Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-20-2025 City Council Work Session Agenda Packet
CITY OF FAIRHOPE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA Thursday, February 20, 2025 - 4:30 PM City Council Chamber Council Members Kevin G. Boone Jack Burrell Jimmy Conyers Corey Martin Jay Robinson 1.Presentation - Eagle Scout Service Project: Colony Nature Park Fence Renewal - Wells Sawyer 2.Discussion of the Fairhope Avenue & Ingleside Street Traffic Study - Chief Hollinghead 3.Committee Updates 4.Department Head Updates Next Regular Meeting - Monday, March 10, 2025 - Same Time Same Place Page 1 of 113 Eagle Scout candidate’s full legal name Please give a name to your project Eagle Scout Service Project Workbook No. 2023a February 2023 Eagle Scout Service Project Workbook Page 2 of 113 Scouts and Parents or *uardians Please read "Message to Scouts and Parents or Guardians” on pages 5 and 6. This includes excerpts and summaries from the Guide to Advancement that may help ensure requirements are properly administered according to national BSA policies and procedures. Please note, also, that when Eagle Scout candidates submit their project proposal they will promise they have read this entire workbook. Doing so will be important to their success. 2nly tKe 2fficial Workbook 0ay %e 8sed Eagle Scout candidates must use the official Eagle Scout Service Project Workbook, No. 512-927, as produced by the BSA and found at www.scouting.org/advancement. Although it is acceptable to copy and distribute the workbook, no council, district, unit, or individual has the authority to produce or require additional forms, or to add or change requirements, or to make any additions, deletions or changes in the text, outlines, links, graphics, or any other elements of the workbook. $ttention 8nit 'istrict and &ouncil 5evieZers Eagle Scout projects must be evaluated primarily on impact—the extent of benefit to the religious institution, school, or community, and on the leadership provided by the candidate. There must also be evidence of planning and development. This is not only part of the requirement but relates to practicing the Scout motto, Be Prepared. However, in determining if a project meets Eagle Scout requirement 5, reviewers must not require more planning and development than necessary to execute the project. These elements must not overshadow the project itself, as long as the effort was well led and resulted in otherwise worthy results acceptable to the beneficiary. +oZ to 8se 7Kis Workbook This workbook includes valuable information that can help ensure your success. It includes four project forms: a proposal, a plan, a fundraising application, and a report. Following the project report you will find “Navigating the Eagle Scout Service Project,” an information sheet that you should provide to the project beneficiary before the beneficiary approves your proposal. You will find it helpful to take the entire workbook—even the parts that have not yet been prepared—with you to all meetings and discussions concerning your project. Before preparing any of the four forms, read with your parent or guardian, the “Message to Scouts and Parents or Guardians” found on pages 5 and 6. If your project is worthy and meets Eagle Scout requirement 5 as written, the message will help you successfully present your proposal through the approval process. Preparing tKe Project Proposal Your proposal must be completed first. It is an overview, but also the beginnings of planning. Be sure to read “Instructions for Preparing Your Proposal” which appears right after the proposal cover page in this workbook. 7Ke Project Plan Prepare your project plan after your proposal has been approved, but before you begin work on your project. The Project Plan form is a tool for your use. No one approves it, although your project beneficiary has the authority to review it and require changes in it. Your project plan can also be important in showing your Eagle Scout board of review that you have planned and developed your project as required. And you are strongly encouraged to share your project plan with an Eagle Scout service project coach. Doing so can help you avoid many problems associated with service projects. Be sure to check with the council or district person who approved your proposal to learn how project coaches are designated in your community. 7Ke )undraising $pplication If your fundraising effort involves contributions only from the beneficiary, or you, your parents or relatives, your unit or its chartered organization, or parents or members in your unit, then you do not need a fundraising application. If you will be obtaining money, materials, supplies, or donations from other sources, you may need to submit an application. See “Procedures and Limitations on Eagle Scout Service Project Fundraising,” which appears on page B of the fundraising application. 7Ke Project 5eport Prepare the project report after the project has been executed. You must sign it to confirm you led and executed the project. Note also, the signature lines for the beneficiary's and your unit leader's approval that your project fulfilled Eagle Scout requirement 5. Page 2 Page 3 of 113 0eeting Eagle Scout 5eTuirement Eagle Scout 5eTuirement WKile a /iIe Scout SlaQ GeveloS aQG give leaGerVKiS to otKerV iQ a Vervice Sroject KelSIul to aQ\ religiouV iQVtitutioQ aQ\ VcKool or \our commuQit\. 7Ke Sroject muVt beQeIit aQ orgaQi]atioQ otKer tKaQ tKe %o\ ScoutV oI $merica $ Sroject SroSoVal muVt be aSSroveG b\ tKe orgaQi]atioQ beQeIitiQg Irom tKe eIIort \our uQit leaGer aQG uQit committee aQG tKe couQcil or GiVtrict beIore \ou Vtart. <ou muVt uVe tKe Eagle Scout Service Project Workbook No. 2- 2 iQ meetiQg tKiV reTuiremeQt. Project Purpose In addition to providing service and fulfilling the part of the Scout 2ath, “To help other people at all times,” one of the primary purposes of the Eagle Scout service project is to learn leadership skills, or to improve or demonstrate leadership skills you already have. 5elated to this are important lessons in project management and taking responsibility for a significant accomplishment. &Koosing a Project Your project must be for any religious institution, any school, or your community. It is important to note, however, that the BSA has defined “your community” to include the “community of the world.” Normally, “your community” would not refer to individuals, although a council or district advancement committee may consider scenarios in which an individual in need can affect a community. It is then a matter of identifying a source representing the “community” who will provide approvals. For more information, see the Guide to Advancement, No. , topic 9..2.5. Your project must present an opportunity for planning, development, and leadership. For example, if a blood drive is chosen and the blood bank provides a set of “canned” instructions to be implemented with no further planning, the planning effort would not meet the test. You may need to meet with blood bank officials and work out an approach that requires planning, development, and leadership. This might involve developing and carrying out a marketing and logistics plan, reaching a challenging collection goal, or coordinating multiple blood collection events. An Internet search can reveal hundreds of service project ideas. Your project does not have to be original, but it could be. It might be a construction, conservation, or remodeling project, or it could be the presentation of an event with a worthwhile purpose. &onversations with your unit leader, teachers, your religious leader, or the leaders of various community organizations can also uncover ideas. In any case, be sure the project presents a challenge that requires leadership, but also something that you can do with unskilled helpers, and within a reasonable period of time. 5estrictions and 2tKer &onsiderations There are no required minimum hours for a project. No one may tell you how many hours must be spent on it. •5outine labor is not normally appropriate for a project. This might be defined as a job or service you may provide as part of your daily life, or a routine maintenance job normally done by the beneficiary for example, pulling weeds on the football field at your school . •While projects may not be of a commercial nature or for a business, this is not meant to disallow work for community institutions, such as museums and service agencies like homes for the elderly, for example , that would otherwise be acceptable. Some aspect of a business operation provided as a community service may also be considered for example, a park open to the public that happens to be owned by a business, but primarily benefits the community. •A project may not be a fundraiser. In other words, it may not be an effort that primarily collects money, even for a worthy charity. Fundraising is permitted only for securing materials and facilitating a project, and it may need to be approved by your council. See “Eagle Scout Service Project Fundraising Application” later in this workbook. •No more than one Eagle Scout candidate may receive credit for working on the same Eagle Scout service project. •Projects must not be performed for the Boy Scouts of America, or its councils, districts, units, or properties. &ollecting Service Project 'ata The BSA collects information on hours worked on Eagle Scout projects because it points to achievement of our citizenship aim. Please assist with data collection by keeping a list of people who help and the number of hours they work. When you prepare your project report you will need to include this data on page B of the report. Providing accurate information will also help your unit leadership enter your project into the BSA¶s -ourney to Excellence tracking system. Page Page 4 of 113 0essage to Scouts and Parents or *uardians The Eagle Scout service project requirement has been widely interpreted—both properly and improperly. This message is designed to share with you, the Eagle Scout candidate, and your parents or guardians the same information BSA provides to council and district volunteers responsible for project proposal approvals throughout the Boy Scouts of America. In addition to reading this entire workbook, you and your parents or guardians should consult the Guide to Advancement, No. , beginning with topic 9..2., “The Eagle Scout Service Project.” The Guide may be accessed at www.scouting.org/advancement. The current Guide to Advancement, No. , along with the Scouts BSA 5equirements book, No. 216, and this workbook, are the primary official sources on policies and procedures for Eagle Scout service projects. The Guide to Advancement and Scouts BSA 5equirements book are available in Scout shops or on www.scoutshop.org. Your local council and district are important resources for information and guidance and can tell you where to submit service project proposals. The council and district may also establish limited local procedures as necessary. However, all of this must be done in harmony with the official sources mentioned above. &ouncils, districts, units, and individuals must not add requirements or ask you to do anything that runs contrary to, or that exceeds, the policies, procedures, or requirements of the Boy Scouts of America. Available from your Scout Shop or on www.scoutshop.org is an Eagle Project plaque to place at your project location at the completion of the project https://www.scoutshop.org/catalog/product/view/id/61 . WKat an Eagle Scout &andidate SKould E[pect The Eagle Scout service project belongs to the Eagle Scout candidate. The candidate's parents and others may help, but the Scout must be the leader. Nonetheless, while working toward completion of the project, especially during the proposal approval process, a candidate has the right to expect the following, as reprinted from the Guide to Advancement, topic 9..2.1. $Q aGvaQcemeQt aGmiQiVtrator iV a member or cKair oI a couQcil or GiVtrict aGvaQcemeQt committee or a voluQteer or SroIeVVioQal GeVigQateG accorGiQg to local SracticeV to aVViVt iQ aGvaQcemeQt aGmiQiVtratioQ. Page 1. 4uestioning and probing for their understanding of the project, the proposal, and what must be done, shall be conducted in a helpful, friendly, courteous, and kindhearted manner. We will respect the Scout¶s dignity. Scouts will be allowed, if they choose, to have a parent, unit leader, or other adult present as an observer at any time while they are discussing their proposal or project with someone who is reviewing it. 2. Project expectations will match Eagle Scout requirement 5, and we will not require proposals to include more than described in the Eagle Scout Service Project Workbook. . If requested by the Scout or the Scout's parent or guardian, an explanation of a proposal rejection will be provided in writing, with a copy sent to the council advancement chair and staff advisor. It will indicate reasons for rejection and suggestions concerning what can be done to achieve approval. . Guidance that maximizes the opportunity for completion of a worthwhile project will be readily available and strongly recommended. 8ltimately, however, the responsibility for success belongs to the Scout, and final evaluation is left to the board of review. 5. &andidates who believe they have been mistreated or their proposal wrongfully rejected, will be provided a method of redress. This will include the opportunity for a second opinion and approval, either through another volunteer or professional advancement administrator , or the Scout executive, as determined by the council advancement committee or executive board. Page 5 of 113 E[cerpts and Summaries )rom tKe *uide to $dvancement Eagle Scout Service Project &oacKes See tKe *uide to $dvancement topic Many units, districts, and councils use Eagle Scout service project “coaches,” because the advice they provide after approval of a proposal can be invaluable as candidates develop their project plan. A coach can help Scouts see that if a plan is not sufficiently developed then projects can fail. Assistance can come through evaluating a plan and discussing its strengths, weaknesses, and risks, but coaches do not have the authority to dictate changes or take any other such directive action. Instead, coaches must use the BSA method of positive adult association, logic, and common sense to help the candidate make wise decisions. It is up to the council to determine who may serve as project coaches and how they might be assigned or otherwise provided to candidates. &oaches must be registered with the BSA in any adult position and be current in BSA Youth Protection training, and may come from the unit, district, or council level. For examples of how a service project coach can assist, please see the Guide to Advancement, topic 9..2.9. Note that there should be only one coach that is designated for you by your council or district but your unit may also provide people to coach you. WKat ,s 0eant by ³*ive /eadersKip to 2tKers «"´ See tKe *uide to $dvancement topic “2thers” means at least two people besides the Scout. Helpers may be involved in Scouting or not, and of any age appropriate for the work. &ouncils, districts, and units shall not establish requirements for the number of people led, or their make-up, or for time worked on a project. Evaluating tKe Project $fter &ompletion See tKe *uide to $dvancement topic Eagle Scout projects must be evaluated primarily on impact—the extent of benefit to the religious institution, school, or community, and on the leadership provided by the candidate. There must also be evidence of planning and development. This is not only part of the requirement, but relates to our motto to, “Be Prepared.” However, in determining if a project meets requirement 5, reviewers must not require more planning and development than necessary to execute the project. These elements must not overshadow the project itself, as long as the effort was well led, and resulted in an otherwise worthy outcome acceptable to the beneficiary. There may be instances where, upon its completion, the unit leader or project beneficiary chooses not to approve a project. 