress for the Hollowbrook subdivision when ALDOT was expanding Hwy 181. At least one (1) business (“Storage Pro” outdoor shed sales) that was operating on the subject property has ceased doing business since the application. Re‐zoning from a County district to a similar city district does not automatically increase any commercial activity in the area. It is currently a heavily commercially zoned area via city or county zoning. See below. 4 ZC 25.04 Smith Fresh Kitchen Conditional Annexation B‐2 – July 7, 2025 Conceptual Site Plan Wetland There are no wetlands whatsoever on the subject property per the Engineer of Record. Utilities Water, Sewer, and Gas shall be supplied by Fairhope Utilities. Riviera will provide power. Criteria – The application shall be reviewed based on the following criteria: (1) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan; Response: Meets. All corners of Hwys 181 and 104 are considered Suburban Mixed‐Use Centers. (2) Compliance with the standards, goals, and intent of this ordinance; Response: Applicant intends to annex into the City of Fairhope and fall under the City’s development guidelines. (3) The character of the surrounding property, including any pending development activity; Response: Meets. Most of the surrounding property is already commercially zoned by the county or city. The Encounter Commercial Park already has existing businesses and is otherwise developing. 5 ZC 25.04 Smith Fresh Kitchen Conditional Annexation B‐2 – July 7, 2025 (4) Adequacy of public infrastructure to support the proposed development; Response: This is a re‐zoning request, without a Site Plan review. Future projects within the subject property shall ensure adequate public infrastructure. Sweat Tire shall be connected to Fairhope Sewer and Water prior to the City Council meeting for this case. (5) Impacts on natural resources, including existing conditions and ongoing post‐development conditions; Response: None anticipated. The site is developed. (6) Compliance with other laws and regulations of the City; Response: At the time of any development all applicable laws of the City will be applied. (7) Compliance with other applicable laws and regulations of other jurisdictions; Response: At the time of additional development all applicable laws will be applied. (8) Impacts on adjacent property including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values; and, Response: The area is an existing commercial hub where such things are commonplace and tolerated. B‐2 zoning allows for the same type of impacts that have already happened. (9) Impacts on the surrounding neighborhood including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values. Response: Staff do not anticipate any significant issues relating to this criterion because already developed and no additional or different uses were submitted with the application. Recommendation: Staff recommends to Planning Commission that Case ZC 25.04 Smith Fresh Kitchen from County zoned B‐4 to Fairhope B‐2 “General Business District” be Approved. Smith Fresh Kitchen Metes and Bounds Description From the Northeast comer of Section 10, Township 6 South, Range 2 East, run N ago 57'-W 33.0 feet; thence run South 40.0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run South along the West margin ofBelforest Road, 621.75 feet; thence run Sago 51 ' -W 431.6 feet; thence run North 622.76 feet to the South margin of Alabama H i ghway 104; thence run Sago 57' -E along said South margi n of Alabama Highway 104,431.6 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, contain i ng 6.165 acres, and being a part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 10, Baldwin County, Alabama; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the South 130 feet previously conveyed to John H. Lang. Fro m: To: Subject: Date: Ii)] Jenna smart alfillniaa Fw : Case : ZC 25.04 & ZC 25 .05 (Hwy 104 & 181) Wednesday, May 28, 2025 1:15 :47 PM Dear Fairhope Planning Commision : I am a resident of Hollowbrook Subdivision which backs up to the two proposed 8-2 conditional zoning requests , and I'd like to express my opposition to granting either of these requests . While growth is an integral part of any community, retention of existing residential and "green " areas is just as important. I moved into Hollowbrook subdivision in 2020 and i n the last 5 years our small residential subdivision, with only one way in or out, has been bombarded with commercial expansion . We have watched a cell tower erected that loom s over several of the homes and will likely have a negative impact on property values . The Publix complex, that took forever to come to fruition , as well as the WaWa and Rockwell Apartment Complex have increased traffic exponentially . Not to mention 4+ years that our subdivision was at the mercy of ALDOT due to the road widening project of Hwy 181. Once this section was completed and abruptly stopped in front of our subdivision entrance and 2-3 other businesses we have been left with erosion and drainage problems at the entrance of ou r subdivision that the Homeowners Association is having to clean up at our own expense . Not to mention the dangerous situation of where the road merges just past a major intersection with no turn lane for slower moving traffic to enter the gas station, Hollowbrook subdivision, and the two other business just south of Hwy 104/181 intersection . I oppose adding any further commercial property/construction in this same area of our subdivision . Doing so will only add additional erosion , drainage, and traffic concerns which I fear will negatively property values. I hope that the Planning Commission will choose the residents of this area over the commercial expansion with regard to these two zoning requests . Thank you, Jenna Smart 9605 Chario t Ave Fa irhope. AL 36532 From: To: Subject: Date: ■ Dear Cindy, Biulette. ~ Attn: Ondy Beaudreau (Rezonning Case ZC 25 04) Tuesday, May 27, 2025 2:43:36 PM I am a concerned resident of the city of Fairhope , residing in the neighborhood of Hollowbrook Subdivision. I was j ust made aware of the request of Lieb Engineering Co acting on behalf of the prope1ty owner (Gold Kist Comer, LLC) at the location at 181 and 104. This prope1ty is directly adjacent to our residential Subdivision and I am ve1y much opposed to the rezoning of said prope1ty due to the direct negative effect it would have on all the residents in the Hollowbrook Subdivision . I ask you as a ve1y concerned resident of the Hollowbrook Subdivison and the City of Fairhope to please , please consider our request to not approve the rezolliling of this prope1ty. Our little subdivision would be sandwiched in between two commercial properties of multiple businesses . We have already been overlooked and we feel ve1y slighted by ALDOT who would not put in a much needed south bound tum lane into our subdivision. We requested the help of the city planning committee to appeal along with us to ALDOT and no one saw the need , now the traffic in front of our subdivision is already h01Tendous and dangerous with speeding drivers not slowing down to allow us to tum into the subdivision . Another commercial property coming in next door would only escalate the problem . Please , please help us to keep our subdivision safe and maintain our prope1ty value . Sincerely, Paulette Waller Resident@ 9525 Woohich Ave, Fairhope , AL 36532 Summary of Request: The Applicant/Owner, Adv antage Holdings, LLC, requests cond it ional annexation with rezoning to B-2 "General Business District." The property is approximately 2.23 acres and is located at 21905 State Highway, 181. Lieb Engineering is the authorized agent. Comments The property is currently zoned B-4 "Major Commercial District" by the County. There is one (1) business operating on the subject property: Smith Straw. There is also an existing cell tower. Permitted Uses for Baldwin County B-4 are the following: (a) All uses pennitted by right under the B-3 zon ing designation (b ) Amusement Park (c) Auto conve nience market (d) Automobile parts sales (e) Automobile repair (mechanical an d body ) (f) Automobile sales (g ) Automobile service