2ne or the other may determine, for example, that modifications were so significant that the extent of the service or impact of the project was insufficient to warrant approval. The candidate may be requested to do more work or even start over with another project. The candidate may choose to meet these requests or may decide —if he or she believes the completed project worthy and in compliance—to complete an Eagle Scout 5ank Application and submit the project workbook without final approval. If requested, the candidate must be granted a board of review. If it is thought a unit board may not provide a fair hearing, a board of review under disputed circumstances may be initiated according to the Guide to Advancement, topic ...2. 5isk 0anagement and Eagle Scout Service Projects See tKe *uide to $dvancement topic All Eagle Scout service projects constitute official Scouting activity and thus are subject to Boy Scouts of America policies and procedures. Projects are considered part of a unit's program and are treated as such with regard to policies, procedures, and requirements regarding Youth Protection, two-deep leadership, etc. The health and safety of those working on Eagle projects must be integrated into project execution. Since an Eagle Scout service project is a unit activity, unit leadership has the same responsibility to assure safety in conducting a project as with any other unit activity. The unit leader or unit committee should reject proposals for inherently unsafe projects. The candidate should plan for safe execution, but it must be understood that minors cannot and must not be held responsible for safety concerns. As with any Scouting activity, the Guide to Safe Scouting applies. BSA also expects leaders to use the four points of SAFE when delivering the program. The SAFE Checklist can be found at: https://www.scouting.org/health-and-safety/safe/. The most current version of the Guide to Safe Scouting can be found at: https://www.scouting.org/health-and-safety/gss/. ,nsurance and Eagle Scout Projects See tKe *uide to $dvancement topic The Boy Scouts of America General Liability Policy provides general liability insurance coverage for official Scouting activities. 5egistered adult leaders are provided primary coverage. 8nregistered adults participating in a Scouting activity are provided coverage in excess of their personal insurance. Every council has the opportunity to participate in the BSA Accident and Sickness insurance program. It provides some insurance for medical and dental bills arising from Scouting activities. If councils do not purchase this, then units may contract for it. In some cases, chartered organizations might provide insurance, but this must not be assumed. Most of these programs provide only secondary coverage, and are limited to registered youth and adults and those interested in becoming members. Page 6 of 113 This page intentionally left blank Page 7 of 113 Eagle Scout candidate’s full legal name Please give a name to your project Eagle Scout Service Project Workbook No.2023a February 2023 Eagle Scout Service Project Proposal Page 8 of 113 Instructions for Preparing Your Proposal Meeting the Five Tests of an Acceptable Eagle Scout Service Project Your proposal must be prepared first. It is an overview, but also the beginnings of planning. It must show your unit leader, unit committee, and council or district that your project can meet the following tests. 1.It provides sufficient opportunity to meet the Eagle Scout service project requirement. You must show that planning, development, and leadership will take place; and how the three factors will benefit a religious institution, a school, or your community. 2.It appears to be feasible. You must show the project is realistic for you to carry out. 3.Safety issues will be addressed. You must show you have an understanding of what must be done to guard against injury, and what will be done if someone gets hurt. 4.Action steps for further detailed planning are included. You must make a list of the key steps you will take to make sure your plan will have enough details so it can be carried out successfully. 5.You are on the right track with a reasonable chance for a positive experience. When completing your proposal you only need enough detail to show a reviewer that you can meet the tests above. If showing that you meet the tests requires a lengthy and complicated proposal, your project might be more complex than necessary. Remember, the proposal is only the beginnings of planning. Most of your planning will come with the next step, preparation of your project plan. If your project does not require materials or supplies,etc., simply mark those spaces "not applicable." As a reminder, do not begin any work, or raise any money, or obtain any materials, until your project proposal has been approved. Consider also, that if you submit your proposal too close to your 18th birthday, it may not be approved in time to finish planning and executing the project. Working with Your Project Beneficiary On the last two pages of this workbook there is an information sheet called, “Navigating the Eagle Scout Service Project.” This is for you to print and give to the religious institution, school, or community that will benefit from your efforts. You should do this as part of your first meeting with your beneficiary and use the sheet to help explain how the Eagle Scout service project works. Be sure to read it carefully so you can explain what it says. “Navigating the Eagle Scout Service Project” will help you communicate a number of things to your beneficiary. For example, it provides thanks and congratulations for accepting the project; and it gives some background, discusses the requirements, and points out the responsibilities connected with approving your project proposal. It also explains that the beneficiary has the right to review, and also to require changes in your project plan. of understanding Again, be sure to read carefully “Navigating the Eagle Scout Service Project” so you will have a full understanding of the role of your beneficiary. Next Step: Your Project Plan 2nce your proposal is approved, you are strongly encouraged to prepare your project plan using the form in this workbook. Doing so increases the likelihood your project will be approved at your Eagle Scout board of review. As you begin preparing it, you should meet with a project coach. &heck with the person who handled the approval of your project proposal to learn how coaches are designated in your community. Your designated coach can help you avoid the common pitfalls associated with Eagle Scout service projects and be a big part of your success. You may also want to talk to your unit leader. There may be adults in your troop who are experts in conducting the kind of project you are planning. It's ok for you to work with them as well. The more coaching you get, the better your results will be. Beginning Work on Your Project Once your proposal has been fully approved and you have finished your project planning, only then, may you begin work on your project. Proposal Page A Page 9 of 113 Eagle Scout &andidate 8nit /eader 8nit &ommittee &Kair 8nit $dvancement &oordinator Project %eneficiary Project %eneficiary 5epresentative <our &ouncil Service &enter &ouncil or 'istrict Project $pproval 5epresentative Project &oacK Name of &ouncil: 8nit Number: Preferred telephone s :Life Board of 5eview date: Email Address: Name:Birth date: BSA PID number: Address &ity:S tate:=ip: &ontact ,nformation Eagle Scout caQGiGateV VKoulG kQoZ ZKo iV iQvolveG but coQtact iQIormatioQ ma\ be more imSortaQt to uQit leaGerV aQG otKerV iQ caVe tKe\ ZaQt to talk to eacK otKer. WKile it iV recogQi]eG tKat Qot all tKe iQIormatioQ Zill be QeeGeG Ior ever\ Sroject ScoutV are exSecteG to SroviGe aV mucK aV reaVoQabl\ SoVVible. $SSroval reSreVeQtativeV muVt uQGerVtaQG KoZever tKat GoiQg Vo iV Qot Sart oI tKe Vervice Sroject reTuiremeQt. Email Address: Name oI religiouV iQVtitutioQ VcKool or commuQit\ <our couQcil or GiVtrict Sroject aSSroval reSreVeQtative ma\ KelS \ou learQ ZKo tKiV Zill be. <our uQit leaGer uQit aGvaQcemeQt coorGiQator or couQcil or GiVtrict aGvaQcemeQt cKair ma\ KelS \ou learQ ZKo tKiV Zill be. Name oI coQtact SerVoQ Ior tKe Sroject beQeIiciar\ Email Address: Name:Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:State =ip: Name:Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:S tate:=ip: Email Address: &ontact Name:Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:S tate:=ip: Email Address: Name:Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:S tate:=ip: Email Address: Name:Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:S tate:=ip: Email Address: Name:Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:State:=ip: ,I \our uQit KaV oQe Email Address: Preferred telephone s : Name:Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:S tate:=ip: Name: Address:S tate:&ity:=ip: Proposal Page B &urrent 8nit ,nformation Name of District: &heck 2ne: Troop &rew Ship &heck 2ne: Scoutmaster &rew Advisor Skipper Email Address: Page 10 of 113 Project 'escription and %enefit Briefly describe your proMect Include images on an additional document. Tell how your proMect will be helpful to the beneficiary. :hy is it needed" When do you plan to begin carrying out your project" When do you think your project will be completed" Proposal Page & Page 11 of 113 *iving /eadersKip Approximately how many people will be needed to help on your proMect" :here will you recruit them unit members friends neighbors family others " Explain: :hat do you think will be most difficult about leading them" 0aterials 0aterialV are tKiQgV tKat become Sart oI tKe IiQiVKeG Sroject VucK aV lumber QailV aQG SaiQt. :hat types of materials if any will you need" <ou do not need a detailed list or exact Tuantities but you must show you have a reasonable idea of what is reTuired. For example for lumber use basic dimensions such as x or x. Supplies 6uSSOLHV arH WKLnJV yRu uVH uS VuFK aV IRRG anG rHIrHVKPHnWV JaVROLnH PaVNLnJ WaSH WarSV VaIHWy VuSSOLHV anG JarEaJH EaJV :hat types of supplies if any will you need" <ou do not need a detailed list or exact Tuantities but you must show you have a reasonable idea of what is reTuired. 3roposal 3age 'Page 12 of 113 7ools ,QcluGe toolV aQG alVo eTuiSmeQt tKat Zill be borroZeG reQteG or SurcKaVeG. :hat tools or eTuipment if any will you need" <ou do not need a detailed list but you must show you have a reasonable idea of what is reTuired. 2tKer 1eeds ,WHPV WKaW GRn W ILW WKH aERYH FaWHJRrLHV IRr H[aPSOH SarNLnJ Rr SRVWaJH Rr VHrYLFHV VuFK aV SrLnWLnJ Rr SRurLnJ FRnFrHWH HWF :hat other needs do you think you might encounter" Permits and Permissions Note tKat SroSert\ oZQerV VKoulG obtaiQ aQG Sa\ Ior SermitV. :ill permissions or permits such as building permits be reTuired for your proMect" :ho will obtain them" +ow long will it take" 3roposal 3age E Page 13 of 113 Preliminary &ost Estimate <ou Go Qot QeeG exact coVtV \et. 5evieZerV Zill juVt ZaQt to Vee iI \ou caQ reaVoQabl\ exSect to raiVe eQougK moQe\ to cover aQ iQitial eVtimate oI exSeQVeV. ,QcluGe tKe value oI GoQateG materialV VuSSlieV toolV aQG otKer itemV. ,t iV Qot QeceVVar\ to iQcluGe tKe value oI toolV or otKer itemV tKat Zill be loaQeG at Qo coVt. Note tKat iI \our Sroject reTuireV a IuQGraiViQg aSSlicatioQ \ou Go Qot QeeG to Vubmit it ZitK \our SroSoVal. )undraising Explain how you will raise the money to pay for the total costs. ,f you intend to seek donations of actual materials supplies etc. then explain how you plan to do that too. 0aterials: Supplies: Tools: 2ther: 7otal &osts Project PKases Think of your proMect in terms of phases and list what they might be. The first may be to prepare your proMect plan. 2ther phases might include fundraising preparation execution and reporting. <ou may have as many phases as you want but it is not necessary to become overly complicated brief one line descriptions are sufficient. ,f you have more than phases attach a separate page with your continued phase list. 1 2 5 6 7 9 1 /ogistics +ow will you handle transportation of materials supplies tools and helpers" 3roposal 3age F Enter your estimated expenses below include sales tax if applicable Page 14 of 113 Safety ,ssues 7Ke *uiGe to SaIe ScoutiQg iV aQ imSortaQt reVource iQ coQViGeriQg VaIet\ iVVueV. 'escribe the ha]ards and safety concerns of which you and your helpers should be aware. 5ead the "Age Guidelines for Tool 8sage" at Scouting.org Project Planning <ou Go Qot Kave to liVt ever\ VteS but it muVt be eQougK to VKoZ \ou Kave a reaVoQable iGea oI KoZ to SreSare \our SlaQ. /ist some action steps you will take to prepare your proMect plan. For example Complete a more detailed set of drawings. 3roposal 3age G Page 15 of 113 &andidate s Promise SigQ beloZ beIore \ou Veek tKe otKer aSSrovalV Ior \our SroSoVal. 5emember 'o Qot begiQ aQ\ Zork oQ \our Sroject or raiVe aQ\ moQe\ or obtaiQ aQ\ materialV uQtil \our Sroject KaV beeQ aSSroveG. 2n my honor as a Scout , have read this entire workbook including the 0essage to Scouts and 3arents or Guardians on page . , promise to be the leader of this proMect and to do my best to carry it out for the maximum benefit to the religious institution school or community , have chose as beneficiary. DateSigned Date Date %eneficiary $pproval &ouncil or 'istrict $pproval I have read topics 9..2. through 9..2.15, regarding the Eagle Scout service project, in the *uiGe to $GvaQcemeQt, No. . I agree on my honor to apply the procedures as written, and in compliance with the policy on "8nauthorized &hanges to Advancement." Accordingly, I approve this proposal. I will encourage the candidate to prepare a project plan and share it with the designated project coach. This service proMect will provide significant benefit and we will do all we can to see it through. :e reali]e funding on our part is not reTuired but we have informed the Sc out of the financial support if any to which we have agreed. :e understand any fund raising the Scout conducts will be in our name and that funds left over will come to us if we are allowed to accept them. :e will provide receipts to donors as reTuired. 2uU (agle &andidate Kas SUoYided us a coS\ oI 1aYigating tKe (agle 6cout 6eUYice 3UoMect InIoUmation IoU 3UoMect %eneIiciaUies. Signed Date Signed Name Printed Name Printed Name Printed Name Printed Date Signed This Eagle Scout candidate is a /ife Scout and registered in our unit. , have reviewed this proposal , am comfortable the proMect is feasible and , will do everything , can see that our unit measures up to the level of support we have agreed to provide if any . , certify that , have been authori]ed by our unit committee to provide its approval for this proposal. 8nit /eader $pproval 8nit &ommittee $pproval <HV 1R :KLOH LW PaNHV VHnVH WR REWaLn aSSrRYaOV Ln WKH RrGHr WKHy aSSHar WKHrH VKaOO EH nR rHTuLrHG VHTuHnFH IRr WKH RrGHr RI REWaLnLnJ WKRVH aSSrRYaOV ParNHG ZLWK an aVWHrLVN &RunFLO Rr GLVWrLFW aSSrRYaO KRZHYHr PuVW FRPH aIWHr WKH RWKHrV Signed , have reviewed this proposal and discussed it with the candidate. , believe it provides impact worthy of an Eagle Scout service proMect and will involve planning development and leadership. , am comfortable the Scout understands what to do and how to lead the effort. , will see that the proMect is monitored and that adults or others present will not overshadow them. 3roposal 3age H &aution 8sing an $doEe or otKer P') reader to insert a signature can cause tKis entire document s contents to Ee locNed preventing future edits maNe sure you save a copy if any signatures Zill Ee inserted digitally Page 16 of 113 Eagle Scout Service Project Plan Eagle Scout reTuirement says you must plan and develop your service proMect. Though this proMect plan is a tool for your use and is not approved or signed it is important in helping to show you have done the reTuired planning and development. <ou should take this proMect plan with you to your Eagle Scout board of review. 1ote that you are not reTuired to provide more details than are necessary for the accomplishment of your proMect. A Scout who is prepared will complete the proMect plan and then review it with the designated proMect coach before carrying out the proMect. The council or district representative who approved your proMect may have agreed to serve as your proMect coach or someone else may be designated to take this important role. A proMect coach s involvement and review of your proMect plan is optional but it can help you avoid many problems or mistakes. This can also improve your chances of passing the Eagle Scout board of review. <ou should also show your proMect plan to your beneficiary prior to carrying out the proMect. This will help ensure your plans agree with the beneficiary s expectations. 5emember the proMect beneficiary has the authority to reTuire and approve a proMect plan. Be sure to read 1avigating the Eagle Scout Service 3roMect at the end of this workbook. Eagle Scout candidate’s full legal name Eagle Scout Service Project 1ame Planned start date Planned completion date Page 17 of 113 &omments )rom <our Proposal 5evieZ What suggestions were offered by the council or district representative who approved your project" Project 'escription and %enefit &Kanges from tKe Proposal $V SrojectV are SlaQQeG cKaQgeV are uVuall\ QeceVVar\. ,I tKe\ are major it iV imSortaQt to coQIirm tKe\ are acceStable to tKe beQeIiciar\. <ou VKoulG alVo GiVcuVV major cKaQgeV ZitK tKoVe ZKo aSSroveG \our SroSoVal aQG alVo ZitK \our coacK to get aQ iGea iI tKe cKaQgeV Zill be acceStable to \our boarG oI revieZ. How will your project be different from your approved proposal" Will the changes make the project more, or less, helpful to the beneficiary" Explain: Present &ondition or Situation ,QcluGe beIore SKotograSKV to VKoZ tKe boarG oI revieZ aV attacKmeQtV. Describe the present condition of the worksite. For an event or activity, describe your biggest obstacles. Project Plan Page A Page 18 of 113 2 5 6 77 Project PKases <ou ma\ Kave more tKaQ teQ SKaVeV or IeZer aV QeeGeG. Look at the phases from your proposal. Make any changes, then provide a little more detail, including approximate starting and ending dates for each phase. If you have more than 1 phases, attach a separate page with your continued phase list. Work Processes Prepare a step-by-step list of what must be done and how everything comes together: site preparation, sizing, assembly, fastening of materials, finishes to be used paint, varnish, etc. , uses of supplies and tools, etc. Your project coach may be able to assist. $ttacKments If you are unable to attach items within this workbook, please put them in separate documents that you may send along with your workbook. Attachments might include such things as additional plans, drawings, diagrams, maps, and pictures that will help you carry out your project. They may also be helpful to your workers, your coach, the project beneficiary, and to your board of review. Drawings, if needed, should be to scale. If you are planning an event or activity, something like a program outline or a script would be appropriate Permits and Permissions If you will need permissions or permits , what is being done to obtain them, and when will they be issued" &oulG iQcluGe builGiQg or electrical SermitV Gig SermitV eveQt SermitV SermiVVioQ to acceVV SroSert\ ZilGerQeVV or back couQtr\ SermitV etc. Project Plan Page B 9 1 Project Plan Page B Page 19 of 113 0aterials /LVW HaFK LWHP GHVFrLSWLRn TuanWLWy unLW FRVW WRWaO FRVW anG VRurFH )Rr GRnaWHG LWHPV VKRZ YaOuH Ln FRVW FROuPnV 6HH H[aPSOH Plywood 3/4", 4'x8', B-C interior grade 3 20.00 60.00 ABC Hardware 'onation Item Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Source Total cost of materials: Supplies /iVt eacK item GeVcriStioQ TuaQtit\ uQit coVt total coVt aQG Vource. )or GoQateG itemV VKoZ value iQ coVt columQV. See examSle. ABC Hardware ,tem 'escription 4uantity 8nit &ost 7otal &ost Source Total cost of supplies: 7ools /LVW WRROV anG HTuLSPHnW WKaW PuVW EH SurFKaVHG Rr rHnWHG ZLWK TuanWLWy unLW FRVW WRWaO FRVW VRurFH anG ZKR ZLOO RSHraWH Rr uVH LW 6HH H[aPSOH 7ool Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Source :Ko Zill operateuse" Project Plan Page & 7ool Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Source :Ko Zill operateuse" 2tKer 1eeds /iVt eacK item GeVcriStioQ TuaQtit\ uQit coVt total coVt aQG Vource. )or GoQateG itemV VKoZ value iQ coVt columQV. See examSle. Total cost of tools: ABC Hardware ,tem 'escription 4uantity 8nit &ost 7otal &ost Source Total cost of otKer needs: Printing Marketing brochure 2.1 2. .Mr. Smith Mr. Smith.1&ircular power saw Plastic tarp 9' x 12', 2mil think 2 .. Page 20 of 113 Project Plan Page D ,tem Projected &ost Total materials from above Total supplies from above Total tools from above 7otal cost E[penses 5evenue Total to be raised: &ontribution from beneficiary: Describe how you will get the money for your project. Include what any helpers will do to assist with the effort and also any requests you will make for donations of supplies, materials, etc. *iving /eadersKip Fill out the chart below, telling about specific jobs that need to be done, the skills needed to do them, whether they must be adults or may be youth, how many helpers are needed, and how many you have so far if any . For example: What are your plans for briefing helpers, or making sure they know how to do what you want them to do" Job to Be Done Skills Needed (if any)Adult or Youth Helpers Needed Helpers So Far What is your plan for communicating with your workers to make sure they know how to get to the site and where to park, that they will be on time and they will have with them what they need" /ogistics How will the workers get to and from the place where the work will be done" How will you transport materials, supplies, and tools to and from the site" Adult drivers/supervisors, youth to wash 2 adults, 1 youth 1 adult, 5 youthAble to drive or wash carsWork at car wash Total other from above Page 21 of 113 How will you assure the tools used are in good condition, that clearance and barriers needed between users are considered, and that the tools are properly used and stored" How long will your helpers be working each day" 5ecommend no more than eight hours per day How will the workers be fed" Where will restrooms be located" Safety Will a first aid kit be needed for this project" If so, where will it be kept" Will any hazardous materials or chemicals be used" If so, how will you see that they are properly handled" List hazards you might face. These could include severe weather, wildlife, hazardous tools or equipment, overhead or underground utilities, sunburn, etc. What will you do to prevent problems" For example, "Hazardous tools will be operated by adults only." Potential +a]ard WKat Zill you do to prevent problems" How do you plan to communicate these safety issues and hazards to your helpers" What personal protective equipment or supplies may be needed" For example, gloves, goggles, hardhats, etc. Project Plan Page E Who will conduct it"When will you hold a safety briefing" Who will be your first-aid specialist" How may emergency vehicles access the site" Page 22 of 113 &ontingency Plans What would cause postponement or cancellation of the project" What will you do should this happen" &omments )rom <our Project &oacK $bout <our Project Plan $ Sroject coacK V commeQtV caQ be extremel\ KelSIul iQ aVVuriQg \our Sroject iV VucceVVIul. Project Plan Page F Page 23 of 113 Fundraising Application Page A Eagle Scout Service Project )undraising $pplication Before filling out this application, it is important to read "Procedures and Limitations on Eagle Scout Service Project Fundraising." This can be found on the next page: "Fundraising Application Page B." 2nce completed, you must obtain approval from the project beneficiary and your unit leader, and then submit the fundraising application to your council service center at least two weeks in advance of your fundraising efforts. You will be contacted if it cannot be approved or if adjustments must be made. 8se this form, not the 8nit Money-Earning Application. Eagle Scout &andidate Project %eneficiary 5epresentative &heck 2ne:8nit Number: Name of District:Name of &ouncil: Project %eneficiary Name:Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:State:=ip: Email Address: Name oI religiouV iQVtitutioQ VcKool or commuQit\ Name oI coQtact SerVoQ Ior tKe Sroject beQeIiciar\ Email Address: Email Address: Name:Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:State:=ip: Preferred telephone s : Address:&ity:State:=ip: Name: Describe how funds will be raised: Proposed date the service project will begin: Proposed dates for the fundraising efforts: How much money do you expect to raise" If people or companies are asked for donations of money, materials, supplies, or tools, how will this be done and who will do it" <ou muVt attacK a liVt oI SroVSective GoQor QameV aQG ZKat tKe\ Zill be aVkeG to GoQate. 7KiV iV Qot reTuireG Ior aQ eveQt like a car ZaVK. If so, by whom"Are any contracts to be signed" &ontract details: $pprovals 7Ke beQeIiciar\ aQG uQit leaGer VigQ beloZ iQ aQ\ orGer beIore autKori]eG couQcil aSSroval iV obtaiQeG. Signature Date Signature Date Signature Date Beneficiary Unit Leader Authorized Council Approval* Troop &rew Ship &aution 8sing an $doEe or otKer P') reader to insert a signature can cause tKis entire document s contents to Ee locNed preventing future edits maNe sure you save a copy if any signatures Zill Ee inserted digitally Page 24 of 113 Procedures and Limitations on Eagle Scout Service Project )undraising Eagle Scout Service Project Fundraising Application must be used in obtaining approval for service project fundraising of monies and for in-kind donations of materials, supplies, tools, or other needs.* Send the completed form with any attachments to your local council service center, where it will be routed to those responsible for approval. This may be a district executive or another staff member, the council or district advancement committee, a finance committee, etc., as determined by your council. Only one form is required per service project even if there will be multiple events, participants, or donors. It is not required to submit this form with your project proposal. *This application is not necessary for contributions from the candidate, the candidate's parents or relatives, unit or its chartered organization, unit's parents or members, or the beneficiary. All proceeds left over from fundraising or donations, whether money, materials, supplies, etc., regardless of the source, go to the beneficiary. If the beneficiary is not allowed, for whatever reason, to retain any excess funds or materials, etc., the beneficiary should designate a suitable charity to receive them, or allow the unit to retain them. The unit must not influence this decision. If the standards below are met, your fundraising effort likely will be approved. 1.Eagle Scout service projects may not be fundraisers. In other words, the candidate may not stage an effort that primarily collects money, even if it is for a worthy charity. Fundraising is permitted only for securing materials, etc., and otherwise facilitating a project. 8nless the effort involves contributions only from the beneficiary, the candidate, the candidate's parents or relatives, unit or its chartered organization, unit's parents or members, it must be approved by the local council. This is achieved by submitting the Eagle Scout Service Project Fundraising Application. 2.It must be clear to all donors or event participants that the money is being raised on behalf of the project beneficiary. 2nce collected, money raised must be turned over to the beneficiary or to the candidate¶s unit for deposit until needed for the project. If the unit receives the funds, it must release them to the beneficiary once expenses have been paid. .Any contracts must be signed by a responsible adult, acting as an individual, without reference to the Boy Scouts of America. The person who signs the contract is personally liable. &ontracts must not and cannot bind the local council, the Boy Scouts of America, or the unit¶s chartered organization. .If something is to be sold, we want people to buy it because it is a quality product, not just because of an association with Scouting. Buyers or donors must be informed that the money will be used for an Eagle Scout service project to benefit the school, religious institution, or community chosen, and any funds left over will go to that beneficiary. 5.Any products sold, or fundraising activities conducted, must be in keeping with the ideals and principles of the BSA. For example, they must not include raffles or other games of chance. 6.Should any donors want documentation of a gift, this must be provided through the project beneficiary, not the Boy Scouts of America. If a donor or fundraising participant wants a receipt, this too, must be provided in the name of the beneficiary. 7.Youth are not normally permitted to solicit funds on behalf of other organizations. However, a local council may allow an exception for Eagle Scout service projects. .Local councils may determine that certain types of fundraisers such as bake sales and car washes do not require a fundraising application. &ouncils may also establish dollar thresholds, as well for example, "Any effort expected to raise less than 5 does not require an application." Fundraising Application Page B Page 25 of 113 This page intentionally left blank Page 26 of 113 Eagle Scout Service Project 5eport This report is to be prepared after your service project has been concluded. It is not necessary to provide lengthy answers. Be prepared to discuss your project and this report at your board of review. Eagle Scout candidate’s full legal name Eagle Scout Service Project 1ame Project start date Project completion date Page 27 of 113 When was it finished" Project E[ecution 2nce planning was completed, when did the work begin" Project 'escription PleaVe SroviGe a brieI GeVcriStioQ oI \our Sroject aQG tKe imSact it Zill Kave. Describe what you did after your proposal was approved to complete the planning of your project. 