station {q ) Motorcycle sal es servi ce and repair (r) Movie theatre {s) Recreational vehicle park (h) Automobi le storage (parking lot, parking garage ) (i) Boat sales and service U) Building materials (k) Farm implements (I) Flea market (m)Home improvement center (n) Hotel or motel: (o ) Manufactured hous ing sales, servi ce and repair (p) Marina (t) Recreati onal vehicle sales, service and repair (u) Restaurant. drive-tn (v } Restaurant, fast food Applicant desires to be zoned B-2 if annexed into the City. B-2 Genernl Business Disrr;cr· Th.is di strict is intended to provide oppornmity fo r activi ties causing noise and hea vy tra ffic, not considered compatible iu the more res trictive bus iness dis n-ict. These uses a lso serve a regional a s well as a loca l market and r equire location in proximity to major tran sportation routes . Recreational vehicle parks, ver y light production and processing activities are inc.luded. Staff supports B-2 zoning for the subject property if annexed into the City because B-2 is the "most similar district" per Article I, Section C(6)(c) to Baldwin County B-4 zoning. Allowed uses in County B-4 and City B-2 zoning are similar, although not exact. At the t i me of this application there were multiple businesses on the property. It is the intent to maintain Smith Straw operations on the property. Recent visits to the property reveal that a U-Haul business is also in operation called "Storage Pro, LLC". Both of which have current business licenses. There is also a communications tower on the property. 1 ZC 25.05 Smith Straw Conditiona l Annexation 8-2 -July 7, 2025 Table 3-1 Use Table from Fa i rhope Zon i ng Ord i nance ,z-.i. .... ,I ' L>. --,.,_.&_L..,n r -..,._. 1...., .......... ,1 ,. • • • • "I-<-L I • • • • ,,·-•·-' - - . .r...l--, I ~.J:.: -, .. . I 0 0 L ,,f-.-., .. 1 ]~ ' .i.·-.. 1 • • • • • \.<,,_~~-I -• . . ~J. I L I l "" . ·.w " • ., • ·-• ... ~ -· ,. • • • • ·- , __ i .. • • ,.__ ,. • • • • :;c,-a41,1,._._, I ,~.,,.. ,o 0 0 .il_,...t ,o 0 0 Q -l-..~-.r ,. • • • l~---~•-....,__ ;■ • • • l t..-aru.,, 1 0 0 0 _ .... ._., 0 0 0 0 0 ta.'-., l_...,, ,. • • • -I ■ • • • la.-. ( la•-•-• • it.-. L..,,_,..... I • • • L.un~>-I -• • ,........, ._, __ -,. • • .......__ _._ I • \,c...-. I,._._. .. ..i..t,, .. .o 0 ~ • Wit. i.-:,1 I g l--. .. -..&NL.., I Q ---~ I g u '~ ·---•-U-o, Q Q u ·-1 0 0 0 (. ......... ,,_.,.. ' 0 0 • 0 ·.-l_. :a 0 0 0 ...::a:r. l~ ~ :• • -.....----g D -_iu:tm="' I • ____ ... -1 • • 0 .,,.,,t.~ ~ ,. 0 ~----i g • • 'lld. & u ..... ,,,1 I • 0 ...... i..i-. I 0 0 Cl -•-... n--• • • ........ l".td • • .. I O • 0 • -I • 0 • \,-• 0 .__ 0 0 c-1.,. "-•--tr•-··' 0 0 ia,....t..-.. I .__ '__. , ..... ---'~ ....__,_ -~-~ 0 a :l..irf'II I ('~ ,-.. I ... I.I I --~___,, -~-- 3 ZC 25.05 Sm ith St r aw Conditiona l Annexat ion B-2 -Ju ly 7, 2025 Wetland There are no wetlands whatsoever on the subject property per the Engineer of Record. Utilities Water, Sewer, and Gas shall be supplied by Fairhope Utilities. Riviera will provide power. Criteria -The application shall be reviewed based on the following criteria: (1) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan; Response: Meets. All corners of Hwys 181 and 104 are considered Suburban Mixed-Use Centers per the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Compliance with the standards, goals, and intent of this ordinance; Response: Applicant intends to annex into the City of Fairhope and fall under the Citys development guidelines. (3) The character of the surrounding property, including any pending development activity; Response: Meets. Most of the surround i ng property is already commercially zoned by the county or city. The Encounter Commercial Park already has existing businesses and is otherwise developing. (4) Adequacy of public infrastructure to support the proposed development; Response: This is a re-zoning request, without a Site Plan review. Future projects within the subject property shall ensure adequate public infrastructure. (5) Impacts on natural resources, including existing conditions and ongoing