2bservations What went well" What was challenging" &Kanges Many successful projects require changes from the original proposal. What significant changes did you make and why did you make them be brief " Project 5eport Page A Page 28 of 113 /eadersKip In what ways did you demonstrate leadership" What was most difficult about being the leader" What was most rewarding about being the leader" What did you learn about leadership, or how were your leadership skills further developed" 0aterials Supplies 7ools 2tKer Were there significant shortages or overages of materials, supplies, tools, and other" If so, what effect did this have" Entering Service Project 'ata The BSA collects information on the hours worked on Eagle Scout service projects because it points to achievement of our citizenship aim. To assist with the data collection, please refer to your list of people who helped and the number of hours they worked. Then please provide the information requested below. Include hours spent doing planning under Total Hours Worked. %e sure to include yourself and tKe time spent on planning Number of Workers Total Hours Worked The Eagle Scout &andidate Planning +ours Regi stered BSA youth members Other youth brothers sisters friends etc. who are not BSA members Regi stered BSA adult Scouti ng volunteers and l eaders Other adults parents grandparents etc. who are not BSA members Grand Total of Hours enter here and on your Eagle Scout 5ank Application 7Kere is no reTuirement for a minimum number of Kours tKat must be Zorked on an Eagle Scout service project. ,I \ou Kave beeQ tolG \ou muVt meet a miQimum Qumber oI KourV tKeQ \ou ma\ loGge a comSlaiQt ZitK \our GiVtrict or couQcil. ,I \ou Kave giveQ leaGerVKiS to aQ otKerZiVe ZortK\ Sroject aQG are turQeG GoZQ b\ \our boarG oI revieZ Volel\ becauVe oI a lack oI KourV \ou VKoulG aSSeal tKe GeciVioQ. Project 5eport Page B The Eagle Scout &andidate E[ecution +ours Page 29 of 113 )unding Summary Describe how you obtained money, materials, supplies, and other needs including donations for your project. How much was collected" How much was spent" If your expenses exceeded funds available, explain why this happened, and how excess expenses were paid. If you had money left over at the end of your project, did you turn it over to the project beneficiary" If "No," when will that be done, or if your beneficiary is not allowed to accept the left over funds, which charity will receive them" How were the donors thanked" PKotos and 2tKer 'ocumentation If you have them, submit photographs taken before, during and after project completion on a separate document. You may physically attach letters, maps, handouts, printed materials, or similar items that might be helpful to your board of review. &aution 8sing an $doEe or otKer P') reader to insert a signature can cause tKis entire document s contents to Ee locNed preventing future edits maNe sure you save a copy if any signatures Zill Ee inserted digitally &andidate s Promise SigQ beloZ beIore \ou Veek tKe otKer aSSrovalV. 2Q m\ KoQor , ZaV tKe leaGer oI m\ Eagle Scout Vervice Sroject aQG executeG it aV reSorteG Kere Project 5eport Page & Signature Date Signature Date Beneficiary name Unit l leader name $pprovals ,Q m\ oSiQioQ tKiV Eagle Scout Vervice Sroject meetV Eagle Scout reTuiremeQt aV VtateG oQ Sage oI tKiV Zorkbook. Signature Date Page 30 of 113 Navigating the Eagle Scout Service Project Information for Project Beneficiaries Thank You and Congratulations Congratulations on your selection as an Eagle Scout service project beneficiary, and thank you for the opportunity you are making available to an Eagle Scout candidate. Support from community organizations is important to Scouting— just as important as Scouting's contributions are to the community. Scouts provide important services, and benefiting organizations such as yours provides a vehicle for personal growth. The Eagle Scout Rank and the Service Project Service to others is an important part of the Scout Oath: “... to help other people at all times.” Each year tens of thousands of Scouts strive to achieve the coveted Eagle Scout rank by applying character, citizenship, and Scouting values in their daily lives. One of the rank requirements is to plan, develop, and give leadership to others in a service project helpful to any religious institution, school, or community. Through this requirement, Scouts practice what they have learned and gain valuable project management and leadership experience. Typical Projects There are thousands of possible Eagle Scout projects. Some involve building things, and others do not. There have been all kinds: making birdhouses for an arboretum, conducting bicycle safety rodeos, constructing park picnic tables or benches, upgrading hiking trails, planting trees, conducting well-planned blood drives, and on and on. Other than the general limitations noted below, there are no specific requirements for project scope or for how many hours are worked, and there is no requirement that a project have lasting value. What is most important is the impact or benefit the project will provide to your organization. In choosing a project, remember it must be something a group with perhaps limited skills can accomplish under the leadership of your Eagle Scout candidate. In order to fulfill the requirement, the Scout must be the one to lead the project. Therefore, it is important that you work with the Scout and not with the Scout's parents or leaders. Projects Restrictions and Limitations •Fundraising is permitted only for facilitating a project. Efforts that primarily collect money, even for worthy charities, are not permitted. •Routine labor, like a service Scouts may provide as part of their daily lives such as mowing or weeding a church lawn, is not normally appropriate. However, if project scale and impact are sufficient to require planning and leadership, then it may be considered. •Projects are not to be of a commercial nature or for a business, though some aspects of a business operation provided as a service, such as a community park, may qualify. •The Scout is not responsible for any maintenance of a project once it is completed. Approving the Project Proposal and Project Scheduling Once a potential project is identified, you must approve your Scout's proposal. Regular communications with the Scout can make this quick and easy, but be sure you have both discussed and considered all aspects of the project to ensure your Scout has a clear understanding of your expectations and limitations. Keep in mind the proposal is merely an overview—not a comprehensive project plan. Some projects may take only a few weeks or months to plan and carry out, while others may take longer. Scouts working toward the Eagle rank are typically busy, so scheduling flexibility may be important. The proposal must also have several approvals, besides yours, before project planning occurs and work begins. Therefore, if a proposed project must be completed by a certain rapidly approaching date, it may be a good idea to consider something different. Remember, too, that all work must be completed before the Scout's 18th birthday. Page 31 of 113 Approving Project Plans After the proposal is approved by the BSA local council, your Scout must develop a plan for implementing the project. Before work begins, you should ask to see the plan. It may come in any format you desire or are willing to accept. It could even be a detailed verbal description. That said, the BSA includes a “Project Plan” form in your Scout's Eagle Scout Service Project Workbook, and we recommend that you ask your Scout to use it. If in your plan review you have any concerns the project may run into trouble or not produce the results you want, do not hesitate to require improvements before work begins. Permits, Permissions, and Authorizations •If the project requires building permits, etc., your Scout needs to know about them for planning purposes. However, your organization must be responsible for all permitting. This is not a duty for the Scout. •Your organization must sign any contracts. •If digging is involved, it is your responsibility to locate, mark, and protect underground utilities as necessary. •If you need approval from a committee, your organization's management, or a parent organization, etc., be sure to allow additional time and let the Scout know if their help is needed. Funding the Project Eagle service projects often require fundraising. Donations of any money, materials, or services must be pre-approved by the BSA unless provided by your organization; by the Scout, the Scout's parents, or relatives; or by the Scout's unit or its chartered organization. The Scout must make it clear to donors or fundraising event participants that the money is being raised on the project beneficiary's behalf, and that the beneficiary will retain any leftover funds. If receipts are needed, your organization must provide them. If your organization is not allowed to retain leftover funds, you should designate a charity to receive them or turn them over to your Scout's unit. Supervision To meet the requirement to “give leadership to others,” your Scout must be given every opportunity to succeed independently without direct supervision. The Scout's troop must provide adults to assist or keep an eye on things, and your organization should also have someone available. The Scout, however, must provide the leadership necessary for project completion without adult interference. Safety Through the proposal and planning process, the Scout will identify potential hazards and risks and outline strategies to prevent and handle injuries or emergencies. Scouts as minors, however, cannot be held responsible for safety. Adults must accept this responsibility. Property owners, for example, are responsible for issues and hazards related to their property or employees and any other individuals or circumstances they would normally be responsible for controlling. If during project execution you have any concerns about health and safety, please share them with the Scout and the unit leaders so action may be taken. If necessary, you may stop work on the project until concerns are resolved. Project Execution and Approval After the project has been carried out, your Scout will ask for your approval on their project report. The report will be used in the final review of the Scout's qualifications for the Eagle Scout rank. If the Scout has met your reasonable expectations, you should approve the project; if not, you should ask for corrections. This is not the time, however, to request changes or additions beyond what was originally agreed. The Eagle Scout service project is an accomplishment a Scout will always remember. Your reward will be a helpful project and, more important, the knowledge you have contributed to a young Scout's growth. Navigating the Eagle Scout Service Project is available for download at http://www.scouting.org/advancement Page 32 of 113 Eagle Service 3roMect :orkbook - 5evision Tracking 9ersion a - 5eleased // 9ersion b - 5eleased // •Free text date fields length increased •Scout name copied to footer on all pages •Scout and proMect name copied across pages •Scout name copied to fundraising application •0ade the Safety section much larger and added link to BSA Tool Safety web page •Added an email address to the Council Service Center contact block 9ersion c - 5eleased / / •:arnings about digital signatures locking the document have been added near all signature areas •Candidate hour reporting split into separate planning and execution blocks •3age reference on 3roposal 3age + corrected •3age reference on Fundraising Application 3age A corrected •3age reference on 3roMect 5eport 3age C corrected •Formatting of all telephone fields removed to allow international phone numbers 9ersion d - 5eleased // •Fixed a gender-specific pronoun 9ersion a - 5eleased // •8pdated 5isk 0anagement section 9ersion 3a - 5eleased 2/5/3 •Repaired Security Settings •Repaired and improved formatting Eagle Name footer for very long names Page 33 of 113 Prepared by January 2025 FA IRHOPE AVE UNE & INGLESIDE STREET TRAFFIC STUDY DRAFT REPORT Page 34 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Section .....................................................................................................................................................Page No. Section 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................1 - 1 Figure 1.1 Project Location Map..........................................................................1 - 2 Section 2 Existing Conditions ...........................................................................................2 - 1 2.1 Fairhope Avenue ..........................................................................................................2 - 1 2.2 Ingleside Street.............................................................................................................2 - 1 2.3 Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street .........................................................................2 - 1 Section 3 Evaluation of Existing Conditions.....................................................................3 - 1 3.1 Existing Traffic Volumes...............................................................................................3 - 1 Figure 3.1 Existing Peak Hour Volumes..............................................................3 - 2 3.2 Basis of Analysis ..........................................................................................................3 - 3 3.3 Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street .........................................................................3 - 4 Figure 3.2 Existing Intersection Level-of-Service.................................................3 - 4 Section 4 Evaluation of Future Traffic and Alternatives ..................................................4 - 1 4.1 Traffic Forecast.............................................................................................................4 - 1 Table 4.1 Historical Daily Traffic Volumes ............................................................4 - 1 Figure 4.1 Year 2034 Mid Year Traffic Volumes....................................................4 - 2 Figure 4.2 Year 2044 Horizon Traffic Volumes......................................................4 - 3 4.2 Alternatives...................................................................................................................4 - 4 Figure 4.3 Alternative A..........................................................................................4 - 5 Figure 4.4 Alternative B..........................................................................................4 - 6 Figure 4.5 Alternative C .........................................................................................4 - 7 Figure 4.6 Alternative D .........................................................................................4 - 8 4.3 Year 2034 Traffic Analysis............................................................................................4 - 9 Table 4.2 Year 2034 Mid Year Traffic Level-of-Service........................................4 - 9 4.4 Year 2044 Traffic Analysis............................................................................................4 - 9 Table 4.3 Year 2044 Horizon Traffic Level-of-Service........................................4 - 10 Section 5 Recommendations and Conclusions ................................................................5 - 1 5.1 Recommendations........................................................................................................5 - 1 Page 35 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study Appendix Year 2024 Existing Traffic Volumes Peak Hour Volumes and Trip Distribution Year 2024 Analysis Year 2034 Analysis Year 2044 Analysis Page 36 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 1-1 Section 1 Introduction This report summarizes the findings of the analysis performed by Neel-Schaffer, Inc. as requested by the City of Fairhope for traffic circulation at the intersection of Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street. Funding for the project was provided by the City of Fairhope. Figure 1.1 illustrates the location of the study intersection. The purpose of this analysis is to review the existing and future traffic volumes at the intersection and determine geometric improvements that could mitigate traffic congestion. Page 37 of 113 FIGURE Solutions you can build uponN.T.S.1.1PROJECT LOCATION MAP FAIRHOPE AVE-INGLESIDE ST PROJECT LOCATION © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 TomTom Page 38 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 2-1 Section 2 Existing Conditions The study area is comprised of one intersection: Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street. 