post-development conditions; Response: None anticipated. The site is developed. (6) Compliance with other laws and regulations of the City; Response: At the time of any development all applicable laws of the City will be applied. (7) Compliance with other applicable laws and regulations of other jurisdictions; Response: At the time of additional deve l opment all applicable laws will be applied. (8) Impacts on adjacent property including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values; and, Response: The area is an existing commercial hub where such things are commonplace and tolerated. B-2 zoning allows for the same type of impacts that have already happened. (9) Impacts on the surrounding neighborhood including noise, traffic, visible intrusions, potential physical impacts, and property values. Response: Staff do not anticipate any significant issues relating to this criterion because already developed and no additional or different uses were submitted with the application. 5 ZC 25.05 Smith Straw Conditiona l Annexation B-2 -July 7, 2025 Recommendation: Staff recommends Case ZC 25.05 Smith Straw County zoned 8-4 to Fairhope 8-2 "General Business District" be Approved w ith the following condition(s): 6 1) Provide the City with the Lessor for the communications tower lease. 2) A twenty foot (20') l andscape buffer shall be required along all property lines abutting residentially zoned property in compliance with Article V, Section 8(2) of the Zoning Ordinance. ZC 25.05 Smith Straw Conditiona l Annexation 8-2-July 7, 2025 Smith Straw/Advantage Holdings Metes and Bounds Description Commencing at the point of intersection of the center line of the Silverhill H ighway (Alabama H ighway No. 104) and the cente rline of Belforest Road, which point is now presumed to be the Northeast corner of Section 10, Township 6 South, Range 2 East, Ba ldwin County, Alabama; run thence South along the centerline of the Belforest Road 661.75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence run South 8 9 ° 51' West, 67 3 . 9 feet to a corner; thence run North 00 ° 30' East, 208.56 feet to a corner; thence run North 89 ° 51' East, 208.56 feet to a corner; thence run South 00 ° 30' West, 78.56 feet to a corner; thence run North 89 ° 51' East, 464.6 feet to a point on the centerline of said Be lforest Road; thence run South 130 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Belforest Road right-of-way; containing 2. 2 7 acres, more or less, in the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 6 South, Range 2 East, Baldwin County, Alabama. From: To: Subject: Date: iJ Archjvesmouse ul.anniml Co mments re the request to annex Property; Case ZC 25.05 Th ursday, June 26, 2025 10:08:48 PM Regarding Case ZC 25.05 Request: Conditional Annexation to B-2 PPIN#: 66242 June 26 , 2025 Dear Planning and Zoning Representatives : I am writing to you out of concern for my home and my property as it relates to the above request for annexation of the property in close proximity to my home My home is located in Hollowbrook Subdivision on Hollow brook A venue just off Highway 181 in Fairhope . My home faces north and is close to the front of the neighborhood . In front of my home and across the street about 150 feet is a towering approximately 190 foot metal cell tower. This t ower was put up without notice to property owners which is required. It was slipped in. This tower represents a health risk with the continuous exposure to constant frequencies being generated coming off this tower. When I live in my home I expect my home to always be a refuge of safety and security. It is unacceptable that someone would be allowed to put up something so irresponsible on their property that it jeopardizes the health and safety of me and my family by effecting the air on and through my home. Further , when a hurricane approaches , I am concerned that any or part of this towner or its attachments will become airborne and become metal projectiles . As a homeowner , I shouldn 't have to leave my home out of the concern for danger this tower could become during a hurricane or have to be concerned about the damage that could occur to my home or property. Also , the tower is like having a huge lightning rod close to your home and there is concern about resulting effect that this can have on our homes both above and below ground. The homes on my street have underground utilities . Additionally, the view of the tower is ugly and only takes from the beauty of the homes on my street. In conclusion, my rights as a homeowner should be respected by having safety and security . The tower needs to come down . Respectfully, Rebecca Glennon 9950 Hollowbrook Avenue Fairhope, AL 365321 From: To: Subject: Dilte: [i] Jenna smart a1.anniml Fw: Case: ZC 25.04 & ZC 25.05 (Hwy 104 & 181 ) Wednesday, May 28, 2025 1:15:47 PM Dear Fairhope Planning Commision : I am a resident of Hollowbrook Subdivision which backs up to the two proposed B-2 conditional zoning requests, and I'd like to express my opposition to granting either of these requests. While growth is an integral part of any community, retention of existing resident ial and "green" areas is just as important. I moved into Hollowbrook subdivision in 2020 and in the last 5 years our small residentia l subdivision, with only one way in or out, has been bombarded with commercial expansion. We have watched a cell tower erected that looms over several of the homes and will likely have a negative impact on property values. The Publ ix comp lex, that took forever to come to fruition, as well as the WaWa and Rockwell Apartment Comp lex have increased traffic exponentially . Not to mention 4+ years that our subdivision was at the mercy of ALDOT due to the road widening project of Hwy 181. Once this section was completed and abruptly stopped in front of our subdivision entrance and 2-3 other businesses we have been left with erosion and drainage problems at the entrance of our subdivision that the Homeowners Association is having to clean up at our own expense . Not to mention the dangerous situat ion of where the road merges just past a major intersection with no turn lane for slower moving traffic to enter the gas station, Hollowbrook subdivision, and the two other business just south of Hwy 104/181 intersection . I oppose adding any further commercial property/construction in this same area of our subdivision . Doing so will only add additional erosion, drainage, and traffic concerns which I fear will negat ively property va lues. I hope that the Planning Commission will choose the residents of this area over the commercial expansion with regard to these two zoning requests . Thank you, Jenna Smart 9605 Char iot Ave Fa irhope . AL 36532 ARTICLE IV REGISTERED AGENT AND OFFICE The location address of the initial registered office of the Company shall be 9916 Windmill Road , #14, Fairhope, Alabama 36532, and the mailing address of the initia l registered office of the Company is 9916 Windmill Road, Fairhope, Alabama 36532. The name of the initial registered agent of the Company at that address is RI CHARD S. SMITH. ARTICLE V INITIAL MEMBERS The name and mailing address of the initial Member of the Company is as follows: Name: Richard S. Smith Mailing Address: 9916 Windmill Road, # 14 Fairhope, Alabama 36532 ARTICLE VI ADDITIONAL MEMBERS Additional members shall be admitted only upon the unanimous WTitt en consent of the then existing Member or Members. ARTICLE VII CONTINUATION OF BUSINESS Upon the occurrence of an event of dissociation of a Member in the Company, the remaining Member or Members of the Company shall have the right to continue the business of the Company; provided that (1) there i s at least one remaining Member, and (2) the legal existence of the Company is continued by the unanimous writte n consent of all remaining Members within ninety days after the occurrence of the event of dissociation. ARTICLE VIII MANAGEMENT The Company shall be managed by its member or members. ARTICLE IX T he Members of the Company shall have no liability for any debt, obligation, or liability of the Company, as provided in the Alabama Limited Liability Company Act. 2 PPIN 66242 300 ft varia nce Parcel Number 05-4 6-01-11-0-000-001,548 05-46-<J2-10-0-000-<J05, 000 05•46-02-10-0-000-002.000 0 5-46-01-11-0 -000-001. S 0 1 05-46-02-10-0-000-030. 