2.1 Fairhope Avenue Fairhope Avenue is a three-lane undivided roadway with a two-way left turn lane. There is the presence of a few landscape medians within the two-way left turn lane. Fairhope Avenue has a typical section that consists of 12-foot travel lanes, sidewalks, and curb/gutter. Fairhope Avenue is functionally classified as a minor arterial and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. In 2023, the Alabama Department of Transportation indicated an ADT of 11,274 vehicles per day on Fairhope Avenue east of Ingleside Street. 2.2 Ingleside Street Ingleside Street is a two-lane undivided roadway. Ingleside Street has a typical section that consists of 10-foot travel lanes, unpaved shoulders, and sidewalk on the west side of the roadway north of Fairhope Avenue and on the east side of the roadway south of Fairhope Avenue. Ingleside Street is functionally classified as a major collector and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. In 2023, the Alabama Department of Transportation indicated an ADT of 1,188 vehicles per day on Ingleside Street north of Fairhope Avenue. 2.3 Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street The Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street intersection is currently an unsignalized intersection with Ingleside Street being stop-controlled. The Fairhope Avenue approaches provide a “slip” lane for right turns and a dedicated left turn lane along with a through lane. The northbound and southbound approaches are single lane approaches. The northbound and southbound approaches also have limited sight distance due to existing vegetation and the angle of the intersecting roads. Page 39 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 1 Section 3 Evaluation of Existing Conditions 3.1 Existing Traffic Volumes The project area for this analysis includes the unsignalized intersection of Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street. Twelve-hour turning movement counts were conducted at the study intersection in September 2024. The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes for the intersections are shown graphically in Figure 3.1. Page 40 of 113 FIGURE Solutions you can build uponN.T.S.3.1 LEGEND (XX) - PM PEAK XX - AM PEAK - STOP SIGN (13)16 (56)37 (14)2121(17)393(394) (443)422 11(17) EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FAIRHOPE AVE-INGLESIDE ST FAIRHOPE AVE INGLESIDE ST(19)14(23)192(1)10(12)17(29) Page 41 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 3-3 3.2 Basis of Analysis From a performance perspective, the effective operation of an intersection is evaluated based on the delay, turning movement volumes, traffic composition and roadway geometrics. The methodology utilized in this analysis is based on the Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition. Intersection level-of-service is based on delay per vehicle (in seconds). The level-of-service, as outlined in the Manual, is reported as a letter designation of LOS A through F (A is the least delay and F is the most delay). The delay range for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections (both four-way and two-way) is as follows: Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections LOS Delay (s/veh)LOS Delay (s/veh) A ≤ 10 A ≤ 10 B > 10 – 20 B > 10 – 15 C > 20 – 35 C > 15 – 25 D > 35 – 55 D > 25 – 35 E > 55 – 80 E > 35 – 50 F > 80 F > 50 The Highway Capacity Software was used to evaluate the existing peak hour traffic volumes at the unsignalized study intersection. Page 42 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 3-4 3.3 Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street Figure 3.2 illustrates the results of the capacity analysis at Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street, based on the Year 2024 traffic volumes. This analysis is based on an unsignalized intersection with Ingleside Street being stop controlled. Figure 3.2 – Existing Intersection Level-of-Service Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street Overall, the intersection operates with acceptable levels-of-service in the morning and afternoon peak hours. Page 43 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 4-1 Section 4 Evaluation of Future Traffic and Alternatives 4.1 Traffic Forecast A review of the historical 24-hour daily traffic volumes from ALDOT traffic counts was conducted to see the historical impacts of traffic growth on the roadways adjacent to the project site. The comparison of traffic volumes is provided in Table 4.1. Table 4.1 – Historical Daily Traffic Volumes Location Year Fairhope – E of Ingleside Ingleside – N of Fairhope Ingleside – S of Fairhope 2023 11,274 1,188 1,689 2022 12,989 1,245 2,120 2021 12,989 1,259 2,120 2020 12,470 1,259 2,034 2019 12,347 1,259 2,090 2018 12,347 1,234 2,049 Annual Growth Factor -1.8%-0.75%-3.8% The historical counts show a decrease traffic over the last five years. The 5-year annual growth factor for Fairhope Avenue is -1.8% from 2018 to 2023. A 1.00% compounded annual growth rate was used to forecast the traffic for the Year 2034 and Year 2044. Figure 4.1 illustrates the Year 2034 Mid Year Traffic Volumes and Figure 4.2 illustrates the Year 2044 Horizon Traffic Volumes. Page 44 of 113 FIGURE Solutions you can build upon 4.12034 MID YEAR TRAFFIC VOLUMES FAIRHOPE AVE-INGLESIDE STN.T.S.LEGEND (XX) - PM PEAK XX - AM PEAK - STOP SIGN (14)18 (62)41 (15)2323(19)434(435) (489)466 12(19) FAIRHOPE AVE INGLESIDE ST(21)15(25)212(1)11(13)19(32) Page 45 of 113 FIGURE Solutions you can build upon 4.22044 HORIZON TRAFFIC VOLUMES FAIRHOPE AVE-INGLESIDE STN.T.S.LEGEND (XX) - PM PEAK XX - AM PEAK - STOP SIGN (17)22 (76)50 (18)2828(23)530(531) (597)569 15(23) FAIRHOPE AVE INGLESIDE ST(26)18(31)262(1)13(16)23(39) Page 46 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 4-4 4.2 Alternatives Four alternatives were developed for the study intersection to reduce the delay experienced by Ingleside Street and improve on the limited sight distance. A traffic signal was not included in the alternatives due to the low traffic volumes on Ingleside Street. Also, a four-way stop controlled intersection was not concerned due to the imbalance of traffic volumes. The imbalance is that Fairhope Avenue has significantly more traffic than Ingleside Street. Right In/Right Out Intersection A right in/right out intersection was considered. This alternative could be completed in the short term and with limited cost. This alternative would utilize the existing roadways and remove the left and through movement from Ingleside Street and the left movement from Fairhope Avenue. A median could be installed along Fairhope Avenue which would reinforce the right in/right out intersection. The alternative would require vehicles to seek other routes for those that were left and through movements. This alternative could also be constructed with little interruption to Fairhope Avenue. Figure 4.3 illustrates the right in/right out intersection geometry. Split Intersection A split intersection was considered. This alternative would be completed by reconstructing Ingleside Street to the east and west to create two separate intersections. It is believed that this could be accomplished within the existing right-of-way. The alternative would remove the “slip lanes” and require full movements at the two intersections. This alternative would also improve the sight distance for left turning vehicles from Ingleside Street onto Fairhope Avenue. A benefit of this alternative verses the right in/right out intersection is that it does not restrict access to and from Ingleside Street. This alternative could also be constructed with little interruption to Fairhope Avenue. Figure 4.4 illustrates the split intersection geometry. Roundabout A roundabout intersection was considered. Roundabout intersections have shown great benefits in improving safety. This alternative would be completed by constructing a single-lane roundabout in the center of the intersection. This alternative would likely require the acquisition of residential units and would be costly. This alternative would also require the closure of Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street for the duration of construction. Figure 4.5 illustrates the roundabout geometry. Peanut Roundabout A peanut roundabout intersection was considered. This alternative was developed to reduce the right-of-way impacts from the single roundabout. The peanut roundabout would require the purchase of additional right-of-way but would not require the purchase of houses. This concept would be costly and would also require the closure of Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street for the duration of construction. Figure 4.6 illustrates the peanut roundabout geometry. Page 47 of 113 FIGURE Solutions you can build uponN.T.S.4.3ALTERNATIVE A FAIRHOPE AVE-INGLESIDE ST © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Page 48 of 113 FIGURE Solutions you can build uponN.T.S.4.4ALTERNATIVE B FAIRHOPE AVE-INGLESIDE ST © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Page 49 of 113 FIGURE Solutions you can build uponN.T.S.4.5ALTERNATIVE C FAIRHOPE AVE-INGLESIDE ST © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Page 50 of 113 FIGURE Solutions you can build uponN.T.S.4.6ALTERNATIVE D FAIRHOPE AVE-INGLESIDE ST © 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS © 2025 TomTom Page 51 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 4-9 4.3 Year 2034 Traffic Analysis An analysis of the Year 2034 Mid-Year traffic volumes was conducted using the information provided in the Highway Capacity Manual, Seven Edition. The lane geometry and traffic control for the mid year traffic analysis includes the existing roadway geometrics along with geometry presented in the previous figures. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 4.2. Table 4.2 – Year 2034 Mid-Year Traffic Level-of-Service Table 4.4 – Year 2034 Total Traffic Level-of-Service All intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels-of-service in Year 2034. 4.4 Year 2044 Traffic Analysis An analysis of the Year 2044 Horizon traffic volumes was conducted using the information provided in the Highway Capacity Manual, Seventh Edition. The lane geometry and traffic control for the horizon traffic analysis includes the existing roadway geometrics along with the geometry presented in the previous figures. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 4.3. Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total AM Peak D - 26 C - 17 A - 1 A - 1 - PM Peak D - 27 C - 19 A - 1 A - 1 - AM Peak B - 13 B - 12 A A - PM Peak B - 13 B - 12 A A - AM Peak C - 18 - A A - 1 - PM Peak C - 17 - A A - 1 - AM Peak - B - 12 A - 1 A - PM Peak - B - 12 A - 1 A - AM Peak A - 6 A - 5 A - 6 A - 7 A - 6 PM Peak A - 6 A - 5 A - 7 A - 7 A - 7 AM Peak A - 6 - A - 7 A - 7 A - 7 PM Peak A - 6 - A - 8 A - 7 A - 7 AM Peak - A - 5 A - 7 A - 7 A - 7 PM Peak - A - 5 A - 7 A - 7 A - 7 Split Intersection Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Right In/Right Out No Build Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Roundabout Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Peanut Roundabout Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St S Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St N Unsignalized Intersection Peak Hour Level-of-Service - Delay (sec/veh) Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St N Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St S Page 52 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 4-10 Table 4.3 – Year 2044 Horizon Traffic Level-of-Service The existing geometry (No Build) is anticipated to operate with failing levels-of-service for Ingleside Street in the horizon year. All alternative intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels-of-service in Year 2044. Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total AM Peak E - 48 C - 22 A - 1 A - 1 - PM Peak F - 51 D - 26 A - 1 A - 1 - AM Peak B - 15 B - 13 A A - PM Peak C - 15+ B - 13 A A - AM Peak C - 26 - A A - 1 - PM Peak C - 23 - A A - 1 - AM Peak - B - 14 A - 1 A - PM Peak - B - 14 A - 1 A - AM Peak A - 7 A - 6 A - 8 A - 8 A - 8 PM Peak A - 7 A - 6 A - 8 A - 8 A - 8 AM Peak A - 7 - A - 9 A - 8 A - 8 PM Peak A - 7 - A - 10 A - 8 A - 9 AM Peak - A - 6 A - 8 A - 8 A - 8 PM Peak - A - 6 A - 9 A - 8 A - 8 Split Intersection Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St No Build Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Roundabout Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Peanut Roundabout Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St S Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St N Unsignalized Intersection Peak Hour Level-of-Service - Delay (sec/veh) Right In/Right Out Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St S Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St N Page 53 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 5-1 Section 5 Recommendations and Conclusions 5.1 Recommendations A reconstruction of the intersection is recommended to reduce the delay and improve the sight distance. While a roundabout alternative would provide the best level-of-service for Ingleside Drive, it is not being recommended due to the higher construction cost, acquisition of right-of- way, and impacts during construction. Also, the roundabout would be introducing some delays to Fairhope Avenue’s traffic. The right in/right out and split intersection alternatives offer the best results for this location. Both alternatives could be constructed within the existing right-of-way and the construction cost would lower than the roundabouts. The following table shows the results of the capacity analysis of the two alternatives in the horizon year. Year 2044 Level-of-Service Analysis Fairhope Avenue and Ingleside Street The right in/right out configuration provides a better level-of-service for Ingleside Street. This is mainly due to the removal of the left and through movements. Both alternatives offer the City of Fairhope reduced delay and improved sight distance. The major disadvantage with the right in/right out intersection is that it removes traffic movements from the intersection. While this would make the intersection safer overall, traffic would be rerouted to adjacent intersections. The major disadvantage with the split intersection is that you are creating an additional intersection to Fairhope Avenue thus likely increasing the probability of crashes. The right in/right out intersection could be completed in a short time with the deployment of signage, striping, and “quick” curb. This could allow the City time to determine the actual impacts of the rerouted traffic and plan for the long term solution of permanently making the intersection right in/right out with a landscaped raised median along Fairhope Avenue or to implement the split intersection and restore full traffic movements. Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total AM Peak B - 15 B - 13 A A - PM Peak C - 15+ B - 13 A A - AM Peak C - 26 - A A - 1 - PM Peak C - 23 - A A - 1 - AM Peak - B - 14 A - 1 A - PM Peak - B - 14 A - 1 A - Split Intersection Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Unsignalized Intersection Peak Hour Level-of-Service - Delay (sec/veh) Right In/Right Out Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St S Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St N Page 54 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 5-2 Appendix Year 2024 Existing Traffic Volumes Peak Hour Volumes and Trip Distribution Year 2024 Analysis Year 2034 Analysis Year 2044 Analysis Page 55 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 5-3 Year 2024 Existing Traffic Volumes Page 56 of 113 File Name : 24104-1 Site Code : 24104-1 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 1 Fairhope Ave @ Ingleside St N Fairhope, AL Groups Printed- Automobiles - Trucks - Buses N Ingleside St Southbound Fairhope Ave Westbound S Ingleside St Northbound Fairhope Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Uturns Left Thru Right Uturns Left Thru Right Uturns Left Thru Right Uturns Int. Total 06:30 0 3 3 0 5 13 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 16 0 0 45 06:45 0 3 2 0 4 39 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 25 0 0 79 Total 0 6 5 0 9 52 0 0 3 4 3 0 1 41 0 0 124 07:00 1 1 2 0 2 48 2 0 3 2 2 1 1 25 0 0 90 07:15 3 3 6 1 5 88 0 0 11 3 1 0 2 32 0 1 156 07:30 2 6 2 1 6 122 2 0 13 2 3 2 5 59 0 0 225 07:45 1 12 2 0 7 88 1 0 4 2 4 0 1 73 0 0 195 Total 7 22 12 2 20 346 5 0 31 9 10 3 9 189 0 1 666 08:00 0 6 5 0 6 105 0 0 4 3 4 1 2 36 0 0 172 08:15 2 4 0 0 8 77 3 0 0 4 0 0 1 33 0 2 134 08:30 0 5 1 0 3 64 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 38 0 0 117 08:45 0 1 7 1 3 92 1 0 5 2 3 0 1 47 0 0 163 Total 2 16 13 1 20 338 7 0 10 10 7 1 5 154 0 2 586 09:00 0 4 3 1 4 89 3 0 1 3 5 0 5 73 0 0 191 09:15 0 4 5 1 5 108 1 0 5 5 1 0 1 78 1 0 215 09:30 1 3 2 0 2 126 3 0 2 0 7 0 1 80 0 0 227 09:45 1 1 1 0 1 108 1 0 3 2 5 0 2 62 0 0 187 Total 2 12 11 2 12 431 8 0 11 10 18 0 9 293 1 0 820 10:00 1 2 6 0 4 97 7 1 6 1 6 0 2 77 0 0 210 10:15 1 2 6 0 6 88 3 0 6 3 5 0 0 87 0 0 207 10:30 0 4 5 0 2 92 3 0 5 4 3 0 6 98 0 0 222 10:45 0 1 6 0 6 98 4 0 4 5 2 0 0 93 0 0 219 Total 2 9 23 0 18 375 17 1 21 13 16 0 8 355 0 0 858 11:00 1 2 6 0 5 100 2 0 5 2 8 0 6 116 0 0 253 11:15 1 3 4 0 4 103 2 2 7 3 6 0 4 115 0 0 254 11:30 0 1 7 1 3 98 5 6 4 5 3 0 2 99 0 0 234 11:45 1 3 4 0 13 107 3 1 3 4 9 1 5 101 0 0 255 Total 3 9 21 1 25 408 12 9 19 14 26 1 17 431 0 0 996 12:00 0 4 2 0 4 88 6 0 3 5 6 0 4 118 0 0 240 12:15 0 4 4 0 9 101 3 0 4 5 5 0 2 125 0 0 262 12:30 1 1 6 0 2 93 3 0 6 3 7 1 6 85 0 1 215 12:45 0 4 6 0 3 90 4 0 5 3 5 0 3 106 0 0 229 Total 1 13 18 0 18 372 16 0 18 16 23 1 15 434 0 1 946 13:00 1 5 5 0 8 99 6 0 1 1 5 0 1 112 0 0 244 13:15 0 5 3 0 7 77 5 2 3 3 7 0 1 113 0 0 226 13:30 0 0 4 0 7 101 1 0 3 3 10 2 2 89 0 0 222 13:45 1 3 5 0 6 98 1 0 3 2 2 0 5 91 0 0 217 Total 2 13 17 0 28 375 13 2 10 9 24 2 9 405 0 0 909 14:00 0 2 4 0 10 77 3 0 3 2 6 0 2 98 0 0 207 14:15 1 4 9 0 10 87 4 0 3 1 4 0 4 107 0 0 234 14:30 0 2 7 0 3 97 2 0 8 6 3 0 2 86 0 0 216 14:45 0 1 4 0 5 95 3 0 6 6 5 0 3 96 0 0 224 Total 1 9 24 0 28 356 12 0 20 15 18 0 11 387 0 0 881 Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 57 of 113 File Name : 24104-1 Site Code : 24104-1 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 2 Groups Printed- Automobiles - Trucks - Buses N Ingleside St Southbound Fairhope Ave Westbound S Ingleside St Northbound Fairhope Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Uturns Left Thru Right Uturns Left Thru Right Uturns Left Thru Right Uturns Int. Total 15:00 1 2 14 0 9 84 3 0 4 4 6 0 3 110 0 0 240 15:15 2 4 5 0 3 83 4 0 7 6 7 0 2 110 0 0 233 15:30 1 1 8 0 5 90 5 1 7 9 12 0 7 110 0 0 256 15:45 0 2 3 0 5 78 6 0 0 5 9 0 4 104 0 0 216 Total 4 9 30 0 22 335 18 1 18 24 34 0 16 434 0 0 945 16:00 0 1 4 0 3 81 3 0 2 6 4 0 3 96 0 0 203 16:15 1 2 3 0 4 84 3 0 2 3 4 0 3 79 0 0 188 16:30 2 1 6 0 3 65 5 0 1 5 12 0 1 86 0 0 187 16:45 1 2 4 0 7 89 4 0 5 2 6 0 3 87 0 0 210 Total 4 6 17 0 17 319 15 0 10 16 26 0 10 348 0 0 788 17:00 0 1 3 0 6 75 7 0 3 8 10 0 5 118 0 0 236 17:15 1 4 7 0 5 67 8 1 6 3 6 1 2 82 0 1 194 17:30 2 5 5 0 4 74 3 0 4 3 6 0 3 70 0 0 179 17:45 0 3 6 0 4 65 3 0 0 3 3 0 2 63 0 0 152 Total 3 13 21 0 19 281 21 1 13 17 25 1 12 333 0 1 761 18:00 2 1 7 0 5 74 5 0 2 0 6 0 3 58 0 0 163 18:15 0 4 6 0 5 51 4 0 1 3 3 0 0 51 0 0 128 Grand Total 33 142 225 6 246 4113 153 14 187 160 239 9 125 3913 1 5 9571 Apprch %8.1 35 55.4 1.5 5.4 90.9 3.4 0.3 31.4 26.9 40.2 1.5 3.1 96.8 0 0.1 Total %0.3 1.5 2.4 0.1 2.6 43 1.6 0.1 2 1.7 2.5 0.1 1.3 40.9 0 0.1 Automobiles 32 141 224 0 243 4044 147 4 184 153 236 0 123 3837 1 0 9369 % Automobiles 97 99.3 99.6 0 98.8 98.3 96.1 28.6 98.4 95.6 98.7 0 98.4 98.1 100 0 97.9 Trucks 1 1 1 4 3 57 5 10 2 3 3 8 2 62 0 5 167 % Trucks 3 0.7 0.4 66.7 1.2 1.4 3.3 71.4 1.1 1.9 1.3 88.9 1.6 1.6 0 100 1.7 Buses 0 0 0 2 0 12 1 0 1 4 0 1 0 14 0 0 35 % Buses 0 0 0 33.3 0 0.3 0.7 0 0.5 2.5 0 11.1 0 0.4 0 0 0.4 Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 58 of 113 File Name : 24104-1 Site Code : 24104-1 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 3 N Ingleside St Fairhope Ave Fairhope Ave S Ingleside St Right 224 1 0 225 Thru 141 1 0 142 Left 32 1 0 33 Uturns 0 4 2 6 InOut Total 423 397 820 10 7 17 5 2 7 438 844 406 Right147 5 1 153 Thru4044 57 12 4113 Left243 3 0 246 Uturns4 10 0 14 OutTotalIn4105 4438 8543 66 75 141 14 13 27 4185 8711 4526 Left 184 2 1 187 Thru 153 3 4 160 Right 236 3 0 239 Uturns 0 8 1 9 Out TotalIn 385 573 958 4 16 20 0 6 6 389 984 595 Left123 2 0 125 Thru3837 62 14 3913 Right1 0 0 1 Uturns0 5 0 5 TotalOutIn4452 3961 8413 60 69 129 13 14 27 4525 8569 4044 9/24/2024 06:30 9/24/2024 18:15 Automobiles Trucks Buses North Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 59 of 113 File Name : 24104-1 Site Code : 24104-1 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 4 N Ingleside St Southbound Fairhope Ave Westbound S Ingleside St Northbound Fairhope Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Uturns App. Total Left Thru Right Uturns App. Total Left Thru Right Uturns App. Total Left Thru Right Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 to 11:15 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 10:30 10:30 0 4 5 0 9 2 92 3 0 97 5 4 3 0 12 6 98 0 0 104 222 10:45 0 1 6 0 7 6 98 4 0 108 4 5 2 0 11 0 93 0 0 93 219 11:00 1 2 6 0 9 5 100 2 0 107 5 2 8 0 15 6 116 0 0 122 253 11:15 1 3 4 0 8 4 103 2 2 111 7 3 6 0 16 4 115 0 0 119 254 Total Volume 2 10 21 0 33 17 393 11 2 423 21 14 19 0 54 16 422 0 0 438 948 % App. Total 6.1 30.3 63.6 0 4 92.9 2.6 0.5 38.9 25.9 35.2 0 3.7 96.3 0 0 PHF .500 .625 .875 .000 .917 .708 .954 .688 .250 .953 .750 .700 .594 .000 .844 .667 .909 .000 .000 .898 .933 Automobiles 2 9 21 0 32 15 387 9 0 411 20 13 19 0 52 16 413 0 0 429 924 % Automobiles 100 90.0 100 0 97.0 88.2 98.5 81.8 0 97.2 95.2 92.9 100 0 96.3 100 97.9 0 0 97.9 97.5 Trucks 0 1 0 0 1 2 4 2 2 10 1 1 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 8 21 % Trucks 0 10.0 0 0 3.0 11.8 1.0 18.2 100 2.4 4.8 7.1 0 0 3.7 0 1.9 0 0 1.8 2.2 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 % Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.3 N Ingleside St Fairhope Ave Fairhope Ave S Ingleside St Right 21 0 0 21 Thru 9 1 0 10 Left 2 0 0 2 Uturns 0 0 0 0 InOut Total 38 32 70 3 1 4 0 0 0 41 74 33 Right9 2 0 11 Thru387 4 2 393 Left15 2 0 17 Uturns0 2 0 2 OutTotalIn434 411 845 8 10 18 1 2 3 443 866 423 Left 20 1 0 21 Thru 13 1 0 14 Right 19 0 0 19 Uturns 0 0 0 0 Out TotalIn 24 52 76 3 2 5 0 0 0 27 81 54 Left16 0 0 16 Thru413 8 1 422 Right0 0 0 0 Uturns0 0 0 0 TotalOutIn428 429 857 5 8 13 2 1 3 435 873 438 Peak Hour Begins at 10:30 Automobiles Trucks Buses Peak Hour Data North Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 60 of 113 File Name : 24104-1 Site Code : 24104-1 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 5 N Ingleside St Southbound Fairhope Ave Westbound S Ingleside St Northbound Fairhope Ave Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right Uturns App. Total Left Thru Right Uturns App. Total Left Thru Right Uturns App. Total Left Thru Right Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:30 to 18:15 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:30 11:30 0 1 7 1 9 3 98 5 6 112 4 5 3 0 12 2 99 0 0 101 234 11:45 1 3 4 0 8 13 107 3 1 124 3 4 9 1 17 5 101 0 0 106 255 12:00 0 4 2 0 6 4 88 6 0 98 3 5 6 0 14 4 118 0 0 122 240 12:15 0 4 4 0 8 9 101 3 0 113 4 5 5 0 14 2 125 0 0 127 262 Total Volume 1 12 17 1 31 29 394 17 7 447 14 19 23 1 57 13 443 0 0 456 991 % App. Total 3.2 38.7 54.8 3.2 6.5 88.1 3.8 1.6 24.6 33.3 40.4 1.8 2.9 97.1 0 0 PHF .250 .750 .607 .250 .861 .558 .921 .708 .292 .901 .875 .950 .639 .250 .838 .650 .886 .000 .000 .898 .946 Automobiles 1 12 17 0 30 29 389 16 0 434 14 18 22 0 54 13 435 0 0 448 966 % Automobiles 100 100 100 0 96.8 100 98.7 94.1 0 97.1 100 94.7 95.7 0 94.7 100 98.2 0 0 98.2 97.5 Trucks 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 1 7 12 0 1 1 0 2 0 7 0 0 7 22 % Trucks 0 0 0 100 3.2 0 1.0 5.9 100 2.7 0 5.3 4.3 0 3.5 0 1.6 0 0 1.5 2.2 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 % Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.2 0 0 0 100 1.8 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.3 N Ingleside St Fairhope Ave Fairhope Ave S Ingleside St Right 17 0 0 17 Thru 12 0 0 12 Left 1 0 0 1 Uturns 0 1 0 1 InOut Total 47 30 77 2 1 3 0 0 0 49 80 31 Right16 1 0 17 Thru389 4 1 394 Left29 0 0 29 Uturns0 7 0 7 OutTotalIn458 434 892 8 12 20 1 1 2 467 914 447 Left 14 0 0 14 Thru 18 1 0 19 Right 22 1 0 23 Uturns 0 0 1 1 Out TotalIn 41 54 95 0 2 2 0 1 1 41 98 57 Left13 0 0 13 Thru435 7 1 443 Right0 0 0 0 Uturns0 0 0 0 TotalOutIn420 448 868 4 7 11 1 1 2 425 881 456 Peak Hour Begins at 11:30 Automobiles Trucks Buses Peak Hour Data North Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 61 of 113 File Name : 24104-2 Site Code : 24104-2 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 1 Fairhope Ave @ Ingleside St/Side Street Fairhope, AL Groups Printed- Cars - Heavy Trucks - Buses Fairhope Ave Westbound Side Street for S Ingleside St Northwestbound Fairhope Ave Eastbound Start Time Hard Left Thru Uturns Bear Left Hard Right Uturns Thru Bear Right Uturns Int. Total 06:30 0 17 0 0 0 0 16 1 0 34 06:45 0 43 0 0 0 0 26 2 0 71 Total 0 60 0 0 0 0 42 3 0 105 07:00 0 52 0 0 0 0 26 3 1 82 07:15 0 105 0 0 0 0 34 17 0 156 07:30 0 138 0 0 0 0 64 24 2 228 07:45 0 94 0 0 0 0 74 30 0 198 Total 0 389 0 0 0 0 198 74 3 664 08:00 0 114 0 0 0 0 38 5 1 158 08:15 0 77 0 0 0 0 34 9 0 120 08:30 0 66 0 0 0 0 40 10 0 116 08:45 0 105 0 0 0 0 47 5 0 157 Total 0 362 0 0 0 0 159 29 1 551 09:00 0 93 0 0 0 0 78 9 0 180 09:15 0 117 0 0 0 0 80 10 0 207 09:30 0 131 0 0 0 0 80 6 0 217 09:45 0 112 0 0 0 0 65 12 0 189 Total 0 453 0 0 0 0 303 37 0 793 10:00 0 109 0 0 0 0 79 7 0 195 10:15 0 99 0 0 0 0 87 11 0 197 10:30 0 103 0 0 0 0 104 12 0 219 10:45 0 107 0 0 0 0 94 9 0 210 Total 0 418 0 0 0 0 364 39 0 821 11:00 0 112 0 0 0 0 121 12 0 245 11:15 0 113 0 0 0 0 120 4 0 237 11:30 0 109 0 0 0 0 100 14 0 223 11:45 0 112 0 0 0 0 107 13 0 232 Total 0 446 0 0 0 0 448 43 0 937 12:00 0 93 0 0 0 0 122 15 0 230 12:15 0 109 0 0 0 0 126 14 0 249 12:30 0 105 0 0 0 0 91 16 1 213 12:45 0 101 0 0 0 0 109 9 0 219 Total 0 408 0 0 0 0 448 54 1 911 13:00 0 105 0 0 0 0 113 14 0 232 13:15 0 83 0 0 0 0 115 5 0 203 13:30 0 108 0 0 0 0 90 11 2 211 13:45 0 106 0 0 0 0 96 8 0 210 Total 0 402 0 0 0 0 414 38 2 856 14:00 0 84 0 0 0 0 100 17 0 201 14:15 0 99 0 0 0 0 111 15 0 225 14:30 0 111 0 0 0 0 88 16 0 215 14:45 0 105 0 0 0 0 99 16 0 220 Total 0 399 0 0 0 0 398 64 0 861 Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 62 of 113 File Name : 24104-2 Site Code : 24104-2 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 2 Groups Printed- Cars - Heavy Trucks - Buses Fairhope Ave Westbound Side Street for S Ingleside St Northwestbound Fairhope Ave Eastbound Start Time Hard Left Thru Uturns Bear Left Hard Right Uturns Thru Bear Right Uturns Int. Total 15:00 0 103 0 0 0 0 114 35 0 252 15:15 0 95 0 0 0 0 111 17 0 223 15:30 0 106 0 0 0 0 118 18 0 242 15:45 0 80 0 0 0 0 107 11 0 198 Total 0 384 0 0 0 0 450 81 0 915 16:00 0 87 0 0 0 0 100 15 0 202 16:15 0 89 0 0 0 0 81 9 0 179 16:30 1 70 0 0 0 0 87 14 0 172 16:45 0 99 0 0 0 0 90 8 0 197 Total 1 345 0 0 0 0 358 46 0 750 17:00 0 82 0 0 0 0 123 11 0 216 17:15 0 82 0 0 0 0 85 15 0 182 17:30 1 81 0 0 0 0 73 6 0 161 17:45 0 71 0 0 0 0 65 5 0 141 Total 1 316 0 0 0 0 346 37 0 700 18:00 0 84 0 0 0 0 61 3 0 148 18:15 0 57 0 0 0 0 51 1 0 109 Grand Total 2 4523 0 0 0 0 4040 549 7 9121 Apprch %0 100 0 0 0 0 87.9 11.9 0.2 Total %0 49.6 0 0 0 0 44.3 6 0.1 Cars 2 4450 0 0 0 0 3962 542 0 8956 % Cars 100 98.4 0 0 0 0 98.1 98.7 0 98.2 Heavy Trucks 0 60 0 0 0 0 64 5 7 136 % Heavy Trucks 0 1.3 0 0 0 0 1.6 0.9 100 1.5 Buses 0 13 0 0 0 0 14 2 0 29 % Buses 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.4 0 0.3 Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 63 of 113 File Name : 24104-2 Site Code : 24104-2 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 3 Fairhope Ave Fairhope Ave Side Street for S Ingleside St Thru4450 60 13 4523 HardLeft2 0 0 2 Uturns0 0 0 0 OutTotalIn3962 4452 8414 64 60 124 14 13 27 4040 8565 4525 Uturns0 0 0 0 BearLeft0 0 0 0 HardRight0 0 0 0 Out544 5 2 551 In0 0 0 0 Total544 5 2 551 Thru3962 64 14 4040 BearRight542 5 2 549 Uturns0 7 0 7 TotalOutIn4450 4504 8954 60 76 136 13 16 29 4523 9119 4596 9/24/2024 06:30 9/24/2024 18:15 Cars Heavy Trucks Buses North Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 64 of 113 File Name : 24104-2 Site Code : 24104-2 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 4 Fairhope Ave Westbound Side Street for S Ingleside St Northwestbound Fairhope Ave Eastbound Start Time Hard Left Thru Uturns App. Total Bear Left Hard Right Uturns App. Total Thru Bear Right Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 to 11:15 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 10:30 10:30 0 103 0 103 0 0 0 0 104 12 0 116 219 10:45 0 107 0 107 0 0 0 0 94 9 0 103 210 11:00 0 112 0 112 0 0 0 0 121 12 0 133 245 11:15 0 113 0 113 0 0 0 0 120 4 0 124 237 Total Volume 0 435 0 435 0 0 0 0 439 37 0 476 911 % App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 92.2 7.8 0 PHF .000 .962 .000 .962 .000 .000 .000 .000 .907 .771 .000 .895 .930 Cars 0 428 0 428 0 0 0 0 430 36 0 466 894 % Cars 0 98.4 0 98.4 0 0 0 0 97.9 97.3 0 97.9 98.1 Heavy Trucks 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 9 14 % Heavy Trucks 0 1.1 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 1.8 2.7 0 1.9 1.5 Buses 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 % Buses 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.3 Fairhope Ave Fairhope Ave Side Street for S Ingleside St Thru428 5 2 435 HardLeft0 0 0 0 Uturns0 0 0 0 OutTotalIn430 428 858 8 5 13 1 2 3 439 874 435 Uturns0 0 0 0 BearLeft0 0 0 0 HardRight0 0 0 0 Out36 1 0 37 In0 0 0 0 Total36 1 0 37 Thru430 8 1 439 BearRight36 1 0 37 Uturns0 0 0 0 TotalOutIn428 466 894 5 9 14 2 1 3 435 911 476 Peak Hour Begins at 10:30 Cars Heavy Trucks Buses Peak Hour Data North Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 65 of 113 File Name : 24104-2 Site Code : 24104-2 Start Date : 9/24/2024 Page No : 5 Fairhope Ave Westbound Side Street for S Ingleside St Northwestbound Fairhope Ave Eastbound Start Time Hard Left Thru Uturns App. Total Bear Left Hard Right Uturns App. Total Thru Bear Right Uturns App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:30 to 18:15 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 14:45 14:45 0 105 0 105 0 0 0 0 99 16 0 115 220 15:00 0 103 0 103 0 0 0 0 114 35 0 149 252 15:15 0 95 0 95 0 0 0 0 111 17 0 128 223 15:30 0 106 0 106 0 0 0 0 118 18 0 136 242 Total Volume 0 409 0 409 0 0 0 0 442 86 0 528 937 % App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 83.7 16.3 0 PHF .000 .965 .000 .965 .000 .000 .000 .000 .936 .614 .000 .886 .930 Cars 0 401 0 401 0 0 0 0 436 86 0 522 923 % Cars 0 98.0 0 98.0 0 0 0 0 98.6 100 0 98.9 98.5 Heavy Trucks 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 10 % Heavy Trucks 0 1.2 0 1.2 0 0 0 0 1.1 0 0 0.9 1.1 Buses 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 % Buses 0 0.7 0 0.7 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 Fairhope Ave Fairhope Ave Side Street for S Ingleside St Thru401 5 3 409 HardLeft0 0 0 0 Uturns0 0 0 0 OutTotalIn436 401 837 5 5 10 1 3 4 442 851 409 Uturns0 0 0 0 BearLeft0 0 0 0 HardRight0 0 0 0 Out86 0 0 86 In0 0 0 0 Total86 0 0 86 Thru436 5 1 442 BearRight86 0 0 86 Uturns0 0 0 0 TotalOutIn401 522 923 5 5 10 3 1 4 409 937 528 Peak Hour Begins at 14:45 Cars Heavy Trucks Buses Peak Hour Data North Southern Traffic Services, Inc. 2911 Westfield Rd Gulf Breeze, FL 32563 Traffic is Our Only Business Page 66 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 5-4 