004 05-46-01-11-0-000-001.S26 05-46-02-10-0-000-001 .000 0§-46-02-10-0 ·000-003.000 OS-46-02-10-0-000-030.021 05-46-02-10-0 -000-030.013 05-46-02-10-0-000-030.014 05-46-02-10-0-000-030.018 05-46-02-10-0-000-030.017 05-46-02-10-0-000-030.015 05-4 6-02 • 10-0-000-030.0 22 05-46-02-10-0-000·030.012 05-46-02 -10-0-000-030.0 05 os,45.02-10-0-000-030;0 07 05-46-02 -10-0-000-030.0 2 0 □5-46-02-10-0-000-030 .006 05-46-02-10-0-000-0~~_(l_lJ_ 05·46-02-10-0-000-030.039 05 -4 6-02-10-0-000-030.0 0 8 05-46-02-10-0-000-030.010 OS-46-02-10-0-000-030.016 OS-46-02-10·0 -000-030.011 05--46-02-10-0-000-030.009 F'ln Owner Name Addre« 226936 FST AND ROCKWELL, PAULA L 101 IJC 54 APT M3 40307 STAPLETON , A WESLEY AND STAP L 9814 STATE HIGHWAY 104 66242 ADVANTAGE HOLDINGS L l C 17381 BURWICK LOOP 15247 FST AND ROCKWELL, KENNETH ETt 21748 ST HWY 181 261846 H OLLOWBROOK PROPERTY OWNE 82 PLANT AT I ON POINTE n68o FST AND UN IVERSllY OF SOUTH A 775 N UN IIIERSlTY BLVD 199!!:Z GOLD KIST CORNER LL C 10821 STATE HIGHWAY 104 44627 SEALE GUEN N D JR {LI FE ESTAT E) A 9ll98 STAn HIGHWAY 104 2618 63 JANET TAVERNA RENTAIS l l C 129 CHESTNUT RIDGE 261855 HOll.OWBROOK PROPERTY OWNE 82 PLANTATION POINTE 261856 JEFFR IES, JEANA E PO BOX 1762 251860 I MCGREW MEGGAN ELIZABETH 9899 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 261.859 IJANE TTAVERNA RENTAl5 L L C 129 CHESTNUT RIDGE .. 261857 1 KESSLER, NICHOLAS A ETAL KESSL£ 35S85 DESTREHAN AVE 261864 RYU:E, WILLIAM WEstEV 9823 HOUOW3ROOK AVE 261854 HOUOWBROOK PRO~ERTY DWNEI 82 PLANTATION POIIIITE 261847 HOLLOWBROOK PROPERTY OWNE \82 PLANTATION POINTE 26 1849" GLENNON, REBECCA A --------""j995(ff{O([OWBROOKAVE 261862 M EDVED, KAREN L 34680 BAPT IST BALLPARK RD N 2 61848 JANeTTAVERNA RENTALS LL C 129 CHESTNUT RIOGE 261861 ~9.!Jl:HmBI NSON, ROBYN KRIST'I 9885 HOLLOWBROOKAVE ---- 261881 HOLLOW BROOK PROPERTY OWN E 82 PLANTATION POINT E 261850 BRYAN DA LE EDWARD II AND SCHI 9936 HOUOWBROOK AVE 261852 EDWARDS KARLA 9908 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 261858 L VOA, FRANC ES 114222 GABRIEL LE CT t 261B53 WEBB, BENJAMIN CORY ETAL WES 9888 HO LLOWB ROOK AVE 261851 RJJML LC 19460 Sf HWY 181 I Address2 Cit y State CAIIRBORO NC FAI RHOPE AL FAl~OPE AL FAIRHOPE Al BOX 253 FAIRHOP E AL STE 150 MOBILE Al ·----1~AI RH OP E Al FAIRHOPE AL FAIRHOPE AL BOX253 FAIRHOPE AL FAIRHOPE AL FA IRHOP E AL ,FA IRHOPE A L BAY MINETTE A L FAIRHOPE AL BOX253 FAIRHOPE AL 80)( 253 FAIRHOPE AL FAIRHOPE AL STAPLe'TON AL FAIR HOPE AL FAIRHOPE Al BOX 253 FAIRHOPE Al FAIRHOPE Al FAIR HOP E Al SI LVERH ILL Al FAIRHOPE AL FAIRHOPE AL Zi p Pr operty St# Property st Na me 27510 21870 ST HWY 181 365 32 9814 ST HWV 104 36532 21905 STHWV 181 36532 21850 STHWV 181 36532 0 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 36608 l.1890 ST HWY 181 36532 219 73 ST HWV 181 36532 9898 ST HWV 104 36532 9839 HotLOWBROOK AVE 36532 0 HOUOWBROOK AVE 35533 99 61 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 36532 9899 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 36532 99 13 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 36507 9947 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 3 6532 ~23 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 36532 0 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 36532 0 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 36532 9950 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 36578 9853 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 36532 9964 HOUOWBROOK AVE 36532 9885 HO LLOWS ROOK AVE 36532 0 HOLLOWS ROOK AVE 36532 9936 HO LLOWBROOK AVF. 36532 9908 HOUOWBROOK AVE ... 36576 9933 HO U OWllROOK AVE 36532 9888 HOLL OWBROOK AVE 36532 9922 HOLLOWBROOK AVE 57A"P.; OF ALABAMA BALDWIN OOU Nl'V i I, TEDDY J. FAUSr, JR., Revenua Ctlmtnfaatonw In and for &aid Stateand County do hereby ce,t!!'y tl13t !llis le a true and cor:ect copy of Uta reco rtftl of thi$ offl ce, ~-::::J--,9? 4/29/2025