Peak Hour Volumes and Trip Distribution Page 67 of 113 Fairhope Ave / Ingleside StAnnual Growth Factor 1.00%Base Year 2024Mid Year 2034Horizon Year 2044StartTime Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right TotalAM Peak Hour2024 Existing Traffic 21 14 19 2 10 21 16 422 37 17 393 11 9832034 Mid Year Traffic 23 15 21 2 11 23 18 466 41 19 434 12 10852044 Horizon Year Traffic 28 18 26 2 13 28 22 569 50 23 530 15 1324PM Peak Hour2024 Existing Traffic 14 19 23 1 12 17 13 443 56 29 394 17 10382034 Mid Year Traffic 15 21 25 1 13 19 14 489 62 32 435 19 11452044 Horizon Year Traffic 18 26 31 1 16 23 17 597 76 39 531 23 1398Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestboundPage 68 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 5-5 Year 2024 Analysis Page 69 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2024 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Exisitng AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)16 422 37 17 393 11 21 14 19 2 10 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 4.13 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 2.23 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)17 18 59 36 Capacity, c (veh/h)1115 1060 272 379 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.22 0.09 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.1 0.8 0.3 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)0.0 2.6 20.5 7.7 Control Delay (s/veh)8.3 8.5 21.8 15.5 Level of Service (LOS)A A C C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.3 0.3 21.8 15.5 Approach LOS A A C C Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 2:34:39 PM2024 Existing AM Peak.xtw Page 70 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2024 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Exisitng PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)13 443 56 29 394 17 14 19 23 1 12 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 4.13 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 2.23 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)14 32 61 33 Capacity, c (veh/h)1108 1021 269 331 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.03 0.23 0.10 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.1 0.8 0.3 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)0.0 2.6 20.5 7.7 Control Delay (s/veh)8.3 8.6 22.3 17.1 Level of Service (LOS)A A C C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 0.6 22.3 17.1 Approach LOS A A C C Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 2:35:52 PM2024 Existing PM Peak.xtw Page 71 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 5-6 Year 2034 Analysis Page 72 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2034 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Mid Year AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)18 466 41 19 434 12 23 15 21 2 11 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 4.13 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 2.23 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)20 21 64 39 Capacity, c (veh/h)1073 1014 233 337 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.12 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.1 1.1 0.4 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.6 2.6 28.2 10.2 Control Delay (s/veh)8.4 8.6 26.2 17.1 Level of Service (LOS)A A D C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.3 0.4 26.2 17.1 Approach LOS A A D C Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 2:37:12 PM2034 Mid Year AM Peak.xtw Page 73 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2034 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Mid Year PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)14 489 62 32 435 19 15 21 25 1 13 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 4.13 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 2.23 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)15 35 66 36 Capacity, c (veh/h)1065 973 230 293 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.04 0.29 0.12 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.0 0.1 1.2 0.4 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)0.0 2.6 30.7 10.2 Control Delay (s/veh)8.4 8.8 26.9 19.0 Level of Service (LOS)A A D C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 0.6 26.9 19.0 Approach LOS A A D C Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 2:38:31 PM2034 Mid Year PM Peak.xtw Page 74 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2034 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Mid Year AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study RI/RO Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR TR R R Volume (veh/h)484 41 453 12 59 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)6.2 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)6.23 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.3 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.33 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)64 39 Capacity, c (veh/h)534 570 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.07 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.4 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)10.2 5.1 Control Delay (s/veh)12.7 11.8 Level of Service (LOS)B B Approach Delay (s/veh)12.7 11.8 Approach LOS B B Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 1/24/2025 9:00:50 AM2024 RI-RO Mid Year AM Peak.xtw Page 75 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2034 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Mid Year PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study RI/RO Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR TR R R Volume (veh/h)503 62 467 19 61 33 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)6.2 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)6.23 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.3 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.33 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)66 36 Capacity, c (veh/h)512 556 v/c Ratio 0.13 0.06 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.4 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)10.2 5.1 Control Delay (s/veh)13.1 11.9 Level of Service (LOS)B B Approach Delay (s/veh)13.1 11.9 Approach LOS B B Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 1/24/2025 9:03:05 AM2024 RI-RO Mid Year PM Peak.xtw Page 76 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside N Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2034 North/South Street Ingleside Street N Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR LR Volume (veh/h)33 487 453 12 2 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)36 39 Capacity, c (veh/h)1054 525 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.07 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.6 5.1 Control Delay (s/veh)8.5 12.4 Level of Service (LOS)A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.5 12.4 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 4:05:01 PM2034 Ingleside N Build AM Peak.xtw Page 77 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside N Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2034 North/South Street Ingleside Street N Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR LR Volume (veh/h)35 514 467 19 1 32 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)38 36 Capacity, c (veh/h)1034 529 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.07 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.6 5.1 Control Delay (s/veh)8.6 12.3 Level of Service (LOS)A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.5 12.3 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 4:06:04 PM2034 Ingleside N Build PM Peak.xtw Page 78 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside S Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2034 North/South Street Ingleside Street S Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T LR Volume (veh/h)484 41 30 457 23 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)33 64 Capacity, c (veh/h)997 346 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.19 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.7 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.6 17.9 Control Delay (s/veh)8.7 17.8 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.5 17.8 Approach LOS A C Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 3:56:56 PM2034 Ingleside S Build AM Peak.xtw Page 79 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside S Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2034 North/South Street Ingleside Street S Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T LR Volume (veh/h)503 62 45 454 15 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)49 66 Capacity, c (veh/h)960 371 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.18 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.2 0.6 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)5.1 15.4 Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 16.8 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.8 16.8 Approach LOS A C Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 3:58:07 PM2034 Ingleside S Build PM Peak.xtw Page 80 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St Analysis Year 2034 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LT LT LTR LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 18 466 41 0 19 434 12 0 23 15 21 0 2 11 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 20 522 46 0 21 486 13 0 26 17 24 0 2 12 26 Right-Turn Bypass Yielding Yielding None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 542 46 507 13 67 40 Entry Volume, veh/h 526 45 492 13 65 39 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 35 63 544 533 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 548 538 37 33 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1332 1334 1294 1329 792 801 Capacity (c), veh/h 1293 1295 1256 1290 769 778 v/c Ratio (x)0.41 0.03 0.39 0.01 0.08 0.05 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 6.7 3.1 6.7 2.9 5.5 5.1 Lane LOS A A A A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)2.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.3 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)51.2 2.6 48.6 0.0 7.7 5.1 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.4 A 6.6 A 5.5 A 5.1 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.4 A Page 81 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 12:00:36 PM 2034 Roundabout AM Peak.xro Page 82 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St Analysis Year 2034 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LT LT LTR LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 14 489 62 0 32 435 19 0 15 21 25 0 1 13 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 16 547 69 0 36 487 21 0 17 24 28 0 1 15 21 Right-Turn Bypass Yielding Yielding None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 563 69 523 21 69 37 Entry Volume, veh/h 547 67 508 20 67 36 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 52 57 564 540 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 576 525 40 51 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1309 1310 1302 1325 776 796 Capacity (c), veh/h 1271 1272 1264 1286 754 772 v/c Ratio (x)0.43 0.05 0.40 0.02 0.09 0.05 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 7.1 3.3 6.8 2.9 5.7 5.1 Lane LOS A A A A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)2.2 0.2 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)56.3 5.1 51.2 0.0 7.7 2.6 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.7 A 6.6 A 5.7 A 5.1 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.6 A Page 83 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 12:01:44 PM 2034 Roundabout PM Peak.xro Page 84 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside N Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St N Analysis Year 2034 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LT TR LR Volume (V), veh/h 0 33 487 0 453 12 0 2 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 37 545 0 507 13 0 2 38 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 582 520 40 Entry Volume, veh/h 565 505 39 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 2 37 584 507 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 547 545 50 0 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1377 1329 823 Capacity (c), veh/h 1337 1290 799 v/c Ratio (x)0.42 0.39 0.05 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 6.8 6.5 5.0 Lane LOS A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)2.1 1.9 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)52.5 48.6 5.1 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.8 A 6.5 A 5.0 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.6 A Page 85 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 2:29:18 PM 2034 2 Roundabouts AM Peak.xro Page 86 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside S Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St S Analysis Year 2034 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Assignment TR LT LR Volume (V), veh/h 0 484 41 0 30 457 0 23 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 542 46 0 34 512 0 26 40 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 588 546 66 Entry Volume, veh/h 571 530 64 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 34 26 542 572 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 582 538 0 80 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1333 1344 794 Capacity (c), veh/h 1294 1305 771 v/c Ratio (x)0.44 0.41 0.08 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 7.2 6.7 5.5 Lane LOS A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)2.3 2.0 0.3 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)58.9 50.0 7.7 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 7.2 A 6.7 A 5.5 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.8 A Page 87 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 2:28:43 PM 2034 2 Roundabouts AM Peak.xro Page 88 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside N Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St N Analysis Year 2034 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LT TR LR Volume (V), veh/h 0 35 514 0 467 19 0 1 32 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 39 575 0 523 21 0 1 36 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 614 544 37 Entry Volume, veh/h 596 528 36 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 1 39 615 523 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 576 559 60 0 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1379 1326 809 Capacity (c), veh/h 1338 1288 786 v/c Ratio (x)0.45 0.41 0.05 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 7.1 6.8 5.0 Lane LOS A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)2.3 2.0 0.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)57.5 51.2 2.6 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 7.1 A 6.8 A 5.0 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 6.9 A Page 89 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 2:31:36 PM 2034 2 Roundabouts PM Peak.xro Page 90 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside S Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St S Analysis Year 2034 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Assignment TR LT LR Volume (V), veh/h 0 503 62 0 45 454 0 15 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 563 69 0 50 508 0 17 52 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 632 558 69 Entry Volume, veh/h 614 542 67 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 50 17 563 575 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 615 525 0 119 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1311 1356 777 Capacity (c), veh/h 1273 1317 754 v/c Ratio (x)0.48 0.41 0.09 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 7.8 6.7 5.7 Lane LOS A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)2.7 2.1 0.3 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)69.1 52.5 7.7 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 7.8 A 6.7 A 5.7 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 7.2 A Page 91 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 2:32:04 PM 2034 2 Roundabouts PM Peak.xro Page 92 of 113 City of Fairhope Fairhope Ave / Ingleside St Traffic Study 5-7 Year 2044 Analysis Page 93 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2044 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Horizon AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)22 569 50 23 530 15 28 18 26 2 13 28 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 4.13 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 2.23 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)24 25 78 47 Capacity, c (veh/h)979 913 159 257 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.03 0.49 0.18 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.1 2.4 0.7 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.6 2.6 61.4 17.9 Control Delay (s/veh)8.8 9.1 47.8 22.1 Level of Service (LOS)A A E C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.3 0.4 47.8 22.1 Approach LOS A A E C Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 2:39:33 PM2044 Horizon AM Peak.xtw Page 94 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2044 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Horizon PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume (veh/h)17 597 76 39 531 23 18 26 31 1 16 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 4.13 7.13 6.53 6.23 7.13 6.53 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 2.23 3.53 4.03 3.33 3.53 4.03 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)18 42 82 43 Capacity, c (veh/h)970 868 156 212 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.05 0.52 0.21 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.2 2.6 0.7 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.6 5.1 66.6 17.9 Control Delay (s/veh)8.8 9.4 50.9 26.4 Level of Service (LOS)A A F D Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 0.6 50.9 26.4 Approach LOS A A F D Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 2:40:35 PM2044 Horizon PM Peak.xtw Page 95 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2044 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Horizon AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study RI/RO Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR TR R R Volume (veh/h)591 50 553 15 72 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)6.2 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)6.23 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.3 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.33 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)78 47 Capacity, c (veh/h)455 493 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.09 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.6 0.3 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)15.4 7.7 Control Delay (s/veh)14.5 13.1 Level of Service (LOS)B B Approach Delay (s/veh)14.5 13.1 Approach LOS B B Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 1/24/2025 9:05:07 AM2044 RI-RO Horizon AM Peak.xtw Page 96 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2044 North/South Street Ingleside Street Time Analyzed Horizon PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study RI/RO Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR TR R R Volume (veh/h)614 76 570 23 75 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)6.2 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)6.23 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.3 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)3.33 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)82 43 Capacity, c (veh/h)433 479 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.09 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.7 0.3 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)17.9 7.7 Control Delay (s/veh)15.2 13.3 Level of Service (LOS)C B Approach Delay (s/veh)15.2 13.3 Approach LOS C B Copyright © 2025 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 1/24/2025 9:07:25 AM2044 RI-RO Horizon PM Peak.xtw Page 97 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside N Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2044 North/South Street Ingleside Street N Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR LR Volume (veh/h)40 595 553 15 2 41 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)43 47 Capacity, c (veh/h)958 449 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.10 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 0.3 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.6 7.7 Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 13.9 Level of Service (LOS)A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.6 13.9 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 4:03:03 PM2044 Ingleside N Build AM Peak.xtw Page 98 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside N Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2044 North/South Street Ingleside Street N Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Configuration L T TR LR Volume (veh/h)43 628 570 23 1 39 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)47 43 Capacity, c (veh/h)936 452 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.10 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.2 0.3 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)5.1 7.7 Control Delay (s/veh)9.0 13.8 Level of Service (LOS)A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.6 13.8 Approach LOS A B Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 4:04:00 PM2044 Ingleside N Build PM Peak.xtw Page 99 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside S Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2044 North/South Street Ingleside Street S Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T LR Volume (veh/h)591 50 36 558 28 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)39 78 Capacity, c (veh/h)895 262 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.30 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.1 1.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)2.6 30.7 Control Delay (s/veh)9.2 24.5 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.6 24.5 Approach LOS A C Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 3:59:04 PM2044 Ingleside S Build AM Peak.xtw Page 100 of 113 HCS Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside S Agency/Co.Neel-Schaffer Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Date Performed 11/12/2024 East/West Street Fairhope Avenue Analysis Year 2044 North/South Street Ingleside Street S Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Study Lanes Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Priority 1U 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Configuration TR L T LR Volume (veh/h)614 76 55 554 18 57 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%)3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%)0 Right Turn Channelized Median Type | Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec)4.1 7.1 6.2 Critical Headway (sec)4.13 6.43 6.23 Base Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.2 3.5 3.3 Follow-Up Headway (sec)2.23 3.53 3.33 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h)60 82 Capacity, c (veh/h)855 285 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.29 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)0.2 1.1 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)5.1 28.2 Control Delay (s/veh)9.5 22.6 Level of Service (LOS)A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.9 22.6 Approach LOS A C Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™TWSC Version 2024 Generated: 11/12/2024 4:00:04 PM2044 Ingleside S Build PM Peak.xtw Page 101 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St Analysis Year 2044 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LT LT LTR LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 22 569 50 0 23 530 15 0 28 18 26 0 2 13 28 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 25 637 56 0 26 593 17 0 31 20 29 0 2 15 31 Right-Turn Bypass Yielding Yielding None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 662 56 619 17 80 48 Entry Volume, veh/h 643 54 601 17 78 47 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 43 76 664 650 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 668 655 45 41 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1321 1323 1277 1318 701 711 Capacity (c), veh/h 1282 1285 1240 1280 681 690 v/c Ratio (x)0.50 0.04 0.48 0.01 0.11 0.07 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 8.1 3.1 8.0 2.9 6.5 5.9 Lane LOS A A A A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)2.9 0.1 2.7 0.0 0.4 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)74.2 2.6 69.1 0.0 10.2 5.1 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 7.7 A 7.9 A 6.5 A 5.9 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 7.7 A Page 102 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 12:02:52 PM 2044 Roundabout AM Peak.xro Page 103 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St Analysis Year 2044 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LT LT LTR LTR Volume (V), veh/h 0 17 597 76 0 39 531 23 0 18 26 31 0 1 16 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 19 668 85 0 44 594 26 0 20 29 35 0 1 18 26 Right-Turn Bypass Yielding Yielding None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 687 85 638 26 84 45 Entry Volume, veh/h 667 83 619 25 82 44 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 63 68 688 658 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 704 640 48 62 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1294 1295 1288 1314 684 705 Capacity (c), veh/h 1256 1258 1250 1276 664 685 v/c Ratio (x)0.53 0.07 0.50 0.02 0.12 0.06 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 8.7 3.4 8.2 3.0 6.8 5.9 Lane LOS A A A A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)3.3 0.2 2.8 0.1 0.4 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)84.5 5.1 71.7 2.6 10.2 5.1 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 8.1 A 7.9 A 6.8 A 5.9 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 7.9 A Page 104 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 12:03:55 PM 2044 Roundabout PM Peak.xro Page 105 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside N Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St N Analysis Year 2044 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LT TR LR Volume (V), veh/h 0 40 595 0 553 15 0 2 41 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 45 666 0 619 17 0 2 46 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 711 636 48 Entry Volume, veh/h 690 617 47 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 2 45 713 619 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 668 665 62 0 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1377 1318 734 Capacity (c), veh/h 1337 1280 713 v/c Ratio (x)0.52 0.48 0.07 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 8.1 7.8 5.7 Lane LOS A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)3.1 2.7 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)77.5 69.1 5.1 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 8.1 A 7.8 A 5.7 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 7.9 A Page 106 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 2:49:28 PM 2044 2 Roundabouts AM Peak.xro Page 107 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside S Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St S Analysis Year 2044 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build AM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Assignment TR LT LR Volume (V), veh/h 0 591 50 0 36 558 0 28 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 662 56 0 40 625 0 31 49 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 718 665 80 Entry Volume, veh/h 697 646 78 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 40 31 662 696 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 711 656 0 96 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1325 1337 702 Capacity (c), veh/h 1286 1298 682 v/c Ratio (x)0.54 0.50 0.11 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 8.8 8.0 6.5 Lane LOS A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)3.4 2.9 0.4 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)87.0 72.5 10.2 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 8.8 A 8.0 A 6.5 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 8.3 A Page 108 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 2:50:09 PM 2044 2 Roundabouts AM Peak.xro Page 109 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside N Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St N Analysis Year 2044 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Assignment LT TR LR Volume (V), veh/h 0 43 628 0 570 23 0 1 39 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 48 703 0 638 26 0 1 44 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 751 664 45 Entry Volume, veh/h 729 645 44 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 1 48 752 638 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 704 682 74 0 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1379 1314 720 Capacity (c), veh/h 1338 1276 699 v/c Ratio (x)0.54 0.51 0.06 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 8.6 8.2 5.8 Lane LOS A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)3.4 3.0 0.2 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)85.0 76.8 5.1 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 8.6 A 8.2 A 5.8 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 8.3 A Page 110 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 2:52:18 PM 2044 2 Roundabouts PM Peak.xro Page 111 of 113 HCS Roundabouts Report General Information Site Information Analyst S Bergin Intersection Fairhope-Ingleside S Agency or Co.Neel-Schaffer E/W Street Name Fairhope Ave Date Performed 11/13/2024 N/S Street Name Ingleside St S Analysis Year 2044 Analysis Time Period, hrs 0.25 Time Analyzed Build PM Peak Peak Hour Factor 0.92 Project Description Fairhope-Ingleside Jurisdiction City of Fairhope Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Approach EB WB NB SB Movement U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Number of Lanes (N)0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Assignment TR LT LR Volume (V), veh/h 0 614 76 0 55 554 0 18 57 Percent Heavy Vehicles, %3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Flow Rate (vPCE), pc/h 0 687 85 0 62 620 0 20 64 Right-Turn Bypass None None None None Conflicting Lanes 1 1 1 Pedestrians Crossing, p/h 0 0 0 Proportion of CAVs, %0 Critical and Follow-Up Headway Adjustment Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Critical Headway, s 4.9763 4.9763 4.9763 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.6087 2.6087 2.6087 Flow Computations, Capacity and v/c Ratios Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Entry Flow (ve), pc/h 772 682 84 Entry Volume, veh/h 750 662 82 Circulating Flow (vc), pc/h 62 20 687 702 Exiting Flow (vex), pc/h 751 640 0 147 Capacity (cpce), pc/h 1295 1352 685 Capacity (c), veh/h 1258 1313 665 v/c Ratio (x)0.60 0.50 0.12 Delay and Level of Service Approach EB WB NB SB Lane Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Left Right Bypass Lane Control Delay (d), s/veh 10.0 8.0 6.8 Lane LOS A A A 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (veh)4.2 2.9 0.4 95% Queue Length, Q₉₅ (ft)107.5 72.5 10.2 Approach Delay, s/veh | LOS 10.0 A 8.0 A 6.8 A Intersection Delay, s/veh | LOS 8.9 A Page 112 of 113 Copyright © 2024 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. HCS™Roundabouts Version 2024 Generated: 11/13/2024 2:52:59 PM 2044 2 Roundabouts PM Peak.xro Page 113 of 113